Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships
Parties acting opportunistically are a major concern in many buyer–supplier relationships, especially in strategic outsourcing arrangements. The extant literature has focused mainly on opportunistic behavior of suppliers and the safeguards that buyers need to put in place to protect their interests....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of production economics 2015-08, Vol.166, p.258-268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | International journal of production economics |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Bhattacharya, Ananya Singh, Prakash J. Nand, Alka Ashwini |
description | Parties acting opportunistically are a major concern in many buyer–supplier relationships, especially in strategic outsourcing arrangements. The extant literature has focused mainly on opportunistic behavior of suppliers and the safeguards that buyers need to put in place to protect their interests. Buyers can also act opportunistically; however, this side of the dyadic relationship has not received adequate attention and remains an under researched area. We address this imbalance by establishing the antecedents of buyer opportunism and strategies to manage this. Based on the transaction cost economics theory, we tested a model consisting of three factors that could give rise to buyer opportunism with dyadic data from 51 outsourcing arrangements between firms in Australia. Our results indicate that only one predictor, frequency of exchange, had a significant and positive effect on buyer opportunism. The other two factors, investments made by suppliers and uncertainty, were not significant. These findings show that, in contrast to what has been found previously for suppliers, only one factor gives rise to buyer opportunism. The results suggest that buyers׳ opportunism can be controlled by the frequency of transactions that takes place. Implications for theory and practice in outsourcing relationships are presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1690240430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925527315000791</els_id><sourcerecordid>3722168521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-c9e3b5e048e30b42a2d7a014b39c4629af17e1b421efdf6b2f88e5eb2ed234f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Fz62TpJ_gZVnUFRa86Dm06cRNWZOapAv7702pZ09zmPeZeXkIuaeQUaDl45DpYcSMAS0y4BlQekFWtK54WhVVc0lW0LAiLVjFr8mN9wMAVLSuV2S3MQEl9miCT6xKuumMLrHjaF2YjPZBy6TDQ3vS1iXaJHYK3k5OavOVODy2QVvjD3r0t-RKtUePd39zTT5fnj-2u3T__vq23exTmZcspLJB3hUIeY0cupy1rK9aoHnHmznQtIpWSOOCoupV2TFV11hgx7BnPFeUr8nDcnd09mdCH8QQ-5j4UtCyAZZDziGm2JKSznrvUInR6e_WnQUFMRsTg5iNidmYAC6isQg9LRDG_ieNTnip0UQ72qEMorf6P_wXU5V15g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690240430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bhattacharya, Ananya ; Singh, Prakash J. ; Nand, Alka Ashwini</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Ananya ; Singh, Prakash J. ; Nand, Alka Ashwini</creatorcontrib><description>Parties acting opportunistically are a major concern in many buyer–supplier relationships, especially in strategic outsourcing arrangements. The extant literature has focused mainly on opportunistic behavior of suppliers and the safeguards that buyers need to put in place to protect their interests. Buyers can also act opportunistically; however, this side of the dyadic relationship has not received adequate attention and remains an under researched area. We address this imbalance by establishing the antecedents of buyer opportunism and strategies to manage this. Based on the transaction cost economics theory, we tested a model consisting of three factors that could give rise to buyer opportunism with dyadic data from 51 outsourcing arrangements between firms in Australia. Our results indicate that only one predictor, frequency of exchange, had a significant and positive effect on buyer opportunism. The other two factors, investments made by suppliers and uncertainty, were not significant. These findings show that, in contrast to what has been found previously for suppliers, only one factor gives rise to buyer opportunism. The results suggest that buyers׳ opportunism can be controlled by the frequency of transactions that takes place. Implications for theory and practice in outsourcing relationships are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPCEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Buyer–supplier relationships ; Dyad-symmetric method ; Dyadic data ; Economic theory ; Investments ; Opportunistic behavior ; Outsourcing ; Purchasing ; Studies ; Transaction cost economics ; Transaction costs ; Uncertainty ; Vendor supplier relations</subject><ispartof>International journal of production economics, 2015-08, Vol.166, p.258-268</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-c9e3b5e048e30b42a2d7a014b39c4629af17e1b421efdf6b2f88e5eb2ed234f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-c9e3b5e048e30b42a2d7a014b39c4629af17e1b421efdf6b2f88e5eb2ed234f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527315000791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Ananya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Prakash J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nand, Alka Ashwini</creatorcontrib><title>Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships</title><title>International journal of production economics</title><description>Parties acting opportunistically are a major concern in many buyer–supplier relationships, especially in strategic outsourcing arrangements. The extant literature has focused mainly on opportunistic behavior of suppliers and the safeguards that buyers need to put in place to protect their interests. Buyers can also act opportunistically; however, this side of the dyadic relationship has not received adequate attention and remains an under researched area. We address this imbalance by establishing the antecedents of buyer opportunism and strategies to manage this. Based on the transaction cost economics theory, we tested a model consisting of three factors that could give rise to buyer opportunism with dyadic data from 51 outsourcing arrangements between firms in Australia. Our results indicate that only one predictor, frequency of exchange, had a significant and positive effect on buyer opportunism. The other two factors, investments made by suppliers and uncertainty, were not significant. These findings show that, in contrast to what has been found previously for suppliers, only one factor gives rise to buyer opportunism. The results suggest that buyers׳ opportunism can be controlled by the frequency of transactions that takes place. Implications for theory and practice in outsourcing relationships are presented.</description><subject>Buyer–supplier relationships</subject><subject>Dyad-symmetric method</subject><subject>Dyadic data</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Opportunistic behavior</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transaction cost economics</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vendor supplier relations</subject><issn>0925-5273</issn><issn>1873-7579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Fz62TpJ_gZVnUFRa86Dm06cRNWZOapAv7702pZ09zmPeZeXkIuaeQUaDl45DpYcSMAS0y4BlQekFWtK54WhVVc0lW0LAiLVjFr8mN9wMAVLSuV2S3MQEl9miCT6xKuumMLrHjaF2YjPZBy6TDQ3vS1iXaJHYK3k5OavOVODy2QVvjD3r0t-RKtUePd39zTT5fnj-2u3T__vq23exTmZcspLJB3hUIeY0cupy1rK9aoHnHmznQtIpWSOOCoupV2TFV11hgx7BnPFeUr8nDcnd09mdCH8QQ-5j4UtCyAZZDziGm2JKSznrvUInR6e_WnQUFMRsTg5iNidmYAC6isQg9LRDG_ieNTnip0UQ72qEMorf6P_wXU5V15g</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Bhattacharya, Ananya</creator><creator>Singh, Prakash J.</creator><creator>Nand, Alka Ashwini</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships</title><author>Bhattacharya, Ananya ; Singh, Prakash J. ; Nand, Alka Ashwini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-c9e3b5e048e30b42a2d7a014b39c4629af17e1b421efdf6b2f88e5eb2ed234f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Buyer–supplier relationships</topic><topic>Dyad-symmetric method</topic><topic>Dyadic data</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Opportunistic behavior</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transaction cost economics</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vendor supplier relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Ananya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Prakash J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nand, Alka Ashwini</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhattacharya, Ananya</au><au>Singh, Prakash J.</au><au>Nand, Alka Ashwini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>258</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>258-268</pages><issn>0925-5273</issn><eissn>1873-7579</eissn><coden>IJPCEY</coden><abstract>Parties acting opportunistically are a major concern in many buyer–supplier relationships, especially in strategic outsourcing arrangements. The extant literature has focused mainly on opportunistic behavior of suppliers and the safeguards that buyers need to put in place to protect their interests. Buyers can also act opportunistically; however, this side of the dyadic relationship has not received adequate attention and remains an under researched area. We address this imbalance by establishing the antecedents of buyer opportunism and strategies to manage this. Based on the transaction cost economics theory, we tested a model consisting of three factors that could give rise to buyer opportunism with dyadic data from 51 outsourcing arrangements between firms in Australia. Our results indicate that only one predictor, frequency of exchange, had a significant and positive effect on buyer opportunism. The other two factors, investments made by suppliers and uncertainty, were not significant. These findings show that, in contrast to what has been found previously for suppliers, only one factor gives rise to buyer opportunism. The results suggest that buyers׳ opportunism can be controlled by the frequency of transactions that takes place. Implications for theory and practice in outsourcing relationships are presented.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-5273 |
ispartof | International journal of production economics, 2015-08, Vol.166, p.258-268 |
issn | 0925-5273 1873-7579 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1690240430 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Buyer–supplier relationships Dyad-symmetric method Dyadic data Economic theory Investments Opportunistic behavior Outsourcing Purchasing Studies Transaction cost economics Transaction costs Uncertainty Vendor supplier relations |
title | Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A36%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antecedents%20of%20buyer%20opportunistic%20behavior%20in%20outsourcing%20relationships&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20economics&rft.au=Bhattacharya,%20Ananya&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=258-268&rft.issn=0925-5273&rft.eissn=1873-7579&rft.coden=IJPCEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3722168521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690240430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925527315000791&rfr_iscdi=true |