Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice

Gender prejudice is a common occurrence that takes place throughout one’s life and in many arenas (i.e., school, work, public settings, etc.). Recent research has explored how targets respond to such experiences, but few studies examine bystander reactions to this type of event. The current study ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sex roles 2015-06, Vol.72 (11-12), p.485-498
Hauptverfasser: Brinkman, Britney G, Dean, Angela M., Simpson, Christine K., McGinley, Meredith, Rosén, Lee A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 498
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 485
container_title Sex roles
container_volume 72
creator Brinkman, Britney G
Dean, Angela M.
Simpson, Christine K.
McGinley, Meredith
Rosén, Lee A.
description Gender prejudice is a common occurrence that takes place throughout one’s life and in many arenas (i.e., school, work, public settings, etc.). Recent research has explored how targets respond to such experiences, but few studies examine bystander reactions to this type of event. The current study examined four factors (social norms, cost-effectiveness, distress, and feminist activism) that might influence how bystanders respond when witnessing gender prejudice. Male and female college students ( n  = 291) from the Western United States completed online surveys in which they described their experiences witnessing a woman being targeted with gender prejudice. Results indicate gender differences in appraisals of the cost-effectiveness of using particular responses, but no gender differences in the types of responses used. Results indicate that the endorsement of feminist activism predicted female bystanders’ use of confrontational responses, but none of the variables predicted male bystanders’ use of confrontational responses. For female bystanders, those who questioned whether their response would be cost-effective were more likely to report considering, but not using a confrontational response. Implications and future directions are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1692241654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3730636401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6ba451b32113a42fcb60ecf78dbc9b18773d0054a612160c49d6b9ce8cb496583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwAWyRmA3vObaTjFBKqVSpDCBGK3FeqlRtEuwEtRu_we_xJaSEgYXpLvfcKx3GLhGuESC68YiYJBxQcZCx4rsjNkIVhVxEWhyzEYQaOIBQp-zM-zUA9JgcseXd3rdplZML5lVL7p2qtqyr4L5zZbUKJvVmQysKXustVV8fnz6Y7hpyJVWWfFAXwYx-2CdH6y4vLZ2zkyLdeLr4zTF7eZg-Tx75YjmbT24X3IaxbrnOUqkwCwVimEpR2EwD2SKK88wmGcZRFOYASqYaBWqwMsl1lliKbSYTreJwzK6G3cbVbx351qzrzlX9pUGdCCFRK9m3cGhZV3vvqDCNK7ep2xsEc_BmBm-m92YO3syuZ8TA-OaggNyf5X-hb5-bcWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692241654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Brinkman, Britney G ; Dean, Angela M. ; Simpson, Christine K. ; McGinley, Meredith ; Rosén, Lee A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brinkman, Britney G ; Dean, Angela M. ; Simpson, Christine K. ; McGinley, Meredith ; Rosén, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><description>Gender prejudice is a common occurrence that takes place throughout one’s life and in many arenas (i.e., school, work, public settings, etc.). Recent research has explored how targets respond to such experiences, but few studies examine bystander reactions to this type of event. The current study examined four factors (social norms, cost-effectiveness, distress, and feminist activism) that might influence how bystanders respond when witnessing gender prejudice. Male and female college students ( n  = 291) from the Western United States completed online surveys in which they described their experiences witnessing a woman being targeted with gender prejudice. Results indicate gender differences in appraisals of the cost-effectiveness of using particular responses, but no gender differences in the types of responses used. Results indicate that the endorsement of feminist activism predicted female bystanders’ use of confrontational responses, but none of the variables predicted male bystanders’ use of confrontational responses. For female bystanders, those who questioned whether their response would be cost-effective were more likely to report considering, but not using a confrontational response. Implications and future directions are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SROLDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Activism ; Behavior Standards ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Beliefs ; College Students ; Feedback (Response) ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender Bias ; Gender differences ; Gender Discrimination ; Gender Studies ; Males ; Medicine/Public Health ; Norms ; Online Surveys ; Original Article ; Psychology ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Sex discrimination ; Sex roles ; Social activism ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Sex roles, 2015-06, Vol.72 (11-12), p.485-498</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6ba451b32113a42fcb60ecf78dbc9b18773d0054a612160c49d6b9ce8cb496583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6ba451b32113a42fcb60ecf78dbc9b18773d0054a612160c49d6b9ce8cb496583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brinkman, Britney G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Christine K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinley, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosén, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><title>Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice</title><title>Sex roles</title><addtitle>Sex Roles</addtitle><description>Gender prejudice is a common occurrence that takes place throughout one’s life and in many arenas (i.e., school, work, public settings, etc.). Recent research has explored how targets respond to such experiences, but few studies examine bystander reactions to this type of event. The current study examined four factors (social norms, cost-effectiveness, distress, and feminist activism) that might influence how bystanders respond when witnessing gender prejudice. Male and female college students ( n  = 291) from the Western United States completed online surveys in which they described their experiences witnessing a woman being targeted with gender prejudice. Results indicate gender differences in appraisals of the cost-effectiveness of using particular responses, but no gender differences in the types of responses used. Results indicate that the endorsement of feminist activism predicted female bystanders’ use of confrontational responses, but none of the variables predicted male bystanders’ use of confrontational responses. For female bystanders, those who questioned whether their response would be cost-effective were more likely to report considering, but not using a confrontational response. Implications and future directions are discussed.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Behavior Standards</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender Bias</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender Discrimination</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0360-0025</issn><issn>1573-2762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwAWyRmA3vObaTjFBKqVSpDCBGK3FeqlRtEuwEtRu_we_xJaSEgYXpLvfcKx3GLhGuESC68YiYJBxQcZCx4rsjNkIVhVxEWhyzEYQaOIBQp-zM-zUA9JgcseXd3rdplZML5lVL7p2qtqyr4L5zZbUKJvVmQysKXustVV8fnz6Y7hpyJVWWfFAXwYx-2CdH6y4vLZ2zkyLdeLr4zTF7eZg-Tx75YjmbT24X3IaxbrnOUqkwCwVimEpR2EwD2SKK88wmGcZRFOYASqYaBWqwMsl1lliKbSYTreJwzK6G3cbVbx351qzrzlX9pUGdCCFRK9m3cGhZV3vvqDCNK7ep2xsEc_BmBm-m92YO3syuZ8TA-OaggNyf5X-hb5-bcWQ</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Brinkman, Britney G</creator><creator>Dean, Angela M.</creator><creator>Simpson, Christine K.</creator><creator>McGinley, Meredith</creator><creator>Rosén, Lee A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice</title><author>Brinkman, Britney G ; Dean, Angela M. ; Simpson, Christine K. ; McGinley, Meredith ; Rosén, Lee A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6ba451b32113a42fcb60ecf78dbc9b18773d0054a612160c49d6b9ce8cb496583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Behavior Standards</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender Bias</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender Discrimination</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brinkman, Britney G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Christine K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinley, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosén, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brinkman, Britney G</au><au>Dean, Angela M.</au><au>Simpson, Christine K.</au><au>McGinley, Meredith</au><au>Rosén, Lee A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice</atitle><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle><stitle>Sex Roles</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>485-498</pages><issn>0360-0025</issn><eissn>1573-2762</eissn><coden>SROLDH</coden><abstract>Gender prejudice is a common occurrence that takes place throughout one’s life and in many arenas (i.e., school, work, public settings, etc.). Recent research has explored how targets respond to such experiences, but few studies examine bystander reactions to this type of event. The current study examined four factors (social norms, cost-effectiveness, distress, and feminist activism) that might influence how bystanders respond when witnessing gender prejudice. Male and female college students ( n  = 291) from the Western United States completed online surveys in which they described their experiences witnessing a woman being targeted with gender prejudice. Results indicate gender differences in appraisals of the cost-effectiveness of using particular responses, but no gender differences in the types of responses used. Results indicate that the endorsement of feminist activism predicted female bystanders’ use of confrontational responses, but none of the variables predicted male bystanders’ use of confrontational responses. For female bystanders, those who questioned whether their response would be cost-effective were more likely to report considering, but not using a confrontational response. Implications and future directions are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-0025
ispartof Sex roles, 2015-06, Vol.72 (11-12), p.485-498
issn 0360-0025
1573-2762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1692241654
source SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Activism
Behavior Standards
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Beliefs
College Students
Feedback (Response)
Females
Feminism
Gender Bias
Gender differences
Gender Discrimination
Gender Studies
Males
Medicine/Public Health
Norms
Online Surveys
Original Article
Psychology
Resistance (Psychology)
Sex discrimination
Sex roles
Social activism
Sociology
title Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A33%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bystander%20Intervention%20During%20College%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Experiences%20of%20Gender%20Prejudice&rft.jtitle=Sex%20roles&rft.au=Brinkman,%20Britney%20G&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=485-498&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.eissn=1573-2762&rft.coden=SROLDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11199-015-0485-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3730636401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692241654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true