Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles

Large males of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus (Cantharidae), exercise choice for larger females in the field and laboratory. The length of copulation limits the maximum mating rate to once per day. This may afford more competitive males the opportunity to reject females early in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2015-06, Vol.69 (6), p.883-894
Hauptverfasser: McLain, Denson K., Pratt, Ann E., Shure, Donald J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 894
container_issue 6
container_start_page 883
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 69
creator McLain, Denson K.
Pratt, Ann E.
Shure, Donald J.
description Large males of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus (Cantharidae), exercise choice for larger females in the field and laboratory. The length of copulation limits the maximum mating rate to once per day. This may afford more competitive males the opportunity to reject females early in the day without significantly reducing their mating rate. Males copulate if they secure evasive females. Body size correlates with the abilities of males to secure females, and of females to evade males. Thus, agonistic courtship gives larger males a mating advantage and may ensure the availability of larger females late into the daily courtship period. Also, larger males spend more time searching for mates and courting than do smaller males which could increase their likelihood of encountering and mating a large female, even after rejecting a smaller one. Stochastic simulations of agonistic courtship indicate that the benefits of male choice are limited to larger males, who are more likely to successfully court a female after having rejected one. Simulations also indicate that strong assortative mating, as observed in the field, requires male choice in combination with agonistic courtship. Both males and females benefit from larger mates, as the fecundity of females is a function of both their own size and the size of their mates. Thus, strong assortative mating magnifies the fecundity advantage of large females through mate effects on fecundity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-015-1900-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1679664271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43599944</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43599944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-9f8f6caed1ef4f54cb041164781d164cdaf64d72162b761ad85f3bb942668fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouK7-AA9CwHN10qZpe5TFL1jwoJ5Dmkx2u3SbmmSF9debpSKePM0wPO98vEPIJYMbBlDdBoBclBmwMmMNQCaOyIzxIs-gEvkxmUHBISs5L07JWQgbABCsrmekf-2-kBoccTA4aKTOUu12PoZ1N1K01vlIt2pPR--2LmLKe6R67brEqsHQEL0bVlSFkEgVu88DErtU6gYaXG869LRFjD2Gc3JiVR_w4ifOyfvD_dviKVu-PD4v7paZ5lDHrLG1FVqhYWi5LblugTMmeFUzk4I2ygpuqpyJvK0EU6YubdG2Dc-FqK0uizm5nvqmpT92GKLcpJOGNFIyUTVC8LxiiWITpb0LwaOVo--2yu8lA3kwVU6mymSqPJgqRdLkkyYkdlih_9P5H9HVJNqE6PzvFF6UTdOkl3wD1O2E8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1679664271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>McLain, Denson K. ; Pratt, Ann E. ; Shure, Donald J.</creator><creatorcontrib>McLain, Denson K. ; Pratt, Ann E. ; Shure, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><description>Large males of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus (Cantharidae), exercise choice for larger females in the field and laboratory. The length of copulation limits the maximum mating rate to once per day. This may afford more competitive males the opportunity to reject females early in the day without significantly reducing their mating rate. Males copulate if they secure evasive females. Body size correlates with the abilities of males to secure females, and of females to evade males. Thus, agonistic courtship gives larger males a mating advantage and may ensure the availability of larger females late into the daily courtship period. Also, larger males spend more time searching for mates and courting than do smaller males which could increase their likelihood of encountering and mating a large female, even after rejecting a smaller one. Stochastic simulations of agonistic courtship indicate that the benefits of male choice are limited to larger males, who are more likely to successfully court a female after having rejected one. Simulations also indicate that strong assortative mating, as observed in the field, requires male choice in combination with agonistic courtship. Both males and females benefit from larger mates, as the fecundity of females is a function of both their own size and the size of their mates. Thus, strong assortative mating magnifies the fecundity advantage of large females through mate effects on fecundity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1900-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Fecundity ; Insects ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Simulation ; Stochastic models ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2015-06, Vol.69 (6), p.883-894</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-9f8f6caed1ef4f54cb041164781d164cdaf64d72162b761ad85f3bb942668fc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-9f8f6caed1ef4f54cb041164781d164cdaf64d72162b761ad85f3bb942668fc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43599944$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43599944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLain, Denson K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shure, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><title>Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Large males of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus (Cantharidae), exercise choice for larger females in the field and laboratory. The length of copulation limits the maximum mating rate to once per day. This may afford more competitive males the opportunity to reject females early in the day without significantly reducing their mating rate. Males copulate if they secure evasive females. Body size correlates with the abilities of males to secure females, and of females to evade males. Thus, agonistic courtship gives larger males a mating advantage and may ensure the availability of larger females late into the daily courtship period. Also, larger males spend more time searching for mates and courting than do smaller males which could increase their likelihood of encountering and mating a large female, even after rejecting a smaller one. Stochastic simulations of agonistic courtship indicate that the benefits of male choice are limited to larger males, who are more likely to successfully court a female after having rejected one. Simulations also indicate that strong assortative mating, as observed in the field, requires male choice in combination with agonistic courtship. Both males and females benefit from larger mates, as the fecundity of females is a function of both their own size and the size of their mates. Thus, strong assortative mating magnifies the fecundity advantage of large females through mate effects on fecundity.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouK7-AA9CwHN10qZpe5TFL1jwoJ5Dmkx2u3SbmmSF9debpSKePM0wPO98vEPIJYMbBlDdBoBclBmwMmMNQCaOyIzxIs-gEvkxmUHBISs5L07JWQgbABCsrmekf-2-kBoccTA4aKTOUu12PoZ1N1K01vlIt2pPR--2LmLKe6R67brEqsHQEL0bVlSFkEgVu88DErtU6gYaXG869LRFjD2Gc3JiVR_w4ifOyfvD_dviKVu-PD4v7paZ5lDHrLG1FVqhYWi5LblugTMmeFUzk4I2ygpuqpyJvK0EU6YubdG2Dc-FqK0uizm5nvqmpT92GKLcpJOGNFIyUTVC8LxiiWITpb0LwaOVo--2yu8lA3kwVU6mymSqPJgqRdLkkyYkdlih_9P5H9HVJNqE6PzvFF6UTdOkl3wD1O2E8Q</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>McLain, Denson K.</creator><creator>Pratt, Ann E.</creator><creator>Shure, Donald J.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles</title><author>McLain, Denson K. ; Pratt, Ann E. ; Shure, Donald J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-9f8f6caed1ef4f54cb041164781d164cdaf64d72162b761ad85f3bb942668fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLain, Denson K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shure, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLain, Denson K.</au><au>Pratt, Ann E.</au><au>Shure, Donald J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>883-894</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Large males of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus (Cantharidae), exercise choice for larger females in the field and laboratory. The length of copulation limits the maximum mating rate to once per day. This may afford more competitive males the opportunity to reject females early in the day without significantly reducing their mating rate. Males copulate if they secure evasive females. Body size correlates with the abilities of males to secure females, and of females to evade males. Thus, agonistic courtship gives larger males a mating advantage and may ensure the availability of larger females late into the daily courtship period. Also, larger males spend more time searching for mates and courting than do smaller males which could increase their likelihood of encountering and mating a large female, even after rejecting a smaller one. Stochastic simulations of agonistic courtship indicate that the benefits of male choice are limited to larger males, who are more likely to successfully court a female after having rejected one. Simulations also indicate that strong assortative mating, as observed in the field, requires male choice in combination with agonistic courtship. Both males and females benefit from larger mates, as the fecundity of females is a function of both their own size and the size of their mates. Thus, strong assortative mating magnifies the fecundity advantage of large females through mate effects on fecundity.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-015-1900-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2015-06, Vol.69 (6), p.883-894
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1679664271
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal behavior
Animal Ecology
Animal reproduction
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body size
Fecundity
Insects
Life Sciences
Original Paper
Simulation
Stochastic models
Zoology
title Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Size%20dependence%20of%20courtship%20effort%20may%20promote%20male%20choice%20and%20strong%20assortative%20mating%20in%20soldier%20beetles&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=McLain,%20Denson%20K.&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=883-894&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-015-1900-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43599944%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1679664271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43599944&rfr_iscdi=true