Evaluation of a Biological Pathogen Decontamination Protocol for Animal Feed Mills
Animal feed and ingredients are potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria. Contaminated ingredients can contaminate facility equipment, leading to cross-contamination of other products. This experiment was conducted to evaluate a standardized protocol for decontamination of an animal feed manufacturi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food protection 2015-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1682-1688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1682 |
container_title | Journal of food protection |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Huss, Anne R Cochrane, Roger A Deliephan, Aiswariya Stark, Charles R Jones, Cassandra K |
description | Animal feed and ingredients are potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria. Contaminated ingredients can contaminate facility equipment, leading to cross-contamination of other products. This experiment was conducted to evaluate a standardized protocol for decontamination of an animal feed manufacturing facility using Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 31282) as an indicator. A pelleted swine diet inoculated with E. faecium was manufactured, and environmental samples (swabs, replicate organism detection and counting plates, and air samples) were collected (i) before inoculation (baseline data), (ii) after production of inoculated feed, (iii) after physical removal of organic material using pressurized air, (iv) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend, (v) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing sodium hypochlorite, (vi) after facility heat-up to 60 8 C for 24 h, (vii) for 48 h, and (viii) for 72 h. Air samples collected outside the facility confirmed pathogen containment; E. faecium levels were equal to or lower than baseline levels at each sample location. The decontamination step and its associated interactions were the only variables that affected E. faecium incidence (P < 0.0001 versus P > 0.22). After production of the inoculated diet, 85.7% of environmental samples were positive for E. faecium. Physical cleaning of equipment had no effect on contamination (P = 0.32). Chemical cleaning with a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend and sodium hypochlorite each significantly reduced E. faecium contamination (P < 0.0001) to 28.6 and 2.4% of tested surfaces, respectively. All samples were negative for E. faecium after 48 h of heating. Both wet chemical cleaning and facility heating but not physical cleaning resulted in substantial E. faecium decontamination. These results confirmed both successful containment and decontamination of biological pathogens in the tested pilot-scale feed mill. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1709257018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3796477501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-22eefa2a973d2a295fce9ceed8f0ca30bae6308535c68ddbc99d7e6415681e183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUjA687kpGmTyzlXP5g4RMG7kKXJ7OiambaC_97WzV0dODzvew4PQpeUjGNG-Q1hCUQExMf4KVtElEeEwxEaUhnHkSQyPUbDAzJAZ3W9JoSAhOQUDSBhVKYAQ_Q6-9Zlq5vCV9g7rPFt4Uu_Kowu8UI3n35lK3xnja8avSmqHbgIvvHGl9j5gCdVsengzNocPxdlWZ-jE6fL2l7s5wi9Z7O36UM0f7l_nE7mkWGCNhGAtU6DlinLQYPkzlhpuhbhiNGMLLVNGBGccZOIPF8aKfPUJjHliaCWCjZC17vebfBfra0btfZtqLqTiqZEAk_JHxXvKBN8XQfr1DZ0D4cfRYnqRarekuotqU6k6hccutjVvrxdbmx-CP2bY7-LGW8I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709257018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Biological Pathogen Decontamination Protocol for Animal Feed Mills</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huss, Anne R ; Cochrane, Roger A ; Deliephan, Aiswariya ; Stark, Charles R ; Jones, Cassandra K</creator><creatorcontrib>Huss, Anne R ; Cochrane, Roger A ; Deliephan, Aiswariya ; Stark, Charles R ; Jones, Cassandra K</creatorcontrib><description>Animal feed and ingredients are potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria. Contaminated ingredients can contaminate facility equipment, leading to cross-contamination of other products. This experiment was conducted to evaluate a standardized protocol for decontamination of an animal feed manufacturing facility using Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 31282) as an indicator. A pelleted swine diet inoculated with E. faecium was manufactured, and environmental samples (swabs, replicate organism detection and counting plates, and air samples) were collected (i) before inoculation (baseline data), (ii) after production of inoculated feed, (iii) after physical removal of organic material using pressurized air, (iv) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend, (v) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing sodium hypochlorite, (vi) after facility heat-up to 60 8 C for 24 h, (vii) for 48 h, and (viii) for 72 h. Air samples collected outside the facility confirmed pathogen containment; E. faecium levels were equal to or lower than baseline levels at each sample location. The decontamination step and its associated interactions were the only variables that affected E. faecium incidence (P < 0.0001 versus P > 0.22). After production of the inoculated diet, 85.7% of environmental samples were positive for E. faecium. Physical cleaning of equipment had no effect on contamination (P = 0.32). Chemical cleaning with a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend and sodium hypochlorite each significantly reduced E. faecium contamination (P < 0.0001) to 28.6 and 2.4% of tested surfaces, respectively. All samples were negative for E. faecium after 48 h of heating. Both wet chemical cleaning and facility heating but not physical cleaning resulted in substantial E. faecium decontamination. These results confirmed both successful containment and decontamination of biological pathogens in the tested pilot-scale feed mill.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26319722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Air sampling ; Ammonium ; Animal Feed - microbiology ; Animals ; Biohazards ; Containment ; Contamination ; Decontamination ; Decontamination - methods ; Decontamination - standards ; Diet ; Enterococcus faecium - drug effects ; Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Feeds ; Feedstock contamination ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food safety ; Food supply ; Heat ; Heating ; Infections ; Ingredients ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Pilot Projects ; Salmonella ; Sanitation ; Sanitizers ; Sodium ; Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology ; Supply chains ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2015-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1682-1688</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-22eefa2a973d2a295fce9ceed8f0ca30bae6308535c68ddbc99d7e6415681e183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-22eefa2a973d2a295fce9ceed8f0ca30bae6308535c68ddbc99d7e6415681e183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1709257018?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,64390,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26319722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huss, Anne R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochrane, Roger A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deliephan, Aiswariya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Cassandra K</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Biological Pathogen Decontamination Protocol for Animal Feed Mills</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Animal feed and ingredients are potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria. Contaminated ingredients can contaminate facility equipment, leading to cross-contamination of other products. This experiment was conducted to evaluate a standardized protocol for decontamination of an animal feed manufacturing facility using Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 31282) as an indicator. A pelleted swine diet inoculated with E. faecium was manufactured, and environmental samples (swabs, replicate organism detection and counting plates, and air samples) were collected (i) before inoculation (baseline data), (ii) after production of inoculated feed, (iii) after physical removal of organic material using pressurized air, (iv) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend, (v) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing sodium hypochlorite, (vi) after facility heat-up to 60 8 C for 24 h, (vii) for 48 h, and (viii) for 72 h. Air samples collected outside the facility confirmed pathogen containment; E. faecium levels were equal to or lower than baseline levels at each sample location. The decontamination step and its associated interactions were the only variables that affected E. faecium incidence (P < 0.0001 versus P > 0.22). After production of the inoculated diet, 85.7% of environmental samples were positive for E. faecium. Physical cleaning of equipment had no effect on contamination (P = 0.32). Chemical cleaning with a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend and sodium hypochlorite each significantly reduced E. faecium contamination (P < 0.0001) to 28.6 and 2.4% of tested surfaces, respectively. All samples were negative for E. faecium after 48 h of heating. Both wet chemical cleaning and facility heating but not physical cleaning resulted in substantial E. faecium decontamination. These results confirmed both successful containment and decontamination of biological pathogens in the tested pilot-scale feed mill.</description><subject>Air sampling</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animal Feed - microbiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biohazards</subject><subject>Containment</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Decontamination - standards</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecium - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Feedstock contamination</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Sanitizers</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUjA687kpGmTyzlXP5g4RMG7kKXJ7OiambaC_97WzV0dODzvew4PQpeUjGNG-Q1hCUQExMf4KVtElEeEwxEaUhnHkSQyPUbDAzJAZ3W9JoSAhOQUDSBhVKYAQ_Q6-9Zlq5vCV9g7rPFt4Uu_Kowu8UI3n35lK3xnja8avSmqHbgIvvHGl9j5gCdVsengzNocPxdlWZ-jE6fL2l7s5wi9Z7O36UM0f7l_nE7mkWGCNhGAtU6DlinLQYPkzlhpuhbhiNGMLLVNGBGccZOIPF8aKfPUJjHliaCWCjZC17vebfBfra0btfZtqLqTiqZEAk_JHxXvKBN8XQfr1DZ0D4cfRYnqRarekuotqU6k6hccutjVvrxdbmx-CP2bY7-LGW8I</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Huss, Anne R</creator><creator>Cochrane, Roger A</creator><creator>Deliephan, Aiswariya</creator><creator>Stark, Charles R</creator><creator>Jones, Cassandra K</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Biological Pathogen Decontamination Protocol for Animal Feed Mills</title><author>Huss, Anne R ; Cochrane, Roger A ; Deliephan, Aiswariya ; Stark, Charles R ; Jones, Cassandra K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-22eefa2a973d2a295fce9ceed8f0ca30bae6308535c68ddbc99d7e6415681e183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Air sampling</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animal Feed - microbiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biohazards</topic><topic>Containment</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Decontamination - standards</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecium - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Feedstock contamination</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Sanitizers</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huss, Anne R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochrane, Roger A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deliephan, Aiswariya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Cassandra K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huss, Anne R</au><au>Cochrane, Roger A</au><au>Deliephan, Aiswariya</au><au>Stark, Charles R</au><au>Jones, Cassandra K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Biological Pathogen Decontamination Protocol for Animal Feed Mills</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1682</spage><epage>1688</epage><pages>1682-1688</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>Animal feed and ingredients are potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria. Contaminated ingredients can contaminate facility equipment, leading to cross-contamination of other products. This experiment was conducted to evaluate a standardized protocol for decontamination of an animal feed manufacturing facility using Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 31282) as an indicator. A pelleted swine diet inoculated with E. faecium was manufactured, and environmental samples (swabs, replicate organism detection and counting plates, and air samples) were collected (i) before inoculation (baseline data), (ii) after production of inoculated feed, (iii) after physical removal of organic material using pressurized air, (iv) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend, (v) after application of a chemical sanitizer containing sodium hypochlorite, (vi) after facility heat-up to 60 8 C for 24 h, (vii) for 48 h, and (viii) for 72 h. Air samples collected outside the facility confirmed pathogen containment; E. faecium levels were equal to or lower than baseline levels at each sample location. The decontamination step and its associated interactions were the only variables that affected E. faecium incidence (P < 0.0001 versus P > 0.22). After production of the inoculated diet, 85.7% of environmental samples were positive for E. faecium. Physical cleaning of equipment had no effect on contamination (P = 0.32). Chemical cleaning with a quaternary ammonium-glutaraldehyde blend and sodium hypochlorite each significantly reduced E. faecium contamination (P < 0.0001) to 28.6 and 2.4% of tested surfaces, respectively. All samples were negative for E. faecium after 48 h of heating. Both wet chemical cleaning and facility heating but not physical cleaning resulted in substantial E. faecium decontamination. These results confirmed both successful containment and decontamination of biological pathogens in the tested pilot-scale feed mill.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>26319722</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-052</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2015-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1682-1688 |
issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1709257018 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Air sampling Ammonium Animal Feed - microbiology Animals Biohazards Containment Contamination Decontamination Decontamination - methods Decontamination - standards Diet Enterococcus faecium - drug effects Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification Evaluation Studies as Topic Feeds Feedstock contamination Food contamination & poisoning Food safety Food supply Heat Heating Infections Ingredients Manufacturing Manufacturing industry Microorganisms Pathogens Pilot Projects Salmonella Sanitation Sanitizers Sodium Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology Supply chains Swine |
title | Evaluation of a Biological Pathogen Decontamination Protocol for Animal Feed Mills |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T15%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Biological%20Pathogen%20Decontamination%20Protocol%20for%20Animal%20Feed%20Mills&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Huss,%20Anne%20R&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1682&rft.epage=1688&rft.pages=1682-1688&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3796477501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709257018&rft_id=info:pmid/26319722&rfr_iscdi=true |