A randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover trial comparing the 24-h FEV1profile for once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting [beta]2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
This randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover, Phase II study compared the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) profile of alternative dosing frequencies of two total daily doses of olodaterol (5 and 10 [micro]g) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory medicine 2015-05, Vol.109 (5), p.606 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 606 |
container_title | Respiratory medicine |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Joos, Guy F Aumann, Joseph-Leon Coeck, Carl Korducki, Lawrence Hamilton, Alan L Kunz, Christina Aalbers, René |
description | This randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover, Phase II study compared the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) profile of alternative dosing frequencies of two total daily doses of olodaterol (5 and 10 [micro]g) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Patients received olodaterol 2 [micro]g twice daily (BID), 5 [micro]g BID, 5 [micro]g once daily (QD) and 10 [micro]g QD in a randomised sequence over 3-week treatment periods. Co-primary end points were FEV1area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) and area under the curve from 12 to 24 h (AUC12-24) responses. Additional lung-function responses, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed. Results 47 patients were treated. All olodaterol doses provided significant increases in FEV1versus baseline (p < 0.001) and FEV1time profiles were nearly identical for olodaterol 5 and 10 [micro]g QD. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD demonstrated improved FEV1AUC0-12and similar AUC12-24versus 2 [micro]g BID. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD showed slightly increased FEV1AUC0-12but lower AUC12-24compared to 5 [micro]g BID. Bronchodilation over 24 h was similar for olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD and BID. All doses were well tolerated. Conclusions Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD is efficacious in COPD, with a superior bronchodilatory profile compared to 2 [micro]g BID, which is close to the same total daily dose, and a similar degree of bronchodilation over 24 h compared with double the daily dose (administered as 10 [micro]g QD or 5 [micro]g BID). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00846768. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.02.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1681951066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3689470291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16819510663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNT0tOwzAQtRBIlM8FWI3ENg52mkR0iVArDlCxQaiaJNPGleMJttOqh-YOGIFYsxrNvHk_Ie60yrXS9cM-9wN1eaF0lasiV6o6EzNdzQs5V3V5LmZqUZWy1lpfiqsQ9kqpRVmqmfh8Ao-u48EE6jLoeGosycYal7YtT14e8ZRB6zkEPpCH6A1aaHkY0Ru3g9gTFKXsYbV81aPnrbGUiB7YtSQ7NPYEiRemAPFo_k7RE8aBXISjiT2w5Q4jebYZILjkZMGy20ls47fLW0MR3wuJO3YmxAyMgxGjSQLhR6HtfYJa4CZEPyXWgWCc7MAO_Qm6VA8D3YiLLdpAt7_zWtyvluvnF5mCf0wU4mafKrsEbXT9qBeVVnU9_9_XF4T4gIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1681951066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover trial comparing the 24-h FEV1profile for once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting [beta]2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Joos, Guy F ; Aumann, Joseph-Leon ; Coeck, Carl ; Korducki, Lawrence ; Hamilton, Alan L ; Kunz, Christina ; Aalbers, René</creator><creatorcontrib>Joos, Guy F ; Aumann, Joseph-Leon ; Coeck, Carl ; Korducki, Lawrence ; Hamilton, Alan L ; Kunz, Christina ; Aalbers, René</creatorcontrib><description>This randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover, Phase II study compared the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) profile of alternative dosing frequencies of two total daily doses of olodaterol (5 and 10 [micro]g) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Patients received olodaterol 2 [micro]g twice daily (BID), 5 [micro]g BID, 5 [micro]g once daily (QD) and 10 [micro]g QD in a randomised sequence over 3-week treatment periods. Co-primary end points were FEV1area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) and area under the curve from 12 to 24 h (AUC12-24) responses. Additional lung-function responses, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed. Results 47 patients were treated. All olodaterol doses provided significant increases in FEV1versus baseline (p < 0.001) and FEV1time profiles were nearly identical for olodaterol 5 and 10 [micro]g QD. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD demonstrated improved FEV1AUC0-12and similar AUC12-24versus 2 [micro]g BID. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD showed slightly increased FEV1AUC0-12but lower AUC12-24compared to 5 [micro]g BID. Bronchodilation over 24 h was similar for olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD and BID. All doses were well tolerated. Conclusions Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD is efficacious in COPD, with a superior bronchodilatory profile compared to 2 [micro]g BID, which is close to the same total daily dose, and a similar degree of bronchodilation over 24 h compared with double the daily dose (administered as 10 [micro]g QD or 5 [micro]g BID). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00846768.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.02.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Asthma ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Drug dosages ; Drug therapy ; Patients ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 2015-05, Vol.109 (5), p.606</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joos, Guy F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aumann, Joseph-Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coeck, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korducki, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Alan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalbers, René</creatorcontrib><title>A randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover trial comparing the 24-h FEV1profile for once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting [beta]2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><description>This randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover, Phase II study compared the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) profile of alternative dosing frequencies of two total daily doses of olodaterol (5 and 10 [micro]g) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Patients received olodaterol 2 [micro]g twice daily (BID), 5 [micro]g BID, 5 [micro]g once daily (QD) and 10 [micro]g QD in a randomised sequence over 3-week treatment periods. Co-primary end points were FEV1area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) and area under the curve from 12 to 24 h (AUC12-24) responses. Additional lung-function responses, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed. Results 47 patients were treated. All olodaterol doses provided significant increases in FEV1versus baseline (p < 0.001) and FEV1time profiles were nearly identical for olodaterol 5 and 10 [micro]g QD. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD demonstrated improved FEV1AUC0-12and similar AUC12-24versus 2 [micro]g BID. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD showed slightly increased FEV1AUC0-12but lower AUC12-24compared to 5 [micro]g BID. Bronchodilation over 24 h was similar for olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD and BID. All doses were well tolerated. Conclusions Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD is efficacious in COPD, with a superior bronchodilatory profile compared to 2 [micro]g BID, which is close to the same total daily dose, and a similar degree of bronchodilation over 24 h compared with double the daily dose (administered as 10 [micro]g QD or 5 [micro]g BID). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00846768.</description><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNT0tOwzAQtRBIlM8FWI3ENg52mkR0iVArDlCxQaiaJNPGleMJttOqh-YOGIFYsxrNvHk_Ie60yrXS9cM-9wN1eaF0lasiV6o6EzNdzQs5V3V5LmZqUZWy1lpfiqsQ9kqpRVmqmfh8Ao-u48EE6jLoeGosycYal7YtT14e8ZRB6zkEPpCH6A1aaHkY0Ru3g9gTFKXsYbV81aPnrbGUiB7YtSQ7NPYEiRemAPFo_k7RE8aBXISjiT2w5Q4jebYZILjkZMGy20ls47fLW0MR3wuJO3YmxAyMgxGjSQLhR6HtfYJa4CZEPyXWgWCc7MAO_Qm6VA8D3YiLLdpAt7_zWtyvluvnF5mCf0wU4mafKrsEbXT9qBeVVnU9_9_XF4T4gIk</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Joos, Guy F</creator><creator>Aumann, Joseph-Leon</creator><creator>Coeck, Carl</creator><creator>Korducki, Lawrence</creator><creator>Hamilton, Alan L</creator><creator>Kunz, Christina</creator><creator>Aalbers, René</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>A randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover trial comparing the 24-h FEV1profile for once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting [beta]2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><author>Joos, Guy F ; Aumann, Joseph-Leon ; Coeck, Carl ; Korducki, Lawrence ; Hamilton, Alan L ; Kunz, Christina ; Aalbers, René</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16819510663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joos, Guy F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aumann, Joseph-Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coeck, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korducki, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Alan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aalbers, René</creatorcontrib><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joos, Guy F</au><au>Aumann, Joseph-Leon</au><au>Coeck, Carl</au><au>Korducki, Lawrence</au><au>Hamilton, Alan L</au><au>Kunz, Christina</au><au>Aalbers, René</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover trial comparing the 24-h FEV1profile for once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting [beta]2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>606</spage><pages>606-</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>This randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover, Phase II study compared the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) profile of alternative dosing frequencies of two total daily doses of olodaterol (5 and 10 [micro]g) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Patients received olodaterol 2 [micro]g twice daily (BID), 5 [micro]g BID, 5 [micro]g once daily (QD) and 10 [micro]g QD in a randomised sequence over 3-week treatment periods. Co-primary end points were FEV1area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) and area under the curve from 12 to 24 h (AUC12-24) responses. Additional lung-function responses, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed. Results 47 patients were treated. All olodaterol doses provided significant increases in FEV1versus baseline (p < 0.001) and FEV1time profiles were nearly identical for olodaterol 5 and 10 [micro]g QD. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD demonstrated improved FEV1AUC0-12and similar AUC12-24versus 2 [micro]g BID. Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD showed slightly increased FEV1AUC0-12but lower AUC12-24compared to 5 [micro]g BID. Bronchodilation over 24 h was similar for olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD and BID. All doses were well tolerated. Conclusions Olodaterol 5 [micro]g QD is efficacious in COPD, with a superior bronchodilatory profile compared to 2 [micro]g BID, which is close to the same total daily dose, and a similar degree of bronchodilation over 24 h compared with double the daily dose (administered as 10 [micro]g QD or 5 [micro]g BID). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00846768.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rmed.2015.02.005</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-6111 |
ispartof | Respiratory medicine, 2015-05, Vol.109 (5), p.606 |
issn | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1681951066 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Asthma Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Drug dosages Drug therapy Patients Urine |
title | A randomised, double-blind, four-way, crossover trial comparing the 24-h FEV1profile for once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with olodaterol, a novel long-acting [beta]2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A43%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomised,%20double-blind,%20four-way,%20crossover%20trial%20comparing%20the%2024-h%20FEV1profile%20for%20once-daily%20versus%20twice-daily%20treatment%20with%20olodaterol,%20a%20novel%20long-acting%20%5Bbeta%5D2-agonist,%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20obstructive%20pulmonary%20disease&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=Joos,%20Guy%20F&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=606&rft.pages=606-&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rmed.2015.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3689470291%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1681951066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |