A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times
Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Communication research 2015-03, Vol.42 (2), p.237-259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Communication research |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Sohn, YJ Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver |
description | Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0093650212466891 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1658871823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0093650212466891</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3608437021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqLgnN49BjxX8yZpkp5kG36BIOg8l6x9Mzu2pibtwdt-hEf9c_slds6DCJ5e3ucTHkJOgZ0DaH3BWCZUyjhwqZTJYI8MIE15IgywfTLY0smWPyRHMS4YYzoDPSBPI7pZf4w75zBs1p_Uh-_f-xUGW88ve2yzfqfTF6SPfonUOzrxofHBtj2CTdfatvI1rWo6tiWdViuMx-TA2WXEk587JM_XV9PJbXL_cHM3Gd0nhVCiTSRYKQ3amVSzTEnOINUCTYZWlawQhUA5Y1KiM1ooV8pCF4KDRScVL0xaiiE52-U2wb92GNt84btQ95U5qNQYDYaLXsV2qiL4GAO6vAnVyoa3HFi-nS7_O11vSXaWaOf4K_Q__Rdzb3BT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658871823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Sohn, YJ ; Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creator><creatorcontrib>Sohn, YJ ; Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creatorcontrib><description>Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-6502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0093650212466891</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRESDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Corporate management ; Management of crises ; Reputations ; Social responsibility</subject><ispartof>Communication research, 2015-03, Vol.42 (2), p.237-259</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0093650212466891$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0093650212466891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sohn, YJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creatorcontrib><title>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</title><title>Communication research</title><description>Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Corporate management</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><issn>0093-6502</issn><issn>1552-3810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqLgnN49BjxX8yZpkp5kG36BIOg8l6x9Mzu2pibtwdt-hEf9c_slds6DCJ5e3ucTHkJOgZ0DaH3BWCZUyjhwqZTJYI8MIE15IgywfTLY0smWPyRHMS4YYzoDPSBPI7pZf4w75zBs1p_Uh-_f-xUGW88ve2yzfqfTF6SPfonUOzrxofHBtj2CTdfatvI1rWo6tiWdViuMx-TA2WXEk587JM_XV9PJbXL_cHM3Gd0nhVCiTSRYKQ3amVSzTEnOINUCTYZWlawQhUA5Y1KiM1ooV8pCF4KDRScVL0xaiiE52-U2wb92GNt84btQ95U5qNQYDYaLXsV2qiL4GAO6vAnVyoa3HFi-nS7_O11vSXaWaOf4K_Q__Rdzb3BT</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Sohn, YJ</creator><creator>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</title><author>Sohn, YJ ; Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Corporate management</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sohn, YJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sohn, YJ</au><au>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</atitle><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>237-259</pages><issn>0093-6502</issn><eissn>1552-3810</eissn><coden>CRESDG</coden><abstract>Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0093650212466891</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-6502 |
ispartof | Communication research, 2015-03, Vol.42 (2), p.237-259 |
issn | 0093-6502 1552-3810 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1658871823 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Communication Corporate management Management of crises Reputations Social responsibility |
title | A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%9CBuffer%E2%80%9D%20or%20%E2%80%9CBoomerang?%E2%80%9D%E2%80%94%20The%20Role%20of%20Corporate%20Reputation%20in%20Bad%20Times&rft.jtitle=Communication%20research&rft.au=Sohn,%20YJ&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=237-259&rft.issn=0093-6502&rft.eissn=1552-3810&rft.coden=CRESDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0093650212466891&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3608437021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658871823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0093650212466891&rfr_iscdi=true |