A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications
Inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT) are the two most pervasive methods of wireless power transfer (WPT). IPT is the most common and is applicable to many power levels and gap distances. Conversely, CPT is only applicable for power transfer applications with inherently...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power electronics 2015-11, Vol.30 (11), p.6017-6029 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6029 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 6017 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on power electronics |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Jiejian Dai Ludois, Daniel C. |
description | Inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT) are the two most pervasive methods of wireless power transfer (WPT). IPT is the most common and is applicable to many power levels and gap distances. Conversely, CPT is only applicable for power transfer applications with inherently small gap distances due to constraints on the developed voltage. Despite limitations on gap distance, CPT has been shown to be viable in kilowatt power level applications. This paper provides a critical comparison of IPT and CPT for small gap applications, wherein the theoretical and empirical limitations of each approach are established. A survey of empirical WPT data across diverse applications in the last decade using IPT and CPT technology graphically compares the two approaches in power level, gap distance, operational frequency, and efficiency, among other aspects. The coupler volumetric power density constrained to small gap sizes is analytically established through theoretical physical limitations of IPT and CPT. Finally, guidelines for selecting IPT or CPT in small gap systems are presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2415253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1696705367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7064773</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3744746921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-b986533ae354a34c396ddeb0ecd9bbce4f894204c3c341683925ecf7737d6c8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKc_QLwJeN2ZNF_N5ShzDgYONvEyZGkqGV1Tk3ayC_-77Ta8er-e8x44ADxiNMEYyZfNaracpAizSUoxSxm5AiMsKU4QRuIajFCWsSSTktyCuxh3CGHKEB6B3ylcd-Fgj9CX8NMFW9kY4cr_2AA3Qdex7BtdF1DDPLjWGV3B3O8bHVz09SBa1EVnWnewJyzXjTbuNOa-aypXf8HSB7je66qCc93AadNvjW6dr-M9uCl1Fe3DpY7Bx-tsk78ly_f5Ip8uE0ORaJOtzDgjRFvCqCbUEMmLwm6RNYXcbo2lZSZpivqDIRTzjMiUWVMKQUTBTabJGDyf_zbBf3c2tmrnu1D3lgpzyQVihIuewmfKBB9jsKVqgtvrcFQYqSFlNaSshpTVJeVe83TWOGvtPy8Qp707-QPHMHmJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696705367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Jiejian Dai ; Ludois, Daniel C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiejian Dai ; Ludois, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><description>Inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT) are the two most pervasive methods of wireless power transfer (WPT). IPT is the most common and is applicable to many power levels and gap distances. Conversely, CPT is only applicable for power transfer applications with inherently small gap distances due to constraints on the developed voltage. Despite limitations on gap distance, CPT has been shown to be viable in kilowatt power level applications. This paper provides a critical comparison of IPT and CPT for small gap applications, wherein the theoretical and empirical limitations of each approach are established. A survey of empirical WPT data across diverse applications in the last decade using IPT and CPT technology graphically compares the two approaches in power level, gap distance, operational frequency, and efficiency, among other aspects. The coupler volumetric power density constrained to small gap sizes is analytically established through theoretical physical limitations of IPT and CPT. Finally, guidelines for selecting IPT or CPT in small gap systems are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2415253</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPEE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Capacitive power transfer ; Comparative analysis ; Couplers ; Couplings ; Density ; Density measurement ; Electric fields ; Electrical engineering ; Electronics ; Frequencies ; Inductive power transfer ; non-contact ; Power generation ; Power system measurements ; Wireless communication ; wireless power transfer</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2015-11, Vol.30 (11), p.6017-6029</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Nov 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-b986533ae354a34c396ddeb0ecd9bbce4f894204c3c341683925ecf7737d6c8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-b986533ae354a34c396ddeb0ecd9bbce4f894204c3c341683925ecf7737d6c8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7064773$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,797,27929,27930,54763</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7064773$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiejian Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludois, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications</title><title>IEEE transactions on power electronics</title><addtitle>TPEL</addtitle><description>Inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT) are the two most pervasive methods of wireless power transfer (WPT). IPT is the most common and is applicable to many power levels and gap distances. Conversely, CPT is only applicable for power transfer applications with inherently small gap distances due to constraints on the developed voltage. Despite limitations on gap distance, CPT has been shown to be viable in kilowatt power level applications. This paper provides a critical comparison of IPT and CPT for small gap applications, wherein the theoretical and empirical limitations of each approach are established. A survey of empirical WPT data across diverse applications in the last decade using IPT and CPT technology graphically compares the two approaches in power level, gap distance, operational frequency, and efficiency, among other aspects. The coupler volumetric power density constrained to small gap sizes is analytically established through theoretical physical limitations of IPT and CPT. Finally, guidelines for selecting IPT or CPT in small gap systems are presented.</description><subject>Capacitive power transfer</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Couplers</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Density measurement</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electrical engineering</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Frequencies</subject><subject>Inductive power transfer</subject><subject>non-contact</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Power system measurements</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><subject>wireless power transfer</subject><issn>0885-8993</issn><issn>1941-0107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKc_QLwJeN2ZNF_N5ShzDgYONvEyZGkqGV1Tk3ayC_-77Ta8er-e8x44ADxiNMEYyZfNaracpAizSUoxSxm5AiMsKU4QRuIajFCWsSSTktyCuxh3CGHKEB6B3ylcd-Fgj9CX8NMFW9kY4cr_2AA3Qdex7BtdF1DDPLjWGV3B3O8bHVz09SBa1EVnWnewJyzXjTbuNOa-aypXf8HSB7je66qCc93AadNvjW6dr-M9uCl1Fe3DpY7Bx-tsk78ly_f5Ip8uE0ORaJOtzDgjRFvCqCbUEMmLwm6RNYXcbo2lZSZpivqDIRTzjMiUWVMKQUTBTabJGDyf_zbBf3c2tmrnu1D3lgpzyQVihIuewmfKBB9jsKVqgtvrcFQYqSFlNaSshpTVJeVe83TWOGvtPy8Qp707-QPHMHmJ</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Jiejian Dai</creator><creator>Ludois, Daniel C.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications</title><author>Jiejian Dai ; Ludois, Daniel C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-b986533ae354a34c396ddeb0ecd9bbce4f894204c3c341683925ecf7737d6c8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Capacitive power transfer</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Couplers</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Density measurement</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electrical engineering</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Frequencies</topic><topic>Inductive power transfer</topic><topic>non-contact</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Power system measurements</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><topic>wireless power transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiejian Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludois, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiejian Dai</au><au>Ludois, Daniel C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle><stitle>TPEL</stitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6017</spage><epage>6029</epage><pages>6017-6029</pages><issn>0885-8993</issn><eissn>1941-0107</eissn><coden>ITPEE8</coden><abstract>Inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT) are the two most pervasive methods of wireless power transfer (WPT). IPT is the most common and is applicable to many power levels and gap distances. Conversely, CPT is only applicable for power transfer applications with inherently small gap distances due to constraints on the developed voltage. Despite limitations on gap distance, CPT has been shown to be viable in kilowatt power level applications. This paper provides a critical comparison of IPT and CPT for small gap applications, wherein the theoretical and empirical limitations of each approach are established. A survey of empirical WPT data across diverse applications in the last decade using IPT and CPT technology graphically compares the two approaches in power level, gap distance, operational frequency, and efficiency, among other aspects. The coupler volumetric power density constrained to small gap sizes is analytically established through theoretical physical limitations of IPT and CPT. Finally, guidelines for selecting IPT or CPT in small gap systems are presented.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPEL.2015.2415253</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8993 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2015-11, Vol.30 (11), p.6017-6029 |
issn | 0885-8993 1941-0107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1696705367 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Capacitive power transfer Comparative analysis Couplers Couplings Density Density measurement Electric fields Electrical engineering Electronics Frequencies Inductive power transfer non-contact Power generation Power system measurements Wireless communication wireless power transfer |
title | A Survey of Wireless Power Transfer and a Critical Comparison of Inductive and Capacitive Coupling for Small Gap Applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T12%3A43%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20of%20Wireless%20Power%20Transfer%20and%20a%20Critical%20Comparison%20of%20Inductive%20and%20Capacitive%20Coupling%20for%20Small%20Gap%20Applications&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20electronics&rft.au=Jiejian%20Dai&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6017&rft.epage=6029&rft.pages=6017-6029&rft.issn=0885-8993&rft.eissn=1941-0107&rft.coden=ITPEE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPEL.2015.2415253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E3744746921%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696705367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7064773&rfr_iscdi=true |