Detiding DART^sup ^ Buoy Data for Real-Time Extraction of Source Coefficients for Operational Tsunami Forecasting
US Tsunami Warning Centers use real-time bottom pressure (BP) data transmitted from a network of buoys deployed in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans to tune source coefficients of tsunami forecast models. For accurate coefficients and therefore forecasts, tides and background noise at the buoys must b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pure and applied geophysics 2015-06, Vol.172 (6), p.1653 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1653 |
container_title | Pure and applied geophysics |
container_volume | 172 |
creator | Percival, Donald B Denbo, Donald W Eblé, Marie C Gica, Edison Huang, Paul Y Mofjeld, Harold O Spillane, Michael C Titov, Vasily V Tolkova, Elena I |
description | US Tsunami Warning Centers use real-time bottom pressure (BP) data transmitted from a network of buoys deployed in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans to tune source coefficients of tsunami forecast models. For accurate coefficients and therefore forecasts, tides and background noise at the buoys must be accounted for through detiding. In this study, five methods for coefficient estimation are compared, each of which handles detiding differently. The first three subtract off a tidal prediction based on (1) a localized harmonic analysis involving 29 days of data immediately preceding the tsunami event, (2) 68 preexisting harmonic constituents specific to each buoy, and (3) an empirical orthogonal function fit to the previous 25 h of data. Method (4) is a Kalman smoother that uses method (1) as its input. These four methods estimate source coefficients after detiding. Method (5) estimates the coefficients simultaneously with a two-component harmonic model that accounts for the tides. The five methods are evaluated using archived data from 11 DART^sup ^ buoys, to which selected artificial tsunami signals are superimposed. These buoys represent a full range of observed tidal conditions and background BP noise in the Pacific and Atlantic, and the artificial signals have a variety of patterns and induce varying signal-to-noise ratios. The root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of least squares estimates of source coefficients using varying amounts of data are used to compare the five detiding methods. The RMSE varies over two orders of magnitude among detiding methods, generally decreasing in the order listed, with method (5) yielding the most accurate estimate of the source coefficient. The RMSE is substantially reduced by waiting for the first full wave of the tsunami signal to arrive. As a case study, the five methods are compared using data recorded from the devastating 2011 Japan tsunami. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00024-014-0962-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1676543026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3669506031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16765430263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjc1KxDAUhYMoWH8ewN0F19Gbpk3pUqczuBPGrmcI9UYydJpObgL69lbxAVwczub7zhHiTuGDQmweGRHLSqJa0ppS4pkoVFWibJU256JA1FpWda0vxRXzAVE1Td0W4tRR8u9--oDuadvvOM-wg-ccvqCzyYILEbZkR9n7I8H6M0U7JB8mCA7eQo4DwSqQc37wNCX-5V9nivYHsiP0nCd79LAJkQbLaTm6ERfOjky3f30t7jfrfvUi5xhOmTjtD8vwIvNemcbUlcbS6P9R39GcUMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676543026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detiding DART^sup ^ Buoy Data for Real-Time Extraction of Source Coefficients for Operational Tsunami Forecasting</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Percival, Donald B ; Denbo, Donald W ; Eblé, Marie C ; Gica, Edison ; Huang, Paul Y ; Mofjeld, Harold O ; Spillane, Michael C ; Titov, Vasily V ; Tolkova, Elena I</creator><creatorcontrib>Percival, Donald B ; Denbo, Donald W ; Eblé, Marie C ; Gica, Edison ; Huang, Paul Y ; Mofjeld, Harold O ; Spillane, Michael C ; Titov, Vasily V ; Tolkova, Elena I</creatorcontrib><description>US Tsunami Warning Centers use real-time bottom pressure (BP) data transmitted from a network of buoys deployed in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans to tune source coefficients of tsunami forecast models. For accurate coefficients and therefore forecasts, tides and background noise at the buoys must be accounted for through detiding. In this study, five methods for coefficient estimation are compared, each of which handles detiding differently. The first three subtract off a tidal prediction based on (1) a localized harmonic analysis involving 29 days of data immediately preceding the tsunami event, (2) 68 preexisting harmonic constituents specific to each buoy, and (3) an empirical orthogonal function fit to the previous 25 h of data. Method (4) is a Kalman smoother that uses method (1) as its input. These four methods estimate source coefficients after detiding. Method (5) estimates the coefficients simultaneously with a two-component harmonic model that accounts for the tides. The five methods are evaluated using archived data from 11 DART^sup ^ buoys, to which selected artificial tsunami signals are superimposed. These buoys represent a full range of observed tidal conditions and background BP noise in the Pacific and Atlantic, and the artificial signals have a variety of patterns and induce varying signal-to-noise ratios. The root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of least squares estimates of source coefficients using varying amounts of data are used to compare the five detiding methods. The RMSE varies over two orders of magnitude among detiding methods, generally decreasing in the order listed, with method (5) yielding the most accurate estimate of the source coefficient. The RMSE is substantially reduced by waiting for the first full wave of the tsunami signal to arrive. As a case study, the five methods are compared using data recorded from the devastating 2011 Japan tsunami.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00024-014-0962-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Buoys ; Emergency communications systems ; Emergency preparedness ; Geophysics ; Harmonic analysis ; Meteorology ; Oceans ; Tides ; Tsunamis</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied geophysics, 2015-06, Vol.172 (6), p.1653</ispartof><rights>Springer Basel 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Percival, Donald B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denbo, Donald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eblé, Marie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gica, Edison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Paul Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mofjeld, Harold O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spillane, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titov, Vasily V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolkova, Elena I</creatorcontrib><title>Detiding DART^sup ^ Buoy Data for Real-Time Extraction of Source Coefficients for Operational Tsunami Forecasting</title><title>Pure and applied geophysics</title><description>US Tsunami Warning Centers use real-time bottom pressure (BP) data transmitted from a network of buoys deployed in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans to tune source coefficients of tsunami forecast models. For accurate coefficients and therefore forecasts, tides and background noise at the buoys must be accounted for through detiding. In this study, five methods for coefficient estimation are compared, each of which handles detiding differently. The first three subtract off a tidal prediction based on (1) a localized harmonic analysis involving 29 days of data immediately preceding the tsunami event, (2) 68 preexisting harmonic constituents specific to each buoy, and (3) an empirical orthogonal function fit to the previous 25 h of data. Method (4) is a Kalman smoother that uses method (1) as its input. These four methods estimate source coefficients after detiding. Method (5) estimates the coefficients simultaneously with a two-component harmonic model that accounts for the tides. The five methods are evaluated using archived data from 11 DART^sup ^ buoys, to which selected artificial tsunami signals are superimposed. These buoys represent a full range of observed tidal conditions and background BP noise in the Pacific and Atlantic, and the artificial signals have a variety of patterns and induce varying signal-to-noise ratios. The root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of least squares estimates of source coefficients using varying amounts of data are used to compare the five detiding methods. The RMSE varies over two orders of magnitude among detiding methods, generally decreasing in the order listed, with method (5) yielding the most accurate estimate of the source coefficient. The RMSE is substantially reduced by waiting for the first full wave of the tsunami signal to arrive. As a case study, the five methods are compared using data recorded from the devastating 2011 Japan tsunami.</description><subject>Buoys</subject><subject>Emergency communications systems</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Harmonic analysis</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>Tsunamis</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjc1KxDAUhYMoWH8ewN0F19Gbpk3pUqczuBPGrmcI9UYydJpObgL69lbxAVwczub7zhHiTuGDQmweGRHLSqJa0ppS4pkoVFWibJU256JA1FpWda0vxRXzAVE1Td0W4tRR8u9--oDuadvvOM-wg-ccvqCzyYILEbZkR9n7I8H6M0U7JB8mCA7eQo4DwSqQc37wNCX-5V9nivYHsiP0nCd79LAJkQbLaTm6ERfOjky3f30t7jfrfvUi5xhOmTjtD8vwIvNemcbUlcbS6P9R39GcUMQ</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Percival, Donald B</creator><creator>Denbo, Donald W</creator><creator>Eblé, Marie C</creator><creator>Gica, Edison</creator><creator>Huang, Paul Y</creator><creator>Mofjeld, Harold O</creator><creator>Spillane, Michael C</creator><creator>Titov, Vasily V</creator><creator>Tolkova, Elena I</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Detiding DART^sup ^ Buoy Data for Real-Time Extraction of Source Coefficients for Operational Tsunami Forecasting</title><author>Percival, Donald B ; Denbo, Donald W ; Eblé, Marie C ; Gica, Edison ; Huang, Paul Y ; Mofjeld, Harold O ; Spillane, Michael C ; Titov, Vasily V ; Tolkova, Elena I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16765430263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Buoys</topic><topic>Emergency communications systems</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Harmonic analysis</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>Tsunamis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Percival, Donald B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denbo, Donald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eblé, Marie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gica, Edison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Paul Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mofjeld, Harold O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spillane, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titov, Vasily V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolkova, Elena I</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Percival, Donald B</au><au>Denbo, Donald W</au><au>Eblé, Marie C</au><au>Gica, Edison</au><au>Huang, Paul Y</au><au>Mofjeld, Harold O</au><au>Spillane, Michael C</au><au>Titov, Vasily V</au><au>Tolkova, Elena I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detiding DART^sup ^ Buoy Data for Real-Time Extraction of Source Coefficients for Operational Tsunami Forecasting</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1653</spage><pages>1653-</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>US Tsunami Warning Centers use real-time bottom pressure (BP) data transmitted from a network of buoys deployed in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans to tune source coefficients of tsunami forecast models. For accurate coefficients and therefore forecasts, tides and background noise at the buoys must be accounted for through detiding. In this study, five methods for coefficient estimation are compared, each of which handles detiding differently. The first three subtract off a tidal prediction based on (1) a localized harmonic analysis involving 29 days of data immediately preceding the tsunami event, (2) 68 preexisting harmonic constituents specific to each buoy, and (3) an empirical orthogonal function fit to the previous 25 h of data. Method (4) is a Kalman smoother that uses method (1) as its input. These four methods estimate source coefficients after detiding. Method (5) estimates the coefficients simultaneously with a two-component harmonic model that accounts for the tides. The five methods are evaluated using archived data from 11 DART^sup ^ buoys, to which selected artificial tsunami signals are superimposed. These buoys represent a full range of observed tidal conditions and background BP noise in the Pacific and Atlantic, and the artificial signals have a variety of patterns and induce varying signal-to-noise ratios. The root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of least squares estimates of source coefficients using varying amounts of data are used to compare the five detiding methods. The RMSE varies over two orders of magnitude among detiding methods, generally decreasing in the order listed, with method (5) yielding the most accurate estimate of the source coefficient. The RMSE is substantially reduced by waiting for the first full wave of the tsunami signal to arrive. As a case study, the five methods are compared using data recorded from the devastating 2011 Japan tsunami.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00024-014-0962-0</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-4553 |
ispartof | Pure and applied geophysics, 2015-06, Vol.172 (6), p.1653 |
issn | 0033-4553 1420-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1676543026 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Buoys Emergency communications systems Emergency preparedness Geophysics Harmonic analysis Meteorology Oceans Tides Tsunamis |
title | Detiding DART^sup ^ Buoy Data for Real-Time Extraction of Source Coefficients for Operational Tsunami Forecasting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A25%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detiding%20DART%5Esup%20%5E%20Buoy%20Data%20for%20Real-Time%20Extraction%20of%20Source%20Coefficients%20for%20Operational%20Tsunami%20Forecasting&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20geophysics&rft.au=Percival,%20Donald%20B&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1653&rft.pages=1653-&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00024-014-0962-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3669506031%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676543026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |