Closing the gap: The growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia

This paper reviews major developments in Australian poverty research in the 50 years since the Melbourne poverty study established the Henderson measurement framework. It focuses on the limitations of the dominant, but narrow income (poverty line) approach used in Australia, contrasts it with the de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of social issues 2015-01, Vol.50 (1), p.13-35
1. Verfasser: Saunders, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title The Australian journal of social issues
container_volume 50
creator Saunders, Peter
description This paper reviews major developments in Australian poverty research in the 50 years since the Melbourne poverty study established the Henderson measurement framework. It focuses on the limitations of the dominant, but narrow income (poverty line) approach used in Australia, contrasts it with the deprivation approach pioneered and refined in the United Kingdom, and shows how this provides more compelling evidence that poverty exists. Against the background of recent developments in international poverty research, the paper identifies existing gaps in Australia, and explores what needs to be done to address this situation. It then draws on international experience to examine how anti-poverty policy has evolved, focusing on the role of poverty targets in producing better data and promoting debate between policy makers, researchers and community sector practitioners about developing better measures. Australia lags behind these developments: a new approach is needed that engages researchers, policy makers, and other key stakeholders in positive dialogue aimed at setting a new framework for poverty measurement and an achievable anti-poverty policy agenda.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00332.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1676476181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.092051008431239</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1752993106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7052-afeb5f0e4870291f07db59e98b6e8b5801d5e691c6846c5d9296c647a93917a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhO0Rw4ZLUf2In7m21AkpViQMrrpbjTLaOvHGwvd3ut8dpWoQqIejJo3lvfiPPy7L3GJUYIXI-lLihoqg4YyVBmJWxRYhSUt69yFa_pZfZKml1wSnBr7M3IQwIoQYLusq2G-uCGXd5vIF8p6aLfDsX3h3nZmduTQd5C_EIMOaTuwUfT7mHAMrrm1yNXWpao0-5GfP1IUSvrFFvs1e9sgHePbxn2fbzp-3msrj-9uXrZn1d6BoxUqgeWtYjqJoaEYF7VHctEyCalkPTsgbhjgEXWPOm4pp1ggiueVUrQQWuFT3LPi7YybufBwhR7k3QYK0awR2CxDUjQjCGxH9aKUY8WT88sQ7u4Mf0D4l5ndZz3ODkulhc2rsQPPRy8mav_EliJOdo5CDn-8v5_nKORj5EI-_S8HoZPhoLp2dMyvXV9-q-TowfC8PvTZTaWQs6GjeGQcUgl3ykGXt3rzu_k50zUrVhXkMp5tKAVZOSSBDE0t6mopjQ-VSXf4CTo49_xf0TdfV81KPwFPYLyubknQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676476181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closing the gap: The growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Saunders, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews major developments in Australian poverty research in the 50 years since the Melbourne poverty study established the Henderson measurement framework. It focuses on the limitations of the dominant, but narrow income (poverty line) approach used in Australia, contrasts it with the deprivation approach pioneered and refined in the United Kingdom, and shows how this provides more compelling evidence that poverty exists. Against the background of recent developments in international poverty research, the paper identifies existing gaps in Australia, and explores what needs to be done to address this situation. It then draws on international experience to examine how anti-poverty policy has evolved, focusing on the role of poverty targets in producing better data and promoting debate between policy makers, researchers and community sector practitioners about developing better measures. Australia lags behind these developments: a new approach is needed that engages researchers, policy makers, and other key stakeholders in positive dialogue aimed at setting a new framework for poverty measurement and an achievable anti-poverty policy agenda.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-6321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-4655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00332.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSIBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anniversaries ; Australia ; Data processing ; Deprivation ; Development Strategies ; Finance ; Government policy ; Households ; Income ; income data ; Income distribution ; Interest Groups ; Low income groups ; Measurement ; Perceptions ; Policy Making ; Politics ; Poverty ; poverty targets ; Social policy ; Social security ; Studies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of social issues, 2015-01, Vol.50 (1), p.13-35</ispartof><rights>Australian Social Policy Association</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Social Policy Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7052-afeb5f0e4870291f07db59e98b6e8b5801d5e691c6846c5d9296c647a93917a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7052-afeb5f0e4870291f07db59e98b6e8b5801d5e691c6846c5d9296c647a93917a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.1839-4655.2015.tb00332.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.1839-4655.2015.tb00332.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27325,27905,27906,33755,33756,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Closing the gap: The growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia</title><title>The Australian journal of social issues</title><description>This paper reviews major developments in Australian poverty research in the 50 years since the Melbourne poverty study established the Henderson measurement framework. It focuses on the limitations of the dominant, but narrow income (poverty line) approach used in Australia, contrasts it with the deprivation approach pioneered and refined in the United Kingdom, and shows how this provides more compelling evidence that poverty exists. Against the background of recent developments in international poverty research, the paper identifies existing gaps in Australia, and explores what needs to be done to address this situation. It then draws on international experience to examine how anti-poverty policy has evolved, focusing on the role of poverty targets in producing better data and promoting debate between policy makers, researchers and community sector practitioners about developing better measures. Australia lags behind these developments: a new approach is needed that engages researchers, policy makers, and other key stakeholders in positive dialogue aimed at setting a new framework for poverty measurement and an achievable anti-poverty policy agenda.</description><subject>Anniversaries</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>Development Strategies</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>income data</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Interest Groups</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>poverty targets</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0157-6321</issn><issn>1839-4655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhO0Rw4ZLUf2In7m21AkpViQMrrpbjTLaOvHGwvd3ut8dpWoQqIejJo3lvfiPPy7L3GJUYIXI-lLihoqg4YyVBmJWxRYhSUt69yFa_pZfZKml1wSnBr7M3IQwIoQYLusq2G-uCGXd5vIF8p6aLfDsX3h3nZmduTQd5C_EIMOaTuwUfT7mHAMrrm1yNXWpao0-5GfP1IUSvrFFvs1e9sgHePbxn2fbzp-3msrj-9uXrZn1d6BoxUqgeWtYjqJoaEYF7VHctEyCalkPTsgbhjgEXWPOm4pp1ggiueVUrQQWuFT3LPi7YybufBwhR7k3QYK0awR2CxDUjQjCGxH9aKUY8WT88sQ7u4Mf0D4l5ndZz3ODkulhc2rsQPPRy8mav_EliJOdo5CDn-8v5_nKORj5EI-_S8HoZPhoLp2dMyvXV9-q-TowfC8PvTZTaWQs6GjeGQcUgl3ykGXt3rzu_k50zUrVhXkMp5tKAVZOSSBDE0t6mopjQ-VSXf4CTo49_xf0TdfV81KPwFPYLyubknQ</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Saunders, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Closing the gap: The growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia</title><author>Saunders, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7052-afeb5f0e4870291f07db59e98b6e8b5801d5e691c6846c5d9296c647a93917a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anniversaries</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>Development Strategies</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>income data</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Interest Groups</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>poverty targets</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saunders, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closing the gap: The growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>13-35</pages><issn>0157-6321</issn><eissn>1839-4655</eissn><coden>AJSIBA</coden><abstract>This paper reviews major developments in Australian poverty research in the 50 years since the Melbourne poverty study established the Henderson measurement framework. It focuses on the limitations of the dominant, but narrow income (poverty line) approach used in Australia, contrasts it with the deprivation approach pioneered and refined in the United Kingdom, and shows how this provides more compelling evidence that poverty exists. Against the background of recent developments in international poverty research, the paper identifies existing gaps in Australia, and explores what needs to be done to address this situation. It then draws on international experience to examine how anti-poverty policy has evolved, focusing on the role of poverty targets in producing better data and promoting debate between policy makers, researchers and community sector practitioners about developing better measures. Australia lags behind these developments: a new approach is needed that engages researchers, policy makers, and other key stakeholders in positive dialogue aimed at setting a new framework for poverty measurement and an achievable anti-poverty policy agenda.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00332.x</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0157-6321
ispartof The Australian journal of social issues, 2015-01, Vol.50 (1), p.13-35
issn 0157-6321
1839-4655
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1676476181
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Anniversaries
Australia
Data processing
Deprivation
Development Strategies
Finance
Government policy
Households
Income
income data
Income distribution
Interest Groups
Low income groups
Measurement
Perceptions
Policy Making
Politics
Poverty
poverty targets
Social policy
Social security
Studies
United Kingdom
title Closing the gap: The growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closing%20the%20gap:%20The%20growing%20divide%20between%20poverty%20research%20and%20policy%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20social%20issues&rft.au=Saunders,%20Peter&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=13-35&rft.issn=0157-6321&rft.eissn=1839-4655&rft.coden=AJSIBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00332.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E1752993106%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676476181&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.092051008431239&rfr_iscdi=true