Pod Set in Soybean: Investigations with SOYPODP, a Whole Plant Model
The ability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to adjust its pod load to environmental conditions is an important, but not well understood, part of the yield production process. To better understand this process at the whole plant level, a single‐node model (SOYPOD) was extended to predict pod set...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2015-01, Vol.107 (1), p.349-360 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 360 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 349 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Egli, D. B. |
description | The ability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to adjust its pod load to environmental conditions is an important, but not well understood, part of the yield production process. To better understand this process at the whole plant level, a single‐node model (SOYPOD) was extended to predict pod set of whole plants. Pod survival in SOYPODP was determined by comparing assimilate from photosynthesis (calculated from solar radiation) to pod requirements during initial pod growth. Measured profiles of flowers per node and pod and seed growth rates were used as input. Pods that do not receive adequate assimilate for a specified number of consecutive days do not survive. When inter‐nodal movement of assimilate was prohibited and the nodal assimilate production profile matched the input flower profile, pod set on the stem matched measured profiles of two field‐grown cultivars. In this form, SOYPODP accurately mimicked known responses of pod number to variation in assimilate supply, nodes per plant and individual seed growth rate. Competition for assimilate at a node‐controlled pod set, so increasing uniformity of pod development (more flowers or a shorter flowering period) increased pod set. Increasing nodal variation in the beginning of pod development reduced the sensitivity of the plant to short‐term fluctuations in assimilate supply. Variation in uniformity of pod development at a node was responsible for increases in pod set with no change in assimilate availability. The value of these increases is not clear, but it seems unlikely that they would affect yield. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj14.0330 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1647424033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3565372741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1dc9373e839b74ab3eb8017a3a9a0668dc0528d9a6d6e08930e80bf0dabcb1c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPwkAQRjdGExE9et_Eq8WZ7tJ29URAEYK2EY3xtNntLlBSu9AWCf_eInr1NJc3M9_3CLlE6PjI-I2al65YIu8AY3BEWshZ14OAd49JCwB8D0Xgn5KzqloCIAqOLTJInKFTW9OsoFO301YVt3RUfNmqzuaqzlxR0W1WL-g0_kjiQXJNFX1fuNzSJFdFTZ-csfk5OZmpvLIXv7NN3h7uX_uP3iQejvq9iZcyDMFDkwoWMhsxoUOuNLM6AgwVU0JBEEQmha4fGaECE1iIBAMbgZ6BUTrVmHLWJleHu6vSrTdNRLl0m7JoXkoMeMh93jRvKO9ApaWrqtLO5KrMPlW5kwhyL0r-iZJ7UQ1_d-C3WW53_8OyNxz7veFL_DxG_rP9DTq8bJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647424033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pod Set in Soybean: Investigations with SOYPODP, a Whole Plant Model</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Egli, D. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Egli, D. B.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to adjust its pod load to environmental conditions is an important, but not well understood, part of the yield production process. To better understand this process at the whole plant level, a single‐node model (SOYPOD) was extended to predict pod set of whole plants. Pod survival in SOYPODP was determined by comparing assimilate from photosynthesis (calculated from solar radiation) to pod requirements during initial pod growth. Measured profiles of flowers per node and pod and seed growth rates were used as input. Pods that do not receive adequate assimilate for a specified number of consecutive days do not survive. When inter‐nodal movement of assimilate was prohibited and the nodal assimilate production profile matched the input flower profile, pod set on the stem matched measured profiles of two field‐grown cultivars. In this form, SOYPODP accurately mimicked known responses of pod number to variation in assimilate supply, nodes per plant and individual seed growth rate. Competition for assimilate at a node‐controlled pod set, so increasing uniformity of pod development (more flowers or a shorter flowering period) increased pod set. Increasing nodal variation in the beginning of pod development reduced the sensitivity of the plant to short‐term fluctuations in assimilate supply. Variation in uniformity of pod development at a node was responsible for increases in pod set with no change in assimilate availability. The value of these increases is not clear, but it seems unlikely that they would affect yield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj14.0330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><subject>Soybeans</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2015-01, Vol.107 (1), p.349-360</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1dc9373e839b74ab3eb8017a3a9a0668dc0528d9a6d6e08930e80bf0dabcb1c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1dc9373e839b74ab3eb8017a3a9a0668dc0528d9a6d6e08930e80bf0dabcb1c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0330$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Egli, D. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Pod Set in Soybean: Investigations with SOYPODP, a Whole Plant Model</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>The ability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to adjust its pod load to environmental conditions is an important, but not well understood, part of the yield production process. To better understand this process at the whole plant level, a single‐node model (SOYPOD) was extended to predict pod set of whole plants. Pod survival in SOYPODP was determined by comparing assimilate from photosynthesis (calculated from solar radiation) to pod requirements during initial pod growth. Measured profiles of flowers per node and pod and seed growth rates were used as input. Pods that do not receive adequate assimilate for a specified number of consecutive days do not survive. When inter‐nodal movement of assimilate was prohibited and the nodal assimilate production profile matched the input flower profile, pod set on the stem matched measured profiles of two field‐grown cultivars. In this form, SOYPODP accurately mimicked known responses of pod number to variation in assimilate supply, nodes per plant and individual seed growth rate. Competition for assimilate at a node‐controlled pod set, so increasing uniformity of pod development (more flowers or a shorter flowering period) increased pod set. Increasing nodal variation in the beginning of pod development reduced the sensitivity of the plant to short‐term fluctuations in assimilate supply. Variation in uniformity of pod development at a node was responsible for increases in pod set with no change in assimilate availability. The value of these increases is not clear, but it seems unlikely that they would affect yield.</description><subject>Soybeans</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFPwkAQRjdGExE9et_Eq8WZ7tJ29URAEYK2EY3xtNntLlBSu9AWCf_eInr1NJc3M9_3CLlE6PjI-I2al65YIu8AY3BEWshZ14OAd49JCwB8D0Xgn5KzqloCIAqOLTJInKFTW9OsoFO301YVt3RUfNmqzuaqzlxR0W1WL-g0_kjiQXJNFX1fuNzSJFdFTZ-csfk5OZmpvLIXv7NN3h7uX_uP3iQejvq9iZcyDMFDkwoWMhsxoUOuNLM6AgwVU0JBEEQmha4fGaECE1iIBAMbgZ6BUTrVmHLWJleHu6vSrTdNRLl0m7JoXkoMeMh93jRvKO9ApaWrqtLO5KrMPlW5kwhyL0r-iZJ7UQ1_d-C3WW53_8OyNxz7veFL_DxG_rP9DTq8bJ4</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Egli, D. B.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Pod Set in Soybean: Investigations with SOYPODP, a Whole Plant Model</title><author>Egli, D. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1dc9373e839b74ab3eb8017a3a9a0668dc0528d9a6d6e08930e80bf0dabcb1c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Soybeans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Egli, D. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Egli, D. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pod Set in Soybean: Investigations with SOYPODP, a Whole Plant Model</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>349-360</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>The ability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to adjust its pod load to environmental conditions is an important, but not well understood, part of the yield production process. To better understand this process at the whole plant level, a single‐node model (SOYPOD) was extended to predict pod set of whole plants. Pod survival in SOYPODP was determined by comparing assimilate from photosynthesis (calculated from solar radiation) to pod requirements during initial pod growth. Measured profiles of flowers per node and pod and seed growth rates were used as input. Pods that do not receive adequate assimilate for a specified number of consecutive days do not survive. When inter‐nodal movement of assimilate was prohibited and the nodal assimilate production profile matched the input flower profile, pod set on the stem matched measured profiles of two field‐grown cultivars. In this form, SOYPODP accurately mimicked known responses of pod number to variation in assimilate supply, nodes per plant and individual seed growth rate. Competition for assimilate at a node‐controlled pod set, so increasing uniformity of pod development (more flowers or a shorter flowering period) increased pod set. Increasing nodal variation in the beginning of pod development reduced the sensitivity of the plant to short‐term fluctuations in assimilate supply. Variation in uniformity of pod development at a node was responsible for increases in pod set with no change in assimilate availability. The value of these increases is not clear, but it seems unlikely that they would affect yield.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj14.0330</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2015-01, Vol.107 (1), p.349-360 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1647424033 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Soybeans |
title | Pod Set in Soybean: Investigations with SOYPODP, a Whole Plant Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T12%3A03%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pod%20Set%20in%20Soybean:%20Investigations%20with%20SOYPODP,%20a%20Whole%20Plant%20Model&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Egli,%20D.%20B.&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=349-360&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj14.0330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3565372741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647424033&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |