Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective
This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of management 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.237-254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 254 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | British journal of management |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas Ram, Monder Kakabadse, Nada |
description | This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-8551.12071 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1678620346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3674636771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1PwjAUxRejiYg--7rE58Hart3wDYgiZHxoND42pbsjw9Fhu6H419sx5NW-9OTe8zu5OY5zi_wOsq-LAhZ6EaWog7AfojOndZqcW-0H1CMoxJfOlTFr37dLFrac3UIXEpJKi9ydVKbMJLiZcutppWEDqnSnQolVI4VK3LGSeWWyHVhVgi70SqjsR5RZoWzGC-QHae7dvrIOm1hWx90CtNmCLC177VykIjdwc_zbztvjw-vwyYvno_GwH3sywAx5NJLpMkl6NGVsmTJACUEYCyYCERFgiEAKWIIdyiCJfBmlVCaM9CjGkiEckrZz1-RudfFZgSn5uqi0PcZwxMKIYZ8EzLq6jUvqwhgNKd_qbCP0niOf1-XyukpeV8kP5VqCNcRXlsP-PzsfTObTP9BrwMyU8H0Chf7gLCQh5e-zEaeD50E8ozGfkV8q6Y1d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1678620346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas ; Ram, Monder ; Kakabadse, Nada</creator><creatorcontrib>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas ; Ram, Monder ; Kakabadse, Nada</creatorcontrib><description>This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJMAE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Justice ; Organization theory ; Procedural justice ; Purchasing groups ; Studies ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>British journal of management, 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.237-254</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors. British Journal of Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the British Academy of Management.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Monder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakabadse, Nada</creatorcontrib><title>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</title><title>British journal of management</title><addtitle>Brit J Manage</addtitle><description>This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.</description><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Purchasing groups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1045-3172</issn><issn>1467-8551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1PwjAUxRejiYg--7rE58Hart3wDYgiZHxoND42pbsjw9Fhu6H419sx5NW-9OTe8zu5OY5zi_wOsq-LAhZ6EaWog7AfojOndZqcW-0H1CMoxJfOlTFr37dLFrac3UIXEpJKi9ydVKbMJLiZcutppWEDqnSnQolVI4VK3LGSeWWyHVhVgi70SqjsR5RZoWzGC-QHae7dvrIOm1hWx90CtNmCLC177VykIjdwc_zbztvjw-vwyYvno_GwH3sywAx5NJLpMkl6NGVsmTJACUEYCyYCERFgiEAKWIIdyiCJfBmlVCaM9CjGkiEckrZz1-RudfFZgSn5uqi0PcZwxMKIYZ8EzLq6jUvqwhgNKd_qbCP0niOf1-XyukpeV8kP5VqCNcRXlsP-PzsfTObTP9BrwMyU8H0Chf7gLCQh5e-zEaeD50E8ozGfkV8q6Y1d</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</creator><creator>Ram, Monder</creator><creator>Kakabadse, Nada</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</title><author>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas ; Ram, Monder ; Kakabadse, Nada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Purchasing groups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Monder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakabadse, Nada</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</au><au>Ram, Monder</au><au>Kakabadse, Nada</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</atitle><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle><addtitle>Brit J Manage</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>237-254</pages><issn>1045-3172</issn><eissn>1467-8551</eissn><coden>BJMAE4</coden><abstract>This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8551.12071</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-3172 |
ispartof | British journal of management, 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.237-254 |
issn | 1045-3172 1467-8551 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1678620346 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Justice Organization theory Procedural justice Purchasing groups Studies Supply chains |
title | Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Procedural%20Justice%20in%20Procurement%20Management%20and%20Inclusive%20Interorganizational%20Relations:%20An%20Institutional%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Theodorakopoulos,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=237-254&rft.issn=1045-3172&rft.eissn=1467-8551&rft.coden=BJMAE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3674636771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1678620346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |