Nationwide Survey of the Undergraduate Physical Chemistry Course

A nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry course was conducted to investigate the depth and breadth of content that is covered, how content is delivered, how student understanding is assessed, and the experiences and beliefs of instructors. The survey was administered to instructor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2015-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1456-1465
Hauptverfasser: Fox, Laura J, Roehrig, Gillian H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1465
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1456
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 92
creator Fox, Laura J
Roehrig, Gillian H
description A nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry course was conducted to investigate the depth and breadth of content that is covered, how content is delivered, how student understanding is assessed, and the experiences and beliefs of instructors. The survey was administered to instructors of physical chemistry (N = 331) at American Chemical Society certified colleges and universities in the United States. The majority of instructors (N = 187) provided contact information, allowing responses to be associated with their institution. The goal of this preliminary study is to provide an awareness of the current state of physical chemistry courses across the United States. Several relationships regarding the course curriculum were investigated such as depth versus breadth of course content, and goal for understanding versus types of assessment questions. Also, several relationships regarding instructor beliefs and experiences were investigated such as degree of teacher preparation experience versus course delivery, and instructor beliefs about the challenging nature of physical chemistry education versus proposed strategies to overcome those challenges. Information gained from this study may inform the development of new teaching practices, curriculum, assessments, and resources for physical chemistry education, as well as encourage instructors of physical chemistry and researches of chemical education to work together to improve student understanding of physical chemistry.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1712851799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1074470</ericid><sourcerecordid>3809305031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-c0d5bb0b3bc6f3f9a4ed0f9e30ebd46d32f8cabddd375b0a90716d913ca7459a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKefQISAz91umnZt3pSy-Yehgu45pMmN69jWmbRKv71xHXv06T6c8zuHewi5ZjBiELOx0n600kvcoBmlJQBkcEIGTPA8YjzOT8kAgi0SaZ6ckwvvVwAsTkU-IHcvqqnq7U9lkL637hs7WlvaLJEutgbdp1OmVQ3St2XnK63WtAgtlW9cR4u6dR4vyZlVa49Xhzski9n0o3iM5q8PT8X9PFKciybSYNKyhJKXemK5FSpBA1YgByxNMjE8trlWpTGGZ-EDJSBjEyMY1ypLUqH4kNz2uTtXf7XoG7kK_dtQKVnG4jxlmRDBxXuXdrX3Dq3cuWqjXCcZyL-pZJhKHqaSh6kCddNT6Cp9JKbPDLIk2evjXt_Dx9p_En8BsKd5lQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712851799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nationwide Survey of the Undergraduate Physical Chemistry Course</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Fox, Laura J ; Roehrig, Gillian H</creator><creatorcontrib>Fox, Laura J ; Roehrig, Gillian H</creatorcontrib><description>A nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry course was conducted to investigate the depth and breadth of content that is covered, how content is delivered, how student understanding is assessed, and the experiences and beliefs of instructors. The survey was administered to instructors of physical chemistry (N = 331) at American Chemical Society certified colleges and universities in the United States. The majority of instructors (N = 187) provided contact information, allowing responses to be associated with their institution. The goal of this preliminary study is to provide an awareness of the current state of physical chemistry courses across the United States. Several relationships regarding the course curriculum were investigated such as depth versus breadth of course content, and goal for understanding versus types of assessment questions. Also, several relationships regarding instructor beliefs and experiences were investigated such as degree of teacher preparation experience versus course delivery, and instructor beliefs about the challenging nature of physical chemistry education versus proposed strategies to overcome those challenges. Information gained from this study may inform the development of new teaching practices, curriculum, assessments, and resources for physical chemistry education, as well as encourage instructors of physical chemistry and researches of chemical education to work together to improve student understanding of physical chemistry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEDA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Chemical Education Research ; Chemistry ; College Faculty ; College Students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Course Content ; Curricula ; Curriculum Design ; Education ; Grades (Scholastic) ; National Surveys ; Organic chemistry ; Physical chemistry ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Quantum Mechanics ; Science Curriculum ; Science Instruction ; Science Tests ; Student teacher relationship ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Surveys ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Thermodynamics ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2015-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1456-1465</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Sep 8, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-c0d5bb0b3bc6f3f9a4ed0f9e30ebd46d32f8cabddd375b0a90716d913ca7459a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-c0d5bb0b3bc6f3f9a4ed0f9e30ebd46d32f8cabddd375b0a90716d913ca7459a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1074470$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fox, Laura J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Gillian H</creatorcontrib><title>Nationwide Survey of the Undergraduate Physical Chemistry Course</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>A nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry course was conducted to investigate the depth and breadth of content that is covered, how content is delivered, how student understanding is assessed, and the experiences and beliefs of instructors. The survey was administered to instructors of physical chemistry (N = 331) at American Chemical Society certified colleges and universities in the United States. The majority of instructors (N = 187) provided contact information, allowing responses to be associated with their institution. The goal of this preliminary study is to provide an awareness of the current state of physical chemistry courses across the United States. Several relationships regarding the course curriculum were investigated such as depth versus breadth of course content, and goal for understanding versus types of assessment questions. Also, several relationships regarding instructor beliefs and experiences were investigated such as degree of teacher preparation experience versus course delivery, and instructor beliefs about the challenging nature of physical chemistry education versus proposed strategies to overcome those challenges. Information gained from this study may inform the development of new teaching practices, curriculum, assessments, and resources for physical chemistry education, as well as encourage instructors of physical chemistry and researches of chemical education to work together to improve student understanding of physical chemistry.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Chemical Education Research</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Physical chemistry</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Quantum Mechanics</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Tests</subject><subject>Student teacher relationship</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKefQISAz91umnZt3pSy-Yehgu45pMmN69jWmbRKv71xHXv06T6c8zuHewi5ZjBiELOx0n600kvcoBmlJQBkcEIGTPA8YjzOT8kAgi0SaZ6ckwvvVwAsTkU-IHcvqqnq7U9lkL637hs7WlvaLJEutgbdp1OmVQ3St2XnK63WtAgtlW9cR4u6dR4vyZlVa49Xhzski9n0o3iM5q8PT8X9PFKciybSYNKyhJKXemK5FSpBA1YgByxNMjE8trlWpTGGZ-EDJSBjEyMY1ypLUqH4kNz2uTtXf7XoG7kK_dtQKVnG4jxlmRDBxXuXdrX3Dq3cuWqjXCcZyL-pZJhKHqaSh6kCddNT6Cp9JKbPDLIk2evjXt_Dx9p_En8BsKd5lQ</recordid><startdate>20150908</startdate><enddate>20150908</enddate><creator>Fox, Laura J</creator><creator>Roehrig, Gillian H</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>Division of Chemical Education, Inc and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150908</creationdate><title>Nationwide Survey of the Undergraduate Physical Chemistry Course</title><author>Fox, Laura J ; Roehrig, Gillian H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-c0d5bb0b3bc6f3f9a4ed0f9e30ebd46d32f8cabddd375b0a90716d913ca7459a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Chemical Education Research</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Physical chemistry</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Quantum Mechanics</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Tests</topic><topic>Student teacher relationship</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fox, Laura J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Gillian H</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fox, Laura J</au><au>Roehrig, Gillian H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1074470</ericid><atitle>Nationwide Survey of the Undergraduate Physical Chemistry Course</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2015-09-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1456</spage><epage>1465</epage><pages>1456-1465</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><coden>JCEDA8</coden><abstract>A nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry course was conducted to investigate the depth and breadth of content that is covered, how content is delivered, how student understanding is assessed, and the experiences and beliefs of instructors. The survey was administered to instructors of physical chemistry (N = 331) at American Chemical Society certified colleges and universities in the United States. The majority of instructors (N = 187) provided contact information, allowing responses to be associated with their institution. The goal of this preliminary study is to provide an awareness of the current state of physical chemistry courses across the United States. Several relationships regarding the course curriculum were investigated such as depth versus breadth of course content, and goal for understanding versus types of assessment questions. Also, several relationships regarding instructor beliefs and experiences were investigated such as degree of teacher preparation experience versus course delivery, and instructor beliefs about the challenging nature of physical chemistry education versus proposed strategies to overcome those challenges. Information gained from this study may inform the development of new teaching practices, curriculum, assessments, and resources for physical chemistry education, as well as encourage instructors of physical chemistry and researches of chemical education to work together to improve student understanding of physical chemistry.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2015-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1456-1465
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1712851799
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Beliefs
Chemical Education Research
Chemistry
College Faculty
College Students
Colleges & universities
Course Content
Curricula
Curriculum Design
Education
Grades (Scholastic)
National Surveys
Organic chemistry
Physical chemistry
Polls & surveys
Quantum Mechanics
Science Curriculum
Science Instruction
Science Tests
Student teacher relationship
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Education
Teacher Surveys
Teachers
Teaching methods
Thermodynamics
Undergraduate Study
title Nationwide Survey of the Undergraduate Physical Chemistry Course
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nationwide%20Survey%20of%20the%20Undergraduate%20Physical%20Chemistry%20Course&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Fox,%20Laura%20J&rft.date=2015-09-08&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1456&rft.epage=1465&rft.pages=1456-1465&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft.coden=JCEDA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3809305031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712851799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1074470&rfr_iscdi=true