Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning: A close-up analysis from project development in corporate R&D

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the problem of reconfiguring epistemic boundaries and the authority relationships that these boundaries represent in corporate R&D. The authors focus the analysis on the mediation of this reconfiguration by project management tools, specifically...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Qualitative research in organizations and management 2014-01, Vol.9 (4), p.308-331
Hauptverfasser: Güney, Senem, R. Taylor, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 4
container_start_page 308
container_title Qualitative research in organizations and management
container_volume 9
creator Güney, Senem
R. Taylor, James
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the problem of reconfiguring epistemic boundaries and the authority relationships that these boundaries represent in corporate R&D. The authors focus the analysis on the mediation of this reconfiguration by project management tools, specifically the development plan and its subsidiary roadmaps and timelines. Design/methodology/approach - The authors analyze discourse data from an ethnographic study to showin situ the communication about and through project management tools in collaborative project development. The concepts of organizational map and mapping from the perspective of the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) frame the close-up analysis of this communication. Findings - The analysis reveals how the plan and its subsidiary texts participate in the negotiation and legitimation of epistemic ownership and authority for a collaborative strategy to be implemented. The authors illustrate the material agency of these texts in the objectification and prioritization of strategic choices in this implementation. Research limitations/implications - To conclude, the authors discuss the significance of exploring the mapping function of supposedly mundane representational tools used in project management. Originality/value - The originality of this study comes from applying the organizational map concept to demonstrate the politically charged materiality of project management tools in the discursive establishment of authority and accomplishment of corporate strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/QROM-08-2012-1090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1662632930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3622323481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-be5394e99e931961538a8f623a8f24b84bcd0602d07e4c0e05a2da77ace1ef553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAGyRmA1nO3bsEVVAkYoqKpgtJ7m0KWkSbHfg7XFUxHL_Dd9_J32E3DK4Zwz0w_tm_UZBUw6MUwYGzsiMFbmiUkl1_r_n-pJchbAHUDr1ZkRuMO7a_qvtt1ncYeaHDrOhSenqgxtD1vZZiN5F3LZVNnau7xN6TS4a1wW8-cs5-Xx--lgs6Wr98rp4XNFKcBVpiVKYHI1BI5hRTArtdKO4SJPnpc7LqgYFvIYC8woQpOO1KwpXIcNGSjEnd6e7ox--jxii3Q9H36eXlinFleBGQKLYiar8EILHxo6-PTj_YxnYyY6d7NiUkx072RG_y0FW8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662632930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning: A close-up analysis from project development in corporate R&amp;D</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Güney, Senem ; R. Taylor, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Güney, Senem ; R. Taylor, James</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the problem of reconfiguring epistemic boundaries and the authority relationships that these boundaries represent in corporate R&amp;D. The authors focus the analysis on the mediation of this reconfiguration by project management tools, specifically the development plan and its subsidiary roadmaps and timelines. Design/methodology/approach - The authors analyze discourse data from an ethnographic study to showin situ the communication about and through project management tools in collaborative project development. The concepts of organizational map and mapping from the perspective of the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) frame the close-up analysis of this communication. Findings - The analysis reveals how the plan and its subsidiary texts participate in the negotiation and legitimation of epistemic ownership and authority for a collaborative strategy to be implemented. The authors illustrate the material agency of these texts in the objectification and prioritization of strategic choices in this implementation. Research limitations/implications - To conclude, the authors discuss the significance of exploring the mapping function of supposedly mundane representational tools used in project management. Originality/value - The originality of this study comes from applying the organizational map concept to demonstrate the politically charged materiality of project management tools in the discursive establishment of authority and accomplishment of corporate strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-5648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-5656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/QROM-08-2012-1090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Community ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Epistemology ; Innovations ; Knowledge ; Mediation ; Problem solving ; Product development ; Project management ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Strategic planning ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Qualitative research in organizations and management, 2014-01, Vol.9 (4), p.308-331</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-be5394e99e931961538a8f623a8f24b84bcd0602d07e4c0e05a2da77ace1ef553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,21674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Güney, Senem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R. Taylor, James</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning: A close-up analysis from project development in corporate R&amp;D</title><title>Qualitative research in organizations and management</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the problem of reconfiguring epistemic boundaries and the authority relationships that these boundaries represent in corporate R&amp;D. The authors focus the analysis on the mediation of this reconfiguration by project management tools, specifically the development plan and its subsidiary roadmaps and timelines. Design/methodology/approach - The authors analyze discourse data from an ethnographic study to showin situ the communication about and through project management tools in collaborative project development. The concepts of organizational map and mapping from the perspective of the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) frame the close-up analysis of this communication. Findings - The analysis reveals how the plan and its subsidiary texts participate in the negotiation and legitimation of epistemic ownership and authority for a collaborative strategy to be implemented. The authors illustrate the material agency of these texts in the objectification and prioritization of strategic choices in this implementation. Research limitations/implications - To conclude, the authors discuss the significance of exploring the mapping function of supposedly mundane representational tools used in project management. Originality/value - The originality of this study comes from applying the organizational map concept to demonstrate the politically charged materiality of project management tools in the discursive establishment of authority and accomplishment of corporate strategy.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1746-5648</issn><issn>1746-5656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAGyRmA1nO3bsEVVAkYoqKpgtJ7m0KWkSbHfg7XFUxHL_Dd9_J32E3DK4Zwz0w_tm_UZBUw6MUwYGzsiMFbmiUkl1_r_n-pJchbAHUDr1ZkRuMO7a_qvtt1ncYeaHDrOhSenqgxtD1vZZiN5F3LZVNnau7xN6TS4a1wW8-cs5-Xx--lgs6Wr98rp4XNFKcBVpiVKYHI1BI5hRTArtdKO4SJPnpc7LqgYFvIYC8woQpOO1KwpXIcNGSjEnd6e7ox--jxii3Q9H36eXlinFleBGQKLYiar8EILHxo6-PTj_YxnYyY6d7NiUkx072RG_y0FW8w</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Güney, Senem</creator><creator>R. Taylor, James</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning</title><author>Güney, Senem ; R. Taylor, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-be5394e99e931961538a8f623a8f24b84bcd0602d07e4c0e05a2da77ace1ef553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Güney, Senem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R. Taylor, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Qualitative research in organizations and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Güney, Senem</au><au>R. Taylor, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning: A close-up analysis from project development in corporate R&amp;D</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative research in organizations and management</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>308-331</pages><issn>1746-5648</issn><eissn>1746-5656</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the problem of reconfiguring epistemic boundaries and the authority relationships that these boundaries represent in corporate R&amp;D. The authors focus the analysis on the mediation of this reconfiguration by project management tools, specifically the development plan and its subsidiary roadmaps and timelines. Design/methodology/approach - The authors analyze discourse data from an ethnographic study to showin situ the communication about and through project management tools in collaborative project development. The concepts of organizational map and mapping from the perspective of the communicative constitution of organization (CCO) frame the close-up analysis of this communication. Findings - The analysis reveals how the plan and its subsidiary texts participate in the negotiation and legitimation of epistemic ownership and authority for a collaborative strategy to be implemented. The authors illustrate the material agency of these texts in the objectification and prioritization of strategic choices in this implementation. Research limitations/implications - To conclude, the authors discuss the significance of exploring the mapping function of supposedly mundane representational tools used in project management. Originality/value - The originality of this study comes from applying the organizational map concept to demonstrate the politically charged materiality of project management tools in the discursive establishment of authority and accomplishment of corporate strategy.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/QROM-08-2012-1090</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1746-5648
ispartof Qualitative research in organizations and management, 2014-01, Vol.9 (4), p.308-331
issn 1746-5648
1746-5656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1662632930
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Alliances
Collaboration
Communication
Community
Competition
Competitive advantage
Epistemology
Innovations
Knowledge
Mediation
Problem solving
Product development
Project management
R&D
Research & development
Strategic planning
Studies
title Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning: A close-up analysis from project development in corporate R&D
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20the%20role%20of%20roadmaps%20in%20strategic%20planning:%20A%20close-up%20analysis%20from%20project%20development%20in%20corporate%20R&D&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20research%20in%20organizations%20and%20management&rft.au=G%C3%BCney,%20Senem&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=308-331&rft.issn=1746-5648&rft.eissn=1746-5656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/QROM-08-2012-1090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3622323481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662632930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true