Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation
The effectiveness of revegetation in providing habitat for fauna is expected to be determined both by within‐site factors and attributes of the landscape in which a revegetation site occurs. Most studies of fauna in revegetation have been conducted in landscapes that have been extensively cleared, m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Restoration ecology 2015-09, Vol.23 (5), p.670-680 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 680 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 670 |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Gould, Susan F. Mackey, Brendan G. |
description | The effectiveness of revegetation in providing habitat for fauna is expected to be determined both by within‐site factors and attributes of the landscape in which a revegetation site occurs. Most studies of fauna in revegetation have been conducted in landscapes that have been extensively cleared, modified or fragmented, and in Australia, predominantly in the southern temperate zone. We investigated how within‐site vegetation attributes and landscape context attributes were related to bird species richness and composition in a chronosequence of post‐mining rehabilitation sites within an otherwise intact landscape in tropical northern Australia. Our working hypothesis was that bird species richness in rehabilitating sites would be positively related to site vegetation structure and landscape context including (1) proximity to woodland and (2) the proportion of woodland within a 500‐m buffer of rehabilitation sites. Within each of 67 sites, we sampled vegetation once and surveyed for birds eight times over 16 months. Landscape context variables were calculated using GIS. There were large differences between bird assemblages of woodland and rehabilitation sites and between age classes of rehabilitation. Bird assemblages were strongly related to site vegetation attributes across all rehabilitation sites. Proximity to woodland was only related to bird assemblages in rehabilitation sites older than 4 years old. We conclude that the relative importance of landscape context and site variables at any point in time will be a function of how closely vegetation within the revegetation site matches the habitat resource requirements of individual species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rec.12222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1712396927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3807412571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-6c061a99ee9055786c5592e4978abc171827eaab85d1f335e12076c8c79e0e653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PAyEQhjdGE-vHwX9A4snDVmBlWY7aaDVpqqkajRcypdMW7bIVqLb_XrR-nJwDkMzzMJM3yw4YbbNUxx5Nm_FUG1mLCV7mjNLHzfSmJcu5kmw72wnhmVImqqpoZatbG5G84QQjRNs4YqbgwUT0NkRrAgGPpG7SYet54yO4SOIUHJmBGwUDcySmcRGXkVhHRpjE2jrrJmRo_YhACFgPZzDB8Nn3-DdpL9sawyzg_ve9m91fnN91LvPedfeqc9rLzQkteF6atDkohaioELIqjRCK44mSFQwNk6ziEgGGlRixcVEIZJzK0lRGKqRYimI3O1z_O_fN6wJD1M_Nwrs0UiebF6pUXCbqaE0Z34Tgcazn3tbgV5pR_ZmsTsnqr2QTe7xm3-0MV_-DenDe-THytZFCxeWvAf5Fl7KQQj_0u_rs5qwnBv0nPSg-APXAi10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712396927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gould, Susan F. ; Mackey, Brendan G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gould, Susan F. ; Mackey, Brendan G.</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of revegetation in providing habitat for fauna is expected to be determined both by within‐site factors and attributes of the landscape in which a revegetation site occurs. Most studies of fauna in revegetation have been conducted in landscapes that have been extensively cleared, modified or fragmented, and in Australia, predominantly in the southern temperate zone. We investigated how within‐site vegetation attributes and landscape context attributes were related to bird species richness and composition in a chronosequence of post‐mining rehabilitation sites within an otherwise intact landscape in tropical northern Australia. Our working hypothesis was that bird species richness in rehabilitating sites would be positively related to site vegetation structure and landscape context including (1) proximity to woodland and (2) the proportion of woodland within a 500‐m buffer of rehabilitation sites. Within each of 67 sites, we sampled vegetation once and surveyed for birds eight times over 16 months. Landscape context variables were calculated using GIS. There were large differences between bird assemblages of woodland and rehabilitation sites and between age classes of rehabilitation. Bird assemblages were strongly related to site vegetation attributes across all rehabilitation sites. Proximity to woodland was only related to bird assemblages in rehabilitation sites older than 4 years old. We conclude that the relative importance of landscape context and site variables at any point in time will be a function of how closely vegetation within the revegetation site matches the habitat resource requirements of individual species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.12222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; chronosequence ; distance ; Environmental restoration ; Fauna ; habitat ; Habitats ; isolation ; mining ; Revegetation ; Species richness ; Vegetation ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2015-09, Vol.23 (5), p.670-680</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><rights>2015 Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-6c061a99ee9055786c5592e4978abc171827eaab85d1f335e12076c8c79e0e653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-6c061a99ee9055786c5592e4978abc171827eaab85d1f335e12076c8c79e0e653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frec.12222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frec.12222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gould, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackey, Brendan G.</creatorcontrib><title>Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><addtitle>Restor Ecol</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of revegetation in providing habitat for fauna is expected to be determined both by within‐site factors and attributes of the landscape in which a revegetation site occurs. Most studies of fauna in revegetation have been conducted in landscapes that have been extensively cleared, modified or fragmented, and in Australia, predominantly in the southern temperate zone. We investigated how within‐site vegetation attributes and landscape context attributes were related to bird species richness and composition in a chronosequence of post‐mining rehabilitation sites within an otherwise intact landscape in tropical northern Australia. Our working hypothesis was that bird species richness in rehabilitating sites would be positively related to site vegetation structure and landscape context including (1) proximity to woodland and (2) the proportion of woodland within a 500‐m buffer of rehabilitation sites. Within each of 67 sites, we sampled vegetation once and surveyed for birds eight times over 16 months. Landscape context variables were calculated using GIS. There were large differences between bird assemblages of woodland and rehabilitation sites and between age classes of rehabilitation. Bird assemblages were strongly related to site vegetation attributes across all rehabilitation sites. Proximity to woodland was only related to bird assemblages in rehabilitation sites older than 4 years old. We conclude that the relative importance of landscape context and site variables at any point in time will be a function of how closely vegetation within the revegetation site matches the habitat resource requirements of individual species.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>chronosequence</subject><subject>distance</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>isolation</subject><subject>mining</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PAyEQhjdGE-vHwX9A4snDVmBlWY7aaDVpqqkajRcypdMW7bIVqLb_XrR-nJwDkMzzMJM3yw4YbbNUxx5Nm_FUG1mLCV7mjNLHzfSmJcu5kmw72wnhmVImqqpoZatbG5G84QQjRNs4YqbgwUT0NkRrAgGPpG7SYet54yO4SOIUHJmBGwUDcySmcRGXkVhHRpjE2jrrJmRo_YhACFgPZzDB8Nn3-DdpL9sawyzg_ve9m91fnN91LvPedfeqc9rLzQkteF6atDkohaioELIqjRCK44mSFQwNk6ziEgGGlRixcVEIZJzK0lRGKqRYimI3O1z_O_fN6wJD1M_Nwrs0UiebF6pUXCbqaE0Z34Tgcazn3tbgV5pR_ZmsTsnqr2QTe7xm3-0MV_-DenDe-THytZFCxeWvAf5Fl7KQQj_0u_rs5qwnBv0nPSg-APXAi10</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Gould, Susan F.</creator><creator>Mackey, Brendan G.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation</title><author>Gould, Susan F. ; Mackey, Brendan G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-6c061a99ee9055786c5592e4978abc171827eaab85d1f335e12076c8c79e0e653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>chronosequence</topic><topic>distance</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>isolation</topic><topic>mining</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gould, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackey, Brendan G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gould, Susan F.</au><au>Mackey, Brendan G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Restor Ecol</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>680</epage><pages>670-680</pages><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of revegetation in providing habitat for fauna is expected to be determined both by within‐site factors and attributes of the landscape in which a revegetation site occurs. Most studies of fauna in revegetation have been conducted in landscapes that have been extensively cleared, modified or fragmented, and in Australia, predominantly in the southern temperate zone. We investigated how within‐site vegetation attributes and landscape context attributes were related to bird species richness and composition in a chronosequence of post‐mining rehabilitation sites within an otherwise intact landscape in tropical northern Australia. Our working hypothesis was that bird species richness in rehabilitating sites would be positively related to site vegetation structure and landscape context including (1) proximity to woodland and (2) the proportion of woodland within a 500‐m buffer of rehabilitation sites. Within each of 67 sites, we sampled vegetation once and surveyed for birds eight times over 16 months. Landscape context variables were calculated using GIS. There were large differences between bird assemblages of woodland and rehabilitation sites and between age classes of rehabilitation. Bird assemblages were strongly related to site vegetation attributes across all rehabilitation sites. Proximity to woodland was only related to bird assemblages in rehabilitation sites older than 4 years old. We conclude that the relative importance of landscape context and site variables at any point in time will be a function of how closely vegetation within the revegetation site matches the habitat resource requirements of individual species.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.12222</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2015-09, Vol.23 (5), p.670-680 |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1712396927 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Australia Biodiversity Birds chronosequence distance Environmental restoration Fauna habitat Habitats isolation mining Revegetation Species richness Vegetation Woodlands |
title | Site vegetation characteristics are more important than landscape context in determining bird assemblages in revegetation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Site%20vegetation%20characteristics%20are%20more%20important%20than%20landscape%20context%20in%20determining%20bird%20assemblages%20in%20revegetation&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Gould,%20Susan%20F.&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=680&rft.pages=670-680&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.12222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3807412571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712396927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |