Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised Among Prison Inmates

The Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminal justice and behavior 2015-03, Vol.42 (3), p.286-303
Hauptverfasser: Chenane, Joselyne L., Brennan, Pauline K., Steiner, Benjamin, Ellison, Jared M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 303
container_issue 3
container_start_page 286
container_title Criminal justice and behavior
container_volume 42
creator Chenane, Joselyne L.
Brennan, Pauline K.
Steiner, Benjamin
Ellison, Jared M.
description The Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and its various subcomponents predict prison misconduct similarly for White versus non-White inmates. Using data collected from male inmates confined in prisons across a Midwestern state, we examined the predictive validity of the LSI-R and its 10 subcomponents for White, Black, and Hispanic inmates. We found that the LSI-R predicted the prevalence of misconduct for inmates of varying races/ethnicities. However, we reached a different conclusion when we examined the incidence of misconduct; the LSI-R composite score and subcomponent scores showed greater predictive utility for White inmates than for non-White inmates. Our findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that the predictive validity of the LSI-R differs by offender race/ethnicity. We discuss the policy implications of our findings and offer recommendations for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0093854814548195
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1655583716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0093854814548195</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3593532851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e9a8e861539cd359541d20747b3b189806f09788d0fc40b887e41c3023750c9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxoMoWKt3jwHPq0mTbJJjqVULBcV_1yXNzrYp22xNtgt78x18Q5_EXetBBC8zDN_v-4YZhM4puaRUyitCNFOCK8r7osUBGlAhRgkTmh-iQS8nvX6MTmJcE0K4oGKA2kdjnSmx8Tme1ivvLL52RQEBvIWIncf1CvBDgNzZ2jWAX03pcle3uCq-pTk0UPbDE4TGWcAz34Cvq9B-vn88QuMi5Hi8qfyyS3Gx8h2wMTXEU3RUmDLC2U8fopeb6fPkLpnf384m43liGdF1AtooUCkVTNu8O0Zwmo-I5HLBFlRpRdKCaKlUTgrLyUIpCZx21hGTglht2RBd7HO3oXrbQayzdbULvluZ0VQIoZikaUeRPWVDFWOAItsGtzGhzSjJ-gdnfx_cWZK9JZol_Ar9j_8CD0R6tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655583716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised Among Prison Inmates</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Chenane, Joselyne L. ; Brennan, Pauline K. ; Steiner, Benjamin ; Ellison, Jared M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chenane, Joselyne L. ; Brennan, Pauline K. ; Steiner, Benjamin ; Ellison, Jared M.</creatorcontrib><description>The Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and its various subcomponents predict prison misconduct similarly for White versus non-White inmates. Using data collected from male inmates confined in prisons across a Midwestern state, we examined the predictive validity of the LSI-R and its 10 subcomponents for White, Black, and Hispanic inmates. We found that the LSI-R predicted the prevalence of misconduct for inmates of varying races/ethnicities. However, we reached a different conclusion when we examined the incidence of misconduct; the LSI-R composite score and subcomponent scores showed greater predictive utility for White inmates than for non-White inmates. Our findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that the predictive validity of the LSI-R differs by offender race/ethnicity. We discuss the policy implications of our findings and offer recommendations for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-8548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0093854814548195</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJBHAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cultural differences ; Prison administration ; Prisoners ; Racial differences ; Risk assessment ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Criminal justice and behavior, 2015-03, Vol.42 (3), p.286-303</ispartof><rights>2014 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e9a8e861539cd359541d20747b3b189806f09788d0fc40b887e41c3023750c9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e9a8e861539cd359541d20747b3b189806f09788d0fc40b887e41c3023750c9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0093854814548195$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0093854814548195$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chenane, Joselyne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Pauline K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Jared M.</creatorcontrib><title>Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised Among Prison Inmates</title><title>Criminal justice and behavior</title><description>The Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and its various subcomponents predict prison misconduct similarly for White versus non-White inmates. Using data collected from male inmates confined in prisons across a Midwestern state, we examined the predictive validity of the LSI-R and its 10 subcomponents for White, Black, and Hispanic inmates. We found that the LSI-R predicted the prevalence of misconduct for inmates of varying races/ethnicities. However, we reached a different conclusion when we examined the incidence of misconduct; the LSI-R composite score and subcomponent scores showed greater predictive utility for White inmates than for non-White inmates. Our findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that the predictive validity of the LSI-R differs by offender race/ethnicity. We discuss the policy implications of our findings and offer recommendations for future research.</description><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Prison administration</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0093-8548</issn><issn>1552-3594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxoMoWKt3jwHPq0mTbJJjqVULBcV_1yXNzrYp22xNtgt78x18Q5_EXetBBC8zDN_v-4YZhM4puaRUyitCNFOCK8r7osUBGlAhRgkTmh-iQS8nvX6MTmJcE0K4oGKA2kdjnSmx8Tme1ivvLL52RQEBvIWIncf1CvBDgNzZ2jWAX03pcle3uCq-pTk0UPbDE4TGWcAz34Cvq9B-vn88QuMi5Hi8qfyyS3Gx8h2wMTXEU3RUmDLC2U8fopeb6fPkLpnf384m43liGdF1AtooUCkVTNu8O0Zwmo-I5HLBFlRpRdKCaKlUTgrLyUIpCZx21hGTglht2RBd7HO3oXrbQayzdbULvluZ0VQIoZikaUeRPWVDFWOAItsGtzGhzSjJ-gdnfx_cWZK9JZol_Ar9j_8CD0R6tQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Chenane, Joselyne L.</creator><creator>Brennan, Pauline K.</creator><creator>Steiner, Benjamin</creator><creator>Ellison, Jared M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised Among Prison Inmates</title><author>Chenane, Joselyne L. ; Brennan, Pauline K. ; Steiner, Benjamin ; Ellison, Jared M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e9a8e861539cd359541d20747b3b189806f09788d0fc40b887e41c3023750c9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Prison administration</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chenane, Joselyne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Pauline K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Jared M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Criminal justice and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chenane, Joselyne L.</au><au>Brennan, Pauline K.</au><au>Steiner, Benjamin</au><au>Ellison, Jared M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised Among Prison Inmates</atitle><jtitle>Criminal justice and behavior</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>286-303</pages><issn>0093-8548</issn><eissn>1552-3594</eissn><coden>CJBHAB</coden><abstract>The Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and its various subcomponents predict prison misconduct similarly for White versus non-White inmates. Using data collected from male inmates confined in prisons across a Midwestern state, we examined the predictive validity of the LSI-R and its 10 subcomponents for White, Black, and Hispanic inmates. We found that the LSI-R predicted the prevalence of misconduct for inmates of varying races/ethnicities. However, we reached a different conclusion when we examined the incidence of misconduct; the LSI-R composite score and subcomponent scores showed greater predictive utility for White inmates than for non-White inmates. Our findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that the predictive validity of the LSI-R differs by offender race/ethnicity. We discuss the policy implications of our findings and offer recommendations for future research.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0093854814548195</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-8548
ispartof Criminal justice and behavior, 2015-03, Vol.42 (3), p.286-303
issn 0093-8548
1552-3594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1655583716
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Cultural differences
Prison administration
Prisoners
Racial differences
Risk assessment
Validation studies
title Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised Among Prison Inmates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Racial%20and%20Ethnic%20Differences%20in%20the%20Predictive%20Validity%20of%20the%20Level%20of%20Service%20Inventory%E2%80%93Revised%20Among%20Prison%20Inmates&rft.jtitle=Criminal%20justice%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Chenane,%20Joselyne%20L.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=286-303&rft.issn=0093-8548&rft.eissn=1552-3594&rft.coden=CJBHAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0093854814548195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3593532851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655583716&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0093854814548195&rfr_iscdi=true