Phorate‐induced Host Defence Responses Condition Acquired Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Phorate is an acetylcholinesterase‐inhibiting organophosphate pesticide used for the control of insects, mites and nematodes. In cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), phorate is often used as an in‐furrow, systemic insecticide to reduce thrips populations which vector tomato spotted wilt tospovir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of phytopathology 2015-10, Vol.163 (10), p.853-866
Hauptverfasser: Jain, Mukesh, Gallo, Maria, Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi, Shaikh, Nasir P, MacDonald, Gregory E, Davis, John M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 866
container_issue 10
container_start_page 853
container_title Journal of phytopathology
container_volume 163
creator Jain, Mukesh
Gallo, Maria
Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi
Shaikh, Nasir P
MacDonald, Gregory E
Davis, John M
description Phorate is an acetylcholinesterase‐inhibiting organophosphate pesticide used for the control of insects, mites and nematodes. In cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), phorate is often used as an in‐furrow, systemic insecticide to reduce thrips populations which vector tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV). However, phorate‐induced suppression of disease incidence and severity is not solely due to thrips control because other pesticides control thrips but not TSWV. The present research was focused on understanding the biochemical and molecular components of the phorate‐induced host responses that may condition acquired resistance to TSWV in peanut. Phorate treatments adversely affected maximal quantum yield of the light reactions (Fᵥ/Fₘ). A dose‐dependent increase in ascorbic acid content and in activities of the oxidative stress‐related enzymes, catalase and superoxide dismutase was evident following phorate treatment, whereas the level of glutathione reductase was not affected. An RT‐PCR differential display screen identified 35 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) responsive to phorate treatment in peanut leaves. Functional annotations revealed transcriptional regulation of ESTs implicated in primary and secondary metabolism including photosynthesis‐related genes, mitigation of oxidative stress, signalling pathways and pathogenesis‐ and defence‐related proteins. Two ESTs encoding membrane trafficking functions were downregulated, which may reflect reduced internalization and/or subsequent replication of viral particles in phorate‐treated leaves. Time‐course quantitative RT‐PCR analyses further verified fidelity and sensitivity of the mRNA differential display screen and corroborated that systemic spread of TSWV in field‐grown plants is reduced following phorate application. The mélange of differentially regulated gene functions is consistent with a model in which a phorate‐induced breach of redox control culminates in hypersensitive cell death and subsequent induction of systemic acquired resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jph.12385
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1709976502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3799879491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-b263518d252fa11febb821af89007449777a0b7a7f5be95ec1a77927c0d68f1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1EJZaWA0-AJS70kK3_xHF8XG2h2yoqK9pqERfLSeyul22c2g50bz32yDPyJHgJcGMuI833-2akbwB4jdEUpzrZ9OspJrRkz8AE51RkKKf5czBBguIM85K9AC9D2CBEEEVoAp6Wa-dV1D8ff9iuHRrdwoULEZ5qo7tGw0869K4LOsC561obrevgrLkfrE9kEm2Ias9FB6_dnUrtqncxJnFltxHaDs6HbbTf1H601KobInw386pZ2wDXu97dKq1gNT0-AgdGbYN-9acfgpsP76_ni6z6eHY-n1VZkxPBspoUlOGyJYwYhbHRdV0SrEwpEOJ5LjjnCtVcccNqLZhusOJcEN6gtigN1vQQvB339t7dDzpEuXGD79JJiTkSghcMkUQdj1TjXQheG9l7e6f8TmIk90HLFLT8HXRiT0b2u93q3f9BebFc_HVkoyOlpx_-OZT_KgtOOZOryzNZXV58rr7QlVwl_s3IG-WkuvU2yJsrgjBLbyQMFZT-AnummWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709976502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phorate‐induced Host Defence Responses Condition Acquired Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jain, Mukesh ; Gallo, Maria ; Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi ; Shaikh, Nasir P ; MacDonald, Gregory E ; Davis, John M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jain, Mukesh ; Gallo, Maria ; Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi ; Shaikh, Nasir P ; MacDonald, Gregory E ; Davis, John M</creatorcontrib><description>Phorate is an acetylcholinesterase‐inhibiting organophosphate pesticide used for the control of insects, mites and nematodes. In cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), phorate is often used as an in‐furrow, systemic insecticide to reduce thrips populations which vector tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV). However, phorate‐induced suppression of disease incidence and severity is not solely due to thrips control because other pesticides control thrips but not TSWV. The present research was focused on understanding the biochemical and molecular components of the phorate‐induced host responses that may condition acquired resistance to TSWV in peanut. Phorate treatments adversely affected maximal quantum yield of the light reactions (Fᵥ/Fₘ). A dose‐dependent increase in ascorbic acid content and in activities of the oxidative stress‐related enzymes, catalase and superoxide dismutase was evident following phorate treatment, whereas the level of glutathione reductase was not affected. An RT‐PCR differential display screen identified 35 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) responsive to phorate treatment in peanut leaves. Functional annotations revealed transcriptional regulation of ESTs implicated in primary and secondary metabolism including photosynthesis‐related genes, mitigation of oxidative stress, signalling pathways and pathogenesis‐ and defence‐related proteins. Two ESTs encoding membrane trafficking functions were downregulated, which may reflect reduced internalization and/or subsequent replication of viral particles in phorate‐treated leaves. Time‐course quantitative RT‐PCR analyses further verified fidelity and sensitivity of the mRNA differential display screen and corroborated that systemic spread of TSWV in field‐grown plants is reduced following phorate application. The mélange of differentially regulated gene functions is consistent with a model in which a phorate‐induced breach of redox control culminates in hypersensitive cell death and subsequent induction of systemic acquired resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1785</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jph.12385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Parey</publisher><subject>Arachis hypogaea ; ascorbic acid ; catalase ; cell death ; differential display ; disease control ; disease incidence ; dose response ; expressed sequence tags ; gene expression regulation ; genes ; glutathione-disulfide reductase ; insect control ; leaves ; messenger RNA ; metabolism ; mites ; Nematoda ; oxidative burst ; oxidative stress ; peanuts ; phorate ; population ; proteins ; reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction ; ROS ; RSS ; signal transduction ; superoxide dismutase ; systemic acquired resistance ; tomato spotted wilt ; tomato spotted wilt tospovirus ; tomatoes ; Tospovirus ; transcription (genetics) ; virion ; virus replication</subject><ispartof>Journal of phytopathology, 2015-10, Vol.163 (10), p.853-866</ispartof><rights>2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-b263518d252fa11febb821af89007449777a0b7a7f5be95ec1a77927c0d68f1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-b263518d252fa11febb821af89007449777a0b7a7f5be95ec1a77927c0d68f1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjph.12385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjph.12385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jain, Mukesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Nasir P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Gregory E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, John M</creatorcontrib><title>Phorate‐induced Host Defence Responses Condition Acquired Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)</title><title>Journal of phytopathology</title><addtitle>J Phytopathol</addtitle><description>Phorate is an acetylcholinesterase‐inhibiting organophosphate pesticide used for the control of insects, mites and nematodes. In cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), phorate is often used as an in‐furrow, systemic insecticide to reduce thrips populations which vector tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV). However, phorate‐induced suppression of disease incidence and severity is not solely due to thrips control because other pesticides control thrips but not TSWV. The present research was focused on understanding the biochemical and molecular components of the phorate‐induced host responses that may condition acquired resistance to TSWV in peanut. Phorate treatments adversely affected maximal quantum yield of the light reactions (Fᵥ/Fₘ). A dose‐dependent increase in ascorbic acid content and in activities of the oxidative stress‐related enzymes, catalase and superoxide dismutase was evident following phorate treatment, whereas the level of glutathione reductase was not affected. An RT‐PCR differential display screen identified 35 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) responsive to phorate treatment in peanut leaves. Functional annotations revealed transcriptional regulation of ESTs implicated in primary and secondary metabolism including photosynthesis‐related genes, mitigation of oxidative stress, signalling pathways and pathogenesis‐ and defence‐related proteins. Two ESTs encoding membrane trafficking functions were downregulated, which may reflect reduced internalization and/or subsequent replication of viral particles in phorate‐treated leaves. Time‐course quantitative RT‐PCR analyses further verified fidelity and sensitivity of the mRNA differential display screen and corroborated that systemic spread of TSWV in field‐grown plants is reduced following phorate application. The mélange of differentially regulated gene functions is consistent with a model in which a phorate‐induced breach of redox control culminates in hypersensitive cell death and subsequent induction of systemic acquired resistance.</description><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>ascorbic acid</subject><subject>catalase</subject><subject>cell death</subject><subject>differential display</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>disease incidence</subject><subject>dose response</subject><subject>expressed sequence tags</subject><subject>gene expression regulation</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>glutathione-disulfide reductase</subject><subject>insect control</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>messenger RNA</subject><subject>metabolism</subject><subject>mites</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>oxidative burst</subject><subject>oxidative stress</subject><subject>peanuts</subject><subject>phorate</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>proteins</subject><subject>reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>ROS</subject><subject>RSS</subject><subject>signal transduction</subject><subject>superoxide dismutase</subject><subject>systemic acquired resistance</subject><subject>tomato spotted wilt</subject><subject>tomato spotted wilt tospovirus</subject><subject>tomatoes</subject><subject>Tospovirus</subject><subject>transcription (genetics)</subject><subject>virion</subject><subject>virus replication</subject><issn>0931-1785</issn><issn>1439-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1EJZaWA0-AJS70kK3_xHF8XG2h2yoqK9pqERfLSeyul22c2g50bz32yDPyJHgJcGMuI833-2akbwB4jdEUpzrZ9OspJrRkz8AE51RkKKf5czBBguIM85K9AC9D2CBEEEVoAp6Wa-dV1D8ff9iuHRrdwoULEZ5qo7tGw0869K4LOsC561obrevgrLkfrE9kEm2Ias9FB6_dnUrtqncxJnFltxHaDs6HbbTf1H601KobInw386pZ2wDXu97dKq1gNT0-AgdGbYN-9acfgpsP76_ni6z6eHY-n1VZkxPBspoUlOGyJYwYhbHRdV0SrEwpEOJ5LjjnCtVcccNqLZhusOJcEN6gtigN1vQQvB339t7dDzpEuXGD79JJiTkSghcMkUQdj1TjXQheG9l7e6f8TmIk90HLFLT8HXRiT0b2u93q3f9BebFc_HVkoyOlpx_-OZT_KgtOOZOryzNZXV58rr7QlVwl_s3IG-WkuvU2yJsrgjBLbyQMFZT-AnummWc</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Jain, Mukesh</creator><creator>Gallo, Maria</creator><creator>Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi</creator><creator>Shaikh, Nasir P</creator><creator>MacDonald, Gregory E</creator><creator>Davis, John M</creator><general>Parey</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Phorate‐induced Host Defence Responses Condition Acquired Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)</title><author>Jain, Mukesh ; Gallo, Maria ; Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi ; Shaikh, Nasir P ; MacDonald, Gregory E ; Davis, John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4295-b263518d252fa11febb821af89007449777a0b7a7f5be95ec1a77927c0d68f1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>ascorbic acid</topic><topic>catalase</topic><topic>cell death</topic><topic>differential display</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>disease incidence</topic><topic>dose response</topic><topic>expressed sequence tags</topic><topic>gene expression regulation</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>glutathione-disulfide reductase</topic><topic>insect control</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>messenger RNA</topic><topic>metabolism</topic><topic>mites</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>oxidative burst</topic><topic>oxidative stress</topic><topic>peanuts</topic><topic>phorate</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>proteins</topic><topic>reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>ROS</topic><topic>RSS</topic><topic>signal transduction</topic><topic>superoxide dismutase</topic><topic>systemic acquired resistance</topic><topic>tomato spotted wilt</topic><topic>tomato spotted wilt tospovirus</topic><topic>tomatoes</topic><topic>Tospovirus</topic><topic>transcription (genetics)</topic><topic>virion</topic><topic>virus replication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jain, Mukesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Nasir P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Gregory E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, John M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jain, Mukesh</au><au>Gallo, Maria</au><au>Chengalrayan, Kudithipudi</au><au>Shaikh, Nasir P</au><au>MacDonald, Gregory E</au><au>Davis, John M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phorate‐induced Host Defence Responses Condition Acquired Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Phytopathol</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>853</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>853-866</pages><issn>0931-1785</issn><eissn>1439-0434</eissn><abstract>Phorate is an acetylcholinesterase‐inhibiting organophosphate pesticide used for the control of insects, mites and nematodes. In cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), phorate is often used as an in‐furrow, systemic insecticide to reduce thrips populations which vector tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV). However, phorate‐induced suppression of disease incidence and severity is not solely due to thrips control because other pesticides control thrips but not TSWV. The present research was focused on understanding the biochemical and molecular components of the phorate‐induced host responses that may condition acquired resistance to TSWV in peanut. Phorate treatments adversely affected maximal quantum yield of the light reactions (Fᵥ/Fₘ). A dose‐dependent increase in ascorbic acid content and in activities of the oxidative stress‐related enzymes, catalase and superoxide dismutase was evident following phorate treatment, whereas the level of glutathione reductase was not affected. An RT‐PCR differential display screen identified 35 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) responsive to phorate treatment in peanut leaves. Functional annotations revealed transcriptional regulation of ESTs implicated in primary and secondary metabolism including photosynthesis‐related genes, mitigation of oxidative stress, signalling pathways and pathogenesis‐ and defence‐related proteins. Two ESTs encoding membrane trafficking functions were downregulated, which may reflect reduced internalization and/or subsequent replication of viral particles in phorate‐treated leaves. Time‐course quantitative RT‐PCR analyses further verified fidelity and sensitivity of the mRNA differential display screen and corroborated that systemic spread of TSWV in field‐grown plants is reduced following phorate application. The mélange of differentially regulated gene functions is consistent with a model in which a phorate‐induced breach of redox control culminates in hypersensitive cell death and subsequent induction of systemic acquired resistance.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Parey</pub><doi>10.1111/jph.12385</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-1785
ispartof Journal of phytopathology, 2015-10, Vol.163 (10), p.853-866
issn 0931-1785
1439-0434
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1709976502
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Arachis hypogaea
ascorbic acid
catalase
cell death
differential display
disease control
disease incidence
dose response
expressed sequence tags
gene expression regulation
genes
glutathione-disulfide reductase
insect control
leaves
messenger RNA
metabolism
mites
Nematoda
oxidative burst
oxidative stress
peanuts
phorate
population
proteins
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
ROS
RSS
signal transduction
superoxide dismutase
systemic acquired resistance
tomato spotted wilt
tomato spotted wilt tospovirus
tomatoes
Tospovirus
transcription (genetics)
virion
virus replication
title Phorate‐induced Host Defence Responses Condition Acquired Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phorate%E2%80%90induced%20Host%20Defence%20Responses%20Condition%20Acquired%20Resistance%20to%20Tomato%20Spotted%20Wilt%20in%20Cultivated%20Peanut%20(Arachis%20hypogaea%20L.)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phytopathology&rft.au=Jain,%20Mukesh&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=853&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=853-866&rft.issn=0931-1785&rft.eissn=1439-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jph.12385&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3799879491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709976502&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true