Truncating the Fair Labor Standards Act Limitations Period in Arbitration: A Prospective Waiver of Rights or a Procedural Tweak?
The statute of limitations contains elements of both substantive and procedural rights. Because the FLSA statute of limitations is intertwined with FLSA substantive rights and its application precludes effectuation of substantive rights, most courts conclude the FLSA statute of limitations is a nonw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Labor lawyer 2015-04, Vol.30 (3), p.305 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | The Labor lawyer |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | McGillivary, Gregory K |
description | The statute of limitations contains elements of both substantive and procedural rights. Because the FLSA statute of limitations is intertwined with FLSA substantive rights and its application precludes effectuation of substantive rights, most courts conclude the FLSA statute of limitations is a nonwaivable individual right so that neither the individual nor the union may, by an arbitration agreement, shorten the limitations period. Unlike agreements to truncate statutes of limitations under other labor statutes, such agreements under the FLSA effectively extinguish employees' substantive rights. [...]of whether it is in the context of individual arbitration agreements, union-negotiated collective bargaining agreements, or agreements in the federal sector, such agreements are invalid as an impermissible diminution of substantive rights under the FLSA. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1710752727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3803062501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_17107527273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1qAkEQhIcQISbmHRo8L8yO-6O5yCIRDx4kWchR2t1R25gZ7elNrj56JpIH8FJVVH3UneqbkZkkWaGz-5jTvEiysZ48qMcQDlqbcZEXfXWpuXMNCrkdyN7CHIlhiRvP8C7oWuQ2QNUILOmLJHLeBVhZJt8COah4Q8LX-gUqWLEPJ9sIfVv4wKgMfgtvtNtLgHiJf0Rj247xCPWPxc_pQPW2eAz2-d-f1HD-Ws8WyYn9ubNB1gffsYvTOi1TXeamNOXoNuoX3tVRBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710752727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Truncating the Fair Labor Standards Act Limitations Period in Arbitration: A Prospective Waiver of Rights or a Procedural Tweak?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>McGillivary, Gregory K</creator><creatorcontrib>McGillivary, Gregory K</creatorcontrib><description>The statute of limitations contains elements of both substantive and procedural rights. Because the FLSA statute of limitations is intertwined with FLSA substantive rights and its application precludes effectuation of substantive rights, most courts conclude the FLSA statute of limitations is a nonwaivable individual right so that neither the individual nor the union may, by an arbitration agreement, shorten the limitations period. Unlike agreements to truncate statutes of limitations under other labor statutes, such agreements under the FLSA effectively extinguish employees' substantive rights. [...]of whether it is in the context of individual arbitration agreements, union-negotiated collective bargaining agreements, or agreements in the federal sector, such agreements are invalid as an impermissible diminution of substantive rights under the FLSA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-4809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-4604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Antitrust laws ; Arbitration ; Class action lawsuits ; Collective bargaining ; Employees ; Employers ; Employment ; Federal court decisions ; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ; Labor law ; Labor standards ; State court decisions ; Statutes of limitations ; Wagner Act 1935-US</subject><ispartof>The Labor lawyer, 2015-04, Vol.30 (3), p.305</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Spring 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGillivary, Gregory K</creatorcontrib><title>Truncating the Fair Labor Standards Act Limitations Period in Arbitration: A Prospective Waiver of Rights or a Procedural Tweak?</title><title>The Labor lawyer</title><description>The statute of limitations contains elements of both substantive and procedural rights. Because the FLSA statute of limitations is intertwined with FLSA substantive rights and its application precludes effectuation of substantive rights, most courts conclude the FLSA statute of limitations is a nonwaivable individual right so that neither the individual nor the union may, by an arbitration agreement, shorten the limitations period. Unlike agreements to truncate statutes of limitations under other labor statutes, such agreements under the FLSA effectively extinguish employees' substantive rights. [...]of whether it is in the context of individual arbitration agreements, union-negotiated collective bargaining agreements, or agreements in the federal sector, such agreements are invalid as an impermissible diminution of substantive rights under the FLSA.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Antitrust laws</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Class action lawsuits</subject><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</subject><subject>Labor law</subject><subject>Labor standards</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Statutes of limitations</subject><subject>Wagner Act 1935-US</subject><issn>2156-4809</issn><issn>2329-4604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1qAkEQhIcQISbmHRo8L8yO-6O5yCIRDx4kWchR2t1R25gZ7elNrj56JpIH8FJVVH3UneqbkZkkWaGz-5jTvEiysZ48qMcQDlqbcZEXfXWpuXMNCrkdyN7CHIlhiRvP8C7oWuQ2QNUILOmLJHLeBVhZJt8COah4Q8LX-gUqWLEPJ9sIfVv4wKgMfgtvtNtLgHiJf0Rj247xCPWPxc_pQPW2eAz2-d-f1HD-Ws8WyYn9ubNB1gffsYvTOi1TXeamNOXoNuoX3tVRBA</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>McGillivary, Gregory K</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Truncating the Fair Labor Standards Act Limitations Period in Arbitration: A Prospective Waiver of Rights or a Procedural Tweak?</title><author>McGillivary, Gregory K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_17107527273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Antitrust laws</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Class action lawsuits</topic><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</topic><topic>Labor law</topic><topic>Labor standards</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Statutes of limitations</topic><topic>Wagner Act 1935-US</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGillivary, Gregory K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Labor lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGillivary, Gregory K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Truncating the Fair Labor Standards Act Limitations Period in Arbitration: A Prospective Waiver of Rights or a Procedural Tweak?</atitle><jtitle>The Labor lawyer</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>305</spage><pages>305-</pages><issn>2156-4809</issn><eissn>2329-4604</eissn><abstract>The statute of limitations contains elements of both substantive and procedural rights. Because the FLSA statute of limitations is intertwined with FLSA substantive rights and its application precludes effectuation of substantive rights, most courts conclude the FLSA statute of limitations is a nonwaivable individual right so that neither the individual nor the union may, by an arbitration agreement, shorten the limitations period. Unlike agreements to truncate statutes of limitations under other labor statutes, such agreements under the FLSA effectively extinguish employees' substantive rights. [...]of whether it is in the context of individual arbitration agreements, union-negotiated collective bargaining agreements, or agreements in the federal sector, such agreements are invalid as an impermissible diminution of substantive rights under the FLSA.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2156-4809 |
ispartof | The Labor lawyer, 2015-04, Vol.30 (3), p.305 |
issn | 2156-4809 2329-4604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1710752727 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Agreements Antitrust laws Arbitration Class action lawsuits Collective bargaining Employees Employers Employment Federal court decisions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Labor law Labor standards State court decisions Statutes of limitations Wagner Act 1935-US |
title | Truncating the Fair Labor Standards Act Limitations Period in Arbitration: A Prospective Waiver of Rights or a Procedural Tweak? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Truncating%20the%20Fair%20Labor%20Standards%20Act%20Limitations%20Period%20in%20Arbitration:%20A%20Prospective%20Waiver%20of%20Rights%20or%20a%20Procedural%20Tweak?&rft.jtitle=The%20Labor%20lawyer&rft.au=McGillivary,%20Gregory%20K&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.pages=305-&rft.issn=2156-4809&rft.eissn=2329-4604&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3803062501%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710752727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |