Ya shouldn'ta couldn'ta wouldn'ta
In a recent issue of this journal, Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno presented a counterfactual theory of essence, designed to get around Kit Fine's influential objections to the standard modal account of essence. I argue that Brogaard and Salerno's theory does not avoid Fine's objection...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2015-06, Vol.192 (6), p.1909-1921 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1921 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1909 |
| container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
| container_volume | 192 |
| creator | Steward, Stephen |
| description | In a recent issue of this journal, Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno presented a counterfactual theory of essence, designed to get around Kit Fine's influential objections to the standard modal account of essence. I argue that Brogaard and Salerno's theory does not avoid Fine's objections. Then I propose a sequence of variations on their theory, and argue that none of them succeed either. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-015-0663-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1683724888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24704533</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24704533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b5625be90d06629fa1d08d0ae5214daae254450af652ef1292b4e730f840d0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtLxEAUhQdRMK7-AAthxcJq9N55p5RlfcCCjRZWwySZqGFN1pkEyb93luhiZXVvcb5z4CPkFOEKAfR1RGQsp4CSglKcjnskQ6k5hVyJfZIB8JxqI_UhOYqxAUBUAjJy_uLm8a0b1lV72bt5ufu-fr9jclC7dfQnP3dGnm-XT4t7unq8e1jcrGjJuelpIRWThc-hSvssrx1WYCpwXjIUlXOeSSEkuFpJ5mtkOSuE1xxqIxJSOj4jF1PvJnSfg4-9bbohtGnSojJcM2GMSSmcUmXoYgy-tpvw_uHCaBHs1oSdTNhkwm5N2DExbGJiyravPvxp_gc6m6Am9l3YrTChQUjO-TcoqWiJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683724888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ya shouldn'ta couldn'ta wouldn'ta</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Steward, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Steward, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent issue of this journal, Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno presented a counterfactual theory of essence, designed to get around Kit Fine's influential objections to the standard modal account of essence. I argue that Brogaard and Salerno's theory does not avoid Fine's objections. Then I propose a sequence of variations on their theory, and argue that none of them succeed either.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0663-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Education ; Epistemology ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2015-06, Vol.192 (6), p.1909-1921</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b5625be90d06629fa1d08d0ae5214daae254450af652ef1292b4e730f840d0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b5625be90d06629fa1d08d0ae5214daae254450af652ef1292b4e730f840d0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24704533$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24704533$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steward, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Ya shouldn'ta couldn'ta wouldn'ta</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>In a recent issue of this journal, Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno presented a counterfactual theory of essence, designed to get around Kit Fine's influential objections to the standard modal account of essence. I argue that Brogaard and Salerno's theory does not avoid Fine's objections. Then I propose a sequence of variations on their theory, and argue that none of them succeed either.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtLxEAUhQdRMK7-AAthxcJq9N55p5RlfcCCjRZWwySZqGFN1pkEyb93luhiZXVvcb5z4CPkFOEKAfR1RGQsp4CSglKcjnskQ6k5hVyJfZIB8JxqI_UhOYqxAUBUAjJy_uLm8a0b1lV72bt5ufu-fr9jclC7dfQnP3dGnm-XT4t7unq8e1jcrGjJuelpIRWThc-hSvssrx1WYCpwXjIUlXOeSSEkuFpJ5mtkOSuE1xxqIxJSOj4jF1PvJnSfg4-9bbohtGnSojJcM2GMSSmcUmXoYgy-tpvw_uHCaBHs1oSdTNhkwm5N2DExbGJiyravPvxp_gc6m6Am9l3YrTChQUjO-TcoqWiJ</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Steward, Stephen</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Ya shouldn'ta couldn'ta wouldn'ta</title><author>Steward, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b5625be90d06629fa1d08d0ae5214daae254450af652ef1292b4e730f840d0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steward, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steward, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ya shouldn'ta couldn'ta wouldn'ta</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>192</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1909</spage><epage>1921</epage><pages>1909-1921</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>In a recent issue of this journal, Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno presented a counterfactual theory of essence, designed to get around Kit Fine's influential objections to the standard modal account of essence. I argue that Brogaard and Salerno's theory does not avoid Fine's objections. Then I propose a sequence of variations on their theory, and argue that none of them succeed either.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-015-0663-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
| ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2015-06, Vol.192 (6), p.1909-1921 |
| issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1683724888 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Analysis Education Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science |
| title | Ya shouldn'ta couldn'ta wouldn'ta |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A08%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ya%20shouldn'ta%20couldn'ta%20wouldn'ta&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Steward,%20Stephen&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=192&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1909&rft.epage=1921&rft.pages=1909-1921&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-015-0663-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24704533%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683724888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24704533&rfr_iscdi=true |