Engaging Moral Agency for Human Rights: Outlooks From the Global South
A sample of 1,043 participants from 3 regions in the Global South (South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America) responded to the Personal and Institutional Rights to Aggression and Peace Survey (PAIRTAPS). Participants' descriptions of what they would want to do if directly exposed to 3...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Peace and conflict 2015-02, Vol.21 (1), p.68-88 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 88 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 68 |
| container_title | Peace and conflict |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Malley-Morrison, Kathleen Caputi, Ross Gutowski, Ellen Campbell, Tristyn Estuar, Maria Regina E Akhurst, Jacqueline Dalley, Mahlon P de Souza, Luciana Karine DeSouza, Eros Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti McCarthy, Sherri Puri, Ellora Raj, Nisha Scruggs, Natoschia Shah, Darshini Stevens, Michael J |
| description | A sample of 1,043 participants from 3 regions in the Global South (South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America) responded to the Personal and Institutional Rights to Aggression and Peace Survey (PAIRTAPS). Participants' descriptions of what they would want to do if directly exposed to 3 specific human rights violations (torturing a prisoner, bombing civilians, and beating antiwar protestors) were coded for personal agency (prosocial or nonprosocial). In addition, their arguments concerning whether countries have a right to invade other countries and torture suspects, and whether civilians have a right to protest, were coded for moral disengagement and engagement. As predicted, moral engagement was positively correlated with prosocial agency and with belief in a right to protest, and negatively correlated with nonprosocial agency and with beliefs in the acceptability of state-perpetrated invasion and torture. When scores for activists versus nonactivists were compared, activists showed more prosocial agency on behalf of human rights, lower nonprosocial agency on behalf of those rights, and more moral engagement regarding the right to protest than nonactivists. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pac0000085 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1659979621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3605546101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-1c33a0c97175d51032c8078408acfc10ef86c7241fcacf827d3607aec4014fb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlqwzAQhkUXaJrm0icQ9FZwq5FkS-othCyFlECXs1AU2XHqWK5kH_L2dUghx85lYOb7Z_kRugfyBISJ58ZYcgyZXqABpIwmQnF1iUZKSOCMSUqo4Fd9jwiZgAJ1g25j3PUSTgEGaDatC1OUdYHffDAVHheutgec-4AX3d7U-L0stm18wauurbz_jngW_B63W4fnlV_3ig_ftds7dJ2bKrrRXx6ir9n0c7JIlqv562S8TAyjtE3AMmaIVQJEukn7D6iV_WGcSGNzC8TlMrOCcshtX5BUbFhGhHGWE-D5WrIhejjNbYL_6Vxs9c53oe5XashSpYTKKPxDSQ7AU9VTjyfKBh9jcLluQrk34aCB6KO7-uzuGTaN0U08WBPa0lYu2i4EV7dHVlPQoDPJfgFVV3a5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1659979621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engaging Moral Agency for Human Rights: Outlooks From the Global South</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen ; Caputi, Ross ; Gutowski, Ellen ; Campbell, Tristyn ; Estuar, Maria Regina E ; Akhurst, Jacqueline ; Dalley, Mahlon P ; de Souza, Luciana Karine ; DeSouza, Eros ; Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti ; McCarthy, Sherri ; Puri, Ellora ; Raj, Nisha ; Scruggs, Natoschia ; Shah, Darshini ; Stevens, Michael J</creator><contributor>Twose, Gabriel ; Moghaddam, Fathali ; Cohrs, J. Christopher</contributor><creatorcontrib>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen ; Caputi, Ross ; Gutowski, Ellen ; Campbell, Tristyn ; Estuar, Maria Regina E ; Akhurst, Jacqueline ; Dalley, Mahlon P ; de Souza, Luciana Karine ; DeSouza, Eros ; Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti ; McCarthy, Sherri ; Puri, Ellora ; Raj, Nisha ; Scruggs, Natoschia ; Shah, Darshini ; Stevens, Michael J ; Twose, Gabriel ; Moghaddam, Fathali ; Cohrs, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>A sample of 1,043 participants from 3 regions in the Global South (South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America) responded to the Personal and Institutional Rights to Aggression and Peace Survey (PAIRTAPS). Participants' descriptions of what they would want to do if directly exposed to 3 specific human rights violations (torturing a prisoner, bombing civilians, and beating antiwar protestors) were coded for personal agency (prosocial or nonprosocial). In addition, their arguments concerning whether countries have a right to invade other countries and torture suspects, and whether civilians have a right to protest, were coded for moral disengagement and engagement. As predicted, moral engagement was positively correlated with prosocial agency and with belief in a right to protest, and negatively correlated with nonprosocial agency and with beliefs in the acceptability of state-perpetrated invasion and torture. When scores for activists versus nonactivists were compared, activists showed more prosocial agency on behalf of human rights, lower nonprosocial agency on behalf of those rights, and more moral engagement regarding the right to protest than nonactivists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1919</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433820274</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433820277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pac0000085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springfield: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Activism ; Agency ; Aggressive Behavior ; Demonstrations & protests ; Disengagement ; Female ; Human ; Human Rights ; Human rights violations ; Male ; Morality ; Peace ; Prisoners ; Right wing politics ; Social activism ; Social psychology ; Torture ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Peace and conflict, 2015-02, Vol.21 (1), p.68-88</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2015</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-1c33a0c97175d51032c8078408acfc10ef86c7241fcacf827d3607aec4014fb83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Twose, Gabriel</contributor><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><contributor>Cohrs, J. Christopher</contributor><creatorcontrib>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputi, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutowski, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Tristyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estuar, Maria Regina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhurst, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalley, Mahlon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Luciana Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSouza, Eros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Sherri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puri, Ellora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, Natoschia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Darshini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>Engaging Moral Agency for Human Rights: Outlooks From the Global South</title><title>Peace and conflict</title><description>A sample of 1,043 participants from 3 regions in the Global South (South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America) responded to the Personal and Institutional Rights to Aggression and Peace Survey (PAIRTAPS). Participants' descriptions of what they would want to do if directly exposed to 3 specific human rights violations (torturing a prisoner, bombing civilians, and beating antiwar protestors) were coded for personal agency (prosocial or nonprosocial). In addition, their arguments concerning whether countries have a right to invade other countries and torture suspects, and whether civilians have a right to protest, were coded for moral disengagement and engagement. As predicted, moral engagement was positively correlated with prosocial agency and with belief in a right to protest, and negatively correlated with nonprosocial agency and with beliefs in the acceptability of state-perpetrated invasion and torture. When scores for activists versus nonactivists were compared, activists showed more prosocial agency on behalf of human rights, lower nonprosocial agency on behalf of those rights, and more moral engagement regarding the right to protest than nonactivists.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Aggressive Behavior</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Disengagement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>Human rights violations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Torture</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>1078-1919</issn><issn>1532-7949</issn><isbn>9781433820274</isbn><isbn>1433820277</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlqwzAQhkUXaJrm0icQ9FZwq5FkS-othCyFlECXs1AU2XHqWK5kH_L2dUghx85lYOb7Z_kRugfyBISJ58ZYcgyZXqABpIwmQnF1iUZKSOCMSUqo4Fd9jwiZgAJ1g25j3PUSTgEGaDatC1OUdYHffDAVHheutgec-4AX3d7U-L0stm18wauurbz_jngW_B63W4fnlV_3ig_ftds7dJ2bKrrRXx6ir9n0c7JIlqv562S8TAyjtE3AMmaIVQJEukn7D6iV_WGcSGNzC8TlMrOCcshtX5BUbFhGhHGWE-D5WrIhejjNbYL_6Vxs9c53oe5XashSpYTKKPxDSQ7AU9VTjyfKBh9jcLluQrk34aCB6KO7-uzuGTaN0U08WBPa0lYu2i4EV7dHVlPQoDPJfgFVV3a5</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen</creator><creator>Caputi, Ross</creator><creator>Gutowski, Ellen</creator><creator>Campbell, Tristyn</creator><creator>Estuar, Maria Regina E</creator><creator>Akhurst, Jacqueline</creator><creator>Dalley, Mahlon P</creator><creator>de Souza, Luciana Karine</creator><creator>DeSouza, Eros</creator><creator>Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti</creator><creator>McCarthy, Sherri</creator><creator>Puri, Ellora</creator><creator>Raj, Nisha</creator><creator>Scruggs, Natoschia</creator><creator>Shah, Darshini</creator><creator>Stevens, Michael J</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Engaging Moral Agency for Human Rights: Outlooks From the Global South</title><author>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen ; Caputi, Ross ; Gutowski, Ellen ; Campbell, Tristyn ; Estuar, Maria Regina E ; Akhurst, Jacqueline ; Dalley, Mahlon P ; de Souza, Luciana Karine ; DeSouza, Eros ; Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti ; McCarthy, Sherri ; Puri, Ellora ; Raj, Nisha ; Scruggs, Natoschia ; Shah, Darshini ; Stevens, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-1c33a0c97175d51032c8078408acfc10ef86c7241fcacf827d3607aec4014fb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Aggressive Behavior</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Disengagement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>Human rights violations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Torture</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputi, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutowski, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Tristyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estuar, Maria Regina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhurst, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalley, Mahlon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Luciana Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSouza, Eros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Sherri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puri, Ellora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, Natoschia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Darshini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malley-Morrison, Kathleen</au><au>Caputi, Ross</au><au>Gutowski, Ellen</au><au>Campbell, Tristyn</au><au>Estuar, Maria Regina E</au><au>Akhurst, Jacqueline</au><au>Dalley, Mahlon P</au><au>de Souza, Luciana Karine</au><au>DeSouza, Eros</au><au>Jaafar, Jas Laile Suzana Binti</au><au>McCarthy, Sherri</au><au>Puri, Ellora</au><au>Raj, Nisha</au><au>Scruggs, Natoschia</au><au>Shah, Darshini</au><au>Stevens, Michael J</au><au>Twose, Gabriel</au><au>Moghaddam, Fathali</au><au>Cohrs, J. Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engaging Moral Agency for Human Rights: Outlooks From the Global South</atitle><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>68-88</pages><issn>1078-1919</issn><eissn>1532-7949</eissn><isbn>9781433820274</isbn><isbn>1433820277</isbn><abstract>A sample of 1,043 participants from 3 regions in the Global South (South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America) responded to the Personal and Institutional Rights to Aggression and Peace Survey (PAIRTAPS). Participants' descriptions of what they would want to do if directly exposed to 3 specific human rights violations (torturing a prisoner, bombing civilians, and beating antiwar protestors) were coded for personal agency (prosocial or nonprosocial). In addition, their arguments concerning whether countries have a right to invade other countries and torture suspects, and whether civilians have a right to protest, were coded for moral disengagement and engagement. As predicted, moral engagement was positively correlated with prosocial agency and with belief in a right to protest, and negatively correlated with nonprosocial agency and with beliefs in the acceptability of state-perpetrated invasion and torture. When scores for activists versus nonactivists were compared, activists showed more prosocial agency on behalf of human rights, lower nonprosocial agency on behalf of those rights, and more moral engagement regarding the right to protest than nonactivists.</abstract><cop>Springfield</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/pac0000085</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1078-1919 |
| ispartof | Peace and conflict, 2015-02, Vol.21 (1), p.68-88 |
| issn | 1078-1919 1532-7949 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1659979621 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Activism Agency Aggressive Behavior Demonstrations & protests Disengagement Female Human Human Rights Human rights violations Male Morality Peace Prisoners Right wing politics Social activism Social psychology Torture Violations |
| title | Engaging Moral Agency for Human Rights: Outlooks From the Global South |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engaging%20Moral%20Agency%20for%20Human%20Rights:%20Outlooks%20From%20the%20Global%20South&rft.jtitle=Peace%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Malley-Morrison,%20Kathleen&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=68-88&rft.issn=1078-1919&rft.eissn=1532-7949&rft.isbn=9781433820274&rft.isbn_list=1433820277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pac0000085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3605546101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1659979621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |