Comparison of Fatigue Levels of Postratum Women According to the Birth Method
The purpose of this descriptive and comparative study conducted at the Nene Hatun Maternity Hospital was to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women who had vaginal birth and caesaren section, after 24 hours of childbirth. Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue "VAS-F" was used to deter...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of caring sciences 2015-01, Vol.8 (1), p.124 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 124 |
| container_title | International journal of caring sciences |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Kilic, Meral Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur Apay, Serap Ejder Çapik, Ayla Agapinar, Safiye Özkan, Hava |
| description | The purpose of this descriptive and comparative study conducted at the Nene Hatun Maternity Hospital was to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women who had vaginal birth and caesaren section, after 24 hours of childbirth. Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue "VAS-F" was used to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women. It was determined that half of the postpartum women in both groups had a moderate-level fatigue. Mean score of the postpartum women with vaginal birth for fatigue was 59.5±25.2 and mean score of those, who gave caesaren section, for the fatigue was 71.2±22.8. According to the birth methods, the fatigue levels of the postpartum women who had vaginal birth were lower compared to those giving caesaren section, their energies were higher than the postpartum women who gave caesaren section. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1648623494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3571244221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16486234943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNissKgkAYhYcoSMp3-KG14Dij5rIkaZHQIqidiI431N_m0vNn0QN0NufjfGdBLBpGnuOy8LH8MnV8z6VrYivVuXN4xHjoWySNcZhy2SocAStIct3WRsBFvESvPssVlZa5NgPccRAjHIoCZdmONWgE3Qg4tlI3kArdYLklqyrvlbB_vSG75HSLz84k8WmE0lmHRo6zymjA94HHeMTZf6839N4_ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1648623494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Fatigue Levels of Postratum Women According to the Birth Method</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kilic, Meral ; Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur ; Apay, Serap Ejder ; Çapik, Ayla ; Agapinar, Safiye ; Özkan, Hava</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Meral ; Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur ; Apay, Serap Ejder ; Çapik, Ayla ; Agapinar, Safiye ; Özkan, Hava</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this descriptive and comparative study conducted at the Nene Hatun Maternity Hospital was to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women who had vaginal birth and caesaren section, after 24 hours of childbirth. Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue "VAS-F" was used to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women. It was determined that half of the postpartum women in both groups had a moderate-level fatigue. Mean score of the postpartum women with vaginal birth for fatigue was 59.5±25.2 and mean score of those, who gave caesaren section, for the fatigue was 71.2±22.8. According to the birth methods, the fatigue levels of the postpartum women who had vaginal birth were lower compared to those giving caesaren section, their energies were higher than the postpartum women who gave caesaren section.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1791-5201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1792-037X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nicosia: Professor Despina Sapountzi - Krepia Publisher of the International Journal of Caring Sciences</publisher><subject>Babies ; Cesarean section ; Childbirth & labor ; Postpartum depression</subject><ispartof>International journal of caring sciences, 2015-01, Vol.8 (1), p.124</ispartof><rights>Copyright Professor Despina Sapountzi - Krepia Publisher of the International Journal of Caring Sciences Jan-Apr 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Meral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apay, Serap Ejder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çapik, Ayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agapinar, Safiye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Hava</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Fatigue Levels of Postratum Women According to the Birth Method</title><title>International journal of caring sciences</title><description>The purpose of this descriptive and comparative study conducted at the Nene Hatun Maternity Hospital was to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women who had vaginal birth and caesaren section, after 24 hours of childbirth. Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue "VAS-F" was used to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women. It was determined that half of the postpartum women in both groups had a moderate-level fatigue. Mean score of the postpartum women with vaginal birth for fatigue was 59.5±25.2 and mean score of those, who gave caesaren section, for the fatigue was 71.2±22.8. According to the birth methods, the fatigue levels of the postpartum women who had vaginal birth were lower compared to those giving caesaren section, their energies were higher than the postpartum women who gave caesaren section.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><issn>1791-5201</issn><issn>1792-037X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNissKgkAYhYcoSMp3-KG14Dij5rIkaZHQIqidiI431N_m0vNn0QN0NufjfGdBLBpGnuOy8LH8MnV8z6VrYivVuXN4xHjoWySNcZhy2SocAStIct3WRsBFvESvPssVlZa5NgPccRAjHIoCZdmONWgE3Qg4tlI3kArdYLklqyrvlbB_vSG75HSLz84k8WmE0lmHRo6zymjA94HHeMTZf6839N4_ZA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Kilic, Meral</creator><creator>Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur</creator><creator>Apay, Serap Ejder</creator><creator>Çapik, Ayla</creator><creator>Agapinar, Safiye</creator><creator>Özkan, Hava</creator><general>Professor Despina Sapountzi - Krepia Publisher of the International Journal of Caring Sciences</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Fatigue Levels of Postratum Women According to the Birth Method</title><author>Kilic, Meral ; Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur ; Apay, Serap Ejder ; Çapik, Ayla ; Agapinar, Safiye ; Özkan, Hava</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16486234943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Meral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apay, Serap Ejder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çapik, Ayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agapinar, Safiye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Hava</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International journal of caring sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilic, Meral</au><au>Ozorhan, Elif Yagmur</au><au>Apay, Serap Ejder</au><au>Çapik, Ayla</au><au>Agapinar, Safiye</au><au>Özkan, Hava</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Fatigue Levels of Postratum Women According to the Birth Method</atitle><jtitle>International journal of caring sciences</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><pages>124-</pages><issn>1791-5201</issn><eissn>1792-037X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this descriptive and comparative study conducted at the Nene Hatun Maternity Hospital was to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women who had vaginal birth and caesaren section, after 24 hours of childbirth. Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue "VAS-F" was used to determine the fatigue levels of postpartum women. It was determined that half of the postpartum women in both groups had a moderate-level fatigue. Mean score of the postpartum women with vaginal birth for fatigue was 59.5±25.2 and mean score of those, who gave caesaren section, for the fatigue was 71.2±22.8. According to the birth methods, the fatigue levels of the postpartum women who had vaginal birth were lower compared to those giving caesaren section, their energies were higher than the postpartum women who gave caesaren section.</abstract><cop>Nicosia</cop><pub>Professor Despina Sapountzi - Krepia Publisher of the International Journal of Caring Sciences</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1791-5201 |
| ispartof | International journal of caring sciences, 2015-01, Vol.8 (1), p.124 |
| issn | 1791-5201 1792-037X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1648623494 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Babies Cesarean section Childbirth & labor Postpartum depression |
| title | Comparison of Fatigue Levels of Postratum Women According to the Birth Method |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A48%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Fatigue%20Levels%20of%20Postratum%20Women%20According%20to%20the%20Birth%20Method&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20caring%20sciences&rft.au=Kilic,%20Meral&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.pages=124-&rft.issn=1791-5201&rft.eissn=1792-037X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3571244221%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1648623494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |