Model Uncertainty and Liquidity
Extreme market outcomes are often followed by a lack of liquidity and a lack of trade. This market collapse seems particularly acute for markets where traders rely heavily on a specific empirical model such as in derivative markets. Asset pricing and trading, in these cases, are intrinsically model...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2001-12, p.8683 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 8683 |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
creator | Routledge, Bryan Zin, Stanley E |
description | Extreme market outcomes are often followed by a lack of liquidity and a lack of trade. This market collapse seems particularly acute for markets where traders rely heavily on a specific empirical model such as in derivative markets. Asset pricing and trading, in these cases, are intrinsically model dependent. Moreover, the observed behavior of traders and institutions that places a large emphasis on 'worst-case scenarios'' through the use of 'stress testing'' and 'value-at-risk'' seems different than Savage rationality (expected utility) would suggest. In this paper we capture model-uncertainty explicitly using an Epstein-Wang (1994) uncertainty-averse utility function with an ambiguous underlying asset-returns distribution. To explore the connection of uncertainty with liquidity, we specify a simple market where a monopolist financial intermediary makes a market for a propriety derivative security. The market-maker chooses bid and ask prices for the derivative, then, conditional on trade in this market, chooses an optimal portfolio and consumption. We explore how uncertainty can increase the bid-ask spread and, hence, reduces liquidity. In addition, 'hedge portfolios'' for the market-maker, an important component to understanding spreads, can look very different from those implied by a model without Knightian uncertainty. Our infinite-horizon example produces short, dramatic decreases in liquidity even though the underlying environment is stationary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w8683 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1689561599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w8683</nber_id><sourcerecordid>3718611321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1023-406745bcac8ce9743a482adba21391cbfc613050609b966da8792f9f247b10fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1KxDAUBeAsFBzHeQBXFlxXb36a5C5lUEeouHHWJUlTyDCmM0mL9O0tVlydzcc5cAjZUHjgXMvHby01vyAr0KhLhlxdkeucDwBMa6Arcvfet_5Y7KPzaTAhDlNhYlvU4TyGNgzTDbnszDH7zV-uyf7l-XO7K-uP17ftU116CoyXAqQSlXXGaedRCW6EZqa1hlGO1NnOScqhAgloUcrWaIWsw44JZSl0hq_J_dJ7Sv159HloDv2Y4jzZUKmxkrRCnFWxKO_6GHJzSuHLpKmhIKSiqJicye1CovXpH_zewH8AV0VNew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1689561599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model Uncertainty and Liquidity</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Routledge, Bryan ; Zin, Stanley E</creator><creatorcontrib>Routledge, Bryan ; Zin, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><description>Extreme market outcomes are often followed by a lack of liquidity and a lack of trade. This market collapse seems particularly acute for markets where traders rely heavily on a specific empirical model such as in derivative markets. Asset pricing and trading, in these cases, are intrinsically model dependent. Moreover, the observed behavior of traders and institutions that places a large emphasis on 'worst-case scenarios'' through the use of 'stress testing'' and 'value-at-risk'' seems different than Savage rationality (expected utility) would suggest. In this paper we capture model-uncertainty explicitly using an Epstein-Wang (1994) uncertainty-averse utility function with an ambiguous underlying asset-returns distribution. To explore the connection of uncertainty with liquidity, we specify a simple market where a monopolist financial intermediary makes a market for a propriety derivative security. The market-maker chooses bid and ask prices for the derivative, then, conditional on trade in this market, chooses an optimal portfolio and consumption. We explore how uncertainty can increase the bid-ask spread and, hence, reduces liquidity. In addition, 'hedge portfolios'' for the market-maker, an important component to understanding spreads, can look very different from those implied by a model without Knightian uncertainty. Our infinite-horizon example produces short, dramatic decreases in liquidity even though the underlying environment is stationary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w8683</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Asset Pricing ; Bond markets ; Capital losses ; Corporate bonds ; Corporate debt ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Emerging markets ; Expected utility ; Government bonds ; Hedge funds ; Liquidity ; Municipal bonds ; Normal distribution ; Prices ; Recapitalization ; Standard deviation</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2001-12, p.8683</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Dec 2001</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Routledge, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zin, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><title>Model Uncertainty and Liquidity</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Extreme market outcomes are often followed by a lack of liquidity and a lack of trade. This market collapse seems particularly acute for markets where traders rely heavily on a specific empirical model such as in derivative markets. Asset pricing and trading, in these cases, are intrinsically model dependent. Moreover, the observed behavior of traders and institutions that places a large emphasis on 'worst-case scenarios'' through the use of 'stress testing'' and 'value-at-risk'' seems different than Savage rationality (expected utility) would suggest. In this paper we capture model-uncertainty explicitly using an Epstein-Wang (1994) uncertainty-averse utility function with an ambiguous underlying asset-returns distribution. To explore the connection of uncertainty with liquidity, we specify a simple market where a monopolist financial intermediary makes a market for a propriety derivative security. The market-maker chooses bid and ask prices for the derivative, then, conditional on trade in this market, chooses an optimal portfolio and consumption. We explore how uncertainty can increase the bid-ask spread and, hence, reduces liquidity. In addition, 'hedge portfolios'' for the market-maker, an important component to understanding spreads, can look very different from those implied by a model without Knightian uncertainty. Our infinite-horizon example produces short, dramatic decreases in liquidity even though the underlying environment is stationary.</description><subject>Asset Pricing</subject><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Capital losses</subject><subject>Corporate bonds</subject><subject>Corporate debt</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Government bonds</subject><subject>Hedge funds</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Municipal bonds</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Recapitalization</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo90M1KxDAUBeAsFBzHeQBXFlxXb36a5C5lUEeouHHWJUlTyDCmM0mL9O0tVlydzcc5cAjZUHjgXMvHby01vyAr0KhLhlxdkeucDwBMa6Arcvfet_5Y7KPzaTAhDlNhYlvU4TyGNgzTDbnszDH7zV-uyf7l-XO7K-uP17ftU116CoyXAqQSlXXGaedRCW6EZqa1hlGO1NnOScqhAgloUcrWaIWsw44JZSl0hq_J_dJ7Sv159HloDv2Y4jzZUKmxkrRCnFWxKO_6GHJzSuHLpKmhIKSiqJicye1CovXpH_zewH8AV0VNew</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Routledge, Bryan</creator><creator>Zin, Stanley E</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Model Uncertainty and Liquidity</title><author>Routledge, Bryan ; Zin, Stanley E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1023-406745bcac8ce9743a482adba21391cbfc613050609b966da8792f9f247b10fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Asset Pricing</topic><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Capital losses</topic><topic>Corporate bonds</topic><topic>Corporate debt</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Government bonds</topic><topic>Hedge funds</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Municipal bonds</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Recapitalization</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Routledge, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zin, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Routledge, Bryan</au><au>Zin, Stanley E</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Model Uncertainty and Liquidity</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><spage>8683</spage><pages>8683-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Extreme market outcomes are often followed by a lack of liquidity and a lack of trade. This market collapse seems particularly acute for markets where traders rely heavily on a specific empirical model such as in derivative markets. Asset pricing and trading, in these cases, are intrinsically model dependent. Moreover, the observed behavior of traders and institutions that places a large emphasis on 'worst-case scenarios'' through the use of 'stress testing'' and 'value-at-risk'' seems different than Savage rationality (expected utility) would suggest. In this paper we capture model-uncertainty explicitly using an Epstein-Wang (1994) uncertainty-averse utility function with an ambiguous underlying asset-returns distribution. To explore the connection of uncertainty with liquidity, we specify a simple market where a monopolist financial intermediary makes a market for a propriety derivative security. The market-maker chooses bid and ask prices for the derivative, then, conditional on trade in this market, chooses an optimal portfolio and consumption. We explore how uncertainty can increase the bid-ask spread and, hence, reduces liquidity. In addition, 'hedge portfolios'' for the market-maker, an important component to understanding spreads, can look very different from those implied by a model without Knightian uncertainty. Our infinite-horizon example produces short, dramatic decreases in liquidity even though the underlying environment is stationary.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w8683</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2001-12, p.8683 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1689561599 |
source | National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Asset Pricing Bond markets Capital losses Corporate bonds Corporate debt Economic models Economic theory Emerging markets Expected utility Government bonds Hedge funds Liquidity Municipal bonds Normal distribution Prices Recapitalization Standard deviation |
title | Model Uncertainty and Liquidity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A09%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Model%20Uncertainty%20and%20Liquidity&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Routledge,%20Bryan&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.spage=8683&rft.pages=8683-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w8683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E3718611321%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1689561599&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w8683&rfr_iscdi=true |