Linear individual pitch control design for two-bladed wind turbines

In this article, the conventional individual pitch control (IPC) strategy for wind turbines is reviewed, and a linear IPC strategy for two‐bladed wind turbines is proposed. The typical approach of IPC for three‐bladed rotors involves a multi‐blade coordinate (MBC) transformation, which transforms me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wind energy (Chichester, England) England), 2015-04, Vol.18 (4), p.677-697
Hauptverfasser: van Solingen, E., van Wingerden, J.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 697
container_issue 4
container_start_page 677
container_title Wind energy (Chichester, England)
container_volume 18
creator van Solingen, E.
van Wingerden, J.W.
description In this article, the conventional individual pitch control (IPC) strategy for wind turbines is reviewed, and a linear IPC strategy for two‐bladed wind turbines is proposed. The typical approach of IPC for three‐bladed rotors involves a multi‐blade coordinate (MBC) transformation, which transforms measured blade load signals, i.e., signals measured in a rotating frame of reference, to signals in a fixed non‐rotating frame of reference. The fixed non‐rotating signals, in the so‐called yaw and tilt direction, are decoupled by the MBC transformation, such that single‐input single‐output (SISO) control design is possible. Then, SISO controllers designed for the yaw and tilt directions provide pitch signals in the non‐rotating frame of reference, which are then reverse transformed to the rotating frame of reference so as to obtain the desired pitch actuator signals. For three‐bladed rotors, the aforementioned method is a proven strategy to significantly reduce fatigue loadings on pitch controlled wind turbines. The same MBC transformation and approach can be applied to two‐bladed rotors, which also results in significant load reductions. However, for two‐bladed rotors, this MBC transformation is singular and therefore, not uniquely defined. For that reason, a linear non‐singular coordinate transformation is proposed for IPC of two‐bladed wind turbines. This transformation only requires a single control loop to reduce the once‐per‐revolution rotating blade loads (‘1P’ loads). Moreover, all harmonics (2P, 3P, etc.) in the rotating blade loads can be accounted for with only two control loops. As in the case of the MBC transformation, also the linear coordinate transformation decouples the control loops to allow for SISO control design. High fidelity simulation studies on a two‐bladed wind turbine without a teetering hub prove the effectiveness of the concept. The simulation study indicates that IPC based on the linear coordinate transformation provides similar load reductions and requires similar pitch actuation compared with the conventional IPC approach. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/we.1720
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1661860930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3619616591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-1c02e8942f53069ac728ff519d7753845c49d32b4312e85dd39749f9f26d2bff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQpiFewxMCAUvwbxyNUbUGKgKGoo5XENriEpNhJQ9-elFRsTPcO37lXOgBcYjTBCJHbzkywIOgIjDCSMsIJYce_O48YYewUnIWwRggjjJMRmKauMpmHrtJu63SblXDjmuIdFnXV-LqE2gT3VkFbe9h0dZSXmTYadr2HTevzPh3OwYnNymAuDnMMXuez5fQhSp8Xj9O7NCqoFCjCBSImkYxYTlEss0KQxFqOpRaC04TxgklNSc4o7h3Xuk8xaaUlsSa5tXQMroa7G19_tSY0al23vupfKhzHOImRpKhX14MqfB2CN1ZtvPvM_E5hpPYNqc6ofUO9vBlk50qz-4-p1eygo0G70JjvP535DxULKrhaPS3U8oWnc7oS6p7-AJULc7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661860930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linear individual pitch control design for two-bladed wind turbines</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>van Solingen, E. ; van Wingerden, J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Solingen, E. ; van Wingerden, J.W.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, the conventional individual pitch control (IPC) strategy for wind turbines is reviewed, and a linear IPC strategy for two‐bladed wind turbines is proposed. The typical approach of IPC for three‐bladed rotors involves a multi‐blade coordinate (MBC) transformation, which transforms measured blade load signals, i.e., signals measured in a rotating frame of reference, to signals in a fixed non‐rotating frame of reference. The fixed non‐rotating signals, in the so‐called yaw and tilt direction, are decoupled by the MBC transformation, such that single‐input single‐output (SISO) control design is possible. Then, SISO controllers designed for the yaw and tilt directions provide pitch signals in the non‐rotating frame of reference, which are then reverse transformed to the rotating frame of reference so as to obtain the desired pitch actuator signals. For three‐bladed rotors, the aforementioned method is a proven strategy to significantly reduce fatigue loadings on pitch controlled wind turbines. The same MBC transformation and approach can be applied to two‐bladed rotors, which also results in significant load reductions. However, for two‐bladed rotors, this MBC transformation is singular and therefore, not uniquely defined. For that reason, a linear non‐singular coordinate transformation is proposed for IPC of two‐bladed wind turbines. This transformation only requires a single control loop to reduce the once‐per‐revolution rotating blade loads (‘1P’ loads). Moreover, all harmonics (2P, 3P, etc.) in the rotating blade loads can be accounted for with only two control loops. As in the case of the MBC transformation, also the linear coordinate transformation decouples the control loops to allow for SISO control design. High fidelity simulation studies on a two‐bladed wind turbine without a teetering hub prove the effectiveness of the concept. The simulation study indicates that IPC based on the linear coordinate transformation provides similar load reductions and requires similar pitch actuation compared with the conventional IPC approach. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/we.1720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>coordinate transformation ; individual pitch control ; load reduction ; multi-blade coordinate transformation ; two-bladed wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2015-04, Vol.18 (4), p.677-697</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-1c02e8942f53069ac728ff519d7753845c49d32b4312e85dd39749f9f26d2bff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-1c02e8942f53069ac728ff519d7753845c49d32b4312e85dd39749f9f26d2bff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwe.1720$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwe.1720$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Solingen, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wingerden, J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Linear individual pitch control design for two-bladed wind turbines</title><title>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Wind Energ</addtitle><description>In this article, the conventional individual pitch control (IPC) strategy for wind turbines is reviewed, and a linear IPC strategy for two‐bladed wind turbines is proposed. The typical approach of IPC for three‐bladed rotors involves a multi‐blade coordinate (MBC) transformation, which transforms measured blade load signals, i.e., signals measured in a rotating frame of reference, to signals in a fixed non‐rotating frame of reference. The fixed non‐rotating signals, in the so‐called yaw and tilt direction, are decoupled by the MBC transformation, such that single‐input single‐output (SISO) control design is possible. Then, SISO controllers designed for the yaw and tilt directions provide pitch signals in the non‐rotating frame of reference, which are then reverse transformed to the rotating frame of reference so as to obtain the desired pitch actuator signals. For three‐bladed rotors, the aforementioned method is a proven strategy to significantly reduce fatigue loadings on pitch controlled wind turbines. The same MBC transformation and approach can be applied to two‐bladed rotors, which also results in significant load reductions. However, for two‐bladed rotors, this MBC transformation is singular and therefore, not uniquely defined. For that reason, a linear non‐singular coordinate transformation is proposed for IPC of two‐bladed wind turbines. This transformation only requires a single control loop to reduce the once‐per‐revolution rotating blade loads (‘1P’ loads). Moreover, all harmonics (2P, 3P, etc.) in the rotating blade loads can be accounted for with only two control loops. As in the case of the MBC transformation, also the linear coordinate transformation decouples the control loops to allow for SISO control design. High fidelity simulation studies on a two‐bladed wind turbine without a teetering hub prove the effectiveness of the concept. The simulation study indicates that IPC based on the linear coordinate transformation provides similar load reductions and requires similar pitch actuation compared with the conventional IPC approach. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>coordinate transformation</subject><subject>individual pitch control</subject><subject>load reduction</subject><subject>multi-blade coordinate transformation</subject><subject>two-bladed wind turbines</subject><issn>1095-4244</issn><issn>1099-1824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQpiFewxMCAUvwbxyNUbUGKgKGoo5XENriEpNhJQ9-elFRsTPcO37lXOgBcYjTBCJHbzkywIOgIjDCSMsIJYce_O48YYewUnIWwRggjjJMRmKauMpmHrtJu63SblXDjmuIdFnXV-LqE2gT3VkFbe9h0dZSXmTYadr2HTevzPh3OwYnNymAuDnMMXuez5fQhSp8Xj9O7NCqoFCjCBSImkYxYTlEss0KQxFqOpRaC04TxgklNSc4o7h3Xuk8xaaUlsSa5tXQMroa7G19_tSY0al23vupfKhzHOImRpKhX14MqfB2CN1ZtvPvM_E5hpPYNqc6ofUO9vBlk50qz-4-p1eygo0G70JjvP535DxULKrhaPS3U8oWnc7oS6p7-AJULc7o</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>van Solingen, E.</creator><creator>van Wingerden, J.W.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Linear individual pitch control design for two-bladed wind turbines</title><author>van Solingen, E. ; van Wingerden, J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-1c02e8942f53069ac728ff519d7753845c49d32b4312e85dd39749f9f26d2bff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>coordinate transformation</topic><topic>individual pitch control</topic><topic>load reduction</topic><topic>multi-blade coordinate transformation</topic><topic>two-bladed wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Solingen, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wingerden, J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Solingen, E.</au><au>van Wingerden, J.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linear individual pitch control design for two-bladed wind turbines</atitle><jtitle>Wind energy (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Wind Energ</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>697</epage><pages>677-697</pages><issn>1095-4244</issn><eissn>1099-1824</eissn><abstract>In this article, the conventional individual pitch control (IPC) strategy for wind turbines is reviewed, and a linear IPC strategy for two‐bladed wind turbines is proposed. The typical approach of IPC for three‐bladed rotors involves a multi‐blade coordinate (MBC) transformation, which transforms measured blade load signals, i.e., signals measured in a rotating frame of reference, to signals in a fixed non‐rotating frame of reference. The fixed non‐rotating signals, in the so‐called yaw and tilt direction, are decoupled by the MBC transformation, such that single‐input single‐output (SISO) control design is possible. Then, SISO controllers designed for the yaw and tilt directions provide pitch signals in the non‐rotating frame of reference, which are then reverse transformed to the rotating frame of reference so as to obtain the desired pitch actuator signals. For three‐bladed rotors, the aforementioned method is a proven strategy to significantly reduce fatigue loadings on pitch controlled wind turbines. The same MBC transformation and approach can be applied to two‐bladed rotors, which also results in significant load reductions. However, for two‐bladed rotors, this MBC transformation is singular and therefore, not uniquely defined. For that reason, a linear non‐singular coordinate transformation is proposed for IPC of two‐bladed wind turbines. This transformation only requires a single control loop to reduce the once‐per‐revolution rotating blade loads (‘1P’ loads). Moreover, all harmonics (2P, 3P, etc.) in the rotating blade loads can be accounted for with only two control loops. As in the case of the MBC transformation, also the linear coordinate transformation decouples the control loops to allow for SISO control design. High fidelity simulation studies on a two‐bladed wind turbine without a teetering hub prove the effectiveness of the concept. The simulation study indicates that IPC based on the linear coordinate transformation provides similar load reductions and requires similar pitch actuation compared with the conventional IPC approach. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/we.1720</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1095-4244
ispartof Wind energy (Chichester, England), 2015-04, Vol.18 (4), p.677-697
issn 1095-4244
1099-1824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1661860930
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects coordinate transformation
individual pitch control
load reduction
multi-blade coordinate transformation
two-bladed wind turbines
title Linear individual pitch control design for two-bladed wind turbines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A19%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linear%20individual%20pitch%20control%20design%20for%20two-bladed%20wind%20turbines&rft.jtitle=Wind%20energy%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=van%20Solingen,%20E.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=697&rft.pages=677-697&rft.issn=1095-4244&rft.eissn=1099-1824&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/we.1720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3619616591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661860930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true