Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective

This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of management 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.237-254
Hauptverfasser: Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas, Ram, Monder, Kakabadse, Nada
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 254
container_issue 2
container_start_page 237
container_title British journal of management
container_volume 26
creator Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas
Ram, Monder
Kakabadse, Nada
description This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8551.12071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1678620346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3674636771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1PwjAUxRejiYg--7rE58Hart3wDYgiZHxoND42pbsjw9Fhu6H419sx5NW-9OTe8zu5OY5zi_wOsq-LAhZ6EaWog7AfojOndZqcW-0H1CMoxJfOlTFr37dLFrac3UIXEpJKi9ydVKbMJLiZcutppWEDqnSnQolVI4VK3LGSeWWyHVhVgi70SqjsR5RZoWzGC-QHae7dvrIOm1hWx90CtNmCLC177VykIjdwc_zbztvjw-vwyYvno_GwH3sywAx5NJLpMkl6NGVsmTJACUEYCyYCERFgiEAKWIIdyiCJfBmlVCaM9CjGkiEckrZz1-RudfFZgSn5uqi0PcZwxMKIYZ8EzLq6jUvqwhgNKd_qbCP0niOf1-XyukpeV8kP5VqCNcRXlsP-PzsfTObTP9BrwMyU8H0Chf7gLCQh5e-zEaeD50E8ozGfkV8q6Y1d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1678620346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas ; Ram, Monder ; Kakabadse, Nada</creator><creatorcontrib>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas ; Ram, Monder ; Kakabadse, Nada</creatorcontrib><description>This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJMAE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Justice ; Organization theory ; Procedural justice ; Purchasing groups ; Studies ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>British journal of management, 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.237-254</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors. British Journal of Management published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the British Academy of Management.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Monder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakabadse, Nada</creatorcontrib><title>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</title><title>British journal of management</title><addtitle>Brit J Manage</addtitle><description>This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.</description><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Purchasing groups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1045-3172</issn><issn>1467-8551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1PwjAUxRejiYg--7rE58Hart3wDYgiZHxoND42pbsjw9Fhu6H419sx5NW-9OTe8zu5OY5zi_wOsq-LAhZ6EaWog7AfojOndZqcW-0H1CMoxJfOlTFr37dLFrac3UIXEpJKi9ydVKbMJLiZcutppWEDqnSnQolVI4VK3LGSeWWyHVhVgi70SqjsR5RZoWzGC-QHae7dvrIOm1hWx90CtNmCLC177VykIjdwc_zbztvjw-vwyYvno_GwH3sywAx5NJLpMkl6NGVsmTJACUEYCyYCERFgiEAKWIIdyiCJfBmlVCaM9CjGkiEckrZz1-RudfFZgSn5uqi0PcZwxMKIYZ8EzLq6jUvqwhgNKd_qbCP0niOf1-XyukpeV8kP5VqCNcRXlsP-PzsfTObTP9BrwMyU8H0Chf7gLCQh5e-zEaeD50E8ozGfkV8q6Y1d</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</creator><creator>Ram, Monder</creator><creator>Kakabadse, Nada</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</title><author>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas ; Ram, Monder ; Kakabadse, Nada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4261-58cfbdd95f66bf6e1d3122a6a4a83e613efe2ce312c4d80c8f5cd639522c61273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Purchasing groups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Monder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakabadse, Nada</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theodorakopoulos, Nicholas</au><au>Ram, Monder</au><au>Kakabadse, Nada</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective</atitle><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle><addtitle>Brit J Manage</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>237-254</pages><issn>1045-3172</issn><eissn>1467-8551</eissn><coden>BJMAE4</coden><abstract>This paper applies the concept of procedural justice to one of the most important focal points of interorganizational relations: the purchaser–supplier relationship. The few extant studies of the concept in the purchaser–supplier domain have overlooked an important aspect of this key relationship: that is, inclusiveness in procurement. This is despite the fact that interest in the specific empirical context of supply chain links between large purchasing organizations (LPOs) and ethnic minority suppliers (EMSs) from disadvantaged communities proceeds apace on both sides of the Atlantic. Institutional theory is used to examine the form that procedural justice takes in eight case studies of LPOs from the private and public sectors, which actively engage with inclusive procurement management initiatives in England. The guiding question is twofold: ‘What may LPO approaches to installing procedural justice in procurement management entail?’ and ‘How are these approaches shaped?’ This paper identifies specific approaches to installing procedural justice for inclusive procurement and submits theoretical propositions about how these are shaped. The study contributes to a macro‐level assessment of procedural justice, i.e. interorganizational procedural justice, as a significant aspect of inclusive interorganizational relationships, which is a domain in need of theoretical development.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8551.12071</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3172
ispartof British journal of management, 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.237-254
issn 1045-3172
1467-8551
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1678620346
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Justice
Organization theory
Procedural justice
Purchasing groups
Studies
Supply chains
title Procedural Justice in Procurement Management and Inclusive Interorganizational Relations: An Institutional Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Procedural%20Justice%20in%20Procurement%20Management%20and%20Inclusive%20Interorganizational%20Relations:%20An%20Institutional%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Theodorakopoulos,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=237-254&rft.issn=1045-3172&rft.eissn=1467-8551&rft.coden=BJMAE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3674636771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1678620346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true