THE GAP BETWEEN BIOETHICS PRINCIPLISM AND JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: HOW SOCIAL SCIENCES CAN HELP ROMANIAN LAW
Applying bioethics traditional principles in modern medicine is a difficult process. Alternative approaches compete with the so-called principlism. The law is required to offer solutions that best fit contemporary realities and moral problems, always taking into account the individual and the surviv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială 2015-06, Vol.49 (49), p.216-228 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 228 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 49 |
| container_start_page | 216 |
| container_title | Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Nanu, Andrei Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan Oprea, Liviu |
| description | Applying bioethics traditional principles in modern medicine is a difficult process. Alternative approaches compete with the so-called principlism. The law is required to offer solutions that best fit contemporary realities and moral problems, always taking into account the individual and the survival of the medical system. This paper shows how the four principles of Beauchamp Childress (2009) translate into Romanian law. It argues that social sciences shouldn’t be considered from an adversarial position with bioethics. Authors consider that the empirical based psychological and sociological findings are able to fill in the gap between bioethics and an adapted and regulated medical practice. This is true worldwide and especially in Romania, where transition makes the defensive medicine a danger for quality evidence-based care. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1690993755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>521897</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>521897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-18cff1a3de0874a22dbe15ada4f66eacf8cf0d9dddd91661865be67cd8ca25a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzt9LwzAQB_AiCo65_8CHgC--FJrmV-Nbl8U1kqVl7Rg-jSxNYVJXXdf_37IJgvdyd3w_HHcTTCBJcEgQZ7eXGYUIw-g-mPX9YR8RlGDKMJ4EbZVJsEwLMJfVVkoD5iqXVaZECYq1MkIVWpUrkJoFeNsslFCpBmtZFrkp1VxpVb2_gCzfgjK_RKVQ0ghZApEakEldgHW-So0aN51uH4K7xra9n_32abB5lZXIQp0vlUh16GLEziFMXNNAi2ofJQzbOK73HhJbW9xQ6q1rxjyqeT0Wh5TChJK9p8zVibMxsRBNg-fr3a9T9z34_rz7PPTOt609-m7od5BRhmJOOBrp0z_60Q2n4_jdDlIecY4YIaN6vCrnfdf-ERLDhDP0A54pZQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690993755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE GAP BETWEEN BIOETHICS PRINCIPLISM AND JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: HOW SOCIAL SCIENCES CAN HELP ROMANIAN LAW</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Nanu, Andrei ; Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana ; Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan ; Oprea, Liviu</creator><creatorcontrib>Nanu, Andrei ; Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana ; Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan ; Oprea, Liviu</creatorcontrib><description>Applying bioethics traditional principles in modern medicine is a difficult process. Alternative approaches compete with the so-called principlism. The law is required to offer solutions that best fit contemporary realities and moral problems, always taking into account the individual and the survival of the medical system. This paper shows how the four principles of Beauchamp Childress (2009) translate into Romanian law. It argues that social sciences shouldn’t be considered from an adversarial position with bioethics. Authors consider that the empirical based psychological and sociological findings are able to fill in the gap between bioethics and an adapted and regulated medical practice. This is true worldwide and especially in Romania, where transition makes the defensive medicine a danger for quality evidence-based care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1583-3410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1584-5397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Iasi: Expert Projects Publishing</publisher><subject>Alternative Approaches ; Bioethics ; Constitutional Law ; Ethics ; Ethics / Practical Philosophy ; Health and medicine and law ; Health care ; Health Care Services ; Law ; Medicine ; Romania ; Social sciences ; Sociology of Law ; Threat ; Traditional Medicine</subject><ispartof>Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, 2015-06, Vol.49 (49), p.216-228</ispartof><rights>Copyright Editura Expert Projects (Expert Projects Publishing House) Jun 2015</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2015_30542.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,33753,33754</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nanu, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Liviu</creatorcontrib><title>THE GAP BETWEEN BIOETHICS PRINCIPLISM AND JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: HOW SOCIAL SCIENCES CAN HELP ROMANIAN LAW</title><title>Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială</title><addtitle>Review of Research and Social Intervention</addtitle><description>Applying bioethics traditional principles in modern medicine is a difficult process. Alternative approaches compete with the so-called principlism. The law is required to offer solutions that best fit contemporary realities and moral problems, always taking into account the individual and the survival of the medical system. This paper shows how the four principles of Beauchamp Childress (2009) translate into Romanian law. It argues that social sciences shouldn’t be considered from an adversarial position with bioethics. Authors consider that the empirical based psychological and sociological findings are able to fill in the gap between bioethics and an adapted and regulated medical practice. This is true worldwide and especially in Romania, where transition makes the defensive medicine a danger for quality evidence-based care.</description><subject>Alternative Approaches</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics / Practical Philosophy</subject><subject>Health and medicine and law</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Sociology of Law</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Traditional Medicine</subject><issn>1583-3410</issn><issn>1584-5397</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzt9LwzAQB_AiCo65_8CHgC--FJrmV-Nbl8U1kqVl7Rg-jSxNYVJXXdf_37IJgvdyd3w_HHcTTCBJcEgQZ7eXGYUIw-g-mPX9YR8RlGDKMJ4EbZVJsEwLMJfVVkoD5iqXVaZECYq1MkIVWpUrkJoFeNsslFCpBmtZFrkp1VxpVb2_gCzfgjK_RKVQ0ghZApEakEldgHW-So0aN51uH4K7xra9n_32abB5lZXIQp0vlUh16GLEziFMXNNAi2ofJQzbOK73HhJbW9xQ6q1rxjyqeT0Wh5TChJK9p8zVibMxsRBNg-fr3a9T9z34_rz7PPTOt609-m7od5BRhmJOOBrp0z_60Q2n4_jdDlIecY4YIaN6vCrnfdf-ERLDhDP0A54pZQI</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Nanu, Andrei</creator><creator>Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana</creator><creator>Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan</creator><creator>Oprea, Liviu</creator><general>Expert Projects Publishing</general><general>Editura Expert Projects (Expert Projects Publishing House)</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>THE GAP BETWEEN BIOETHICS PRINCIPLISM AND JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: HOW SOCIAL SCIENCES CAN HELP ROMANIAN LAW</title><author>Nanu, Andrei ; Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana ; Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan ; Oprea, Liviu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-18cff1a3de0874a22dbe15ada4f66eacf8cf0d9dddd91661865be67cd8ca25a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alternative Approaches</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics / Practical Philosophy</topic><topic>Health and medicine and law</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Sociology of Law</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Traditional Medicine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nanu, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Liviu</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nanu, Andrei</au><au>Bulgaru-Iliescu, Diana</au><au>Rotaru, Tudor-Ştefan</au><au>Oprea, Liviu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE GAP BETWEEN BIOETHICS PRINCIPLISM AND JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: HOW SOCIAL SCIENCES CAN HELP ROMANIAN LAW</atitle><jtitle>Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială</jtitle><addtitle>Review of Research and Social Intervention</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>49</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>216-228</pages><issn>1583-3410</issn><eissn>1584-5397</eissn><abstract>Applying bioethics traditional principles in modern medicine is a difficult process. Alternative approaches compete with the so-called principlism. The law is required to offer solutions that best fit contemporary realities and moral problems, always taking into account the individual and the survival of the medical system. This paper shows how the four principles of Beauchamp Childress (2009) translate into Romanian law. It argues that social sciences shouldn’t be considered from an adversarial position with bioethics. Authors consider that the empirical based psychological and sociological findings are able to fill in the gap between bioethics and an adapted and regulated medical practice. This is true worldwide and especially in Romania, where transition makes the defensive medicine a danger for quality evidence-based care.</abstract><cop>Iasi</cop><pub>Expert Projects Publishing</pub><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1583-3410 |
| ispartof | Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, 2015-06, Vol.49 (49), p.216-228 |
| issn | 1583-3410 1584-5397 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1690993755 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Alternative Approaches Bioethics Constitutional Law Ethics Ethics / Practical Philosophy Health and medicine and law Health care Health Care Services Law Medicine Romania Social sciences Sociology of Law Threat Traditional Medicine |
| title | THE GAP BETWEEN BIOETHICS PRINCIPLISM AND JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: HOW SOCIAL SCIENCES CAN HELP ROMANIAN LAW |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20GAP%20BETWEEN%20BIOETHICS%20PRINCIPLISM%20AND%20JUDICIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY:%20HOW%20SOCIAL%20SCIENCES%20CAN%20HELP%20ROMANIAN%20LAW&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20Cercetare%20%C5%9Fi%20Interven%C5%A3ie%20Social%C4%83&rft.au=Nanu,%20Andrei&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=49&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=216-228&rft.issn=1583-3410&rft.eissn=1584-5397&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E521897%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690993755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=521897&rfr_iscdi=true |