“Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field
In this essay, inspired by the somatic turn in philosophy initiated by Richard Shusterman, I want to invoke the language of classical Confucian philosophy to think through the best efforts of William James and John Dewey to escape the mind-body and nature-nurture dualisms—that is, to offer an altern...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers of philosophy in China 2015-01, Vol.10 (2), p.167-180 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 180 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 167 |
| container_title | Frontiers of philosophy in China |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Ames, Roger T. |
| description | In this essay, inspired by the somatic turn in philosophy initiated by Richard Shusterman, I want to invoke the language of classical Confucian philosophy to think through the best efforts of William James and John Dewey to escape the mind-body and nature-nurture dualisms—that is, to offer an alternative vocabulary that might lend further clarity to the revolutionary insights of James and Dewey by appealing to the processual categories of Chinese cosmology. What I will try to do first is to refocus the pragmatist’s explanation of the relationship between mind and body through the lens of a process Confucian cosmology. And then, to make the case for James and Dewey, I will return to the radical, imagistic language they invoke to try and make the argument that this processual, holistic understanding of “vital bodyminding” is in fact what they were trying to say all along. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3868/s030-004-015-0013-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1695168528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44156941</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44156941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h256t-19d6114a2386b4071ceed9b6dde51947a7858238daf18500b704c78e382ca8d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kd9qFDEUxgdRsFafQISAN3oxNmfyZzK9s8VtCwuFVrF3ITs5M5NlmqzJjNC7BV-jPovvUvA9mu3q1Xf4vvOHw68o3gL9xJRUR4kyWlLKSwoiK7ASnhUHIGtWMiFunv-vOZMvi1cprSkVVQXioNg-bO9Pgr0b0MTp1nnrfP-w_U0-3DhP_v759fGYXGEbfIvuZ47INCC58B4jucaxI8bbJ-tynrL1PcTRkjy4s5bG97PpkYSOnIcx9NFsBteSRWjn9DS4cDja18WLzowJ3_zTw-Lb4svX0_NyeXl2cfp5WQ6VkFMJjZUA3FT53xWnNbSItllJa1FAw2tTK6FyaE0HSlC6qilva4VMVa1RlrPD4v1-7yaGHzOmSa_DHH0-qUE2AqQSlcpd7_Zd6zSFqDfR3Zp4pzkHIRsOOT_e54PrB4xoNxFT0l0MfnIY8y6qd0T0jojORHQmondENLBHwHCAOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695168528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Ames, Roger T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ames, Roger T.</creatorcontrib><description>In this essay, inspired by the somatic turn in philosophy initiated by Richard Shusterman, I want to invoke the language of classical Confucian philosophy to think through the best efforts of William James and John Dewey to escape the mind-body and nature-nurture dualisms—that is, to offer an alternative vocabulary that might lend further clarity to the revolutionary insights of James and Dewey by appealing to the processual categories of Chinese cosmology. What I will try to do first is to refocus the pragmatist’s explanation of the relationship between mind and body through the lens of a process Confucian cosmology. And then, to make the case for James and Dewey, I will return to the radical, imagistic language they invoke to try and make the argument that this processual, holistic understanding of “vital bodyminding” is in fact what they were trying to say all along.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-3436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1673-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3868/s030-004-015-0013-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Higher Education Press</publisher><subject>aspectual language ; bodyheatminding ; Chinese medicine ; Confucianism ; Cosmology ; dualism ; focus-field ; holography ; internal relations ; John Dewey ; pragmatism ; Richard Shusterman ; somaesthetics ; Special Theme: Richard Shusterman's Somaesthetics ; William James</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of philosophy in China, 2015-01, Vol.10 (2), p.167-180</ispartof><rights>Copyright reserved, 2014, Higher Education Press and Brill</rights><rights>Copyright Brill Academic Publishers, Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44156941$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44156941$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ames, Roger T.</creatorcontrib><title>“Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field</title><title>Frontiers of philosophy in China</title><addtitle>Front. Philos. China</addtitle><description>In this essay, inspired by the somatic turn in philosophy initiated by Richard Shusterman, I want to invoke the language of classical Confucian philosophy to think through the best efforts of William James and John Dewey to escape the mind-body and nature-nurture dualisms—that is, to offer an alternative vocabulary that might lend further clarity to the revolutionary insights of James and Dewey by appealing to the processual categories of Chinese cosmology. What I will try to do first is to refocus the pragmatist’s explanation of the relationship between mind and body through the lens of a process Confucian cosmology. And then, to make the case for James and Dewey, I will return to the radical, imagistic language they invoke to try and make the argument that this processual, holistic understanding of “vital bodyminding” is in fact what they were trying to say all along.</description><subject>aspectual language</subject><subject>bodyheatminding</subject><subject>Chinese medicine</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>dualism</subject><subject>focus-field</subject><subject>holography</subject><subject>internal relations</subject><subject>John Dewey</subject><subject>pragmatism</subject><subject>Richard Shusterman</subject><subject>somaesthetics</subject><subject>Special Theme: Richard Shusterman's Somaesthetics</subject><subject>William James</subject><issn>1673-3436</issn><issn>1673-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo1kd9qFDEUxgdRsFafQISAN3oxNmfyZzK9s8VtCwuFVrF3ITs5M5NlmqzJjNC7BV-jPovvUvA9mu3q1Xf4vvOHw68o3gL9xJRUR4kyWlLKSwoiK7ASnhUHIGtWMiFunv-vOZMvi1cprSkVVQXioNg-bO9Pgr0b0MTp1nnrfP-w_U0-3DhP_v759fGYXGEbfIvuZ47INCC58B4jucaxI8bbJ-tynrL1PcTRkjy4s5bG97PpkYSOnIcx9NFsBteSRWjn9DS4cDja18WLzowJ3_zTw-Lb4svX0_NyeXl2cfp5WQ6VkFMJjZUA3FT53xWnNbSItllJa1FAw2tTK6FyaE0HSlC6qilva4VMVa1RlrPD4v1-7yaGHzOmSa_DHH0-qUE2AqQSlcpd7_Zd6zSFqDfR3Zp4pzkHIRsOOT_e54PrB4xoNxFT0l0MfnIY8y6qd0T0jojORHQmondENLBHwHCAOg</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Ames, Roger T.</creator><general>Higher Education Press</general><general>Higher Education Press and Koninklijke Brill NV</general><general>Higher Education Press Limited Company</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>“Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field</title><author>Ames, Roger T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h256t-19d6114a2386b4071ceed9b6dde51947a7858238daf18500b704c78e382ca8d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>aspectual language</topic><topic>bodyheatminding</topic><topic>Chinese medicine</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>dualism</topic><topic>focus-field</topic><topic>holography</topic><topic>internal relations</topic><topic>John Dewey</topic><topic>pragmatism</topic><topic>Richard Shusterman</topic><topic>somaesthetics</topic><topic>Special Theme: Richard Shusterman's Somaesthetics</topic><topic>William James</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ames, Roger T.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Frontiers of philosophy in China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ames, Roger T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of philosophy in China</jtitle><stitle>Front. Philos. China</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>167-180</pages><issn>1673-3436</issn><eissn>1673-355X</eissn><abstract>In this essay, inspired by the somatic turn in philosophy initiated by Richard Shusterman, I want to invoke the language of classical Confucian philosophy to think through the best efforts of William James and John Dewey to escape the mind-body and nature-nurture dualisms—that is, to offer an alternative vocabulary that might lend further clarity to the revolutionary insights of James and Dewey by appealing to the processual categories of Chinese cosmology. What I will try to do first is to refocus the pragmatist’s explanation of the relationship between mind and body through the lens of a process Confucian cosmology. And then, to make the case for James and Dewey, I will return to the radical, imagistic language they invoke to try and make the argument that this processual, holistic understanding of “vital bodyminding” is in fact what they were trying to say all along.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Higher Education Press</pub><doi>10.3868/s030-004-015-0013-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1673-3436 |
| ispartof | Frontiers of philosophy in China, 2015-01, Vol.10 (2), p.167-180 |
| issn | 1673-3436 1673-355X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1695168528 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | aspectual language bodyheatminding Chinese medicine Confucianism Cosmology dualism focus-field holography internal relations John Dewey pragmatism Richard Shusterman somaesthetics Special Theme: Richard Shusterman's Somaesthetics William James |
| title | “Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CBodyheartminding%E2%80%9D%20(Xin%20%E5%BF%83):%20Reconceiving%20the%20Inner%20Self%20and%20the%20Outer%20World%20in%20the%20Language%20of%20Holographic%20Focus%20and%20Field&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20philosophy%20in%20China&rft.au=Ames,%20Roger%20T.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=167-180&rft.issn=1673-3436&rft.eissn=1673-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3868/s030-004-015-0013-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44156941%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695168528&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44156941&rfr_iscdi=true |