Comparison of Soil Sampling Devices for Soil Bulk Density Determination for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring
Soil bulk density is often used to adjust soil carbon (C) values for changes in soil density because of management differences in C-sequestration studies. Often hand-sampling devices used for soil fertility monitoring may be used for sampling soil to a depth of up to 30 cm. Four sampling devices of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2015-01, Vol.46 (2), p.180-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Cihacek, L. J. Foss, L. A. Jacobson, K. A. |
description | Soil bulk density is often used to adjust soil carbon (C) values for changes in soil density because of management differences in C-sequestration studies. Often hand-sampling devices used for soil fertility monitoring may be used for sampling soil to a depth of up to 30 cm. Four sampling devices of differing characteristics that can be used with hand-sampling equipment across full tillage, reduced tillage, and no-tillage to determine soil bulk density were evaluated. There were no significant differences in soil bulk density values between three cylindrical devices, which measured from 19 to 31 mm in diameter. However, a 21 mm × 76 mm rectangular device gave significantly lower bulk density values than the cylindrical devices. Calculation of soil organic carbon (SOC) mass per unit area showed similar results for the cylindrical devices with the rectangular device giving a significantly lower value than the cylindrical devices. Using a cylindrical device on a hand probe in a consistent manner will give satisfactory results when sampling surface soils. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00103624.2014.967857 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1643169412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654673449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-af6d0eb740f611c45f07e63184507d507ca0f8682d8d2a03473a0f7d2080dbc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxgisbCk-Ct2MiEIn1IRQ2G23MRGbhM72Amo_x6HwMLAYJ3v7nlPp3sBOEVwgWAOLyBEkDBMFxgiuigYzzO-B2YoIzjFFLF9MBuRdGQOwVEIm5gWHOIZ2Jau7aQ3wdnE6WTlTJOsZNs1xr4lN-rDVCok2vmpcz0021i1wfS7GHvlW2Nlb6J4ZErp1_G7Uu-DCr2fGk_Omt75OO8YHGjZBHXyE-fg9e72pXxIl8_3j-XVMq0oyftUalZDteYUaoZQRTMNuWIE5TSDvI6vklDnLMd1XmMJCeUkFniN4ynqdZWTOTif5nbefW8iWhMq1TTSKjcEgVhGGSeUFhE9-4Nu3OBt3C5SlCBWUIQjRSeq8i4Er7TovGml3wkExeiA-HVAjA6IyYEou5xkxsbrtPLT-aYWvdw1zmsvbWWCIP9O-AKw_4x8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1643169412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Soil Sampling Devices for Soil Bulk Density Determination for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Cihacek, L. J. ; Foss, L. A. ; Jacobson, K. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cihacek, L. J. ; Foss, L. A. ; Jacobson, K. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil bulk density is often used to adjust soil carbon (C) values for changes in soil density because of management differences in C-sequestration studies. Often hand-sampling devices used for soil fertility monitoring may be used for sampling soil to a depth of up to 30 cm. Four sampling devices of differing characteristics that can be used with hand-sampling equipment across full tillage, reduced tillage, and no-tillage to determine soil bulk density were evaluated. There were no significant differences in soil bulk density values between three cylindrical devices, which measured from 19 to 31 mm in diameter. However, a 21 mm × 76 mm rectangular device gave significantly lower bulk density values than the cylindrical devices. Calculation of soil organic carbon (SOC) mass per unit area showed similar results for the cylindrical devices with the rectangular device giving a significantly lower value than the cylindrical devices. Using a cylindrical device on a hand probe in a consistent manner will give satisfactory results when sampling surface soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2014.967857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Soil bulk density ; soil carbon ; soil sampling</subject><ispartof>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2015-01, Vol.46 (2), p.180-184</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-af6d0eb740f611c45f07e63184507d507ca0f8682d8d2a03473a0f7d2080dbc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-af6d0eb740f611c45f07e63184507d507ca0f8682d8d2a03473a0f7d2080dbc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cihacek, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foss, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, K. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Soil Sampling Devices for Soil Bulk Density Determination for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring</title><title>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</title><description>Soil bulk density is often used to adjust soil carbon (C) values for changes in soil density because of management differences in C-sequestration studies. Often hand-sampling devices used for soil fertility monitoring may be used for sampling soil to a depth of up to 30 cm. Four sampling devices of differing characteristics that can be used with hand-sampling equipment across full tillage, reduced tillage, and no-tillage to determine soil bulk density were evaluated. There were no significant differences in soil bulk density values between three cylindrical devices, which measured from 19 to 31 mm in diameter. However, a 21 mm × 76 mm rectangular device gave significantly lower bulk density values than the cylindrical devices. Calculation of soil organic carbon (SOC) mass per unit area showed similar results for the cylindrical devices with the rectangular device giving a significantly lower value than the cylindrical devices. Using a cylindrical device on a hand probe in a consistent manner will give satisfactory results when sampling surface soils.</description><subject>Soil bulk density</subject><subject>soil carbon</subject><subject>soil sampling</subject><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>1532-4133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kT1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxgisbCk-Ct2MiEIn1IRQ2G23MRGbhM72Amo_x6HwMLAYJ3v7nlPp3sBOEVwgWAOLyBEkDBMFxgiuigYzzO-B2YoIzjFFLF9MBuRdGQOwVEIm5gWHOIZ2Jau7aQ3wdnE6WTlTJOsZNs1xr4lN-rDVCok2vmpcz0021i1wfS7GHvlW2Nlb6J4ZErp1_G7Uu-DCr2fGk_Omt75OO8YHGjZBHXyE-fg9e72pXxIl8_3j-XVMq0oyftUalZDteYUaoZQRTMNuWIE5TSDvI6vklDnLMd1XmMJCeUkFniN4ynqdZWTOTif5nbefW8iWhMq1TTSKjcEgVhGGSeUFhE9-4Nu3OBt3C5SlCBWUIQjRSeq8i4Er7TovGml3wkExeiA-HVAjA6IyYEou5xkxsbrtPLT-aYWvdw1zmsvbWWCIP9O-AKw_4x8</recordid><startdate>20150119</startdate><enddate>20150119</enddate><creator>Cihacek, L. J.</creator><creator>Foss, L. A.</creator><creator>Jacobson, K. A.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150119</creationdate><title>Comparison of Soil Sampling Devices for Soil Bulk Density Determination for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring</title><author>Cihacek, L. J. ; Foss, L. A. ; Jacobson, K. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-af6d0eb740f611c45f07e63184507d507ca0f8682d8d2a03473a0f7d2080dbc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Soil bulk density</topic><topic>soil carbon</topic><topic>soil sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cihacek, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foss, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, K. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cihacek, L. J.</au><au>Foss, L. A.</au><au>Jacobson, K. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Soil Sampling Devices for Soil Bulk Density Determination for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle><date>2015-01-19</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>180-184</pages><issn>0010-3624</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><eissn>1532-4133</eissn><abstract>Soil bulk density is often used to adjust soil carbon (C) values for changes in soil density because of management differences in C-sequestration studies. Often hand-sampling devices used for soil fertility monitoring may be used for sampling soil to a depth of up to 30 cm. Four sampling devices of differing characteristics that can be used with hand-sampling equipment across full tillage, reduced tillage, and no-tillage to determine soil bulk density were evaluated. There were no significant differences in soil bulk density values between three cylindrical devices, which measured from 19 to 31 mm in diameter. However, a 21 mm × 76 mm rectangular device gave significantly lower bulk density values than the cylindrical devices. Calculation of soil organic carbon (SOC) mass per unit area showed similar results for the cylindrical devices with the rectangular device giving a significantly lower value than the cylindrical devices. Using a cylindrical device on a hand probe in a consistent manner will give satisfactory results when sampling surface soils.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00103624.2014.967857</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-3624 |
ispartof | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2015-01, Vol.46 (2), p.180-184 |
issn | 0010-3624 1532-2416 1532-4133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1643169412 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Soil bulk density soil carbon soil sampling |
title | Comparison of Soil Sampling Devices for Soil Bulk Density Determination for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A28%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Soil%20Sampling%20Devices%20for%20Soil%20Bulk%20Density%20Determination%20for%20Carbon%20Sequestration%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20Soil%20Science%20and%20Plant%20Analysis&rft.au=Cihacek,%20L.%20J.&rft.date=2015-01-19&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=180-184&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00103624.2014.967857&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654673449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1643169412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |