Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues

Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues

Replies to comments by Mark. A. Stall and Carroll H. Greene III (see record 2015-19945-004) on the original article by Jean Maria Arrigo et al. (see record 2012-30971-004). We respond to four representative issues raised in their preceding rebuttal. We conclude with a call to all stakeholders to gra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Peace and conflict 2015-05, Vol.21 (2), p.282-284
Hauptverfasser: Arrigo, Jean Maria, Eidelson, Roy J, Rockwood, Lawrence P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
American Psychological Association
Government
Human
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Military Psychology
Occupational psychology
Professional Ethics
Psychologists
Psychology
Stakeholders
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 2
container_start_page 282
container_title Peace and conflict
container_volume 21
creator Arrigo, Jean Maria
Eidelson, Roy J
Rockwood, Lawrence P
description Replies to comments by Mark. A. Stall and Carroll H. Greene III (see record 2015-19945-004) on the original article by Jean Maria Arrigo et al. (see record 2012-30971-004). We respond to four representative issues raised in their preceding rebuttal. We conclude with a call to all stakeholders to grapple with foundational issues that they evaded. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pac0000109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1684380319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3699785951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-8257267815c7ff552801bc8bedcf9649e1bdabc2d3d6023e01f83e07c32a39813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKcvfoKCb0o1l7RN4tsYzg0GE9HnkKbp1lGbmqRCv70ZU3z0Hu7-Dz_ujh9C14DvAVP20CuNYwEWJ2gCOSUpE5k4jRkznoIAcY4uvN9HJiMAE7ScVV_GeeUa1Sab3jgVGtvF_OJHvbOt3Y6PyasJg-uabpsEm4SdSRZ26KpfcuX9YPwlOqtV683Vz5yi98XT23yZrjfPq_lsnSpKaEg5yRkpGIdcs7rOc8IxlJqXptK1KDJhoKxUqUlFqwITajDUPHamKVFUcKBTdHPc2zv7Ge8GubfxuXhSQsEzyjEF8Q-FSTREcaRuj5R21ntnatm75kO5UQKWB5_yz2eE746w6pXsox3lQqNb4_XgnOnCgZUEJJGEE_oNYLx2YA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680201030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Arrigo, Jean Maria ; Eidelson, Roy J ; Rockwood, Lawrence P</creator><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Jean Maria ; Eidelson, Roy J ; Rockwood, Lawrence P ; Moghaddam, Fathali</creatorcontrib><description>Replies to comments by Mark. A. Stall and Carroll H. Greene III (see record 2015-19945-004) on the original article by Jean Maria Arrigo et al. (see record 2012-30971-004). We respond to four representative issues raised in their preceding rebuttal. We conclude with a call to all stakeholders to grapple with foundational issues that they evaded. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pac0000109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springfield: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>American Psychological Association ; Government ; Human ; Industrial and Organizational Psychology ; Military Psychology ; Occupational psychology ; Professional Ethics ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Peace and conflict, 2015-05, Vol.21 (2), p.282-284</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-8257267815c7ff552801bc8bedcf9649e1bdabc2d3d6023e01f83e07c32a39813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Jean Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eidelson, Roy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockwood, Lawrence P</creatorcontrib><title>Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues</title><title>Peace and conflict</title><description>Replies to comments by Mark. A. Stall and Carroll H. Greene III (see record 2015-19945-004) on the original article by Jean Maria Arrigo et al. (see record 2012-30971-004). We respond to four representative issues raised in their preceding rebuttal. We conclude with a call to all stakeholders to grapple with foundational issues that they evaded. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>American Psychological Association</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</subject><subject>Military Psychology</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Professional Ethics</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>1078-1919</issn><issn>1532-7949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKcvfoKCb0o1l7RN4tsYzg0GE9HnkKbp1lGbmqRCv70ZU3z0Hu7-Dz_ujh9C14DvAVP20CuNYwEWJ2gCOSUpE5k4jRkznoIAcY4uvN9HJiMAE7ScVV_GeeUa1Sab3jgVGtvF_OJHvbOt3Y6PyasJg-uabpsEm4SdSRZ26KpfcuX9YPwlOqtV683Vz5yi98XT23yZrjfPq_lsnSpKaEg5yRkpGIdcs7rOc8IxlJqXptK1KDJhoKxUqUlFqwITajDUPHamKVFUcKBTdHPc2zv7Ge8GubfxuXhSQsEzyjEF8Q-FSTREcaRuj5R21ntnatm75kO5UQKWB5_yz2eE746w6pXsox3lQqNb4_XgnOnCgZUEJJGEE_oNYLx2YA</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Arrigo, Jean Maria</creator><creator>Eidelson, Roy J</creator><creator>Rockwood, Lawrence P</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues</title><author>Arrigo, Jean Maria ; Eidelson, Roy J ; Rockwood, Lawrence P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-8257267815c7ff552801bc8bedcf9649e1bdabc2d3d6023e01f83e07c32a39813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>American Psychological Association</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</topic><topic>Military Psychology</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Professional Ethics</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Jean Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eidelson, Roy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockwood, Lawrence P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arrigo, Jean Maria</au><au>Eidelson, Roy J</au><au>Rockwood, Lawrence P</au><au>Moghaddam, Fathali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues</atitle><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>282-284</pages><issn>1078-1919</issn><eissn>1532-7949</eissn><abstract>Replies to comments by Mark. A. Stall and Carroll H. Greene III (see record 2015-19945-004) on the original article by Jean Maria Arrigo et al. (see record 2012-30971-004). We respond to four representative issues raised in their preceding rebuttal. We conclude with a call to all stakeholders to grapple with foundational issues that they evaded. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><cop>Springfield</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/pac0000109</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1919
ispartof Peace and conflict, 2015-05, Vol.21 (2), p.282-284
issn 1078-1919
1532-7949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1684380319
source APA PsycARTICLES; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects American Psychological Association
Government
Human
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Military Psychology
Occupational psychology
Professional Ethics
Psychologists
Psychology
Stakeholders
title Adversarial Operational Psychology: Returning to the Foundational Issues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adversarial%20Operational%20Psychology:%20Returning%20to%20the%20Foundational%20Issues&rft.jtitle=Peace%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Arrigo,%20Jean%20Maria&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=282-284&rft.issn=1078-1919&rft.eissn=1532-7949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pac0000109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3699785951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680201030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true