Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency

The relationship between the core field and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) By has been addressed by spacecraft observations in the magnetotail, but it is not yet fully clear since observations by Slavin et al. (2003) and Borg et al. (2012) show controversial results. In this study, we exami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2014-04, Vol.119 (4), p.2933-2944
Hauptverfasser: Teh, W.-L., Nakamura, R., Karimabadi, H., Baumjohann, W., Zhang, T. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2944
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2933
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 119
creator Teh, W.-L.
Nakamura, R.
Karimabadi, H.
Baumjohann, W.
Zhang, T. L.
description The relationship between the core field and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) By has been addressed by spacecraft observations in the magnetotail, but it is not yet fully clear since observations by Slavin et al. (2003) and Borg et al. (2012) show controversial results. In this study, we examine 13 flux ropes from the Cluster observations to show for the first time that the correlation between the core field Bcore and the IMF By depends on the guide field Bg. For large guide fields (> 20% of the reconnecting field), we show that the Bcore is found to correlate with the IMF By. However, for weak guide fields (< 10% of the reconnecting field) we show that the core fields have either a positive or negative polarity, irrespective of the IMF By. This result indicates that for weak guide field reconnection the core field generation of the magnetotail flux rope is not governed by the external IMF By. We can explain the previous controversy in terms of the guide field dependency. We also confirm earlier suggestions that for weak guide field reconnection the flux ropes can have a significant core field whose polarity agrees with the ambient quadrupole Hall field. In addition, the Grad‐Shafranov reconstruction results suggest that the axis of the flux rope may have been kinked. Our findings are crucial and can help advance theoretical simulations of the core field generation for weak guide reconnection. Discussions of the possible core field generation for weak guide field will be given in terms of 3‐D reconnection. Key Points Correlation between core field and IMF By is guide field dependent Reconnection guide field dependency can explain previous controversial results Results are crucial to studying core field generation for weak guide field
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2013JA019454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1638302258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3531864511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2181-41342da681b0c886ffc42a9ee55cae1e6af357fe50cb6f60a0ee12d26fd6acb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRejiQR58wM08XnaP2u3-YZEEAKaoMbHpnS3UBzr6EZg394harwv9-bknN9NThBcE3xLMKZ3FBM26WOSRjw6CzqUiDRMI0zPf2-W4MugV1Vr3E7SSoR3gu3AeQ-5qq0rkDNIOw_IWMgzVLpceVs3R3mjlgXUrlY2RybfHZB3JVRob-sVqleAxrMhemju0Ry0KwrQ37jlzma_sAxKKDIodHMVXBiVV9D72d3gffj4NngKpy-j8aA_DS0lCQkjwiKaKZGQBdZJIozREVUpAOdaAQGhDOOxAY71QhiBFQYgNKPCZELpRcq6wc2JW3q33UFVy7Xb-aJ9KYlgCcOU8qR1sZNrb3NoZOntRvlGEiyPpcr_pcrJaN7nOI1JmwpPKVvVcPhLKf8pRcxiLj-eR5LMXvEgakmMfQF_bnsv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638302258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Teh, W.-L. ; Nakamura, R. ; Karimabadi, H. ; Baumjohann, W. ; Zhang, T. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Teh, W.-L. ; Nakamura, R. ; Karimabadi, H. ; Baumjohann, W. ; Zhang, T. L.</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between the core field and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) By has been addressed by spacecraft observations in the magnetotail, but it is not yet fully clear since observations by Slavin et al. (2003) and Borg et al. (2012) show controversial results. In this study, we examine 13 flux ropes from the Cluster observations to show for the first time that the correlation between the core field Bcore and the IMF By depends on the guide field Bg. For large guide fields (&gt; 20% of the reconnecting field), we show that the Bcore is found to correlate with the IMF By. However, for weak guide fields (&lt; 10% of the reconnecting field) we show that the core fields have either a positive or negative polarity, irrespective of the IMF By. This result indicates that for weak guide field reconnection the core field generation of the magnetotail flux rope is not governed by the external IMF By. We can explain the previous controversy in terms of the guide field dependency. We also confirm earlier suggestions that for weak guide field reconnection the flux ropes can have a significant core field whose polarity agrees with the ambient quadrupole Hall field. In addition, the Grad‐Shafranov reconstruction results suggest that the axis of the flux rope may have been kinked. Our findings are crucial and can help advance theoretical simulations of the core field generation for weak guide reconnection. Discussions of the possible core field generation for weak guide field will be given in terms of 3‐D reconnection. Key Points Correlation between core field and IMF By is guide field dependent Reconnection guide field dependency can explain previous controversial results Results are crucial to studying core field generation for weak guide field</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Fluctuations ; Geophysics ; Interplanetary Magnetic Field ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic Flux Rope ; Magnetic Reconnection ; Magnetotail ; Polarity ; Spacecraft</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2014-04, Vol.119 (4), p.2933-2944</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013JA019454$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013JA019454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teh, W.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimabadi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumjohann, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, T. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics</addtitle><description>The relationship between the core field and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) By has been addressed by spacecraft observations in the magnetotail, but it is not yet fully clear since observations by Slavin et al. (2003) and Borg et al. (2012) show controversial results. In this study, we examine 13 flux ropes from the Cluster observations to show for the first time that the correlation between the core field Bcore and the IMF By depends on the guide field Bg. For large guide fields (&gt; 20% of the reconnecting field), we show that the Bcore is found to correlate with the IMF By. However, for weak guide fields (&lt; 10% of the reconnecting field) we show that the core fields have either a positive or negative polarity, irrespective of the IMF By. This result indicates that for weak guide field reconnection the core field generation of the magnetotail flux rope is not governed by the external IMF By. We can explain the previous controversy in terms of the guide field dependency. We also confirm earlier suggestions that for weak guide field reconnection the flux ropes can have a significant core field whose polarity agrees with the ambient quadrupole Hall field. In addition, the Grad‐Shafranov reconstruction results suggest that the axis of the flux rope may have been kinked. Our findings are crucial and can help advance theoretical simulations of the core field generation for weak guide reconnection. Discussions of the possible core field generation for weak guide field will be given in terms of 3‐D reconnection. Key Points Correlation between core field and IMF By is guide field dependent Reconnection guide field dependency can explain previous controversial results Results are crucial to studying core field generation for weak guide field</description><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Interplanetary Magnetic Field</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic Flux Rope</subject><subject>Magnetic Reconnection</subject><subject>Magnetotail</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRejiQR58wM08XnaP2u3-YZEEAKaoMbHpnS3UBzr6EZg394harwv9-bknN9NThBcE3xLMKZ3FBM26WOSRjw6CzqUiDRMI0zPf2-W4MugV1Vr3E7SSoR3gu3AeQ-5qq0rkDNIOw_IWMgzVLpceVs3R3mjlgXUrlY2RybfHZB3JVRob-sVqleAxrMhemju0Ry0KwrQ37jlzma_sAxKKDIodHMVXBiVV9D72d3gffj4NngKpy-j8aA_DS0lCQkjwiKaKZGQBdZJIozREVUpAOdaAQGhDOOxAY71QhiBFQYgNKPCZELpRcq6wc2JW3q33UFVy7Xb-aJ9KYlgCcOU8qR1sZNrb3NoZOntRvlGEiyPpcr_pcrJaN7nOI1JmwpPKVvVcPhLKf8pRcxiLj-eR5LMXvEgakmMfQF_bnsv</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Teh, W.-L.</creator><creator>Nakamura, R.</creator><creator>Karimabadi, H.</creator><creator>Baumjohann, W.</creator><creator>Zhang, T. L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency</title><author>Teh, W.-L. ; Nakamura, R. ; Karimabadi, H. ; Baumjohann, W. ; Zhang, T. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2181-41342da681b0c886ffc42a9ee55cae1e6af357fe50cb6f60a0ee12d26fd6acb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Interplanetary Magnetic Field</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic Flux Rope</topic><topic>Magnetic Reconnection</topic><topic>Magnetotail</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teh, W.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimabadi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumjohann, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, T. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teh, W.-L.</au><au>Nakamura, R.</au><au>Karimabadi, H.</au><au>Baumjohann, W.</au><au>Zhang, T. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2933</spage><epage>2944</epage><pages>2933-2944</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>The relationship between the core field and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) By has been addressed by spacecraft observations in the magnetotail, but it is not yet fully clear since observations by Slavin et al. (2003) and Borg et al. (2012) show controversial results. In this study, we examine 13 flux ropes from the Cluster observations to show for the first time that the correlation between the core field Bcore and the IMF By depends on the guide field Bg. For large guide fields (&gt; 20% of the reconnecting field), we show that the Bcore is found to correlate with the IMF By. However, for weak guide fields (&lt; 10% of the reconnecting field) we show that the core fields have either a positive or negative polarity, irrespective of the IMF By. This result indicates that for weak guide field reconnection the core field generation of the magnetotail flux rope is not governed by the external IMF By. We can explain the previous controversy in terms of the guide field dependency. We also confirm earlier suggestions that for weak guide field reconnection the flux ropes can have a significant core field whose polarity agrees with the ambient quadrupole Hall field. In addition, the Grad‐Shafranov reconstruction results suggest that the axis of the flux rope may have been kinked. Our findings are crucial and can help advance theoretical simulations of the core field generation for weak guide reconnection. Discussions of the possible core field generation for weak guide field will be given in terms of 3‐D reconnection. Key Points Correlation between core field and IMF By is guide field dependent Reconnection guide field dependency can explain previous controversial results Results are crucial to studying core field generation for weak guide field</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013JA019454</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2014-04, Vol.119 (4), p.2933-2944
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1638302258
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Fluctuations
Geophysics
Interplanetary Magnetic Field
Magnetic fields
Magnetic Flux Rope
Magnetic Reconnection
Magnetotail
Polarity
Spacecraft
title Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20core%20field%20polarity%20of%20magnetotail%20flux%20ropes%20with%20the%20IMF%20By:%20Reconnection%20guide%20field%20dependency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Teh,%20W.-L.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2933&rft.epage=2944&rft.pages=2933-2944&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013JA019454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3531864511%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638302258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true