Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales

Using data collected at the Mero catchment during three hydrological years (2005/06–2007/08), an analysis of rainfall–runoff relationships was performed at annual, seasonal, monthly, and event scales. At annual scale, the catchment showed low runoff coefficients (23–35%), due to high water storage c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2014-02, Vol.28 (4), p.1677-1688
Hauptverfasser: Palleiro, L., Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L., Taboada-Castro, M. M., Taboada-Castro, M. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1688
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1677
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 28
creator Palleiro, L.
Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L.
Taboada-Castro, M. M.
Taboada-Castro, M. T.
description Using data collected at the Mero catchment during three hydrological years (2005/06–2007/08), an analysis of rainfall–runoff relationships was performed at annual, seasonal, monthly, and event scales. At annual scale, the catchment showed low runoff coefficients (23–35%), due to high water storage capacity soils as well as high runoff inter‐annual variability. Rainfall variability was the main responsible for the differences in the inter‐annual runoff. At seasonal and monthly scales, there was no simple relationship between rainfall and runoff. Seasonal dynamics of rainfall and potential evapotranspiration in conjunction with different rainfall distribution during the study years could be the key factors explaining the complex relationship between rainfall and runoff at monthly and seasonal scale. At the event scale, the results revealed that the hydrological response was highly dependent on initial conditions and, to a lesser extent, on rainfall amount. The shapes of the different hydrographs, regardless of the magnitude, presented similar characteristics: a moderate rise and a prolonged recession, suggesting that subsurface flow was the dominant process in direct runoff. Moreover, all rainfall–runoff events had a higher proportion of baseflow than of direct runoff. A cluster‐type analysis discriminated three types of events differentiated mainly by rainfall amount and antecedent rainfall conditions. The study highlights the role of the antecedent rainfall and the need for caution in extrapolating relationships between rainfall amount and hydrological response of the catchment. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.9714
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1659806654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3610770961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-9c86192cdc056c58836fed9e9cc3a077c57832e9b11236a0e16bf791837397ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgTwh48bJ10my-jlJsVyhaRC2eQprNtlu3zZps0f33bqkIHjwNwzy87_AgdElgQACGN6u2HihB0iPUI6BUQkCyY9QDKVnCQYpTdBbjGgBSkNBDs6zNg6_8srSmwsHF2m-jw77ABq92mzLHZhl84btLE1psTWNXG7dtsGlwXhaFC_ulKTcOxy7BxXN0Upgquouf2Ucv47vnUZZMHyf3o9tpYilnaaKs5EQNbW6BccukpLxwuXLKWmpACMuEpEOnFoQMKTfgCF8UQhFJBVXCGdpHV4fcOviPXfedXvtd2HaVmnCmJPCupqOuD5QNPsbgCl2HcmNCqwnovS_d-dJ7Xx2aHNDPsnLtv5zO3mZ_-TI27uuXN-Fdc0EF0_OHiR7TjKXp06ue02_WRnrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1659806654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Palleiro, L. ; Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L. ; Taboada-Castro, M. M. ; Taboada-Castro, M. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palleiro, L. ; Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L. ; Taboada-Castro, M. M. ; Taboada-Castro, M. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Using data collected at the Mero catchment during three hydrological years (2005/06–2007/08), an analysis of rainfall–runoff relationships was performed at annual, seasonal, monthly, and event scales. At annual scale, the catchment showed low runoff coefficients (23–35%), due to high water storage capacity soils as well as high runoff inter‐annual variability. Rainfall variability was the main responsible for the differences in the inter‐annual runoff. At seasonal and monthly scales, there was no simple relationship between rainfall and runoff. Seasonal dynamics of rainfall and potential evapotranspiration in conjunction with different rainfall distribution during the study years could be the key factors explaining the complex relationship between rainfall and runoff at monthly and seasonal scale. At the event scale, the results revealed that the hydrological response was highly dependent on initial conditions and, to a lesser extent, on rainfall amount. The shapes of the different hydrographs, regardless of the magnitude, presented similar characteristics: a moderate rise and a prolonged recession, suggesting that subsurface flow was the dominant process in direct runoff. Moreover, all rainfall–runoff events had a higher proportion of baseflow than of direct runoff. A cluster‐type analysis discriminated three types of events differentiated mainly by rainfall amount and antecedent rainfall conditions. The study highlights the role of the antecedent rainfall and the need for caution in extrapolating relationships between rainfall amount and hydrological response of the catchment. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>agroforestry catchment ; baseflow ; humid Spain ; hydrological response ; runoff events</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2014-02, Vol.28 (4), p.1677-1688</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-9c86192cdc056c58836fed9e9cc3a077c57832e9b11236a0e16bf791837397ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-9c86192cdc056c58836fed9e9cc3a077c57832e9b11236a0e16bf791837397ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.9714$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.9714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palleiro, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboada-Castro, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboada-Castro, M. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Using data collected at the Mero catchment during three hydrological years (2005/06–2007/08), an analysis of rainfall–runoff relationships was performed at annual, seasonal, monthly, and event scales. At annual scale, the catchment showed low runoff coefficients (23–35%), due to high water storage capacity soils as well as high runoff inter‐annual variability. Rainfall variability was the main responsible for the differences in the inter‐annual runoff. At seasonal and monthly scales, there was no simple relationship between rainfall and runoff. Seasonal dynamics of rainfall and potential evapotranspiration in conjunction with different rainfall distribution during the study years could be the key factors explaining the complex relationship between rainfall and runoff at monthly and seasonal scale. At the event scale, the results revealed that the hydrological response was highly dependent on initial conditions and, to a lesser extent, on rainfall amount. The shapes of the different hydrographs, regardless of the magnitude, presented similar characteristics: a moderate rise and a prolonged recession, suggesting that subsurface flow was the dominant process in direct runoff. Moreover, all rainfall–runoff events had a higher proportion of baseflow than of direct runoff. A cluster‐type analysis discriminated three types of events differentiated mainly by rainfall amount and antecedent rainfall conditions. The study highlights the role of the antecedent rainfall and the need for caution in extrapolating relationships between rainfall amount and hydrological response of the catchment. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>agroforestry catchment</subject><subject>baseflow</subject><subject>humid Spain</subject><subject>hydrological response</subject><subject>runoff events</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgTwh48bJ10my-jlJsVyhaRC2eQprNtlu3zZps0f33bqkIHjwNwzy87_AgdElgQACGN6u2HihB0iPUI6BUQkCyY9QDKVnCQYpTdBbjGgBSkNBDs6zNg6_8srSmwsHF2m-jw77ABq92mzLHZhl84btLE1psTWNXG7dtsGlwXhaFC_ulKTcOxy7BxXN0Upgquouf2Ucv47vnUZZMHyf3o9tpYilnaaKs5EQNbW6BccukpLxwuXLKWmpACMuEpEOnFoQMKTfgCF8UQhFJBVXCGdpHV4fcOviPXfedXvtd2HaVmnCmJPCupqOuD5QNPsbgCl2HcmNCqwnovS_d-dJ7Xx2aHNDPsnLtv5zO3mZ_-TI27uuXN-Fdc0EF0_OHiR7TjKXp06ue02_WRnrs</recordid><startdate>20140215</startdate><enddate>20140215</enddate><creator>Palleiro, L.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L.</creator><creator>Taboada-Castro, M. M.</creator><creator>Taboada-Castro, M. T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140215</creationdate><title>Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales</title><author>Palleiro, L. ; Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L. ; Taboada-Castro, M. M. ; Taboada-Castro, M. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-9c86192cdc056c58836fed9e9cc3a077c57832e9b11236a0e16bf791837397ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>agroforestry catchment</topic><topic>baseflow</topic><topic>humid Spain</topic><topic>hydrological response</topic><topic>runoff events</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palleiro, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboada-Castro, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taboada-Castro, M. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palleiro, L.</au><au>Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L.</au><au>Taboada-Castro, M. M.</au><au>Taboada-Castro, M. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2014-02-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1677</spage><epage>1688</epage><pages>1677-1688</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Using data collected at the Mero catchment during three hydrological years (2005/06–2007/08), an analysis of rainfall–runoff relationships was performed at annual, seasonal, monthly, and event scales. At annual scale, the catchment showed low runoff coefficients (23–35%), due to high water storage capacity soils as well as high runoff inter‐annual variability. Rainfall variability was the main responsible for the differences in the inter‐annual runoff. At seasonal and monthly scales, there was no simple relationship between rainfall and runoff. Seasonal dynamics of rainfall and potential evapotranspiration in conjunction with different rainfall distribution during the study years could be the key factors explaining the complex relationship between rainfall and runoff at monthly and seasonal scale. At the event scale, the results revealed that the hydrological response was highly dependent on initial conditions and, to a lesser extent, on rainfall amount. The shapes of the different hydrographs, regardless of the magnitude, presented similar characteristics: a moderate rise and a prolonged recession, suggesting that subsurface flow was the dominant process in direct runoff. Moreover, all rainfall–runoff events had a higher proportion of baseflow than of direct runoff. A cluster‐type analysis discriminated three types of events differentiated mainly by rainfall amount and antecedent rainfall conditions. The study highlights the role of the antecedent rainfall and the need for caution in extrapolating relationships between rainfall amount and hydrological response of the catchment. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.9714</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2014-02, Vol.28 (4), p.1677-1688
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1659806654
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects agroforestry catchment
baseflow
humid Spain
hydrological response
runoff events
title Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T22%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrological%20response%20of%20a%20humid%20agroforestry%20catchment%20at%20different%20time%20scales&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Palleiro,%20L.&rft.date=2014-02-15&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1677&rft.epage=1688&rft.pages=1677-1688&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.9714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3610770961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1659806654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true