Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters

One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Labour history (Canberra) 1998-05 (74), p.40-53
Hauptverfasser: Kent, David, Townsend, Norma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 74
container_start_page 40
container_title Labour history (Canberra)
container_volume
creator Kent, David
Townsend, Norma
description One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/27516552
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1683809581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/apaft.536160617779446</informt_id><jstor_id>27516552</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27516552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2446-e46bac015c02442e5c6964b03e0243a15ab3c859dc589fbf0c4667151f9de55b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRyiI4Es1f5q08W0UncJEYfoc0jTdUrqmJhmyb29mFXwRny7n8rvn3nsAOEfwGhOY3-CcIkYpPgATVBCeEkj4IZhAiEnKeIaPwYn3LYSIY5hPwHxpNzqZ-UGr4BPbJKXtbG9klzxJ54xc6dtklpTS62QZtvVuj4R1FB-mXyUvzgbtg3b-FBw1svP67LtOwdv93Wv5kC6e54_lbJEqnGUs1RmrpIKIKhg11lQxzrIKEh01kYjKiqiC8lrRgjdVA1XGWI4oanitKa3IFFyMvoOz79u4W7R26_q4UiBWkAJyWqBIXY2UctZ7pxsxOLORbicQFPuYxE9MEeUj6jYmCGW7LiZhbO9bGfweJwQxIQfZBEEJQwwylOc5j9_E2fmv2ZHxWjq1FqZv7FfXupWorfnX6XJ0an2w7u9rPwECyIyu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683809581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kent, David ; Townsend, Norma</creator><creatorcontrib>Kent, David ; Townsend, Norma</creatorcontrib><description>One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-6942</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-3039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/27516552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Liverpool, United Kingdom: Australian Society for the Study of Labour History</publisher><subject>Bachelors ; Children ; Cohabitation ; Governors ; Marriage ; Men ; Political protests ; Single women ; Widows ; Wives</subject><ispartof>Labour history (Canberra), 1998-05 (74), p.40-53</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2446-e46bac015c02442e5c6964b03e0243a15ab3c859dc589fbf0c4667151f9de55b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27516552$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27516552$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kent, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Norma</creatorcontrib><title>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</title><title>Labour history (Canberra)</title><description>One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.</description><subject>Bachelors</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Single women</subject><subject>Widows</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0023-6942</issn><issn>1839-3039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRyiI4Es1f5q08W0UncJEYfoc0jTdUrqmJhmyb29mFXwRny7n8rvn3nsAOEfwGhOY3-CcIkYpPgATVBCeEkj4IZhAiEnKeIaPwYn3LYSIY5hPwHxpNzqZ-UGr4BPbJKXtbG9klzxJ54xc6dtklpTS62QZtvVuj4R1FB-mXyUvzgbtg3b-FBw1svP67LtOwdv93Wv5kC6e54_lbJEqnGUs1RmrpIKIKhg11lQxzrIKEh01kYjKiqiC8lrRgjdVA1XGWI4oanitKa3IFFyMvoOz79u4W7R26_q4UiBWkAJyWqBIXY2UctZ7pxsxOLORbicQFPuYxE9MEeUj6jYmCGW7LiZhbO9bGfweJwQxIQfZBEEJQwwylOc5j9_E2fmv2ZHxWjq1FqZv7FfXupWorfnX6XJ0an2w7u9rPwECyIyu</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Kent, David</creator><creator>Townsend, Norma</creator><general>Australian Society for the Study of Labour History</general><general>Liverpool University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</title><author>Kent, David ; Townsend, Norma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2446-e46bac015c02442e5c6964b03e0243a15ab3c859dc589fbf0c4667151f9de55b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Bachelors</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Single women</topic><topic>Widows</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kent, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Norma</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Labour history (Canberra)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kent, David</au><au>Townsend, Norma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters</atitle><jtitle>Labour history (Canberra)</jtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><issue>74</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>40-53</pages><issn>0023-6942</issn><eissn>1839-3039</eissn><abstract>One of the most important but least understood aspects of colonial society was the process of marriage involving the lower ranks. Legal marriage was the only officially recognised form of cohabitation. Those who were free were subject to the same scrutiny as convicts if they were marrying a convict or ticket-of-leave holder. Common-law relationships were not common and usually arose because of a woman's marriage in the colony. Women who usually held the whip hand, choosing men with skills or some capital, cannot be ignored in a discussion of marriage. Although the Swing protesters fared slightly better than others in the marriage stakes (33%) they were not as attractive marriage partners as we had expected. Few achieved material success and their average age at their colonial marriage was far higher than colonial men as a whole. Various stratagems to outwit the bureaucracy reveal the extent to which Swing men valued matrimony.</abstract><cop>Liverpool, United Kingdom</cop><pub>Australian Society for the Study of Labour History</pub><doi>10.2307/27516552</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-6942
ispartof Labour history (Canberra), 1998-05 (74), p.40-53
issn 0023-6942
1839-3039
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1683809581
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Bachelors
Children
Cohabitation
Governors
Marriage
Men
Political protests
Single women
Widows
Wives
title Some Aspects of Colonial Marriage: A Case Study of the Swing Protesters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Aspects%20of%20Colonial%20Marriage:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20the%20Swing%20Protesters&rft.jtitle=Labour%20history%20(Canberra)&rft.au=Kent,%20David&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.issue=74&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=40-53&rft.issn=0023-6942&rft.eissn=1839-3039&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/27516552&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27516552%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683809581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/apaft.536160617779446&rft_jstor_id=27516552&rfr_iscdi=true