Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?
Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical social work journal 2015-09, Vol.43 (3), p.304-312 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 312 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 304 |
| container_title | Clinical social work journal |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Anastas, Jeane W. |
| description | Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1701839049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3769540221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-74a79958befc606dc41de216fdda96848159739cd6ff6e00da4906ebafd6b16d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC10Znmmyy8SJS6z8KHqp4DGmSrVvbjSbbQ7-9KevBi4fhMczvvYFHyDnCJQLIq4QgsKSwn5JxWh6QAZaSUcY4OyQDAIUUheTH5CSlFeRdjqsBeZ6sm7axZl3Mg22yvIf4OSrmtvGt9aPCtK64C7YLMd-mbmtN14T2OgMfTdqkIsRivmt9XO5uTslRbdbJn_3qkLzdT18nj3T28vA0uZ1Ry1B0VHIjlSqrha-tAOEsR-fHKGrnjBIVr7BUkinrRF0LD-AMVyD8wtROLFA4NiQXfe5XDN9bnzq9CtvY5pcaJWDFFHCVKewpG0NK0df6KzYbE3caQe8r031lGvaTK9Nl9ox7T8psu_TxT_K_ph-pP21g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701839049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Anastas, Jeane W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anastas, Jeane W.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-1674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSWJBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; Higher education ; Original Paper ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Psychology ; Science education ; Social work</subject><ispartof>Clinical social work journal, 2015-09, Vol.43 (3), p.304-312</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-74a79958befc606dc41de216fdda96848159739cd6ff6e00da4906ebafd6b16d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-74a79958befc606dc41de216fdda96848159739cd6ff6e00da4906ebafd6b16d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27343,27923,27924,33773,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anastas, Jeane W.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?</title><title>Clinical social work journal</title><addtitle>Clin Soc Work J</addtitle><description>Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Social work</subject><issn>0091-1674</issn><issn>1573-3343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC10Znmmyy8SJS6z8KHqp4DGmSrVvbjSbbQ7-9KevBi4fhMczvvYFHyDnCJQLIq4QgsKSwn5JxWh6QAZaSUcY4OyQDAIUUheTH5CSlFeRdjqsBeZ6sm7axZl3Mg22yvIf4OSrmtvGt9aPCtK64C7YLMd-mbmtN14T2OgMfTdqkIsRivmt9XO5uTslRbdbJn_3qkLzdT18nj3T28vA0uZ1Ry1B0VHIjlSqrha-tAOEsR-fHKGrnjBIVr7BUkinrRF0LD-AMVyD8wtROLFA4NiQXfe5XDN9bnzq9CtvY5pcaJWDFFHCVKewpG0NK0df6KzYbE3caQe8r031lGvaTK9Nl9ox7T8psu_TxT_K_ph-pP21g</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Anastas, Jeane W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?</title><author>Anastas, Jeane W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-74a79958befc606dc41de216fdda96848159739cd6ff6e00da4906ebafd6b16d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Social work</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anastas, Jeane W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical social work journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anastas, Jeane W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical social work journal</jtitle><stitle>Clin Soc Work J</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>304-312</pages><issn>0091-1674</issn><eissn>1573-3343</eissn><coden>CSWJBG</coden><abstract>Recent trends in social work have widened the schism between science and clinical social work. Ph.D. programs have become ever more oriented to grant-funded research and to preparing graduates for research-dominated careers. Academics have been developing a definition of a “science of social work” so the profession can claim its scientific base. The evidence-based practice movement and funders’ mandates to use evidence-supported practice techniques have created dilemmas for practitioners, whose views of these developments, positive and negative, are described. Some now argue for “practice-based research,” a model promoting practitioner involvement in research. Finally, rather than moving toward enhanced research and practice synergy in doctoral education, “practice doctorates” in social work are now being developed. Suggestions for enhancing connections between science and clinical social work are offered.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-1674 |
| ispartof | Clinical social work journal, 2015-09, Vol.43 (3), p.304-312 |
| issn | 0091-1674 1573-3343 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1701839049 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Clinical Psychology Higher education Original Paper Personality and Social Psychology Psychology Science education Social work |
| title | Clinical Social Work, Science, and Doctoral Education: Schisms or Synergy? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Social%20Work,%20Science,%20and%20Doctoral%20Education:%20Schisms%20or%20Synergy?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20social%20work%20journal&rft.au=Anastas,%20Jeane%20W.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=304-312&rft.issn=0091-1674&rft.eissn=1573-3343&rft.coden=CSWJBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10615-015-0534-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3769540221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701839049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |