Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, the collection of an appropriate number of HSCs while maintaining a high level of safety for healthy donors is fundamental. Inadequate HSC mobilization can be seen with the standard use of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating (G‐CSF)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2015-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1993-2000
Hauptverfasser: Gattillo, Salvatore, Marktel, Sarah, Rizzo, Lorenzo, Malato, Simona, Malabarba, Lucia, Coppola, Milena, Assanelli, Andrea, Milani, Raffaella, De Freitas, Tiago, Corti, Consuelo, Bellio, Laura, Ciceri, Fabio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2000
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1993
container_title Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 55
creator Gattillo, Salvatore
Marktel, Sarah
Rizzo, Lorenzo
Malato, Simona
Malabarba, Lucia
Coppola, Milena
Assanelli, Andrea
Milani, Raffaella
De Freitas, Tiago
Corti, Consuelo
Bellio, Laura
Ciceri, Fabio
description BACKGROUND In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, the collection of an appropriate number of HSCs while maintaining a high level of safety for healthy donors is fundamental. Inadequate HSC mobilization can be seen with the standard use of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating (G‐CSF). Plerixafor (PL) is a chemokine receptor CXC Type 4–stromal‐derived factor 1 inhibitor; its HSC‐mobilizing properties are synergistic with G‐CSF in poor mobilizing patients. The use of PL as adjuvant or alternative to G‐CSF in healthy donors has shown a good safety profile but is so far off‐label. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We report 10 healthy HSC donors treated with PL because of insufficient response to G‐CSF alone or contraindication to G‐CSF. Eight donors did not mobilize enough CD34+ cells with G‐CSF alone because poor mobilizers or because insufficient HSCs were harvested according to the clinical need of the patient; in two cases G‐CSF administration and marrow harvest were unfeasible or contraindicated in the donor. RESULTS The use of PL for mobilization increased the number of circulating CD34+ cells by 2.8‐fold and the CD34+/kg collection by 3.0‐fold. Only mild adverse events were reported (bone pain or discomfort) and not univocally attributable to PL. Rate of engraftment and graft‐versus‐host disease were similar to those seen in recipients of grafts from G‐CSF only–mobilized donors. CONCLUSION We exposed 10 allogeneic donors to mobilization with PL. PL was well tolerated in all cases and ensured procurement of an adequate graft for transplantation resulting in a normal hematopoietic engraftment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/trf.13059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1703166228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3774639921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-215edb9dffb4a877f63fa13bd46841a736580dcc4307c194aa811f50b1cb2f883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhwB9AljhxSOuJkzg5oi3dVipfbYGjNfFHNyVxtrZDm2P_OV627Y2RpTn4eZ-RXkLeAjuANIfR2wPgrGyekQWUXGR505TPyYKxAjIAnu-RVyFcM8byhsFLspeXIgeoxILcf-uN7-7Qjp6OjmozoNO0czQaR9cG-7ieqcWh62eqRzf6QDE96k1Qk6EheozmaqZxpKjWnfljKDqK2txM6YNeebSRbuUhmoEq0_c0RVzY9Ogixm50r8kLi30wbx72Pvlx_OlyeZKdfV2dLj-eZaqooMlyKI1uG21tW2AthK24ReCtLqq6ABS8KmumlSo4EwqaArEGsCVrQbW5rWu-T97vvBs_3kwmRHk9Tt6lkxIE41BVeb6lPuwo5ccQvLFy47sB_SyByW3ZMpUt_5Wd2HcPxqkdjH4iH9tNwOEOuO16M__fJC_Pjx-V2S7Rpb7unhLof8vkE6X89WUlxdH3z8vVxU-54n8BWTaZnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703166228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Gattillo, Salvatore ; Marktel, Sarah ; Rizzo, Lorenzo ; Malato, Simona ; Malabarba, Lucia ; Coppola, Milena ; Assanelli, Andrea ; Milani, Raffaella ; De Freitas, Tiago ; Corti, Consuelo ; Bellio, Laura ; Ciceri, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gattillo, Salvatore ; Marktel, Sarah ; Rizzo, Lorenzo ; Malato, Simona ; Malabarba, Lucia ; Coppola, Milena ; Assanelli, Andrea ; Milani, Raffaella ; De Freitas, Tiago ; Corti, Consuelo ; Bellio, Laura ; Ciceri, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, the collection of an appropriate number of HSCs while maintaining a high level of safety for healthy donors is fundamental. Inadequate HSC mobilization can be seen with the standard use of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating (G‐CSF). Plerixafor (PL) is a chemokine receptor CXC Type 4–stromal‐derived factor 1 inhibitor; its HSC‐mobilizing properties are synergistic with G‐CSF in poor mobilizing patients. The use of PL as adjuvant or alternative to G‐CSF in healthy donors has shown a good safety profile but is so far off‐label. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We report 10 healthy HSC donors treated with PL because of insufficient response to G‐CSF alone or contraindication to G‐CSF. Eight donors did not mobilize enough CD34+ cells with G‐CSF alone because poor mobilizers or because insufficient HSCs were harvested according to the clinical need of the patient; in two cases G‐CSF administration and marrow harvest were unfeasible or contraindicated in the donor. RESULTS The use of PL for mobilization increased the number of circulating CD34+ cells by 2.8‐fold and the CD34+/kg collection by 3.0‐fold. Only mild adverse events were reported (bone pain or discomfort) and not univocally attributable to PL. Rate of engraftment and graft‐versus‐host disease were similar to those seen in recipients of grafts from G‐CSF only–mobilized donors. CONCLUSION We exposed 10 allogeneic donors to mobilization with PL. PL was well tolerated in all cases and ensured procurement of an adequate graft for transplantation resulting in a normal hematopoietic engraftment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.13059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25721167</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRANAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Allografts ; Antigens, CD34 - blood ; Blood Cell Count ; Bone marrow ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - therapy ; Colony-Forming Units Assay ; Drug Synergism ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Graft vs Host Disease - etiology ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - pharmacology ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - adverse effects ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells - chemistry ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells - drug effects ; Heterocyclic Compounds - adverse effects ; Heterocyclic Compounds - pharmacology ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - therapy ; Lenograstim ; Leukapheresis ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain - chemically induced ; Parents ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - methods ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma - therapy ; Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology ; Siblings ; Stem cells ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2015-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1993-2000</ispartof><rights>2015 AABB</rights><rights>2015 AABB.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-215edb9dffb4a877f63fa13bd46841a736580dcc4307c194aa811f50b1cb2f883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-215edb9dffb4a877f63fa13bd46841a736580dcc4307c194aa811f50b1cb2f883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftrf.13059$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftrf.13059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25721167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gattillo, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marktel, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malato, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malabarba, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assanelli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milani, Raffaella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Freitas, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corti, Consuelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellio, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciceri, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, the collection of an appropriate number of HSCs while maintaining a high level of safety for healthy donors is fundamental. Inadequate HSC mobilization can be seen with the standard use of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating (G‐CSF). Plerixafor (PL) is a chemokine receptor CXC Type 4–stromal‐derived factor 1 inhibitor; its HSC‐mobilizing properties are synergistic with G‐CSF in poor mobilizing patients. The use of PL as adjuvant or alternative to G‐CSF in healthy donors has shown a good safety profile but is so far off‐label. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We report 10 healthy HSC donors treated with PL because of insufficient response to G‐CSF alone or contraindication to G‐CSF. Eight donors did not mobilize enough CD34+ cells with G‐CSF alone because poor mobilizers or because insufficient HSCs were harvested according to the clinical need of the patient; in two cases G‐CSF administration and marrow harvest were unfeasible or contraindicated in the donor. RESULTS The use of PL for mobilization increased the number of circulating CD34+ cells by 2.8‐fold and the CD34+/kg collection by 3.0‐fold. Only mild adverse events were reported (bone pain or discomfort) and not univocally attributable to PL. Rate of engraftment and graft‐versus‐host disease were similar to those seen in recipients of grafts from G‐CSF only–mobilized donors. CONCLUSION We exposed 10 allogeneic donors to mobilization with PL. PL was well tolerated in all cases and ensured procurement of an adequate graft for transplantation resulting in a normal hematopoietic engraftment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Antigens, CD34 - blood</subject><subject>Blood Cell Count</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - therapy</subject><subject>Colony-Forming Units Assay</subject><subject>Drug Synergism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Graft vs Host Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - pharmacology</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cells - chemistry</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Heterocyclic Compounds - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heterocyclic Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Lenograstim</subject><subject>Leukapheresis</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - chemically induced</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma - therapy</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhwB9AljhxSOuJkzg5oi3dVipfbYGjNfFHNyVxtrZDm2P_OV627Y2RpTn4eZ-RXkLeAjuANIfR2wPgrGyekQWUXGR505TPyYKxAjIAnu-RVyFcM8byhsFLspeXIgeoxILcf-uN7-7Qjp6OjmozoNO0czQaR9cG-7ieqcWh62eqRzf6QDE96k1Qk6EheozmaqZxpKjWnfljKDqK2txM6YNeebSRbuUhmoEq0_c0RVzY9Ogixm50r8kLi30wbx72Pvlx_OlyeZKdfV2dLj-eZaqooMlyKI1uG21tW2AthK24ReCtLqq6ABS8KmumlSo4EwqaArEGsCVrQbW5rWu-T97vvBs_3kwmRHk9Tt6lkxIE41BVeb6lPuwo5ccQvLFy47sB_SyByW3ZMpUt_5Wd2HcPxqkdjH4iH9tNwOEOuO16M__fJC_Pjx-V2S7Rpb7unhLof8vkE6X89WUlxdH3z8vVxU-54n8BWTaZnA</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Gattillo, Salvatore</creator><creator>Marktel, Sarah</creator><creator>Rizzo, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Malato, Simona</creator><creator>Malabarba, Lucia</creator><creator>Coppola, Milena</creator><creator>Assanelli, Andrea</creator><creator>Milani, Raffaella</creator><creator>De Freitas, Tiago</creator><creator>Corti, Consuelo</creator><creator>Bellio, Laura</creator><creator>Ciceri, Fabio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation</title><author>Gattillo, Salvatore ; Marktel, Sarah ; Rizzo, Lorenzo ; Malato, Simona ; Malabarba, Lucia ; Coppola, Milena ; Assanelli, Andrea ; Milani, Raffaella ; De Freitas, Tiago ; Corti, Consuelo ; Bellio, Laura ; Ciceri, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-215edb9dffb4a877f63fa13bd46841a736580dcc4307c194aa811f50b1cb2f883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Antigens, CD34 - blood</topic><topic>Blood Cell Count</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - therapy</topic><topic>Colony-Forming Units Assay</topic><topic>Drug Synergism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Graft vs Host Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - pharmacology</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cells - chemistry</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Heterocyclic Compounds - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heterocyclic Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Lenograstim</topic><topic>Leukapheresis</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - chemically induced</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma - therapy</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gattillo, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marktel, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malato, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malabarba, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assanelli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milani, Raffaella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Freitas, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corti, Consuelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellio, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciceri, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gattillo, Salvatore</au><au>Marktel, Sarah</au><au>Rizzo, Lorenzo</au><au>Malato, Simona</au><au>Malabarba, Lucia</au><au>Coppola, Milena</au><au>Assanelli, Andrea</au><au>Milani, Raffaella</au><au>De Freitas, Tiago</au><au>Corti, Consuelo</au><au>Bellio, Laura</au><au>Ciceri, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1993</spage><epage>2000</epage><pages>1993-2000</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><coden>TRANAT</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, the collection of an appropriate number of HSCs while maintaining a high level of safety for healthy donors is fundamental. Inadequate HSC mobilization can be seen with the standard use of granulocyte–colony‐stimulating (G‐CSF). Plerixafor (PL) is a chemokine receptor CXC Type 4–stromal‐derived factor 1 inhibitor; its HSC‐mobilizing properties are synergistic with G‐CSF in poor mobilizing patients. The use of PL as adjuvant or alternative to G‐CSF in healthy donors has shown a good safety profile but is so far off‐label. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We report 10 healthy HSC donors treated with PL because of insufficient response to G‐CSF alone or contraindication to G‐CSF. Eight donors did not mobilize enough CD34+ cells with G‐CSF alone because poor mobilizers or because insufficient HSCs were harvested according to the clinical need of the patient; in two cases G‐CSF administration and marrow harvest were unfeasible or contraindicated in the donor. RESULTS The use of PL for mobilization increased the number of circulating CD34+ cells by 2.8‐fold and the CD34+/kg collection by 3.0‐fold. Only mild adverse events were reported (bone pain or discomfort) and not univocally attributable to PL. Rate of engraftment and graft‐versus‐host disease were similar to those seen in recipients of grafts from G‐CSF only–mobilized donors. CONCLUSION We exposed 10 allogeneic donors to mobilization with PL. PL was well tolerated in all cases and ensured procurement of an adequate graft for transplantation resulting in a normal hematopoietic engraftment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25721167</pmid><doi>10.1111/trf.13059</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1132
ispartof Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2015-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1993-2000
issn 0041-1132
1537-2995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1703166228
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Allografts
Antigens, CD34 - blood
Blood Cell Count
Bone marrow
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - therapy
Colony-Forming Units Assay
Drug Synergism
Female
Graft Survival
Graft vs Host Disease - etiology
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - pharmacology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - adverse effects
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization - methods
Hematopoietic Stem Cells - chemistry
Hematopoietic Stem Cells - drug effects
Heterocyclic Compounds - adverse effects
Heterocyclic Compounds - pharmacology
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - therapy
Lenograstim
Leukapheresis
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy
Living Donors
Male
Middle Aged
Pain - chemically induced
Parents
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation - methods
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma - therapy
Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology
Siblings
Stem cells
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
title Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plerixafor%20on%20demand%20in%20ten%20healthy%20family%20donors%20as%20a%20rescue%20strategy%20to%20achieve%20an%20adequate%20graft%20for%20stem%20cell%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Gattillo,%20Salvatore&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1993&rft.epage=2000&rft.pages=1993-2000&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft.coden=TRANAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.13059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3774639921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703166228&rft_id=info:pmid/25721167&rfr_iscdi=true