Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study
With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of actuarial science 2015-03, Vol.9 (1), p.134-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 134 |
container_title | Annals of actuarial science |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yang, Wei Tapadar, Pradip |
description | With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financial markets. In this paper, we analyse the impact of applying economic capital techniques to defined benefit pension schemes in the United Kingdom. We propose two alternative economic capital quantification approaches, first, for individual defined benefit pension schemes on a stand-alone basis and then for the pension sector as a whole by quantifying economic capital of the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, which takes over eligible schemes with deficit, in the event of sponsor insolvency. We find that economic capital requirements for individual schemes are significantly high. However, we show that sharing risks through the Pension Protection Fund reduces the aggregate economic capital requirement of the entire sector. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1748499514000256 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1654393130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1748499514000256</cupid><sourcerecordid>3586995001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-493f60e97213eac2bb314b290fe0c79753e5d1f8a90e90966b978059cfb34723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwyAYhxujicvcB_BG4rkKhf7Bm1mcGpe46Dw3lL6dzBYq0MO-gx9amvVgYjzxA57fQ3ij6JLga4JJfvNGclYwzlPCMMZJmp1Es_EoTsPudMrj_Xm0cG4fGMw4LiifRd-vpgVkGuQ_AG1AO2U02ljjQfoxrgZdI6VRo7TQUokWWeU-USe02EEH2o_d92dUQyCgRhXokDzqJ5ULHmNvkUDd0HoV92CVqRFIo02nJJKiVz5YnR_qw0V01ojWwWJa59F2db9dPsbrl4en5d06lixhPvyENhkGnieEgpBJVVHCqoTjBrDMeZ5SSGvSFIIHCPMsq3he4JTLpqIsT-g8ujpqe2u-BnC-3JvB6vBiSbKUUU4JxYEiR0pa45yFpuyt6oQ9lASX49jLP2MPHTp1RFdZVe_gl_rf1g_D_4Tt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654393130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Yang, Wei ; Tapadar, Pradip</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei ; Tapadar, Pradip</creatorcontrib><description>With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financial markets. In this paper, we analyse the impact of applying economic capital techniques to defined benefit pension schemes in the United Kingdom. We propose two alternative economic capital quantification approaches, first, for individual defined benefit pension schemes on a stand-alone basis and then for the pension sector as a whole by quantifying economic capital of the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, which takes over eligible schemes with deficit, in the event of sponsor insolvency. We find that economic capital requirements for individual schemes are significantly high. However, we show that sharing risks through the Pension Protection Fund reduces the aggregate economic capital requirement of the entire sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-4995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5002</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1748499514000256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Arbitrage ; Banking ; Capital requirements ; Defined benefit plans ; Economic crisis ; Financial institutions ; Financial services ; Insurance industry ; Pension plan funding ; Pension plans ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Securities markets ; Social policy ; Solvency ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of actuarial science, 2015-03, Vol.9 (1), p.134-166</ispartof><rights>Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-493f60e97213eac2bb314b290fe0c79753e5d1f8a90e90966b978059cfb34723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-493f60e97213eac2bb314b290fe0c79753e5d1f8a90e90966b978059cfb34723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499514000256/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55607</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapadar, Pradip</creatorcontrib><title>Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study</title><title>Annals of actuarial science</title><addtitle>Ann. actuar. sci</addtitle><description>With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financial markets. In this paper, we analyse the impact of applying economic capital techniques to defined benefit pension schemes in the United Kingdom. We propose two alternative economic capital quantification approaches, first, for individual defined benefit pension schemes on a stand-alone basis and then for the pension sector as a whole by quantifying economic capital of the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, which takes over eligible schemes with deficit, in the event of sponsor insolvency. We find that economic capital requirements for individual schemes are significantly high. However, we show that sharing risks through the Pension Protection Fund reduces the aggregate economic capital requirement of the entire sector.</description><subject>Arbitrage</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Capital requirements</subject><subject>Defined benefit plans</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Financial services</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Pension plan funding</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Solvency</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1748-4995</issn><issn>1748-5002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9PwyAYhxujicvcB_BG4rkKhf7Bm1mcGpe46Dw3lL6dzBYq0MO-gx9amvVgYjzxA57fQ3ij6JLga4JJfvNGclYwzlPCMMZJmp1Es_EoTsPudMrj_Xm0cG4fGMw4LiifRd-vpgVkGuQ_AG1AO2U02ljjQfoxrgZdI6VRo7TQUokWWeU-USe02EEH2o_d92dUQyCgRhXokDzqJ5ULHmNvkUDd0HoV92CVqRFIo02nJJKiVz5YnR_qw0V01ojWwWJa59F2db9dPsbrl4en5d06lixhPvyENhkGnieEgpBJVVHCqoTjBrDMeZ5SSGvSFIIHCPMsq3he4JTLpqIsT-g8ujpqe2u-BnC-3JvB6vBiSbKUUU4JxYEiR0pa45yFpuyt6oQ9lASX49jLP2MPHTp1RFdZVe_gl_rf1g_D_4Tt</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Yang, Wei</creator><creator>Tapadar, Pradip</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study</title><author>Yang, Wei ; Tapadar, Pradip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-493f60e97213eac2bb314b290fe0c79753e5d1f8a90e90966b978059cfb34723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arbitrage</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Capital requirements</topic><topic>Defined benefit plans</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Financial services</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Pension plan funding</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Solvency</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapadar, Pradip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of actuarial science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Wei</au><au>Tapadar, Pradip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of actuarial science</jtitle><addtitle>Ann. actuar. sci</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>134-166</pages><issn>1748-4995</issn><eissn>1748-5002</eissn><abstract>With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financial markets. In this paper, we analyse the impact of applying economic capital techniques to defined benefit pension schemes in the United Kingdom. We propose two alternative economic capital quantification approaches, first, for individual defined benefit pension schemes on a stand-alone basis and then for the pension sector as a whole by quantifying economic capital of the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, which takes over eligible schemes with deficit, in the event of sponsor insolvency. We find that economic capital requirements for individual schemes are significantly high. However, we show that sharing risks through the Pension Protection Fund reduces the aggregate economic capital requirement of the entire sector.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1748499514000256</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-4995 |
ispartof | Annals of actuarial science, 2015-03, Vol.9 (1), p.134-166 |
issn | 1748-4995 1748-5002 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1654393130 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Arbitrage Banking Capital requirements Defined benefit plans Economic crisis Financial institutions Financial services Insurance industry Pension plan funding Pension plans Regulation of financial institutions Risk assessment Risk management Securities markets Social policy Solvency Studies |
title | Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20the%20Pension%20Protection%20Fund%20in%20financial%20risk%20management%20of%20UK%20defined%20benefit%20pension%20sector:%20a%20multi-period%20economic%20capital%20study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20actuarial%20science&rft.au=Yang,%20Wei&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=134-166&rft.issn=1748-4995&rft.eissn=1748-5002&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1748499514000256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3586995001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654393130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1748499514000256&rfr_iscdi=true |