Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain
The paper investigates the extent to which capacity investment considerations interact with the double marginalization effect in a simple supply chain governed by a wholesale price contract. To do so, a non-cooperative differential game model is formulated to study the pricing and capacity investmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Operational Research Society 2015-08, Vol.66 (8), p.1281-1296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1281 |
container_title | The Journal of the Operational Research Society |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Ouardighi, Fouad El Erickson, Gary |
description | The paper investigates the extent to which capacity investment considerations interact with the double marginalization effect in a simple supply chain governed by a wholesale price contract. To do so, a non-cooperative differential game model is formulated to study the pricing and capacity investment decisions in a supply chain, which consists of a supplier and a manufacturer. In such a game, there are different decision rules-open-loop, closed-loop, feedback-that are available to the supply chain participants, depending on the observability of the current state of the supply chain. While closed-loop and feedback equilibrium strategies involve the observability of other chain member's production capacity, open-loop equilibrium strategies do not have such requirement. We examine how the supplier and the manufacturer determine, with the different decision rules, their production capacities and pricing policies to maximize their profits over an infinite planning horizon, and determine how the observability of other supply chain's members' production capacity affects the magnitude of the double marginalization effect. Our study suggests that the observability of other chain member's current production capacity entails a lower production efficiency that results in a greater double marginalization effect. This allows us to conclude that observability of other chain member's current production capacity is associated with a greater double marginalization effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/jors.2014.99 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1700363858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24505751</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24505751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-67bcea53a0a806bce19d42218e3506c075fc18ebd4a063923dedfb0d3e9c07843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFr3DAQhUVpods0t1wDgl7jzciyZetYQpoEAsmhPfUgxpK80eKVHMmmuL--2jiUHHKaN7yPx8wj5IzBlkHdXO5DTNsSWLWV8gPZsKoRheQCPpINMAFFLdryM_mS0h4AJDC5Ib8fYzCznlzwVOOI2k0L7WY3mHmk6A01Ye4GSw8Yd87j4P7iC3twk9ut0nmK1CweD07TNI_jsFD9hM5_JZ96HJI9fZ0n5NeP659Xt8X9w83d1ff7QldQToVoOm2x5gjYgsiaSVOVJWstr0FoaOpe56UzFYLgsuTGmr4Dw63MZlvxE_JtzR1jeJ5tmtQ-zDEfmxRrALjgbd1m6mKldAwpRdurMbr81qIYqGN96lifOtanpMx4seIpY35n45vQ9_nzld-nKcT_2WVVZ7Rm2W9W3_k-xAP-CXEwasJlCLGP6LVLir-b_A_5R5D0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1700363858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ouardighi, Fouad El ; Erickson, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Ouardighi, Fouad El ; Erickson, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>The paper investigates the extent to which capacity investment considerations interact with the double marginalization effect in a simple supply chain governed by a wholesale price contract. To do so, a non-cooperative differential game model is formulated to study the pricing and capacity investment decisions in a supply chain, which consists of a supplier and a manufacturer. In such a game, there are different decision rules-open-loop, closed-loop, feedback-that are available to the supply chain participants, depending on the observability of the current state of the supply chain. While closed-loop and feedback equilibrium strategies involve the observability of other chain member's production capacity, open-loop equilibrium strategies do not have such requirement. We examine how the supplier and the manufacturer determine, with the different decision rules, their production capacities and pricing policies to maximize their profits over an infinite planning horizon, and determine how the observability of other supply chain's members' production capacity affects the magnitude of the double marginalization effect. Our study suggests that the observability of other chain member's current production capacity entails a lower production efficiency that results in a greater double marginalization effect. This allows us to conclude that observability of other chain member's current production capacity is associated with a greater double marginalization effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-9360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/jors.2014.99</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPRQAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Collaboration ; differential games ; double marginalization ; Equilibrium ; Feedback ; Game theory ; Games ; General Paper ; General Papers ; Investments ; Management ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; pricing ; Production capacity ; Revenue sharing ; Social exclusion ; Suppliers ; supply chain management ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2015-08, Vol.66 (8), p.1281-1296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014, Operational Research Society Ltd. 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Operational Research Society Ltd</rights><rights>Operational Research Society Ltd. 2014</rights><rights>Operational Research Society Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-67bcea53a0a806bce19d42218e3506c075fc18ebd4a063923dedfb0d3e9c07843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-67bcea53a0a806bce19d42218e3506c075fc18ebd4a063923dedfb0d3e9c07843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24505751$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24505751$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ouardighi, Fouad El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain</title><title>The Journal of the Operational Research Society</title><addtitle>J Oper Res Soc</addtitle><description>The paper investigates the extent to which capacity investment considerations interact with the double marginalization effect in a simple supply chain governed by a wholesale price contract. To do so, a non-cooperative differential game model is formulated to study the pricing and capacity investment decisions in a supply chain, which consists of a supplier and a manufacturer. In such a game, there are different decision rules-open-loop, closed-loop, feedback-that are available to the supply chain participants, depending on the observability of the current state of the supply chain. While closed-loop and feedback equilibrium strategies involve the observability of other chain member's production capacity, open-loop equilibrium strategies do not have such requirement. We examine how the supplier and the manufacturer determine, with the different decision rules, their production capacities and pricing policies to maximize their profits over an infinite planning horizon, and determine how the observability of other supply chain's members' production capacity affects the magnitude of the double marginalization effect. Our study suggests that the observability of other chain member's current production capacity entails a lower production efficiency that results in a greater double marginalization effect. This allows us to conclude that observability of other chain member's current production capacity is associated with a greater double marginalization effect.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>differential games</subject><subject>double marginalization</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>General Paper</subject><subject>General Papers</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>pricing</subject><subject>Production capacity</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>supply chain management</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0160-5682</issn><issn>1476-9360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEFr3DAQhUVpods0t1wDgl7jzciyZetYQpoEAsmhPfUgxpK80eKVHMmmuL--2jiUHHKaN7yPx8wj5IzBlkHdXO5DTNsSWLWV8gPZsKoRheQCPpINMAFFLdryM_mS0h4AJDC5Ib8fYzCznlzwVOOI2k0L7WY3mHmk6A01Ye4GSw8Yd87j4P7iC3twk9ut0nmK1CweD07TNI_jsFD9hM5_JZ96HJI9fZ0n5NeP659Xt8X9w83d1ff7QldQToVoOm2x5gjYgsiaSVOVJWstr0FoaOpe56UzFYLgsuTGmr4Dw63MZlvxE_JtzR1jeJ5tmtQ-zDEfmxRrALjgbd1m6mKldAwpRdurMbr81qIYqGN96lifOtanpMx4seIpY35n45vQ9_nzld-nKcT_2WVVZ7Rm2W9W3_k-xAP-CXEwasJlCLGP6LVLir-b_A_5R5D0</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Ouardighi, Fouad El</creator><creator>Erickson, Gary</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain</title><author>Ouardighi, Fouad El ; Erickson, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-67bcea53a0a806bce19d42218e3506c075fc18ebd4a063923dedfb0d3e9c07843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>differential games</topic><topic>double marginalization</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>General Paper</topic><topic>General Papers</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>pricing</topic><topic>Production capacity</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>supply chain management</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ouardighi, Fouad El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Operational Research Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ouardighi, Fouad El</au><au>Erickson, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Operational Research Society</jtitle><stitle>J Oper Res Soc</stitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1281</spage><epage>1296</epage><pages>1281-1296</pages><issn>0160-5682</issn><eissn>1476-9360</eissn><coden>OPRQAK</coden><abstract>The paper investigates the extent to which capacity investment considerations interact with the double marginalization effect in a simple supply chain governed by a wholesale price contract. To do so, a non-cooperative differential game model is formulated to study the pricing and capacity investment decisions in a supply chain, which consists of a supplier and a manufacturer. In such a game, there are different decision rules-open-loop, closed-loop, feedback-that are available to the supply chain participants, depending on the observability of the current state of the supply chain. While closed-loop and feedback equilibrium strategies involve the observability of other chain member's production capacity, open-loop equilibrium strategies do not have such requirement. We examine how the supplier and the manufacturer determine, with the different decision rules, their production capacities and pricing policies to maximize their profits over an infinite planning horizon, and determine how the observability of other supply chain's members' production capacity affects the magnitude of the double marginalization effect. Our study suggests that the observability of other chain member's current production capacity entails a lower production efficiency that results in a greater double marginalization effect. This allows us to conclude that observability of other chain member's current production capacity is associated with a greater double marginalization effect.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1057/jors.2014.99</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-5682 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2015-08, Vol.66 (8), p.1281-1296 |
issn | 0160-5682 1476-9360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1700363858 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Business and Management Collaboration differential games double marginalization Equilibrium Feedback Game theory Games General Paper General Papers Investments Management Operations Research/Decision Theory pricing Production capacity Revenue sharing Social exclusion Suppliers supply chain management Supply chains |
title | Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A09%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Production%20capacity%20buildup%20and%20double%20marginalization%20mitigation%20in%20a%20dynamic%20supply%20chain&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Operational%20Research%20Society&rft.au=Ouardighi,%20Fouad%20El&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1281&rft.epage=1296&rft.pages=1281-1296&rft.issn=0160-5682&rft.eissn=1476-9360&rft.coden=OPRQAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/jors.2014.99&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24505751%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1700363858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24505751&rfr_iscdi=true |