An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs 1

The Asp298Asn polymorphism of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in pigs is known to affect economically important traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. We have assessed the possible use of this polymorphism as a molecular marker to perform genetic selection toward lower boar taint level...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.934
Hauptverfasser: Van den Broeke, A, Aluwé, M, Tuyttens, F AM, Ampe, B, Vanhaecke, L, Wauters, J, Janssens, S, Coussé, A, Buys, N, Millet, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 934
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 93
creator Van den Broeke, A
Aluwé, M
Tuyttens, F AM
Ampe, B
Vanhaecke, L
Wauters, J
Janssens, S
Coussé, A
Buys, N
Millet, S
description The Asp298Asn polymorphism of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in pigs is known to affect economically important traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. We have assessed the possible use of this polymorphism as a molecular marker to perform genetic selection toward lower boar taint levels without compromising growth performance and carcass and meat quality in commercial boars and gilts. Homozygous boars and gilts of the AA genotype and GG genotype were compared in an intervention study with a 2 ... 2 design to assess main effects and possible interactions between sex and MC4R genotype. The concentrations of the 3 boar taint compounds androstenone (P = 0.044), skatole (P = 0.049), and indole (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in fat of AA boars compared to GG boars. However, no effect on the sensory analysis of the fat samples could be observed. Between 20 and 115 kg BW, AA pigs showed higher ADFI than GG pigs (P < 0.001). An interaction between genotype and sex was observed for ADG (P = 0.044): AA boars had a significantly higher ADG than GG boars but there was no significant difference between the gilts. Daily lean meat gain tended to be higher in boars compared to gilts (P = 0.051), independent of genotype. Similarly, boars showed higher G:F compared to gilts (P > 0.001), without effect of genotype. Genotype and sex affected several carcass quality parameters but there was no interaction. Pigs of the AA genotype displayed a lower dressing percentage (P = 0.005), lower ham width (P = 0.024), lower muscle thickness (P = 0.011), and higher fat thickness (P > 0.001), resulting in a lower lean meat percentage (P > 0.001) in comparison with GG pigs. Gilts had a significantly higher dressing percentage (P > 0.001), higher muscle thickness (P > 0.001), higher ham width (P > 0.001), and lower ham angle (P > 0.001) compared to boars. Other than the boar taint compounds, meat quality was not affected by genotype. Pork of gilts was darker (P = 0.014) and less exudative during cooking (P > 0.001) and contained more intramuscular fat (P = 0.013). These results indicate that genetic selection against boar taint is possible using this marker. This will also result in lower feed intake and ADG and, consequently, better carcass quality.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1684392281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3700752171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16843922813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzEFrwkAQBeClVGiq_ocBz4Hsxkg8iiheeim9y2pm44rOxJ2J4r83lP6Ant6D9_HeTGYrV-WlXZTvJisKZ_O6tu7DfIqci8K6alll5r4iiKSY7kgamUC0b57Q4JVJNHlFAQwBjyrAAb7W829okVifHcLAD-wTqB8uwFMDHabA6erpiL--TfyI1OYhUpTT0KCLrYCdmFHwF8HpX47NbLv5We_yLvGtR9H9mftEw7S3i3peLp2rbfk_9QIenE5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684392281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs 1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Van den Broeke, A ; Aluwé, M ; Tuyttens, F AM ; Ampe, B ; Vanhaecke, L ; Wauters, J ; Janssens, S ; Coussé, A ; Buys, N ; Millet, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Van den Broeke, A ; Aluwé, M ; Tuyttens, F AM ; Ampe, B ; Vanhaecke, L ; Wauters, J ; Janssens, S ; Coussé, A ; Buys, N ; Millet, S</creatorcontrib><description>The Asp298Asn polymorphism of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in pigs is known to affect economically important traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. We have assessed the possible use of this polymorphism as a molecular marker to perform genetic selection toward lower boar taint levels without compromising growth performance and carcass and meat quality in commercial boars and gilts. Homozygous boars and gilts of the AA genotype and GG genotype were compared in an intervention study with a 2 ... 2 design to assess main effects and possible interactions between sex and MC4R genotype. The concentrations of the 3 boar taint compounds androstenone (P = 0.044), skatole (P = 0.049), and indole (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in fat of AA boars compared to GG boars. However, no effect on the sensory analysis of the fat samples could be observed. Between 20 and 115 kg BW, AA pigs showed higher ADFI than GG pigs (P &lt; 0.001). An interaction between genotype and sex was observed for ADG (P = 0.044): AA boars had a significantly higher ADG than GG boars but there was no significant difference between the gilts. Daily lean meat gain tended to be higher in boars compared to gilts (P = 0.051), independent of genotype. Similarly, boars showed higher G:F compared to gilts (P &gt; 0.001), without effect of genotype. Genotype and sex affected several carcass quality parameters but there was no interaction. Pigs of the AA genotype displayed a lower dressing percentage (P = 0.005), lower ham width (P = 0.024), lower muscle thickness (P = 0.011), and higher fat thickness (P &gt; 0.001), resulting in a lower lean meat percentage (P &gt; 0.001) in comparison with GG pigs. Gilts had a significantly higher dressing percentage (P &gt; 0.001), higher muscle thickness (P &gt; 0.001), higher ham width (P &gt; 0.001), and lower ham angle (P &gt; 0.001) compared to boars. Other than the boar taint compounds, meat quality was not affected by genotype. Pork of gilts was darker (P = 0.014) and less exudative during cooking (P &gt; 0.001) and contained more intramuscular fat (P = 0.013). These results indicate that genetic selection against boar taint is possible using this marker. This will also result in lower feed intake and ADG and, consequently, better carcass quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal sciences ; Feeds ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Hogs ; Meat quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.934</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van den Broeke, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aluwé, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuyttens, F AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampe, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhaecke, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wauters, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coussé, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buys, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millet, S</creatorcontrib><title>An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>The Asp298Asn polymorphism of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in pigs is known to affect economically important traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. We have assessed the possible use of this polymorphism as a molecular marker to perform genetic selection toward lower boar taint levels without compromising growth performance and carcass and meat quality in commercial boars and gilts. Homozygous boars and gilts of the AA genotype and GG genotype were compared in an intervention study with a 2 ... 2 design to assess main effects and possible interactions between sex and MC4R genotype. The concentrations of the 3 boar taint compounds androstenone (P = 0.044), skatole (P = 0.049), and indole (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in fat of AA boars compared to GG boars. However, no effect on the sensory analysis of the fat samples could be observed. Between 20 and 115 kg BW, AA pigs showed higher ADFI than GG pigs (P &lt; 0.001). An interaction between genotype and sex was observed for ADG (P = 0.044): AA boars had a significantly higher ADG than GG boars but there was no significant difference between the gilts. Daily lean meat gain tended to be higher in boars compared to gilts (P = 0.051), independent of genotype. Similarly, boars showed higher G:F compared to gilts (P &gt; 0.001), without effect of genotype. Genotype and sex affected several carcass quality parameters but there was no interaction. Pigs of the AA genotype displayed a lower dressing percentage (P = 0.005), lower ham width (P = 0.024), lower muscle thickness (P = 0.011), and higher fat thickness (P &gt; 0.001), resulting in a lower lean meat percentage (P &gt; 0.001) in comparison with GG pigs. Gilts had a significantly higher dressing percentage (P &gt; 0.001), higher muscle thickness (P &gt; 0.001), higher ham width (P &gt; 0.001), and lower ham angle (P &gt; 0.001) compared to boars. Other than the boar taint compounds, meat quality was not affected by genotype. Pork of gilts was darker (P = 0.014) and less exudative during cooking (P &gt; 0.001) and contained more intramuscular fat (P = 0.013). These results indicate that genetic selection against boar taint is possible using this marker. This will also result in lower feed intake and ADG and, consequently, better carcass quality.</description><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Meat quality</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzEFrwkAQBeClVGiq_ocBz4Hsxkg8iiheeim9y2pm44rOxJ2J4r83lP6Ant6D9_HeTGYrV-WlXZTvJisKZ_O6tu7DfIqci8K6alll5r4iiKSY7kgamUC0b57Q4JVJNHlFAQwBjyrAAb7W829okVifHcLAD-wTqB8uwFMDHabA6erpiL--TfyI1OYhUpTT0KCLrYCdmFHwF8HpX47NbLv5We_yLvGtR9H9mftEw7S3i3peLp2rbfk_9QIenE5g</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Van den Broeke, A</creator><creator>Aluwé, M</creator><creator>Tuyttens, F AM</creator><creator>Ampe, B</creator><creator>Vanhaecke, L</creator><creator>Wauters, J</creator><creator>Janssens, S</creator><creator>Coussé, A</creator><creator>Buys, N</creator><creator>Millet, S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs 1</title><author>Van den Broeke, A ; Aluwé, M ; Tuyttens, F AM ; Ampe, B ; Vanhaecke, L ; Wauters, J ; Janssens, S ; Coussé, A ; Buys, N ; Millet, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16843922813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Meat quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van den Broeke, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aluwé, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuyttens, F AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampe, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhaecke, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wauters, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coussé, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buys, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millet, S</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van den Broeke, A</au><au>Aluwé, M</au><au>Tuyttens, F AM</au><au>Ampe, B</au><au>Vanhaecke, L</au><au>Wauters, J</au><au>Janssens, S</au><au>Coussé, A</au><au>Buys, N</au><au>Millet, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>934</spage><pages>934-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The Asp298Asn polymorphism of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in pigs is known to affect economically important traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. We have assessed the possible use of this polymorphism as a molecular marker to perform genetic selection toward lower boar taint levels without compromising growth performance and carcass and meat quality in commercial boars and gilts. Homozygous boars and gilts of the AA genotype and GG genotype were compared in an intervention study with a 2 ... 2 design to assess main effects and possible interactions between sex and MC4R genotype. The concentrations of the 3 boar taint compounds androstenone (P = 0.044), skatole (P = 0.049), and indole (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in fat of AA boars compared to GG boars. However, no effect on the sensory analysis of the fat samples could be observed. Between 20 and 115 kg BW, AA pigs showed higher ADFI than GG pigs (P &lt; 0.001). An interaction between genotype and sex was observed for ADG (P = 0.044): AA boars had a significantly higher ADG than GG boars but there was no significant difference between the gilts. Daily lean meat gain tended to be higher in boars compared to gilts (P = 0.051), independent of genotype. Similarly, boars showed higher G:F compared to gilts (P &gt; 0.001), without effect of genotype. Genotype and sex affected several carcass quality parameters but there was no interaction. Pigs of the AA genotype displayed a lower dressing percentage (P = 0.005), lower ham width (P = 0.024), lower muscle thickness (P = 0.011), and higher fat thickness (P &gt; 0.001), resulting in a lower lean meat percentage (P &gt; 0.001) in comparison with GG pigs. Gilts had a significantly higher dressing percentage (P &gt; 0.001), higher muscle thickness (P &gt; 0.001), higher ham width (P &gt; 0.001), and lower ham angle (P &gt; 0.001) compared to boars. Other than the boar taint compounds, meat quality was not affected by genotype. Pork of gilts was darker (P = 0.014) and less exudative during cooking (P &gt; 0.001) and contained more intramuscular fat (P = 0.013). These results indicate that genetic selection against boar taint is possible using this marker. This will also result in lower feed intake and ADG and, consequently, better carcass quality.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.934
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1684392281
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal sciences
Feeds
Genotype & phenotype
Hogs
Meat quality
title An intervention study demonstrates effects of MC4R genotype on boar taint and performances of growing-finishing pigs 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A09%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20intervention%20study%20demonstrates%20effects%20of%20MC4R%20genotype%20on%20boar%20taint%20and%20performances%20of%20growing-finishing%20pigs%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Van%20den%20Broeke,%20A&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=934&rft.pages=934-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3700752171%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684392281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true