Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature
Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of osteoarchaeology 2015-07, Vol.25 (4), p.426-440 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 440 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 426 |
container_title | International journal of osteoarchaeology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Solari, A. Olivera, D. Gordillo, I. Bosch, P. Fetter, G. Lara, V. H. Novelo, O. |
description | Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record.
This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered.
From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/oa.2311 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1697790315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3750315651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuAgCtYq_oUFDx4kdWc3abInqcF-YLQiFb0tm2RW049s3Wyp_fempHjzNAPzzAy8nncJtAeUslujeowDHHkdoEL4wIAd7_sg8oOYfZx6Z3U9p7SZMdbxXhNjFliQe1NhfUee0H2ZgqiqIC9W5a7MkWhjyaTAypV6V1afLSUzi8o1i8qR1GzJDFdrtMptLJ57J1ota7w41K73NnyYJWM_nY4mySD184BT8EFwljOWCaVprkImdBDpIA77OQUWcsAQQVHUcQaCaiYCyJnKFM1UDBmLOO96V-3dtTXfG6ydnJuNrZqXEvoiigTlEDbqulW5NXVtUcu1LVfK7iRQuQ9MGiX3gTXyppXbcom7_5icDg7ab3VZO_z508ouZD_iUSjfn0fyMRiO0ng4lgn_BbhEeE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697790315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Solari, A. ; Olivera, D. ; Gordillo, I. ; Bosch, P. ; Fetter, G. ; Lara, V. H. ; Novelo, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Solari, A. ; Olivera, D. ; Gordillo, I. ; Bosch, P. ; Fetter, G. ; Lara, V. H. ; Novelo, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record.
This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered.
From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-482X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1212</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/oa.2311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>archaeological bones ; Archaeology ; BET ; Bones ; cooked bones ; EDS ; indirect low-temperature exposure ; Morphology ; SAXS ; Scanning electron microscopy ; SEM ; TEM ; Transmission electron microscopy</subject><ispartof>International journal of osteoarchaeology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (4), p.426-440</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul-Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Foa.2311$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Foa.2311$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solari, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivera, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordillo, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, V. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novelo, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</title><title>International journal of osteoarchaeology</title><addtitle>Int. J. Osteoarchaeol</addtitle><description>Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record.
This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered.
From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>archaeological bones</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>BET</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>cooked bones</subject><subject>EDS</subject><subject>indirect low-temperature exposure</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>SAXS</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>SEM</subject><subject>TEM</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><issn>1047-482X</issn><issn>1099-1212</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuAgCtYq_oUFDx4kdWc3abInqcF-YLQiFb0tm2RW049s3Wyp_fempHjzNAPzzAy8nncJtAeUslujeowDHHkdoEL4wIAd7_sg8oOYfZx6Z3U9p7SZMdbxXhNjFliQe1NhfUee0H2ZgqiqIC9W5a7MkWhjyaTAypV6V1afLSUzi8o1i8qR1GzJDFdrtMptLJ57J1ota7w41K73NnyYJWM_nY4mySD184BT8EFwljOWCaVprkImdBDpIA77OQUWcsAQQVHUcQaCaiYCyJnKFM1UDBmLOO96V-3dtTXfG6ydnJuNrZqXEvoiigTlEDbqulW5NXVtUcu1LVfK7iRQuQ9MGiX3gTXyppXbcom7_5icDg7ab3VZO_z508ouZD_iUSjfn0fyMRiO0ng4lgn_BbhEeE0</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Solari, A.</creator><creator>Olivera, D.</creator><creator>Gordillo, I.</creator><creator>Bosch, P.</creator><creator>Fetter, G.</creator><creator>Lara, V. H.</creator><creator>Novelo, O.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</title><author>Solari, A. ; Olivera, D. ; Gordillo, I. ; Bosch, P. ; Fetter, G. ; Lara, V. H. ; Novelo, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>archaeological bones</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>BET</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>cooked bones</topic><topic>EDS</topic><topic>indirect low-temperature exposure</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>SAXS</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>SEM</topic><topic>TEM</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solari, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivera, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordillo, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, V. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novelo, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of osteoarchaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solari, A.</au><au>Olivera, D.</au><au>Gordillo, I.</au><au>Bosch, P.</au><au>Fetter, G.</au><au>Lara, V. H.</au><au>Novelo, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</atitle><jtitle>International journal of osteoarchaeology</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Osteoarchaeol</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>426-440</pages><issn>1047-482X</issn><eissn>1099-1212</eissn><abstract>Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record.
This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered.
From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/oa.2311</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-482X |
ispartof | International journal of osteoarchaeology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (4), p.426-440 |
issn | 1047-482X 1099-1212 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1697790315 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | archaeological bones Archaeology BET Bones cooked bones EDS indirect low-temperature exposure Morphology SAXS Scanning electron microscopy SEM TEM Transmission electron microscopy |
title | Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooked%20Bones?%20Method%20and%20Practice%20for%20Identifying%20Bones%20Treated%20at%20Low%20Temperature&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20osteoarchaeology&rft.au=Solari,%20A.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=426-440&rft.issn=1047-482X&rft.eissn=1099-1212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/oa.2311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3750315651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697790315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |