The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing. Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Managerial auditing journal 2015-03, Vol.30 (3), p.206-225 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 225 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 206 |
container_title | Managerial auditing journal |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Johnson, Lynn O'Keefe, Terrence B |
description | Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive.
Findings
– As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market.
Research limitations/implications
– We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type.
Originality/value
– To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1660627945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3614601221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LAzEQhYMoWKt3jwueY2eSbDZ7LMWfVLzsPWSTCW5puzWbPehf75Z6ETw9GN43Dz7GbhHuEcEs3pavHDQXgIojKH3GZliVhleVLM_ZDIQ2XNcgLtnVMGwAUChUM4bNBxUUI_lc9LHItB8TFf2-cGPocp-KRG7bfbvcTbfkMg3X7CK67UA3vzlnzeNDs3rm6_enl9Vyzb1UInPZgjJQUwjkS6zLEMFA22oItVBaS5KevKcQBcrgYlVGT0aa1hgUUtVyzu5Obw-p_xxpyHbTj2k_LVrUGrSoalVOLTi1fOqHIVG0h9TtXPqyCPboxU5eLGh79GKPXiZkcUJoR8ltw3_EH5PyBywTYpM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660627945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Johnson, Lynn ; O'Keefe, Terrence B</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynn ; O'Keefe, Terrence B</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive.
Findings
– As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market.
Research limitations/implications
– We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type.
Originality/value
– To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accounting & Finance ; Archival studies ; Audit fees ; Audit quality ; Auditors ; Audits ; Bids ; Competition ; Costs ; Fees & charges ; Financial management/structure ; Incumbency ; Production functions ; Profit margins ; Public companies ; Research methodology ; School districts ; Startups ; Studies ; Tenure</subject><ispartof>Managerial auditing journal, 2015-03, Vol.30 (3), p.206-225</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Terrence B</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</title><title>Managerial auditing journal</title><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive.
Findings
– As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market.
Research limitations/implications
– We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type.
Originality/value
– To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.</description><subject>Accounting & Finance</subject><subject>Archival studies</subject><subject>Audit fees</subject><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Financial management/structure</subject><subject>Incumbency</subject><subject>Production functions</subject><subject>Profit margins</subject><subject>Public companies</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><issn>0268-6902</issn><issn>1758-7735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9LAzEQhYMoWKt3jwueY2eSbDZ7LMWfVLzsPWSTCW5puzWbPehf75Z6ETw9GN43Dz7GbhHuEcEs3pavHDQXgIojKH3GZliVhleVLM_ZDIQ2XNcgLtnVMGwAUChUM4bNBxUUI_lc9LHItB8TFf2-cGPocp-KRG7bfbvcTbfkMg3X7CK67UA3vzlnzeNDs3rm6_enl9Vyzb1UInPZgjJQUwjkS6zLEMFA22oItVBaS5KevKcQBcrgYlVGT0aa1hgUUtVyzu5Obw-p_xxpyHbTj2k_LVrUGrSoalVOLTi1fOqHIVG0h9TtXPqyCPboxU5eLGh79GKPXiZkcUJoR8ltw3_EH5PyBywTYpM</recordid><startdate>20150302</startdate><enddate>20150302</enddate><creator>Johnson, Lynn</creator><creator>O'Keefe, Terrence B</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150302</creationdate><title>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</title><author>Johnson, Lynn ; O'Keefe, Terrence B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accounting & Finance</topic><topic>Archival studies</topic><topic>Audit fees</topic><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Financial management/structure</topic><topic>Incumbency</topic><topic>Production functions</topic><topic>Profit margins</topic><topic>Public companies</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Terrence B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Lynn</au><au>O'Keefe, Terrence B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</atitle><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle><date>2015-03-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>206-225</pages><issn>0268-6902</issn><eissn>1758-7735</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive.
Findings
– As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market.
Research limitations/implications
– We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type.
Originality/value
– To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-6902 |
ispartof | Managerial auditing journal, 2015-03, Vol.30 (3), p.206-225 |
issn | 0268-6902 1758-7735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1660627945 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Accounting & Finance Archival studies Audit fees Audit quality Auditors Audits Bids Competition Costs Fees & charges Financial management/structure Incumbency Production functions Profit margins Public companies Research methodology School districts Startups Studies Tenure |
title | The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20tenure%20on%20auditor%20realization%20rates&rft.jtitle=Managerial%20auditing%20journal&rft.au=Johnson,%20Lynn&rft.date=2015-03-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=206-225&rft.issn=0268-6902&rft.eissn=1758-7735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E3614601221%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660627945&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |