FAMILY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES
This paper has operationalized family systems theory to explicate the interfacing dynamics between family dissolution and child custody disputes. The authors suggest that clinical assessment and intervention in these matters which focus solely on individual and marital, or child dimensions, fail to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marital and family therapy 1983-10, Vol.9 (4), p.343-353 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 353 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 343 |
| container_title | Journal of marital and family therapy |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Everett, Craig A. Volgy, Sandra S. |
| description | This paper has operationalized family systems theory to explicate the interfacing dynamics between family dissolution and child custody disputes. The authors suggest that clinical assessment and intervention in these matters which focus solely on individual and marital, or child dimensions, fail to recognize the powerful influences of systemic family process.
A family assessment model, evolved from clinical work with over 200 court‐referred custody cases, is described. The model involves a cross‐sex therapy team with each member responsible for a specific family subsystem. The role of each therapist and the functioning of the team is outlined. Specific criteria for determining custody recommendations are identified based on patterns of family process and dissolution. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01522.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1683830523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1683830523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-f5b214fcc6219584614da3ac0e5c8226be1486643cf0a237a588b04831dada093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1PglAYx89abZn1HVhdNui8c-imGYJSiG7gym6eHRA2zdJAl377YDjve27-F8__ZfshdEuwRep7WFrEFtTEEkuLOIpZ2xQTQam1P0Od0-scdTBxuMlt-n6JrqpqiTGW3FEddO_3RkE4M3px7MXxyIsSI4gMdxiEfcOdxsm4PzP6QTyZJl58jS4Kvarym6N20dT3EndohuNB4PZCM2OKMbMQKSW8yDJJiSMUl4TPNdMZzkWmKJVpTriSkrOswJoyWwulUswVI3M919hhXXTX9m7K9c8ur7awXO_K73oSiFT1BhaU1a7H1pWV66oq8wI25eJLlwcgGBo4sISGADQEoIEDRziwr8NPbfh3scoP_0jCy8hPGG_mzbZhUW3z_alBl58gbWYLeIsGMJHP_kckXyFifyxddXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683830523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FAMILY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Everett, Craig A. ; Volgy, Sandra S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Everett, Craig A. ; Volgy, Sandra S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper has operationalized family systems theory to explicate the interfacing dynamics between family dissolution and child custody disputes. The authors suggest that clinical assessment and intervention in these matters which focus solely on individual and marital, or child dimensions, fail to recognize the powerful influences of systemic family process.
A family assessment model, evolved from clinical work with over 200 court‐referred custody cases, is described. The model involves a cross‐sex therapy team with each member responsible for a specific family subsystem. The role of each therapist and the functioning of the team is outlined. Specific criteria for determining custody recommendations are identified based on patterns of family process and dissolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-472X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-0606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01522.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of marital and family therapy, 1983-10, Vol.9 (4), p.343-353</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-f5b214fcc6219584614da3ac0e5c8226be1486643cf0a237a588b04831dada093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-f5b214fcc6219584614da3ac0e5c8226be1486643cf0a237a588b04831dada093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1752-0606.1983.tb01522.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1752-0606.1983.tb01522.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Everett, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volgy, Sandra S.</creatorcontrib><title>FAMILY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES</title><title>Journal of marital and family therapy</title><description>This paper has operationalized family systems theory to explicate the interfacing dynamics between family dissolution and child custody disputes. The authors suggest that clinical assessment and intervention in these matters which focus solely on individual and marital, or child dimensions, fail to recognize the powerful influences of systemic family process.
A family assessment model, evolved from clinical work with over 200 court‐referred custody cases, is described. The model involves a cross‐sex therapy team with each member responsible for a specific family subsystem. The role of each therapist and the functioning of the team is outlined. Specific criteria for determining custody recommendations are identified based on patterns of family process and dissolution.</description><issn>0194-472X</issn><issn>1752-0606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1PglAYx89abZn1HVhdNui8c-imGYJSiG7gym6eHRA2zdJAl377YDjve27-F8__ZfshdEuwRep7WFrEFtTEEkuLOIpZ2xQTQam1P0Od0-scdTBxuMlt-n6JrqpqiTGW3FEddO_3RkE4M3px7MXxyIsSI4gMdxiEfcOdxsm4PzP6QTyZJl58jS4Kvarym6N20dT3EndohuNB4PZCM2OKMbMQKSW8yDJJiSMUl4TPNdMZzkWmKJVpTriSkrOswJoyWwulUswVI3M919hhXXTX9m7K9c8ur7awXO_K73oSiFT1BhaU1a7H1pWV66oq8wI25eJLlwcgGBo4sISGADQEoIEDRziwr8NPbfh3scoP_0jCy8hPGG_mzbZhUW3z_alBl58gbWYLeIsGMJHP_kckXyFifyxddXE</recordid><startdate>198310</startdate><enddate>198310</enddate><creator>Everett, Craig A.</creator><creator>Volgy, Sandra S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>[Upland, Calif.] :American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SPJJO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198310</creationdate><title>FAMILY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES</title><author>Everett, Craig A. ; Volgy, Sandra S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-f5b214fcc6219584614da3ac0e5c8226be1486643cf0a237a588b04831dada093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Everett, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volgy, Sandra S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 48</collection><jtitle>Journal of marital and family therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Everett, Craig A.</au><au>Volgy, Sandra S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FAMILY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marital and family therapy</jtitle><date>1983-10</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>343-353</pages><issn>0194-472X</issn><eissn>1752-0606</eissn><abstract>This paper has operationalized family systems theory to explicate the interfacing dynamics between family dissolution and child custody disputes. The authors suggest that clinical assessment and intervention in these matters which focus solely on individual and marital, or child dimensions, fail to recognize the powerful influences of systemic family process.
A family assessment model, evolved from clinical work with over 200 court‐referred custody cases, is described. The model involves a cross‐sex therapy team with each member responsible for a specific family subsystem. The role of each therapist and the functioning of the team is outlined. Specific criteria for determining custody recommendations are identified based on patterns of family process and dissolution.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01522.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0194-472X |
| ispartof | Journal of marital and family therapy, 1983-10, Vol.9 (4), p.343-353 |
| issn | 0194-472X 1752-0606 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1683830523 |
| source | Wiley Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| title | FAMILY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A40%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FAMILY%20ASSESSMENT%20IN%20CHILD%20CUSTODY%20DISPUTES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marital%20and%20family%20therapy&rft.au=Everett,%20Craig%20A.&rft.date=1983-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=343-353&rft.issn=0194-472X&rft.eissn=1752-0606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01522.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1683830523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683830523&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |