Introspection through litigation
This Article contends that there is a bright side to being sued: organizational defendants can learn valuable information about their own behavior from lawsuits brought against them. Complaints describe allegations of wrongdoing. The discovery process unearths documents and testimony regarding plain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Notre Dame law review 2015-02, Vol.90 (3), p.1055 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1055 |
container_title | The Notre Dame law review |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Schwartz, Joanna C |
description | This Article contends that there is a bright side to being sued: organizational defendants can learn valuable information about their own behavior from lawsuits brought against them. Complaints describe allegations of wrongdoing. The discovery process unearths documents and testimony regarding plaintiffs' allegations. And in summary judgment briefs, expert reports, pretrial orders, and trial, parties marshal the evidence to support their claims. Each of these aspects of civil litigation can bring to the surface information that an organization does not have or has not previously identified, collected, or recognized as valuable. This information, placed in the hands of an organization's leaders as the result of litigation, can be used to improve systems and personnel. This Article considers the information generated by litigation, the gaps lawsuit data can fill in the information otherwise available to organizations, and possible reasons some organizations may gather and analyze litigation data more frequently than others. To illustrate these concepts, I draw on original research of police departments and hospitals and evidence from other organizational settings. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1666835824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A409714642</galeid><sourcerecordid>A409714642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g255t-11446f9007e8b23d5965f4dbd472f2dda49f8a3d96b3323469974d8e13cc076c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzUtLxDAQB_AeFFxXv0PBq5U8JmlzXBYfCwte9FzSvJqlm6xN-v2tKLgLZWAG_vxm5qpYoRpYRRlmN8VtSgeEECcYVkW5C3mM6WRU9jGUuR_j5Ppy8Nk7-RPdFddWDsnc_8118fny_LF9q_bvr7vtZl85wliuMAbgViBUm6YjVDPBmQXdaaiJJVpLELaRVAveUUoocCFq0I3BVClUc0XXxcPv3dMYvyaTcnuI0xjmly3mnDeUNQT-lZODaX2wMY9SHX1S7QaQqDFwILOqFpQzwYxyiMFYP8cX_mnBz6XN0avFhcezhW5KPpg0t-Rdn5OTU0rn_Bur63K5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1666835824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introspection through litigation</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Schwartz, Joanna C</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Joanna C</creatorcontrib><description>This Article contends that there is a bright side to being sued: organizational defendants can learn valuable information about their own behavior from lawsuits brought against them. Complaints describe allegations of wrongdoing. The discovery process unearths documents and testimony regarding plaintiffs' allegations. And in summary judgment briefs, expert reports, pretrial orders, and trial, parties marshal the evidence to support their claims. Each of these aspects of civil litigation can bring to the surface information that an organization does not have or has not previously identified, collected, or recognized as valuable. This information, placed in the hands of an organization's leaders as the result of litigation, can be used to improve systems and personnel. This Article considers the information generated by litigation, the gaps lawsuit data can fill in the information otherwise available to organizations, and possible reasons some organizations may gather and analyze litigation data more frequently than others. To illustrate these concepts, I draw on original research of police departments and hospitals and evidence from other organizational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0745-3515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Law School</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Civil procedure ; Discovery (Law) ; Evidence ; Influence ; Information science ; Litigation ; Organizational change ; Summary judgment ; Testimony ; Trials</subject><ispartof>The Notre Dame law review, 2015-02, Vol.90 (3), p.1055</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 University of Notre Dame Law School</rights><rights>Copyright Notre Dame Law Review 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Joanna C</creatorcontrib><title>Introspection through litigation</title><title>The Notre Dame law review</title><description>This Article contends that there is a bright side to being sued: organizational defendants can learn valuable information about their own behavior from lawsuits brought against them. Complaints describe allegations of wrongdoing. The discovery process unearths documents and testimony regarding plaintiffs' allegations. And in summary judgment briefs, expert reports, pretrial orders, and trial, parties marshal the evidence to support their claims. Each of these aspects of civil litigation can bring to the surface information that an organization does not have or has not previously identified, collected, or recognized as valuable. This information, placed in the hands of an organization's leaders as the result of litigation, can be used to improve systems and personnel. This Article considers the information generated by litigation, the gaps lawsuit data can fill in the information otherwise available to organizations, and possible reasons some organizations may gather and analyze litigation data more frequently than others. To illustrate these concepts, I draw on original research of police departments and hospitals and evidence from other organizational settings.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Civil procedure</subject><subject>Discovery (Law)</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information science</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Summary judgment</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0745-3515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNptzUtLxDAQB_AeFFxXv0PBq5U8JmlzXBYfCwte9FzSvJqlm6xN-v2tKLgLZWAG_vxm5qpYoRpYRRlmN8VtSgeEECcYVkW5C3mM6WRU9jGUuR_j5Ppy8Nk7-RPdFddWDsnc_8118fny_LF9q_bvr7vtZl85wliuMAbgViBUm6YjVDPBmQXdaaiJJVpLELaRVAveUUoocCFq0I3BVClUc0XXxcPv3dMYvyaTcnuI0xjmly3mnDeUNQT-lZODaX2wMY9SHX1S7QaQqDFwILOqFpQzwYxyiMFYP8cX_mnBz6XN0avFhcezhW5KPpg0t-Rdn5OTU0rn_Bur63K5</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Joanna C</creator><general>University of Notre Dame Law School</general><general>Notre Dame Law Review</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Introspection through litigation</title><author>Schwartz, Joanna C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g255t-11446f9007e8b23d5965f4dbd472f2dda49f8a3d96b3323469974d8e13cc076c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Civil procedure</topic><topic>Discovery (Law)</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information science</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Summary judgment</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Joanna C</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Notre Dame law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Joanna C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introspection through litigation</atitle><jtitle>The Notre Dame law review</jtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1055</spage><pages>1055-</pages><issn>0745-3515</issn><abstract>This Article contends that there is a bright side to being sued: organizational defendants can learn valuable information about their own behavior from lawsuits brought against them. Complaints describe allegations of wrongdoing. The discovery process unearths documents and testimony regarding plaintiffs' allegations. And in summary judgment briefs, expert reports, pretrial orders, and trial, parties marshal the evidence to support their claims. Each of these aspects of civil litigation can bring to the surface information that an organization does not have or has not previously identified, collected, or recognized as valuable. This information, placed in the hands of an organization's leaders as the result of litigation, can be used to improve systems and personnel. This Article considers the information generated by litigation, the gaps lawsuit data can fill in the information otherwise available to organizations, and possible reasons some organizations may gather and analyze litigation data more frequently than others. To illustrate these concepts, I draw on original research of police departments and hospitals and evidence from other organizational settings.</abstract><cop>Notre Dame</cop><pub>University of Notre Dame Law School</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0745-3515 |
ispartof | The Notre Dame law review, 2015-02, Vol.90 (3), p.1055 |
issn | 0745-3515 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1666835824 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Analysis Civil procedure Discovery (Law) Evidence Influence Information science Litigation Organizational change Summary judgment Testimony Trials |
title | Introspection through litigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introspection%20through%20litigation&rft.jtitle=The%20Notre%20Dame%20law%20review&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Joanna%20C&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1055&rft.pages=1055-&rft.issn=0745-3515&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA409714642%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1666835824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A409714642&rfr_iscdi=true |