Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project
Abstract Background Recently published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for initial pediatric outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) have not yet been evaluated for clinical applicability. Objectives This study sought to determine the appropriateness of TTE as currently performed in pediatric...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015-09, Vol.66 (10), p.1132-1140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1132 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS Allen, Joseph, MA Benavidez, Oscar J., MD Campbell, Robert M., MD Douglas, Pamela S., MD Eidem, Benjamin W., MD Gold, Lara, MA Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH Lopez, Leo, MD McCracken, Courtney E., PhD Stern, Kenan W.D., MD Weiner, Rory B., MD Welch, Elizabeth, MD Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH |
description | Abstract Background Recently published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for initial pediatric outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) have not yet been evaluated for clinical applicability. Objectives This study sought to determine the appropriateness of TTE as currently performed in pediatric cardiology clinics, diagnostic yield of TTE for various AUC indications, and any gaps in the AUC document. Methods Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing initial outpatient TTE in 6 centers. TTE indications (appropriate [A], may be appropriate [M], or rarely appropriate [R]) and findings (normal, incidental, or abnormal) were recorded. Results Of the 2,655 studies ordered by 102 physicians, indications rated A, M, and R were found in 1,876 (71%), 316 (12%), and 319 studies (12%), respectively, and 144 studies (5%) were unclassifiable. Twenty-four of 113 indications (21%) were not used. Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indications of cardiovascular disease, a benign family history, and normal electrocardiogram accounted for 75% of indications rated R. Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%). Odds of an abnormal finding in an A or M TTE were 6 times that of R (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.8 to 12.8]). Abnormal findings were more common in patients 10 years of age (odds ratio: 6.4; 95% CI: 4.7 to 8.7). Age was a significant predictor of an abnormal finding after adjusting for indication and site (p < 0.001). Conclusions Most TTEs ordered in pediatric cardiology clinics were for indications rated A. AUC ratings successfully stratified indications based on the yield of abnormal findings. This study identified differences in the yield of TTE based on patient age and most common indications rated R. These findings should inform quality improvement efforts and future revisions of the AUC document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1327 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1709551306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109715043077</els_id><sourcerecordid>3798265711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-fb2016e31f10f6ab868b93dd35d7f00c7c4a01f85db156d6cce35701683820e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gZeA58SZbHc3OSiU4j8oWNCel2QzgY1pEndTod_eDRUEL56GgfnNvPeGsWuEBAHlbZM0hTFJCigSkAnyVJ2wGQqRxVzk6pTNQHERI-TqnF143wCAzDCfsXxDlS1GZ020HAbXDy50FG09RStnRwpt9LIbWtpRNxaj7bto4_qGzHjJzuqi9XT1U-ds-_jwvnqO169PL6vlOjYpRxnXZVAliWONUMuizGRW5ryquKhUDWCUWRSAdSaqEoWspDHEhQpIxrMUSPE5uznuDeo-9-RH3fR714WTGhXkQiAHGab4ccq43ntHtQ5OdoU7aAQ9ZaQbPWWkp4w0SD1lFKi7I0XBwJclp72x1JmQiQsWddXbf_j7P7xpbWdN0X7QgfyvUO1TDfpt-sL0BBSw4KAU_waOfoNf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709551306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS ; Allen, Joseph, MA ; Benavidez, Oscar J., MD ; Campbell, Robert M., MD ; Douglas, Pamela S., MD ; Eidem, Benjamin W., MD ; Gold, Lara, MA ; Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH ; Lopez, Leo, MD ; McCracken, Courtney E., PhD ; Stern, Kenan W.D., MD ; Weiner, Rory B., MD ; Welch, Elizabeth, MD ; Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS ; Allen, Joseph, MA ; Benavidez, Oscar J., MD ; Campbell, Robert M., MD ; Douglas, Pamela S., MD ; Eidem, Benjamin W., MD ; Gold, Lara, MA ; Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH ; Lopez, Leo, MD ; McCracken, Courtney E., PhD ; Stern, Kenan W.D., MD ; Weiner, Rory B., MD ; Welch, Elizabeth, MD ; Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Recently published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for initial pediatric outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) have not yet been evaluated for clinical applicability. Objectives This study sought to determine the appropriateness of TTE as currently performed in pediatric cardiology clinics, diagnostic yield of TTE for various AUC indications, and any gaps in the AUC document. Methods Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing initial outpatient TTE in 6 centers. TTE indications (appropriate [A], may be appropriate [M], or rarely appropriate [R]) and findings (normal, incidental, or abnormal) were recorded. Results Of the 2,655 studies ordered by 102 physicians, indications rated A, M, and R were found in 1,876 (71%), 316 (12%), and 319 studies (12%), respectively, and 144 studies (5%) were unclassifiable. Twenty-four of 113 indications (21%) were not used. Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indications of cardiovascular disease, a benign family history, and normal electrocardiogram accounted for 75% of indications rated R. Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%). Odds of an abnormal finding in an A or M TTE were 6 times that of R (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.8 to 12.8]). Abnormal findings were more common in patients <1 year of age than in those >10 years of age (odds ratio: 6.4; 95% CI: 4.7 to 8.7). Age was a significant predictor of an abnormal finding after adjusting for indication and site (p < 0.001). Conclusions Most TTEs ordered in pediatric cardiology clinics were for indications rated A. AUC ratings successfully stratified indications based on the yield of abnormal findings. This study identified differences in the yield of TTE based on patient age and most common indications rated R. These findings should inform quality improvement efforts and future revisions of the AUC document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cardiomyopathy ; Cardiovascular ; Cardiovascular disease ; Children & youth ; Coronary vessels ; Data collection ; echocardiography ; Electrocardiography ; Family medical history ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Hypertension ; Internal Medicine ; outpatient ; Pain ; pediatric cardiology ; Pediatrics ; Pulmonary arteries ; Sinuses</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015-09, Vol.66 (10), p.1132-1140</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 8, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-fb2016e31f10f6ab868b93dd35d7f00c7c4a01f85db156d6cce35701683820e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-fb2016e31f10f6ab868b93dd35d7f00c7c4a01f85db156d6cce35701683820e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Joseph, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benavidez, Oscar J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Robert M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Pamela S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eidem, Benjamin W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Lara, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Leo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCracken, Courtney E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Kenan W.D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Rory B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Elizabeth, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><description>Abstract Background Recently published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for initial pediatric outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) have not yet been evaluated for clinical applicability. Objectives This study sought to determine the appropriateness of TTE as currently performed in pediatric cardiology clinics, diagnostic yield of TTE for various AUC indications, and any gaps in the AUC document. Methods Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing initial outpatient TTE in 6 centers. TTE indications (appropriate [A], may be appropriate [M], or rarely appropriate [R]) and findings (normal, incidental, or abnormal) were recorded. Results Of the 2,655 studies ordered by 102 physicians, indications rated A, M, and R were found in 1,876 (71%), 316 (12%), and 319 studies (12%), respectively, and 144 studies (5%) were unclassifiable. Twenty-four of 113 indications (21%) were not used. Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indications of cardiovascular disease, a benign family history, and normal electrocardiogram accounted for 75% of indications rated R. Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%). Odds of an abnormal finding in an A or M TTE were 6 times that of R (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.8 to 12.8]). Abnormal findings were more common in patients <1 year of age than in those >10 years of age (odds ratio: 6.4; 95% CI: 4.7 to 8.7). Age was a significant predictor of an abnormal finding after adjusting for indication and site (p < 0.001). Conclusions Most TTEs ordered in pediatric cardiology clinics were for indications rated A. AUC ratings successfully stratified indications based on the yield of abnormal findings. This study identified differences in the yield of TTE based on patient age and most common indications rated R. These findings should inform quality improvement efforts and future revisions of the AUC document.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>outpatient</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>pediatric cardiology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gZeA58SZbHc3OSiU4j8oWNCel2QzgY1pEndTod_eDRUEL56GgfnNvPeGsWuEBAHlbZM0hTFJCigSkAnyVJ2wGQqRxVzk6pTNQHERI-TqnF143wCAzDCfsXxDlS1GZ020HAbXDy50FG09RStnRwpt9LIbWtpRNxaj7bto4_qGzHjJzuqi9XT1U-ds-_jwvnqO169PL6vlOjYpRxnXZVAliWONUMuizGRW5ryquKhUDWCUWRSAdSaqEoWspDHEhQpIxrMUSPE5uznuDeo-9-RH3fR714WTGhXkQiAHGab4ccq43ntHtQ5OdoU7aAQ9ZaQbPWWkp4w0SD1lFKi7I0XBwJclp72x1JmQiQsWddXbf_j7P7xpbWdN0X7QgfyvUO1TDfpt-sL0BBSw4KAU_waOfoNf</recordid><startdate>20150908</startdate><enddate>20150908</enddate><creator>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS</creator><creator>Allen, Joseph, MA</creator><creator>Benavidez, Oscar J., MD</creator><creator>Campbell, Robert M., MD</creator><creator>Douglas, Pamela S., MD</creator><creator>Eidem, Benjamin W., MD</creator><creator>Gold, Lara, MA</creator><creator>Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH</creator><creator>Lopez, Leo, MD</creator><creator>McCracken, Courtney E., PhD</creator><creator>Stern, Kenan W.D., MD</creator><creator>Weiner, Rory B., MD</creator><creator>Welch, Elizabeth, MD</creator><creator>Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150908</creationdate><title>Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project</title><author>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS ; Allen, Joseph, MA ; Benavidez, Oscar J., MD ; Campbell, Robert M., MD ; Douglas, Pamela S., MD ; Eidem, Benjamin W., MD ; Gold, Lara, MA ; Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH ; Lopez, Leo, MD ; McCracken, Courtney E., PhD ; Stern, Kenan W.D., MD ; Weiner, Rory B., MD ; Welch, Elizabeth, MD ; Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-fb2016e31f10f6ab868b93dd35d7f00c7c4a01f85db156d6cce35701683820e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>outpatient</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>pediatric cardiology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Joseph, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benavidez, Oscar J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Robert M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Pamela S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eidem, Benjamin W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Lara, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Leo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCracken, Courtney E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Kenan W.D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Rory B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Elizabeth, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachdeva, Ritu, MBBS</au><au>Allen, Joseph, MA</au><au>Benavidez, Oscar J., MD</au><au>Campbell, Robert M., MD</au><au>Douglas, Pamela S., MD</au><au>Eidem, Benjamin W., MD</au><au>Gold, Lara, MA</au><au>Kelleman, Michael S., MS, MSPH</au><au>Lopez, Leo, MD</au><au>McCracken, Courtney E., PhD</au><au>Stern, Kenan W.D., MD</au><au>Weiner, Rory B., MD</au><au>Welch, Elizabeth, MD</au><au>Lai, Wyman W., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><date>2015-09-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1132</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1132-1140</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Recently published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for initial pediatric outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) have not yet been evaluated for clinical applicability. Objectives This study sought to determine the appropriateness of TTE as currently performed in pediatric cardiology clinics, diagnostic yield of TTE for various AUC indications, and any gaps in the AUC document. Methods Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing initial outpatient TTE in 6 centers. TTE indications (appropriate [A], may be appropriate [M], or rarely appropriate [R]) and findings (normal, incidental, or abnormal) were recorded. Results Of the 2,655 studies ordered by 102 physicians, indications rated A, M, and R were found in 1,876 (71%), 316 (12%), and 319 studies (12%), respectively, and 144 studies (5%) were unclassifiable. Twenty-four of 113 indications (21%) were not used. Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indications of cardiovascular disease, a benign family history, and normal electrocardiogram accounted for 75% of indications rated R. Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%). Odds of an abnormal finding in an A or M TTE were 6 times that of R (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.8 to 12.8]). Abnormal findings were more common in patients <1 year of age than in those >10 years of age (odds ratio: 6.4; 95% CI: 4.7 to 8.7). Age was a significant predictor of an abnormal finding after adjusting for indication and site (p < 0.001). Conclusions Most TTEs ordered in pediatric cardiology clinics were for indications rated A. AUC ratings successfully stratified indications based on the yield of abnormal findings. This study identified differences in the yield of TTE based on patient age and most common indications rated R. These findings should inform quality improvement efforts and future revisions of the AUC document.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1327</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015-09, Vol.66 (10), p.1132-1140 |
issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1709551306 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cardiology Cardiomyopathy Cardiovascular Cardiovascular disease Children & youth Coronary vessels Data collection echocardiography Electrocardiography Family medical history Hospitalization Hospitals Hypertension Internal Medicine outpatient Pain pediatric cardiology Pediatrics Pulmonary arteries Sinuses |
title | Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A06%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20Appropriate%20Use%20Criteria%20Implementation%20Project&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Sachdeva,%20Ritu,%20MBBS&rft.date=2015-09-08&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1132&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1132-1140&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3798265711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709551306&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0735109715043077&rfr_iscdi=true |