Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters
One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Labour history (Canberra) 1998-05 (74), p.40-53 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 53 |
---|---|
container_issue | 74 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | Labour history (Canberra) |
container_volume | |
creator | Kent, David Townsend, Norma |
description | One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/27516552 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1683809581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/apaft.536160617779446</informt_id><jstor_id>27516552</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27516552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2446-e46bac015c02442e5c6964b03e0243a15ab3c859dc589fbf0c4667151f9de55b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRyiI4Es1f5q08W0UncJEYfoc0jTdUrqmJhmyb29mFXwRny7n8rvn3nsAOEfwGhOY3-CcIkYpPgATVBCeEkj4IZhAiEnKeIaPwYn3LYSIY5hPwHxpNzqZ-UGr4BPbJKXtbG9klzxJ54xc6dtklpTS62QZtvVuj4R1FB-mXyUvzgbtg3b-FBw1svP67LtOwdv93Wv5kC6e54_lbJEqnGUs1RmrpIKIKhg11lQxzrIKEh01kYjKiqiC8lrRgjdVA1XGWI4oanitKa3IFFyMvoOz79u4W7R26_q4UiBWkAJyWqBIXY2UctZ7pxsxOLORbicQFPuYxE9MEeUj6jYmCGW7LiZhbO9bGfweJwQxIQfZBEEJQwwylOc5j9_E2fmv2ZHxWjq1FqZv7FfXupWorfnX6XJ0an2w7u9rPwECyIyu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683809581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kent, David ; Townsend, Norma</creator><creatorcontrib>Kent, David ; Townsend, Norma</creatorcontrib><description>One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-6942</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-3039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/27516552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Liverpool, United Kingdom: Australian Society for the Study of Labour History</publisher><subject>Bachelors ; Children ; Cohabitation ; Governors ; Marriage ; Men ; Political protests ; Single women ; Widows ; Wives</subject><ispartof>Labour history (Canberra), 1998-05 (74), p.40-53</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2446-e46bac015c02442e5c6964b03e0243a15ab3c859dc589fbf0c4667151f9de55b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27516552$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27516552$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kent, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Norma</creatorcontrib><title>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</title><title>Labour history (Canberra)</title><description>One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.</description><subject>Bachelors</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Single women</subject><subject>Widows</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0023-6942</issn><issn>1839-3039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRyiI4Es1f5q08W0UncJEYfoc0jTdUrqmJhmyb29mFXwRny7n8rvn3nsAOEfwGhOY3-CcIkYpPgATVBCeEkj4IZhAiEnKeIaPwYn3LYSIY5hPwHxpNzqZ-UGr4BPbJKXtbG9klzxJ54xc6dtklpTS62QZtvVuj4R1FB-mXyUvzgbtg3b-FBw1svP67LtOwdv93Wv5kC6e54_lbJEqnGUs1RmrpIKIKhg11lQxzrIKEh01kYjKiqiC8lrRgjdVA1XGWI4oanitKa3IFFyMvoOz79u4W7R26_q4UiBWkAJyWqBIXY2UctZ7pxsxOLORbicQFPuYxE9MEeUj6jYmCGW7LiZhbO9bGfweJwQxIQfZBEEJQwwylOc5j9_E2fmv2ZHxWjq1FqZv7FfXupWorfnX6XJ0an2w7u9rPwECyIyu</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Kent, David</creator><creator>Townsend, Norma</creator><general>Australian Society for the Study of Labour History</general><general>Liverpool University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</title><author>Kent, David ; Townsend, Norma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2446-e46bac015c02442e5c6964b03e0243a15ab3c859dc589fbf0c4667151f9de55b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Bachelors</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Single women</topic><topic>Widows</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kent, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Norma</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Labour history (Canberra)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kent, David</au><au>Townsend, Norma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</atitle><jtitle>Labour history (Canberra)</jtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><issue>74</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>40-53</pages><issn>0023-6942</issn><eissn>1839-3039</eissn><abstract>One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.</abstract><cop>Liverpool, United Kingdom</cop><pub>Australian Society for the Study of Labour History</pub><doi>10.2307/27516552</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-6942 |
ispartof | Labour history (Canberra), 1998-05 (74), p.40-53 |
issn | 0023-6942 1839-3039 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1683809581 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Bachelors Children Cohabitation Governors Marriage Men Political protests Single women Widows Wives |
title | Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Aspects%20of%20Colonial%20Marriage:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20the%20Swing%20Protesters&rft.jtitle=Labour%20history%20(Canberra)&rft.au=Kent,%20David&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.issue=74&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=40-53&rft.issn=0023-6942&rft.eissn=1839-3039&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/27516552&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27516552%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683809581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/apaft.536160617779446&rft_jstor_id=27516552&rfr_iscdi=true |