Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach
EPA has conducted several assessments of regulatory compliance costs, with the ultimate goal of identifying ways to improve cost estimation. The work to date has culminated in four case studies that examine five regulations using a common conceptual framework. The standardized framework provides a s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of benefit-cost analysis 2014-06, Vol.5 (2), p.173-193 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 193 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 173 |
| container_title | Journal of benefit-cost analysis |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Kopits, Elizabeth McGartland, Al Morgan, Cynthia Pasurka, Carl Shadbegian, Ron Simon, Nathalie B. Simpson, David Wolverton, Ann |
| description | EPA has conducted several
assessments of regulatory compliance costs, with the ultimate goal of identifying ways to improve
cost estimation. The work to date has culminated in four case studies that examine five regulations using a common conceptual framework. The standardized framework provides a systematic way to investigate key drivers of compliance costs to see if judgments can be made about why and how
and
estimates of costs differ. In addition to describing this conceptual framework, we describe the criteria used to select the rules to be analyzed, summarize the main hypotheses for why
and
cost estimates may differ and discuss some of the challenges encountered in conducting these
analyses. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/jbca-2014-0024 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1707650380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3789959551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e3f0ef5c42cb5655bcb42be1ea6ec88e38b8763511586950a5de5537314605e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxRdRsGivXl3wnLofmexWT6XUDygooudls53UlNjE3Y2S_97EiHhwLvMOv5k38wg542zGgcPlLnc2EYynCWMiPSATwUEkQnNxOOh5moDW-phMQ9ixviBVei4mZPWE0dehQRfLD6SuDpHava26gIHWBV09LqjHbVvZWNb7cEUtdTYgDbHddNQ2ja-tez0lR4WtAk5_-gl5uVk9L--S9cPt_XKxTpxUKiYoC4YFuFS4HDKA3OWpyJGjzdBpjVLnWmUSOAedzYFZ2CCAVJKnGQPU8oRcjHt72_cWQzS7uvX9ucFwxVQGTGrWU7ORcv1nwWNhGl--Wd8ZzsyQlhnSMkNaZkirHzgfB9DV-zL84pqrTHP-TVyPxKetIvoNbn3b9eKP_7-rQXAl5RcBEXm6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1707650380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Kopits, Elizabeth ; McGartland, Al ; Morgan, Cynthia ; Pasurka, Carl ; Shadbegian, Ron ; Simon, Nathalie B. ; Simpson, David ; Wolverton, Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Kopits, Elizabeth ; McGartland, Al ; Morgan, Cynthia ; Pasurka, Carl ; Shadbegian, Ron ; Simon, Nathalie B. ; Simpson, David ; Wolverton, Ann</creatorcontrib><description>EPA has conducted several
assessments of regulatory compliance costs, with the ultimate goal of identifying ways to improve
cost estimation. The work to date has culminated in four case studies that examine five regulations using a common conceptual framework. The standardized framework provides a systematic way to investigate key drivers of compliance costs to see if judgments can be made about why and how
and
estimates of costs differ. In addition to describing this conceptual framework, we describe the criteria used to select the rules to be analyzed, summarize the main hypotheses for why
and
cost estimates may differ and discuss some of the challenges encountered in conducting these
analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-5888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-2812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/jbca-2014-0024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Capital costs ; Case studies ; comparisons ; Compliance ; cost analysis ; Cost estimates ; environmental regulation ; Environmental regulations ; Regulation ; retrospective analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of benefit-cost analysis, 2014-06, Vol.5 (2), p.173-193</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e3f0ef5c42cb5655bcb42be1ea6ec88e38b8763511586950a5de5537314605e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e3f0ef5c42cb5655bcb42be1ea6ec88e38b8763511586950a5de5537314605e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbca-2014-0024/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbca-2014-0024/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,66524,68308</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kopits, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGartland, Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasurka, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadbegian, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Nathalie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolverton, Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach</title><title>Journal of benefit-cost analysis</title><description>EPA has conducted several
assessments of regulatory compliance costs, with the ultimate goal of identifying ways to improve
cost estimation. The work to date has culminated in four case studies that examine five regulations using a common conceptual framework. The standardized framework provides a systematic way to investigate key drivers of compliance costs to see if judgments can be made about why and how
and
estimates of costs differ. In addition to describing this conceptual framework, we describe the criteria used to select the rules to be analyzed, summarize the main hypotheses for why
and
cost estimates may differ and discuss some of the challenges encountered in conducting these
analyses.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>comparisons</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>environmental regulation</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>retrospective analysis</subject><issn>2194-5888</issn><issn>2152-2812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxRdRsGivXl3wnLofmexWT6XUDygooudls53UlNjE3Y2S_97EiHhwLvMOv5k38wg542zGgcPlLnc2EYynCWMiPSATwUEkQnNxOOh5moDW-phMQ9ixviBVei4mZPWE0dehQRfLD6SuDpHava26gIHWBV09LqjHbVvZWNb7cEUtdTYgDbHddNQ2ja-tez0lR4WtAk5_-gl5uVk9L--S9cPt_XKxTpxUKiYoC4YFuFS4HDKA3OWpyJGjzdBpjVLnWmUSOAedzYFZ2CCAVJKnGQPU8oRcjHt72_cWQzS7uvX9ucFwxVQGTGrWU7ORcv1nwWNhGl--Wd8ZzsyQlhnSMkNaZkirHzgfB9DV-zL84pqrTHP-TVyPxKetIvoNbn3b9eKP_7-rQXAl5RcBEXm6</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Kopits, Elizabeth</creator><creator>McGartland, Al</creator><creator>Morgan, Cynthia</creator><creator>Pasurka, Carl</creator><creator>Shadbegian, Ron</creator><creator>Simon, Nathalie B.</creator><creator>Simpson, David</creator><creator>Wolverton, Ann</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach</title><author>Kopits, Elizabeth ; McGartland, Al ; Morgan, Cynthia ; Pasurka, Carl ; Shadbegian, Ron ; Simon, Nathalie B. ; Simpson, David ; Wolverton, Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e3f0ef5c42cb5655bcb42be1ea6ec88e38b8763511586950a5de5537314605e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>comparisons</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>environmental regulation</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>retrospective analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kopits, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGartland, Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasurka, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadbegian, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Nathalie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolverton, Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of benefit-cost analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kopits, Elizabeth</au><au>McGartland, Al</au><au>Morgan, Cynthia</au><au>Pasurka, Carl</au><au>Shadbegian, Ron</au><au>Simon, Nathalie B.</au><au>Simpson, David</au><au>Wolverton, Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of benefit-cost analysis</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>173-193</pages><issn>2194-5888</issn><eissn>2152-2812</eissn><abstract>EPA has conducted several
assessments of regulatory compliance costs, with the ultimate goal of identifying ways to improve
cost estimation. The work to date has culminated in four case studies that examine five regulations using a common conceptual framework. The standardized framework provides a systematic way to investigate key drivers of compliance costs to see if judgments can be made about why and how
and
estimates of costs differ. In addition to describing this conceptual framework, we describe the criteria used to select the rules to be analyzed, summarize the main hypotheses for why
and
cost estimates may differ and discuss some of the challenges encountered in conducting these
analyses.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/jbca-2014-0024</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2194-5888 |
| ispartof | Journal of benefit-cost analysis, 2014-06, Vol.5 (2), p.173-193 |
| issn | 2194-5888 2152-2812 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1707650380 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete; De Gruyter journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Capital costs Case studies comparisons Compliance cost analysis Cost estimates environmental regulation Environmental regulations Regulation retrospective analysis |
| title | Retrospective cost analyses of EPA regulations: a case study approach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20cost%20analyses%20of%20EPA%20regulations:%20a%20case%20study%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20benefit-cost%20analysis&rft.au=Kopits,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=173-193&rft.issn=2194-5888&rft.eissn=2152-2812&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/jbca-2014-0024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3789959551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1707650380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |