Simulation of stream flow components in a mountainous catchment in northern Thailand with SWAT, using the ANSELM calibration approach

Highland agriculture is intensifying rapidly in South‐East Asia, leading to alarmingly high applications of agrochemicals. Understanding the fate of these contaminants requires carefully planned monitoring programmes and, in most cases, accurate simulation of hydrological pathways into and through w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2015-03, Vol.29 (6), p.1340-1352
Hauptverfasser: Bannwarth, M. A, Hugenschmidt, C, Sangchan, W, Lamers, M, Ingwersen, J, Ziegler, A. D, Streck, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1352
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1340
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 29
creator Bannwarth, M. A
Hugenschmidt, C
Sangchan, W
Lamers, M
Ingwersen, J
Ziegler, A. D
Streck, T
description Highland agriculture is intensifying rapidly in South‐East Asia, leading to alarmingly high applications of agrochemicals. Understanding the fate of these contaminants requires carefully planned monitoring programmes and, in most cases, accurate simulation of hydrological pathways into and through water bodies. We simulate run‐off in a steep mountainous catchment in tropical South‐East Asia. To overcome calibration difficulties related to the mountainous topography, we introduce a new calibration method, named A Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency Likelihood Match (ANSELM), that allows the assignment of optimal parameters to different hydrological response units in simulations of stream discharge with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model. ANSELM performed better than the Parasol calibration tool built into SWAT in terms of model efficiency and computation time. In our simulation, the most sensitive model parameters were those related to base flow generation, surface run‐off generation, flow routing and soil moisture change. The coupling of SWAT with ANSELM yielded reasonable simulations of both wet‐season and dry‐season storm hydrographs. Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiencies for daily stream flow during two validation years were 0.77 and 0.87. These values are in the upper range or even higher than those reported for other SWAT model applications in temperate or tropical regions. The different flow components were realistically simulated by SWAT, and showed a similar behaviour in all the study years, despite inter‐annual climatic differences. The realistic partitioning of total stream flow into its contributing components will be an important factor for using this hydrological model to simulate solute transport in the future. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.10268
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1659751003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3610380891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-44e69f81ee7b655cb7d63a22f452943eb3d5041bb1c67bcabe29570c56a5b2193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9u1DAYxC0EEkvhwBNgiRMSof4T28lxVZUWaSmVdqsCF8v2Oo1LYgfb0bIPwHvjEuDG6fuk-c2MNAC8xOgdRoic9sepPIQ3j8AKo7atMGrYY7BCTcMqjhrxFDxL6R4hVKMGrcDPrRvnQWUXPAwdTDlaNcJuCAdowjgFb31O0Hmo4Bhmn5XzYU7QqGz6sWgPkg8x9zZ6uOuVG5Tfw4PLPdzerndv4Zycv4NFh-ur7fnmY7EOTselUU1TDMr0z8GTTg3JvvhzT8DN-_Pd2WW1-XTx4Wy9qQxtSVPVteVt12BrheaMGS32nCpCupqRtqZW0z1DNdYaGy60UdqSlglkGFdME9zSE_B6yS2132ebsrwPc_SlUmLOWsHKhrRQbxbKxJBStJ2cohtVPEqM5MPKsqwsf69c2NOFPbjBHv8Pyssv138d1eJwKdsf_xwqfpNcUMHk7dWFZOir-LyhXF4X_tXCdypIdRddkjdbgjAr-YhRwugvyuKXwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1659751003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation of stream flow components in a mountainous catchment in northern Thailand with SWAT, using the ANSELM calibration approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Bannwarth, M. A ; Hugenschmidt, C ; Sangchan, W ; Lamers, M ; Ingwersen, J ; Ziegler, A. D ; Streck, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Bannwarth, M. A ; Hugenschmidt, C ; Sangchan, W ; Lamers, M ; Ingwersen, J ; Ziegler, A. D ; Streck, T</creatorcontrib><description>Highland agriculture is intensifying rapidly in South‐East Asia, leading to alarmingly high applications of agrochemicals. Understanding the fate of these contaminants requires carefully planned monitoring programmes and, in most cases, accurate simulation of hydrological pathways into and through water bodies. We simulate run‐off in a steep mountainous catchment in tropical South‐East Asia. To overcome calibration difficulties related to the mountainous topography, we introduce a new calibration method, named A Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency Likelihood Match (ANSELM), that allows the assignment of optimal parameters to different hydrological response units in simulations of stream discharge with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model. ANSELM performed better than the Parasol calibration tool built into SWAT in terms of model efficiency and computation time. In our simulation, the most sensitive model parameters were those related to base flow generation, surface run‐off generation, flow routing and soil moisture change. The coupling of SWAT with ANSELM yielded reasonable simulations of both wet‐season and dry‐season storm hydrographs. Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiencies for daily stream flow during two validation years were 0.77 and 0.87. These values are in the upper range or even higher than those reported for other SWAT model applications in temperate or tropical regions. The different flow components were realistically simulated by SWAT, and showed a similar behaviour in all the study years, despite inter‐annual climatic differences. The realistic partitioning of total stream flow into its contributing components will be an important factor for using this hydrological model to simulate solute transport in the future. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley</publisher><subject>agrochemicals ; ANSELM ; base flow ; dry season ; hydrograph ; hydrologic response simulation ; Mae Sa ; model calibration ; monitoring ; runoff ; simulation models ; Soil and Water Assessment Tool model ; soil water ; solutes ; streams ; surface water ; topography ; tropical monsoon catchment ; tropics ; watersheds ; wet season</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2015-03, Vol.29 (6), p.1340-1352</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-44e69f81ee7b655cb7d63a22f452943eb3d5041bb1c67bcabe29570c56a5b2193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-44e69f81ee7b655cb7d63a22f452943eb3d5041bb1c67bcabe29570c56a5b2193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.10268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.10268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bannwarth, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugenschmidt, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangchan, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamers, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingwersen, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, A. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streck, T</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of stream flow components in a mountainous catchment in northern Thailand with SWAT, using the ANSELM calibration approach</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Highland agriculture is intensifying rapidly in South‐East Asia, leading to alarmingly high applications of agrochemicals. Understanding the fate of these contaminants requires carefully planned monitoring programmes and, in most cases, accurate simulation of hydrological pathways into and through water bodies. We simulate run‐off in a steep mountainous catchment in tropical South‐East Asia. To overcome calibration difficulties related to the mountainous topography, we introduce a new calibration method, named A Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency Likelihood Match (ANSELM), that allows the assignment of optimal parameters to different hydrological response units in simulations of stream discharge with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model. ANSELM performed better than the Parasol calibration tool built into SWAT in terms of model efficiency and computation time. In our simulation, the most sensitive model parameters were those related to base flow generation, surface run‐off generation, flow routing and soil moisture change. The coupling of SWAT with ANSELM yielded reasonable simulations of both wet‐season and dry‐season storm hydrographs. Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiencies for daily stream flow during two validation years were 0.77 and 0.87. These values are in the upper range or even higher than those reported for other SWAT model applications in temperate or tropical regions. The different flow components were realistically simulated by SWAT, and showed a similar behaviour in all the study years, despite inter‐annual climatic differences. The realistic partitioning of total stream flow into its contributing components will be an important factor for using this hydrological model to simulate solute transport in the future. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>agrochemicals</subject><subject>ANSELM</subject><subject>base flow</subject><subject>dry season</subject><subject>hydrograph</subject><subject>hydrologic response simulation</subject><subject>Mae Sa</subject><subject>model calibration</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Soil and Water Assessment Tool model</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>solutes</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>surface water</subject><subject>topography</subject><subject>tropical monsoon catchment</subject><subject>tropics</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><subject>wet season</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9u1DAYxC0EEkvhwBNgiRMSof4T28lxVZUWaSmVdqsCF8v2Oo1LYgfb0bIPwHvjEuDG6fuk-c2MNAC8xOgdRoic9sepPIQ3j8AKo7atMGrYY7BCTcMqjhrxFDxL6R4hVKMGrcDPrRvnQWUXPAwdTDlaNcJuCAdowjgFb31O0Hmo4Bhmn5XzYU7QqGz6sWgPkg8x9zZ6uOuVG5Tfw4PLPdzerndv4Zycv4NFh-ur7fnmY7EOTselUU1TDMr0z8GTTg3JvvhzT8DN-_Pd2WW1-XTx4Wy9qQxtSVPVteVt12BrheaMGS32nCpCupqRtqZW0z1DNdYaGy60UdqSlglkGFdME9zSE_B6yS2132ebsrwPc_SlUmLOWsHKhrRQbxbKxJBStJ2cohtVPEqM5MPKsqwsf69c2NOFPbjBHv8Pyssv138d1eJwKdsf_xwqfpNcUMHk7dWFZOir-LyhXF4X_tXCdypIdRddkjdbgjAr-YhRwugvyuKXwQ</recordid><startdate>20150315</startdate><enddate>20150315</enddate><creator>Bannwarth, M. A</creator><creator>Hugenschmidt, C</creator><creator>Sangchan, W</creator><creator>Lamers, M</creator><creator>Ingwersen, J</creator><creator>Ziegler, A. D</creator><creator>Streck, T</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150315</creationdate><title>Simulation of stream flow components in a mountainous catchment in northern Thailand with SWAT, using the ANSELM calibration approach</title><author>Bannwarth, M. A ; Hugenschmidt, C ; Sangchan, W ; Lamers, M ; Ingwersen, J ; Ziegler, A. D ; Streck, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-44e69f81ee7b655cb7d63a22f452943eb3d5041bb1c67bcabe29570c56a5b2193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>agrochemicals</topic><topic>ANSELM</topic><topic>base flow</topic><topic>dry season</topic><topic>hydrograph</topic><topic>hydrologic response simulation</topic><topic>Mae Sa</topic><topic>model calibration</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Soil and Water Assessment Tool model</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>solutes</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>surface water</topic><topic>topography</topic><topic>tropical monsoon catchment</topic><topic>tropics</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><topic>wet season</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bannwarth, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugenschmidt, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangchan, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamers, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingwersen, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, A. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streck, T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bannwarth, M. A</au><au>Hugenschmidt, C</au><au>Sangchan, W</au><au>Lamers, M</au><au>Ingwersen, J</au><au>Ziegler, A. D</au><au>Streck, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation of stream flow components in a mountainous catchment in northern Thailand with SWAT, using the ANSELM calibration approach</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2015-03-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1340</spage><epage>1352</epage><pages>1340-1352</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Highland agriculture is intensifying rapidly in South‐East Asia, leading to alarmingly high applications of agrochemicals. Understanding the fate of these contaminants requires carefully planned monitoring programmes and, in most cases, accurate simulation of hydrological pathways into and through water bodies. We simulate run‐off in a steep mountainous catchment in tropical South‐East Asia. To overcome calibration difficulties related to the mountainous topography, we introduce a new calibration method, named A Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency Likelihood Match (ANSELM), that allows the assignment of optimal parameters to different hydrological response units in simulations of stream discharge with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model. ANSELM performed better than the Parasol calibration tool built into SWAT in terms of model efficiency and computation time. In our simulation, the most sensitive model parameters were those related to base flow generation, surface run‐off generation, flow routing and soil moisture change. The coupling of SWAT with ANSELM yielded reasonable simulations of both wet‐season and dry‐season storm hydrographs. Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiencies for daily stream flow during two validation years were 0.77 and 0.87. These values are in the upper range or even higher than those reported for other SWAT model applications in temperate or tropical regions. The different flow components were realistically simulated by SWAT, and showed a similar behaviour in all the study years, despite inter‐annual climatic differences. The realistic partitioning of total stream flow into its contributing components will be an important factor for using this hydrological model to simulate solute transport in the future. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.10268</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2015-03, Vol.29 (6), p.1340-1352
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1659751003
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects agrochemicals
ANSELM
base flow
dry season
hydrograph
hydrologic response simulation
Mae Sa
model calibration
monitoring
runoff
simulation models
Soil and Water Assessment Tool model
soil water
solutes
streams
surface water
topography
tropical monsoon catchment
tropics
watersheds
wet season
title Simulation of stream flow components in a mountainous catchment in northern Thailand with SWAT, using the ANSELM calibration approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T23%3A50%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20stream%20flow%20components%20in%20a%20mountainous%20catchment%20in%20northern%20Thailand%20with%20SWAT,%20using%20the%20ANSELM%20calibration%20approach&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Bannwarth,%20M.%20A&rft.date=2015-03-15&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1340&rft.epage=1352&rft.pages=1340-1352&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.10268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3610380891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1659751003&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true