Nitrogen and Carbon of Switchgrass, Loblolly Pine, and Cottonwood Biofuel Production Systems in the Southeast United States

Switchgrass has favorable characteristics as a biofuel feedstock, and it may be feasibly grown on sites currently forested or retired from agricultural production. It is ecologically important to understand the impacts of establishing and managing switchgrass on site nutrient cycling. Four studies c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest science 2015-06, Vol.61 (3), p.522-534
Hauptverfasser: Blazier, Michael A., Clason, Terry R., Liechty, Hal O., Leggett, Zakiya H., Sucre, Eric B., Roberts, Scott D., Krapfl, Kurt, Vance, Eric D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 534
container_issue 3
container_start_page 522
container_title Forest science
container_volume 61
creator Blazier, Michael A.
Clason, Terry R.
Liechty, Hal O.
Leggett, Zakiya H.
Sucre, Eric B.
Roberts, Scott D.
Krapfl, Kurt
Vance, Eric D.
description Switchgrass has favorable characteristics as a biofuel feedstock, and it may be feasibly grown on sites currently forested or retired from agricultural production. It is ecologically important to understand the impacts of establishing and managing switchgrass on site nutrient cycling. Four studies conducted in the southeast United States tested switchgrass as a bioenergy crop grown in monoculture, in alley cropping systems, and as an alternative to conventional agricultural rotations. Each trial included comparisons of switchgrass with the prevailing land uses. In each trial, nitrogen mineralization (N^sub min^), nitrification (N^sub nit^), microbial biomass carbon (C^sub mic^), microbial activity, and labile carbon were measured because of their sensitivity to management practices that alter soil nutrient cycling. In all studies of loblolly pine and switchgrass, switchgrass was apparently the dominant substrate source for C^sub mic^, and N^sub min^ increased when juvenile loblolly pine was isolated with herbicide as the sole vegetation. However, C^sub mic^ and N^sub min^ of loblolly pine-switchgrass alley cropping systems were similar to those observed in conventional juvenile loblolly pine plantation conditions. In a trial of converting former agricultural fields into switchgrass or cottonwood biofuel plantations, this conversion reduced N^sub nit^, and therefore the potential for nitrogen losses compared with those for a soybean-sorghum rotation typical for such sites.
doi_str_mv 10.5849/forsci.14-016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1690366010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3722840901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-b767bc108dbac48b4c0407b656532d7ff90e0f1a91a5c893bd5b86e18a396a1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1LwzAchoMoOKdH7wGv6_xladPkqMMvGDqoA28lSZMto2tmkjKG_7yVeXouD-8LD0K3BKYFz8W99SFqNyV5BoSdoRERlGe0pPwcjQBIkZW5-LpEVzFuAYBTmI3Qz7tLwa9Nh2XX4LkMynfYW1wdXNKbdZAxTvDCq9a37REvXWcmJ9On5LuD9w1-dN72psXL4JteJzcMVMeYzC5i1-G0Mbjy_QAZE151LpkGV0kmE6_RhZVtNDf_HKPV89Pn_DVbfLy8zR8WmaaQp0yVrFSaAG-U1DlXuYYcSsUKVtBZU1orwIAlUhBZaC6oagrFmSFcUsEkkXSM7k67--C_exNTvfV96IbLmjABlDEgMFjZydLBxxiMrffB7WQ41gTqv771qW9N8nroS38BMEFw6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690366010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen and Carbon of Switchgrass, Loblolly Pine, and Cottonwood Biofuel Production Systems in the Southeast United States</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Blazier, Michael A. ; Clason, Terry R. ; Liechty, Hal O. ; Leggett, Zakiya H. ; Sucre, Eric B. ; Roberts, Scott D. ; Krapfl, Kurt ; Vance, Eric D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blazier, Michael A. ; Clason, Terry R. ; Liechty, Hal O. ; Leggett, Zakiya H. ; Sucre, Eric B. ; Roberts, Scott D. ; Krapfl, Kurt ; Vance, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><description>Switchgrass has favorable characteristics as a biofuel feedstock, and it may be feasibly grown on sites currently forested or retired from agricultural production. It is ecologically important to understand the impacts of establishing and managing switchgrass on site nutrient cycling. Four studies conducted in the southeast United States tested switchgrass as a bioenergy crop grown in monoculture, in alley cropping systems, and as an alternative to conventional agricultural rotations. Each trial included comparisons of switchgrass with the prevailing land uses. In each trial, nitrogen mineralization (N^sub min^), nitrification (N^sub nit^), microbial biomass carbon (C^sub mic^), microbial activity, and labile carbon were measured because of their sensitivity to management practices that alter soil nutrient cycling. In all studies of loblolly pine and switchgrass, switchgrass was apparently the dominant substrate source for C^sub mic^, and N^sub min^ increased when juvenile loblolly pine was isolated with herbicide as the sole vegetation. However, C^sub mic^ and N^sub min^ of loblolly pine-switchgrass alley cropping systems were similar to those observed in conventional juvenile loblolly pine plantation conditions. In a trial of converting former agricultural fields into switchgrass or cottonwood biofuel plantations, this conversion reduced N^sub nit^, and therefore the potential for nitrogen losses compared with those for a soybean-sorghum rotation typical for such sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-749X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5849/forsci.14-016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agroforestry ; Biodiesel fuels ; Carbon ; Coastal plains ; Crops ; Grain ; Land use planning ; Nitrogen ; Plantations ; Raw materials ; Sorghum ; Studies ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Forest science, 2015-06, Vol.61 (3), p.522-534</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Jun 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-b767bc108dbac48b4c0407b656532d7ff90e0f1a91a5c893bd5b86e18a396a1a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blazier, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clason, Terry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liechty, Hal O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggett, Zakiya H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sucre, Eric B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krapfl, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vance, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen and Carbon of Switchgrass, Loblolly Pine, and Cottonwood Biofuel Production Systems in the Southeast United States</title><title>Forest science</title><description>Switchgrass has favorable characteristics as a biofuel feedstock, and it may be feasibly grown on sites currently forested or retired from agricultural production. It is ecologically important to understand the impacts of establishing and managing switchgrass on site nutrient cycling. Four studies conducted in the southeast United States tested switchgrass as a bioenergy crop grown in monoculture, in alley cropping systems, and as an alternative to conventional agricultural rotations. Each trial included comparisons of switchgrass with the prevailing land uses. In each trial, nitrogen mineralization (N^sub min^), nitrification (N^sub nit^), microbial biomass carbon (C^sub mic^), microbial activity, and labile carbon were measured because of their sensitivity to management practices that alter soil nutrient cycling. In all studies of loblolly pine and switchgrass, switchgrass was apparently the dominant substrate source for C^sub mic^, and N^sub min^ increased when juvenile loblolly pine was isolated with herbicide as the sole vegetation. However, C^sub mic^ and N^sub min^ of loblolly pine-switchgrass alley cropping systems were similar to those observed in conventional juvenile loblolly pine plantation conditions. In a trial of converting former agricultural fields into switchgrass or cottonwood biofuel plantations, this conversion reduced N^sub nit^, and therefore the potential for nitrogen losses compared with those for a soybean-sorghum rotation typical for such sites.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0015-749X</issn><issn>1938-3738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkM1LwzAchoMoOKdH7wGv6_xladPkqMMvGDqoA28lSZMto2tmkjKG_7yVeXouD-8LD0K3BKYFz8W99SFqNyV5BoSdoRERlGe0pPwcjQBIkZW5-LpEVzFuAYBTmI3Qz7tLwa9Nh2XX4LkMynfYW1wdXNKbdZAxTvDCq9a37REvXWcmJ9On5LuD9w1-dN72psXL4JteJzcMVMeYzC5i1-G0Mbjy_QAZE151LpkGV0kmE6_RhZVtNDf_HKPV89Pn_DVbfLy8zR8WmaaQp0yVrFSaAG-U1DlXuYYcSsUKVtBZU1orwIAlUhBZaC6oagrFmSFcUsEkkXSM7k67--C_exNTvfV96IbLmjABlDEgMFjZydLBxxiMrffB7WQ41gTqv771qW9N8nroS38BMEFw6g</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Blazier, Michael A.</creator><creator>Clason, Terry R.</creator><creator>Liechty, Hal O.</creator><creator>Leggett, Zakiya H.</creator><creator>Sucre, Eric B.</creator><creator>Roberts, Scott D.</creator><creator>Krapfl, Kurt</creator><creator>Vance, Eric D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Nitrogen and Carbon of Switchgrass, Loblolly Pine, and Cottonwood Biofuel Production Systems in the Southeast United States</title><author>Blazier, Michael A. ; Clason, Terry R. ; Liechty, Hal O. ; Leggett, Zakiya H. ; Sucre, Eric B. ; Roberts, Scott D. ; Krapfl, Kurt ; Vance, Eric D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-b767bc108dbac48b4c0407b656532d7ff90e0f1a91a5c893bd5b86e18a396a1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blazier, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clason, Terry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liechty, Hal O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggett, Zakiya H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sucre, Eric B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krapfl, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vance, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blazier, Michael A.</au><au>Clason, Terry R.</au><au>Liechty, Hal O.</au><au>Leggett, Zakiya H.</au><au>Sucre, Eric B.</au><au>Roberts, Scott D.</au><au>Krapfl, Kurt</au><au>Vance, Eric D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen and Carbon of Switchgrass, Loblolly Pine, and Cottonwood Biofuel Production Systems in the Southeast United States</atitle><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>522-534</pages><issn>0015-749X</issn><eissn>1938-3738</eissn><abstract>Switchgrass has favorable characteristics as a biofuel feedstock, and it may be feasibly grown on sites currently forested or retired from agricultural production. It is ecologically important to understand the impacts of establishing and managing switchgrass on site nutrient cycling. Four studies conducted in the southeast United States tested switchgrass as a bioenergy crop grown in monoculture, in alley cropping systems, and as an alternative to conventional agricultural rotations. Each trial included comparisons of switchgrass with the prevailing land uses. In each trial, nitrogen mineralization (N^sub min^), nitrification (N^sub nit^), microbial biomass carbon (C^sub mic^), microbial activity, and labile carbon were measured because of their sensitivity to management practices that alter soil nutrient cycling. In all studies of loblolly pine and switchgrass, switchgrass was apparently the dominant substrate source for C^sub mic^, and N^sub min^ increased when juvenile loblolly pine was isolated with herbicide as the sole vegetation. However, C^sub mic^ and N^sub min^ of loblolly pine-switchgrass alley cropping systems were similar to those observed in conventional juvenile loblolly pine plantation conditions. In a trial of converting former agricultural fields into switchgrass or cottonwood biofuel plantations, this conversion reduced N^sub nit^, and therefore the potential for nitrogen losses compared with those for a soybean-sorghum rotation typical for such sites.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.5849/forsci.14-016</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-749X
ispartof Forest science, 2015-06, Vol.61 (3), p.522-534
issn 0015-749X
1938-3738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1690366010
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural production
Agroforestry
Biodiesel fuels
Carbon
Coastal plains
Crops
Grain
Land use planning
Nitrogen
Plantations
Raw materials
Sorghum
Studies
Vegetation
title Nitrogen and Carbon of Switchgrass, Loblolly Pine, and Cottonwood Biofuel Production Systems in the Southeast United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A13%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20and%20Carbon%20of%20Switchgrass,%20Loblolly%20Pine,%20and%20Cottonwood%20Biofuel%20Production%20Systems%20in%20the%20Southeast%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Forest%20science&rft.au=Blazier,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=522-534&rft.issn=0015-749X&rft.eissn=1938-3738&rft_id=info:doi/10.5849/forsci.14-016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3722840901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690366010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true