Investment Busts, Reputation, and the Temptation to Blend in with the Crowd

We provide a dynamic model of an industry in which agents strategically time liquidation decisions in an effort to protect their reputations. As in traditional models, agents delay liquidation attempting to signal their quality. However, when the industry faces a common shock that indiscriminately f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2012-03, p.17945
Hauptverfasser: Strebulaev, Ilya A, Malenko, Andrey, Grenadier, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 17945
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Strebulaev, Ilya A
Malenko, Andrey
Grenadier, Steven
description We provide a dynamic model of an industry in which agents strategically time liquidation decisions in an effort to protect their reputations. As in traditional models, agents delay liquidation attempting to signal their quality. However, when the industry faces a common shock that indiscriminately forces liquidation of a subset of projects, agents with bad enough projects choose to liquidate even if their projects are unaffected by the shock. Such "blending in with the crowd" creates an additional incentive to delay liquidation, further amplifying the shock. As a result, even minuscule common shocks can be evidenced by massive liquidations. As agents await common shocks, the industry accumulates "living dead" projects. Surprisingly, the potential for moderate negative common shocks often improves agents values.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w17945
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1687843135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w17945</nber_id><sourcerecordid>3713933231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-11c613f4a9d7d026dca00f76311bb77272b7eea53095790d14e50c296e2a04c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuA9KFir_gBPC14bndlN9uNoi9ViQZB6DptkSlPaTcxuLP57gxFPA-88zAzD2A3CvZRGPZxQ2zQ7YxMw1iTCSn3BLkPYAwhjACfsdeW_KMQj-cjnfYhhxt-p7aOLdeNn3PmKxx3xDR3bMeOx4fMDDXnt-amOu9_-omtO1RU737pDoOu_OmUfy6fN4iVZvz2vFo_rpESwWYJYKpTb1NlKVyBUVTqArVYSsSi0FloUmshlcsDaQoUpZVAKq0g4SEshp-xunNt2zWc_XJ_vm77zw8ocldEmlSizQfFRUdn4OuRtVx9d950jpEoJBdoM5HYkvqDuH4w_kz8Kkl0J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687843135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investment Busts, Reputation, and the Temptation to Blend in with the Crowd</title><source>NBER Working Papers</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Strebulaev, Ilya A ; Malenko, Andrey ; Grenadier, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Strebulaev, Ilya A ; Malenko, Andrey ; Grenadier, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>We provide a dynamic model of an industry in which agents strategically time liquidation decisions in an effort to protect their reputations. As in traditional models, agents delay liquidation attempting to signal their quality. However, when the industry faces a common shock that indiscriminately forces liquidation of a subset of projects, agents with bad enough projects choose to liquidate even if their projects are unaffected by the shock. Such "blending in with the crowd" creates an additional incentive to delay liquidation, further amplifying the shock. As a result, even minuscule common shocks can be evidenced by massive liquidations. As agents await common shocks, the industry accumulates "living dead" projects. Surprisingly, the potential for moderate negative common shocks often improves agents values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w17945</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Business failures ; Corporate Finance ; Economic theory ; Entrepreneurs ; Equity funds ; General partners ; Incentives ; Liquidation ; Loans ; Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship ; Recessions ; Reputation management ; Reputations ; Strategic planning ; Studies ; Venture capital</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2012-03, p.17945</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Mar 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-11c613f4a9d7d026dca00f76311bb77272b7eea53095790d14e50c296e2a04c23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strebulaev, Ilya A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malenko, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenadier, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Investment Busts, Reputation, and the Temptation to Blend in with the Crowd</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>We provide a dynamic model of an industry in which agents strategically time liquidation decisions in an effort to protect their reputations. As in traditional models, agents delay liquidation attempting to signal their quality. However, when the industry faces a common shock that indiscriminately forces liquidation of a subset of projects, agents with bad enough projects choose to liquidate even if their projects are unaffected by the shock. Such "blending in with the crowd" creates an additional incentive to delay liquidation, further amplifying the shock. As a result, even minuscule common shocks can be evidenced by massive liquidations. As agents await common shocks, the industry accumulates "living dead" projects. Surprisingly, the potential for moderate negative common shocks often improves agents values.</description><subject>Business failures</subject><subject>Corporate Finance</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Equity funds</subject><subject>General partners</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Liquidation</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Reputation management</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Venture capital</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuA9KFir_gBPC14bndlN9uNoi9ViQZB6DptkSlPaTcxuLP57gxFPA-88zAzD2A3CvZRGPZxQ2zQ7YxMw1iTCSn3BLkPYAwhjACfsdeW_KMQj-cjnfYhhxt-p7aOLdeNn3PmKxx3xDR3bMeOx4fMDDXnt-amOu9_-omtO1RU737pDoOu_OmUfy6fN4iVZvz2vFo_rpESwWYJYKpTb1NlKVyBUVTqArVYSsSi0FloUmshlcsDaQoUpZVAKq0g4SEshp-xunNt2zWc_XJ_vm77zw8ocldEmlSizQfFRUdn4OuRtVx9d950jpEoJBdoM5HYkvqDuH4w_kz8Kkl0J</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Strebulaev, Ilya A</creator><creator>Malenko, Andrey</creator><creator>Grenadier, Steven</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Investment Busts, Reputation, and the Temptation to Blend in with the Crowd</title><author>Strebulaev, Ilya A ; Malenko, Andrey ; Grenadier, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1095-11c613f4a9d7d026dca00f76311bb77272b7eea53095790d14e50c296e2a04c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Business failures</topic><topic>Corporate Finance</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Equity funds</topic><topic>General partners</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Liquidation</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Reputation management</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Venture capital</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strebulaev, Ilya A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malenko, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenadier, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strebulaev, Ilya A</au><au>Malenko, Andrey</au><au>Grenadier, Steven</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Investment Busts, Reputation, and the Temptation to Blend in with the Crowd</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>17945</spage><pages>17945-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>We provide a dynamic model of an industry in which agents strategically time liquidation decisions in an effort to protect their reputations. As in traditional models, agents delay liquidation attempting to signal their quality. However, when the industry faces a common shock that indiscriminately forces liquidation of a subset of projects, agents with bad enough projects choose to liquidate even if their projects are unaffected by the shock. Such "blending in with the crowd" creates an additional incentive to delay liquidation, further amplifying the shock. As a result, even minuscule common shocks can be evidenced by massive liquidations. As agents await common shocks, the industry accumulates "living dead" projects. Surprisingly, the potential for moderate negative common shocks often improves agents values.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w17945</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2012-03, p.17945
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1687843135
source NBER Working Papers; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Business failures
Corporate Finance
Economic theory
Entrepreneurs
Equity funds
General partners
Incentives
Liquidation
Loans
Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship
Recessions
Reputation management
Reputations
Strategic planning
Studies
Venture capital
title Investment Busts, Reputation, and the Temptation to Blend in with the Crowd
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A23%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Investment%20Busts,%20Reputation,%20and%20the%20Temptation%20to%20Blend%20in%20with%20the%20Crowd&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Strebulaev,%20Ilya%20A&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.spage=17945&rft.pages=17945-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w17945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E3713933231%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687843135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w17945&rfr_iscdi=true