A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times

Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communication research 2015-03, Vol.42 (2), p.237-259
Hauptverfasser: Sohn, YJ, Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 259
container_issue 2
container_start_page 237
container_title Communication research
container_volume 42
creator Sohn, YJ
Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver
description Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0093650212466891
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1658871823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0093650212466891</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3608437021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqLgnN49BjxX8yZpkp5kG36BIOg8l6x9Mzu2pibtwdt-hEf9c_slds6DCJ5e3ucTHkJOgZ0DaH3BWCZUyjhwqZTJYI8MIE15IgywfTLY0smWPyRHMS4YYzoDPSBPI7pZf4w75zBs1p_Uh-_f-xUGW88ve2yzfqfTF6SPfonUOzrxofHBtj2CTdfatvI1rWo6tiWdViuMx-TA2WXEk587JM_XV9PJbXL_cHM3Gd0nhVCiTSRYKQ3amVSzTEnOINUCTYZWlawQhUA5Y1KiM1ooV8pCF4KDRScVL0xaiiE52-U2wb92GNt84btQ95U5qNQYDYaLXsV2qiL4GAO6vAnVyoa3HFi-nS7_O11vSXaWaOf4K_Q__Rdzb3BT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658871823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Sohn, YJ ; Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creator><creatorcontrib>Sohn, YJ ; Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creatorcontrib><description>Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-6502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0093650212466891</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRESDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Corporate management ; Management of crises ; Reputations ; Social responsibility</subject><ispartof>Communication research, 2015-03, Vol.42 (2), p.237-259</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0093650212466891$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0093650212466891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sohn, YJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creatorcontrib><title>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</title><title>Communication research</title><description>Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Corporate management</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><issn>0093-6502</issn><issn>1552-3810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqLgnN49BjxX8yZpkp5kG36BIOg8l6x9Mzu2pibtwdt-hEf9c_slds6DCJ5e3ucTHkJOgZ0DaH3BWCZUyjhwqZTJYI8MIE15IgywfTLY0smWPyRHMS4YYzoDPSBPI7pZf4w75zBs1p_Uh-_f-xUGW88ve2yzfqfTF6SPfonUOzrxofHBtj2CTdfatvI1rWo6tiWdViuMx-TA2WXEk587JM_XV9PJbXL_cHM3Gd0nhVCiTSRYKQ3amVSzTEnOINUCTYZWlawQhUA5Y1KiM1ooV8pCF4KDRScVL0xaiiE52-U2wb92GNt84btQ95U5qNQYDYaLXsV2qiL4GAO6vAnVyoa3HFi-nS7_O11vSXaWaOf4K_Q__Rdzb3BT</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Sohn, YJ</creator><creator>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</title><author>Sohn, YJ ; Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-41a448eab46b964201573e89ea6d0c3c3e4b044ef8736fd4c7c321aef462c85d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Corporate management</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sohn, YJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sohn, YJ</au><au>Lariscy, Ruthann Weaver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times</atitle><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>237-259</pages><issn>0093-6502</issn><eissn>1552-3810</eissn><coden>CRESDG</coden><abstract>Is a favorable prior reputation antibiotics or a hemlock cup in times of organizational crisis? To answer this question, the current study casts light on the contextual cues of crises by applying Brown and Dacin’s (1997) concepts of CA (corporate ability) and CSR (corporate social responsibility) and examines how the cues work in different crisis situations and affect the valence of reputation effects. Drawing on the expectancy violations (EV) theory and the cognitive dissonance perspectives, this study opens the door to reconciling contradicting research findings in literature and provides clues to why and when a good reputation yields buffering or boomerang effects in bad times.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0093650212466891</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-6502
ispartof Communication research, 2015-03, Vol.42 (2), p.237-259
issn 0093-6502
1552-3810
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1658871823
source SAGE Complete
subjects Communication
Corporate management
Management of crises
Reputations
Social responsibility
title A “Buffer” or “Boomerang?”— The Role of Corporate Reputation in Bad Times
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%9CBuffer%E2%80%9D%20or%20%E2%80%9CBoomerang?%E2%80%9D%E2%80%94%20The%20Role%20of%20Corporate%20Reputation%20in%20Bad%20Times&rft.jtitle=Communication%20research&rft.au=Sohn,%20YJ&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=237-259&rft.issn=0093-6502&rft.eissn=1552-3810&rft.coden=CRESDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0093650212466891&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3608437021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658871823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0093650212466891&rfr_iscdi=true