The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing. Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Managerial auditing journal 2015-03, Vol.30 (3), p.206-225
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Lynn, O'Keefe, Terrence B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 3
container_start_page 206
container_title Managerial auditing journal
container_volume 30
creator Johnson, Lynn
O'Keefe, Terrence B
description Purpose – The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing. Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive. Findings – As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market. Research limitations/implications – We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type. Originality/value – To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1660627945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3614601221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LAzEQhYMoWKt3jwueY2eSbDZ7LMWfVLzsPWSTCW5puzWbPehf75Z6ETw9GN43Dz7GbhHuEcEs3pavHDQXgIojKH3GZliVhleVLM_ZDIQ2XNcgLtnVMGwAUChUM4bNBxUUI_lc9LHItB8TFf2-cGPocp-KRG7bfbvcTbfkMg3X7CK67UA3vzlnzeNDs3rm6_enl9Vyzb1UInPZgjJQUwjkS6zLEMFA22oItVBaS5KevKcQBcrgYlVGT0aa1hgUUtVyzu5Obw-p_xxpyHbTj2k_LVrUGrSoalVOLTi1fOqHIVG0h9TtXPqyCPboxU5eLGh79GKPXiZkcUJoR8ltw3_EH5PyBywTYpM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660627945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Johnson, Lynn ; O'Keefe, Terrence B</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynn ; O'Keefe, Terrence B</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose – The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing. Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive. Findings – As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market. Research limitations/implications – We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type. Originality/value – To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accounting &amp; Finance ; Archival studies ; Audit fees ; Audit quality ; Auditors ; Audits ; Bids ; Competition ; Costs ; Fees &amp; charges ; Financial management/structure ; Incumbency ; Production functions ; Profit margins ; Public companies ; Research methodology ; School districts ; Startups ; Studies ; Tenure</subject><ispartof>Managerial auditing journal, 2015-03, Vol.30 (3), p.206-225</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Terrence B</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</title><title>Managerial auditing journal</title><description>Purpose – The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing. Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive. Findings – As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market. Research limitations/implications – We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type. Originality/value – To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.</description><subject>Accounting &amp; Finance</subject><subject>Archival studies</subject><subject>Audit fees</subject><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Financial management/structure</subject><subject>Incumbency</subject><subject>Production functions</subject><subject>Profit margins</subject><subject>Public companies</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><issn>0268-6902</issn><issn>1758-7735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9LAzEQhYMoWKt3jwueY2eSbDZ7LMWfVLzsPWSTCW5puzWbPehf75Z6ETw9GN43Dz7GbhHuEcEs3pavHDQXgIojKH3GZliVhleVLM_ZDIQ2XNcgLtnVMGwAUChUM4bNBxUUI_lc9LHItB8TFf2-cGPocp-KRG7bfbvcTbfkMg3X7CK67UA3vzlnzeNDs3rm6_enl9Vyzb1UInPZgjJQUwjkS6zLEMFA22oItVBaS5KevKcQBcrgYlVGT0aa1hgUUtVyzu5Obw-p_xxpyHbTj2k_LVrUGrSoalVOLTi1fOqHIVG0h9TtXPqyCPboxU5eLGh79GKPXiZkcUJoR8ltw3_EH5PyBywTYpM</recordid><startdate>20150302</startdate><enddate>20150302</enddate><creator>Johnson, Lynn</creator><creator>O'Keefe, Terrence B</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150302</creationdate><title>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</title><author>Johnson, Lynn ; O'Keefe, Terrence B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-3b04809eddec5195df080bb60d924663e3ceccedf213daf75fce838b88123493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accounting &amp; Finance</topic><topic>Archival studies</topic><topic>Audit fees</topic><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Financial management/structure</topic><topic>Incumbency</topic><topic>Production functions</topic><topic>Profit margins</topic><topic>Public companies</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Terrence B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Lynn</au><au>O'Keefe, Terrence B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates</atitle><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle><date>2015-03-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>206-225</pages><issn>0268-6902</issn><eissn>1758-7735</eissn><abstract>Purpose – The purpose of this study is to test whether the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure in competitive markets, suggesting the presence of initial audit lowballing. Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, we test this hypothesis with fee- and cost-related data from a sample of local governments audited by a single audit firm. Based on representations of the firm, we classify the audit market for the 127 cities, counties and school districts in our sample as competitive and the audit market for the 93 special district audits as non-competitive. Findings – As hypothesized, we find that in the competitive market, the realization rate on audit engagements increases with auditor tenure but does not do so in the non-competitive audit market. Research limitations/implications – We cannot identify the specific engagements which were subject to a competitive bidding process, so we rely on the auditor’s representation of competitiveness by entity type. Originality/value – To our knowledge, the central prediction of audit pricing models that the auditor’s realization rate increases with auditor tenure has not been tested in real audit markets because proprietary cost data are rarely available. Testing this prediction is the primary contribution of this paper.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-6902
ispartof Managerial auditing journal, 2015-03, Vol.30 (3), p.206-225
issn 0268-6902
1758-7735
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1660627945
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Accounting & Finance
Archival studies
Audit fees
Audit quality
Auditors
Audits
Bids
Competition
Costs
Fees & charges
Financial management/structure
Incumbency
Production functions
Profit margins
Public companies
Research methodology
School districts
Startups
Studies
Tenure
title The effect of tenure on auditor realization rates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20tenure%20on%20auditor%20realization%20rates&rft.jtitle=Managerial%20auditing%20journal&rft.au=Johnson,%20Lynn&rft.date=2015-03-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=206-225&rft.issn=0268-6902&rft.eissn=1758-7735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/MAJ-06-2014-1046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E3614601221%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660627945&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true