Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation

A retrospective review to determine the incidence and characteristics of microbial infection following amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) was conducted. Among 326 patients who underwent AMT at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1994 and February 2001, a total of 11 (3.4%) culture-p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2004-10, Vol.138 (4), p.701-701
Hauptverfasser: Marangon, F.B., Alfonso, E.A., Miller, D., Remonda, N.M., Muallem, M.S., Tseng, S.C.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 701
container_issue 4
container_start_page 701
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 138
creator Marangon, F.B.
Alfonso, E.A.
Miller, D.
Remonda, N.M.
Muallem, M.S.
Tseng, S.C.G.
description A retrospective review to determine the incidence and characteristics of microbial infection following amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) was conducted. Among 326 patients who underwent AMT at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1994 and February 2001, a total of 11 (3.4%) culture-positive infections were identified. This included 7 (9.2%) infections in 76 patients who received tissue prepared by a research laboratory under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol between January 1994 and June 1998, and 4 (1.6%) infections in 250 patients who received tissue obtained from a commercial source. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P = .004). All 4 infections that occurred within 1 month after AMT were exclusively from the first group ( P = .0003). Overall, gram-positive organisms were the most frequent isolate (64%). Infections were not correlated with the underlying diagnosis. The conclusion was that AMT is a safe method for ocular surface reconstruction with a very low rate of microbial infections, especially if the tissue is prepared according to Good Tissue Banking Practice set forth by the FDA.—Michael D. Wagoner
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1644882846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002939404009638</els_id><sourcerecordid>3556264721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1226-922ca4142e46d63d9bbe7748a8fbf4d62e81d2ba7988d328ad72be42e6da1b8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gLuC69YkDWmKKxnUGRhwo-twk9xCyjQZk47g25syrt3kEjjf_TmE3DPaMMrk49jAGBtOqWioaihrL8iKqa6vmerZJVlRSnndt724Jjc5j-UrO9GtyHYXrHcYLFZxqCZvUzQeDpUPA9rZx1DBMGOqYAo-zt5WE04mQcBqLm8-HiDMsHC35GqAQ8a7v7omn68vH5ttvX9_222e97VlnMu659yCYIKjkE62rjcGu04oUIMZhJMcFXPcQNcr5VquwHXcYMGlA2YUtGvycO57TPHrhHnWYzylUEZqJoVQiishC8XOVLkn54SDPiY_QfrRjOpFmB51EaYXYZoqXYSVzNM5g2X9b49JZ-sXM86n4kK76P9J_wLIwXPl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1644882846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Marangon, F.B. ; Alfonso, E.A. ; Miller, D. ; Remonda, N.M. ; Muallem, M.S. ; Tseng, S.C.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marangon, F.B. ; Alfonso, E.A. ; Miller, D. ; Remonda, N.M. ; Muallem, M.S. ; Tseng, S.C.G.</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective review to determine the incidence and characteristics of microbial infection following amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) was conducted. Among 326 patients who underwent AMT at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1994 and February 2001, a total of 11 (3.4%) culture-positive infections were identified. This included 7 (9.2%) infections in 76 patients who received tissue prepared by a research laboratory under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol between January 1994 and June 1998, and 4 (1.6%) infections in 250 patients who received tissue obtained from a commercial source. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P = .004). All 4 infections that occurred within 1 month after AMT were exclusively from the first group ( P = .0003). Overall, gram-positive organisms were the most frequent isolate (64%). Infections were not correlated with the underlying diagnosis. The conclusion was that AMT is a safe method for ocular surface reconstruction with a very low rate of microbial infections, especially if the tissue is prepared according to Good Tissue Banking Practice set forth by the FDA.—Michael D. Wagoner</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2004-10, Vol.138 (4), p.701-701</ispartof><rights>2004</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939404009638$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marangon, F.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remonda, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muallem, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, S.C.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><description>A retrospective review to determine the incidence and characteristics of microbial infection following amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) was conducted. Among 326 patients who underwent AMT at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1994 and February 2001, a total of 11 (3.4%) culture-positive infections were identified. This included 7 (9.2%) infections in 76 patients who received tissue prepared by a research laboratory under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol between January 1994 and June 1998, and 4 (1.6%) infections in 250 patients who received tissue obtained from a commercial source. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P = .004). All 4 infections that occurred within 1 month after AMT were exclusively from the first group ( P = .0003). Overall, gram-positive organisms were the most frequent isolate (64%). Infections were not correlated with the underlying diagnosis. The conclusion was that AMT is a safe method for ocular surface reconstruction with a very low rate of microbial infections, especially if the tissue is prepared according to Good Tissue Banking Practice set forth by the FDA.—Michael D. Wagoner</description><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gLuC69YkDWmKKxnUGRhwo-twk9xCyjQZk47g25syrt3kEjjf_TmE3DPaMMrk49jAGBtOqWioaihrL8iKqa6vmerZJVlRSnndt724Jjc5j-UrO9GtyHYXrHcYLFZxqCZvUzQeDpUPA9rZx1DBMGOqYAo-zt5WE04mQcBqLm8-HiDMsHC35GqAQ8a7v7omn68vH5ttvX9_222e97VlnMu659yCYIKjkE62rjcGu04oUIMZhJMcFXPcQNcr5VquwHXcYMGlA2YUtGvycO57TPHrhHnWYzylUEZqJoVQiishC8XOVLkn54SDPiY_QfrRjOpFmB51EaYXYZoqXYSVzNM5g2X9b49JZ-sXM86n4kK76P9J_wLIwXPl</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Marangon, F.B.</creator><creator>Alfonso, E.A.</creator><creator>Miller, D.</creator><creator>Remonda, N.M.</creator><creator>Muallem, M.S.</creator><creator>Tseng, S.C.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation</title><author>Marangon, F.B. ; Alfonso, E.A. ; Miller, D. ; Remonda, N.M. ; Muallem, M.S. ; Tseng, S.C.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1226-922ca4142e46d63d9bbe7748a8fbf4d62e81d2ba7988d328ad72be42e6da1b8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marangon, F.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remonda, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muallem, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, S.C.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marangon, F.B.</au><au>Alfonso, E.A.</au><au>Miller, D.</au><au>Remonda, N.M.</au><au>Muallem, M.S.</au><au>Tseng, S.C.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>701</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>701-701</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>A retrospective review to determine the incidence and characteristics of microbial infection following amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) was conducted. Among 326 patients who underwent AMT at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1994 and February 2001, a total of 11 (3.4%) culture-positive infections were identified. This included 7 (9.2%) infections in 76 patients who received tissue prepared by a research laboratory under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol between January 1994 and June 1998, and 4 (1.6%) infections in 250 patients who received tissue obtained from a commercial source. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P = .004). All 4 infections that occurred within 1 month after AMT were exclusively from the first group ( P = .0003). Overall, gram-positive organisms were the most frequent isolate (64%). Infections were not correlated with the underlying diagnosis. The conclusion was that AMT is a safe method for ocular surface reconstruction with a very low rate of microbial infections, especially if the tissue is prepared according to Good Tissue Banking Practice set forth by the FDA.—Michael D. Wagoner</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.013</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2004-10, Vol.138 (4), p.701-701
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1644882846
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20microbial%20infection%20after%20amniotic%20membrane%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Marangon,%20F.B.&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=701&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=701-701&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3556264721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1644882846&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0002939404009638&rfr_iscdi=true