Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature

Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of osteoarchaeology 2015-07, Vol.25 (4), p.426-440
Hauptverfasser: Solari, A., Olivera, D., Gordillo, I., Bosch, P., Fetter, G., Lara, V. H., Novelo, O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 440
container_issue 4
container_start_page 426
container_title International journal of osteoarchaeology
container_volume 25
creator Solari, A.
Olivera, D.
Gordillo, I.
Bosch, P.
Fetter, G.
Lara, V. H.
Novelo, O.
description Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record. This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered. From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/oa.2311
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1697790315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3750315651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuAgCtYq_oUFDx4kdWc3abInqcF-YLQiFb0tm2RW049s3Wyp_fempHjzNAPzzAy8nncJtAeUslujeowDHHkdoEL4wIAd7_sg8oOYfZx6Z3U9p7SZMdbxXhNjFliQe1NhfUee0H2ZgqiqIC9W5a7MkWhjyaTAypV6V1afLSUzi8o1i8qR1GzJDFdrtMptLJ57J1ota7w41K73NnyYJWM_nY4mySD184BT8EFwljOWCaVprkImdBDpIA77OQUWcsAQQVHUcQaCaiYCyJnKFM1UDBmLOO96V-3dtTXfG6ydnJuNrZqXEvoiigTlEDbqulW5NXVtUcu1LVfK7iRQuQ9MGiX3gTXyppXbcom7_5icDg7ab3VZO_z508ouZD_iUSjfn0fyMRiO0ng4lgn_BbhEeE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697790315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Solari, A. ; Olivera, D. ; Gordillo, I. ; Bosch, P. ; Fetter, G. ; Lara, V. H. ; Novelo, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Solari, A. ; Olivera, D. ; Gordillo, I. ; Bosch, P. ; Fetter, G. ; Lara, V. H. ; Novelo, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record. This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered. From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-482X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1212</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/oa.2311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>archaeological bones ; Archaeology ; BET ; Bones ; cooked bones ; EDS ; indirect low-temperature exposure ; Morphology ; SAXS ; Scanning electron microscopy ; SEM ; TEM ; Transmission electron microscopy</subject><ispartof>International journal of osteoarchaeology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (4), p.426-440</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul-Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Foa.2311$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Foa.2311$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solari, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivera, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordillo, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, V. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novelo, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</title><title>International journal of osteoarchaeology</title><addtitle>Int. J. Osteoarchaeol</addtitle><description>Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record. This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered. From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>archaeological bones</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>BET</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>cooked bones</subject><subject>EDS</subject><subject>indirect low-temperature exposure</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>SAXS</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>SEM</subject><subject>TEM</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><issn>1047-482X</issn><issn>1099-1212</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuAgCtYq_oUFDx4kdWc3abInqcF-YLQiFb0tm2RW049s3Wyp_fempHjzNAPzzAy8nncJtAeUslujeowDHHkdoEL4wIAd7_sg8oOYfZx6Z3U9p7SZMdbxXhNjFliQe1NhfUee0H2ZgqiqIC9W5a7MkWhjyaTAypV6V1afLSUzi8o1i8qR1GzJDFdrtMptLJ57J1ota7w41K73NnyYJWM_nY4mySD184BT8EFwljOWCaVprkImdBDpIA77OQUWcsAQQVHUcQaCaiYCyJnKFM1UDBmLOO96V-3dtTXfG6ydnJuNrZqXEvoiigTlEDbqulW5NXVtUcu1LVfK7iRQuQ9MGiX3gTXyppXbcom7_5icDg7ab3VZO_z508ouZD_iUSjfn0fyMRiO0ng4lgn_BbhEeE0</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Solari, A.</creator><creator>Olivera, D.</creator><creator>Gordillo, I.</creator><creator>Bosch, P.</creator><creator>Fetter, G.</creator><creator>Lara, V. H.</creator><creator>Novelo, O.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</title><author>Solari, A. ; Olivera, D. ; Gordillo, I. ; Bosch, P. ; Fetter, G. ; Lara, V. H. ; Novelo, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4301-1932c22b9af0ca529f47f4856c012531e5e1a0ef8b190f2941c2aba0ba81b2733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>archaeological bones</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>BET</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>cooked bones</topic><topic>EDS</topic><topic>indirect low-temperature exposure</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>SAXS</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>SEM</topic><topic>TEM</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solari, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivera, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordillo, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, V. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novelo, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of osteoarchaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solari, A.</au><au>Olivera, D.</au><au>Gordillo, I.</au><au>Bosch, P.</au><au>Fetter, G.</au><au>Lara, V. H.</au><au>Novelo, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature</atitle><jtitle>International journal of osteoarchaeology</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Osteoarchaeol</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>426-440</pages><issn>1047-482X</issn><eissn>1099-1212</eissn><abstract>Is it possible to determine low‐temperature cooking in archaeological bones? The indirect exposure of bones to fire at low temperature (≤ 100 °C), linked to cooking, produces macroscopic modifications on these bones. These modifications have not been clearly or systematically described previously. Instead, physicochemical changes at nanometric level are only now beginning to be understood. In this paper, our principle aim is to explore new methods and techniques that correlate macroscopic features such as smoothness or light transparency with physicochemical characterization results that could aid towards detecting cooked bones in the archaeological record. This study then selected 11 archaeological samples, both human and non‐human. Bones were considered to be thermally treated or not, on the basis of macroscopic criteria. Complementary characterization techniques were used to study morphology (scanning electron microscopy and small angle X‐ray scattering), structure (X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy), local composition (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) and texture (gas adsorption). Indeed, fractal dimension, particle size, crystalline percentage or specific surface area may well explain some of the macroscopically observed modifications on these samples. The possibility that such apparent modifications may also be due to diagenesis is also considered. From an archaeological point of view, the results are promising. Our characterization of human and non‐human bones demonstrates that physicochemical techniques are complementary and provide good criteria against which to distinguish boiled from un‐boiled archaeological samples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/oa.2311</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-482X
ispartof International journal of osteoarchaeology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (4), p.426-440
issn 1047-482X
1099-1212
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1697790315
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects archaeological bones
Archaeology
BET
Bones
cooked bones
EDS
indirect low-temperature exposure
Morphology
SAXS
Scanning electron microscopy
SEM
TEM
Transmission electron microscopy
title Cooked Bones? Method and Practice for Identifying Bones Treated at Low Temperature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooked%20Bones?%20Method%20and%20Practice%20for%20Identifying%20Bones%20Treated%20at%20Low%20Temperature&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20osteoarchaeology&rft.au=Solari,%20A.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=426-440&rft.issn=1047-482X&rft.eissn=1099-1212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/oa.2311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3750315651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697790315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true