Promoting Entrepreneurship – The New Company Law Agenda
Promoting entrepreneurship is high on the agenda at both European and national level. This is, e.g., reflected in a number of company law initiatives, which have mainly focused on creating easier and cheaper access to limited liability, for example, by introducing sub-types of the private limited co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European business organization law review 2014-12, Vol.15 (4), p.545-584 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 584 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 545 |
container_title | European business organization law review |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Neville, Mette Sørensen, Karsten Engsig |
description | Promoting entrepreneurship is high on the agenda at both European and national level. This is, e.g., reflected in a number of company law initiatives, which have mainly focused on creating easier and cheaper access to limited liability, for example, by introducing sub-types of the private limited company. The main questions addressed here are whether it is possible to promote entrepreneurship through company law reforms and what the content of such frameworks should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. The analysis takes its point of departure in a new Danish survey of what the content of company legislation should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. In line with existing empirical studies, the importance of the capital requirement and formation procedures and costs is analysed, and further insight is given into, for example, what level of minimum capital and cost is regarded as acceptable. Besides this insight, the Danish survey adds to the existing studies and literature by also shedding light on whether company laws can be further optimised, for instance, by introducing more flexible rules for company management, etc. The results of the survey are compared with the reforms which, in recent years, have been adopted in several EU Member States, with the aim of evaluating whether these have met the needs indicated in the survey. The overall conclusion is that this is not the case on all points and that there is thus room for improvement. It is also briefly discussed whether the different reform methods used in the recent national reforms are well-suited for further optimising the legislation and it is shown that the method of introducing sub-types of private limited companies has its limitations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S156675291400127X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1636647170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S156675291400127X</cupid><sourcerecordid>3528662881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7e315aff4fd6fe390ecbf06ded67fad41b970b4fc533f90a317f4b7ea08fccb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_wLeAz9XcJk3WxzGmE4YKTvCtpO1N12HTmnSMvfkf_If-EjO2B0EQn-6F851z4BByCewaGKibZ0ikVEmcgmAMYvV6RAagBEQyZslx-IMc7fRTcub9KjAyVnxA0ifXNm1f24pObe-wc2hx7fyy7ujXxyddLJE-4IZO2qbTdkvnekPHFdpSn5MTo988XhzukLzcTheTWTR_vLufjOdRIWDURwo5JNoYYUppkKcMi9wwWWIpldGlgDxVLBemSDg3KdMclBG5Qs1GpijyER-Sq31u59r3Nfo-W7VrZ0NlBpJLKRQoFijYU4VrvXdoss7VjXbbDFi2Wyj7tVDwxHuPD6yt0P1I_sPED0W6yV1dVvgf1zeUdXgz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1636647170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promoting Entrepreneurship – The New Company Law Agenda</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Neville, Mette ; Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</creator><creatorcontrib>Neville, Mette ; Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</creatorcontrib><description>Promoting entrepreneurship is high on the agenda at both European and national level. This is, e.g., reflected in a number of company law initiatives, which have mainly focused on creating easier and cheaper access to limited liability, for example, by introducing sub-types of the private limited company. The main questions addressed here are whether it is possible to promote entrepreneurship through company law reforms and what the content of such frameworks should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. The analysis takes its point of departure in a new Danish survey of what the content of company legislation should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. In line with existing empirical studies, the importance of the capital requirement and formation procedures and costs is analysed, and further insight is given into, for example, what level of minimum capital and cost is regarded as acceptable. Besides this insight, the Danish survey adds to the existing studies and literature by also shedding light on whether company laws can be further optimised, for instance, by introducing more flexible rules for company management, etc. The results of the survey are compared with the reforms which, in recent years, have been adopted in several EU Member States, with the aim of evaluating whether these have met the needs indicated in the survey. The overall conclusion is that this is not the case on all points and that there is thus room for improvement. It is also briefly discussed whether the different reform methods used in the recent national reforms are well-suited for further optimising the legislation and it is shown that the method of introducing sub-types of private limited companies has its limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-7529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-6205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S156675291400127X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Hague, NL: T.M.C. Asser Press</publisher><subject>Capital requirements ; Comparative Law ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; European Law ; International & Foreign Law ; International Economic Law ; Law ; Law and Criminology ; Legislation ; Liability ; Limited liability companies ; Private International Law ; Questionnaires ; Reforms ; Regulation ; Regulatory reform ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Small business ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Supranationalism ; Trade Law</subject><ispartof>European business organization law review, 2014-12, Vol.15 (4), p.545-584</ispartof><rights>Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2014</rights><rights>T.M.C. Asser Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7e315aff4fd6fe390ecbf06ded67fad41b970b4fc533f90a317f4b7ea08fccb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7e315aff4fd6fe390ecbf06ded67fad41b970b4fc533f90a317f4b7ea08fccb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1017/S156675291400127X$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S156675291400127X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neville, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</creatorcontrib><title>Promoting Entrepreneurship – The New Company Law Agenda</title><title>European business organization law review</title><addtitle>Eur Bus Org Law Rev</addtitle><addtitle>European Business Organization Law Review</addtitle><description>Promoting entrepreneurship is high on the agenda at both European and national level. This is, e.g., reflected in a number of company law initiatives, which have mainly focused on creating easier and cheaper access to limited liability, for example, by introducing sub-types of the private limited company. The main questions addressed here are whether it is possible to promote entrepreneurship through company law reforms and what the content of such frameworks should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. The analysis takes its point of departure in a new Danish survey of what the content of company legislation should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. In line with existing empirical studies, the importance of the capital requirement and formation procedures and costs is analysed, and further insight is given into, for example, what level of minimum capital and cost is regarded as acceptable. Besides this insight, the Danish survey adds to the existing studies and literature by also shedding light on whether company laws can be further optimised, for instance, by introducing more flexible rules for company management, etc. The results of the survey are compared with the reforms which, in recent years, have been adopted in several EU Member States, with the aim of evaluating whether these have met the needs indicated in the survey. The overall conclusion is that this is not the case on all points and that there is thus room for improvement. It is also briefly discussed whether the different reform methods used in the recent national reforms are well-suited for further optimising the legislation and it is shown that the method of introducing sub-types of private limited companies has its limitations.</description><subject>Capital requirements</subject><subject>Comparative Law</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>European Law</subject><subject>International & Foreign Law</subject><subject>International Economic Law</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Limited liability companies</subject><subject>Private International Law</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory reform</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supranationalism</subject><subject>Trade Law</subject><issn>1566-7529</issn><issn>1741-6205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_wLeAz9XcJk3WxzGmE4YKTvCtpO1N12HTmnSMvfkf_If-EjO2B0EQn-6F851z4BByCewaGKibZ0ikVEmcgmAMYvV6RAagBEQyZslx-IMc7fRTcub9KjAyVnxA0ifXNm1f24pObe-wc2hx7fyy7ujXxyddLJE-4IZO2qbTdkvnekPHFdpSn5MTo988XhzukLzcTheTWTR_vLufjOdRIWDURwo5JNoYYUppkKcMi9wwWWIpldGlgDxVLBemSDg3KdMclBG5Qs1GpijyER-Sq31u59r3Nfo-W7VrZ0NlBpJLKRQoFijYU4VrvXdoss7VjXbbDFi2Wyj7tVDwxHuPD6yt0P1I_sPED0W6yV1dVvgf1zeUdXgz</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Neville, Mette</creator><creator>Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</creator><general>T.M.C. Asser Press</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Promoting Entrepreneurship – The New Company Law Agenda</title><author>Neville, Mette ; Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-7e315aff4fd6fe390ecbf06ded67fad41b970b4fc533f90a317f4b7ea08fccb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Capital requirements</topic><topic>Comparative Law</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>European Law</topic><topic>International & Foreign Law</topic><topic>International Economic Law</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Limited liability companies</topic><topic>Private International Law</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory reform</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supranationalism</topic><topic>Trade Law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neville, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European business organization law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neville, Mette</au><au>Sørensen, Karsten Engsig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Promoting Entrepreneurship – The New Company Law Agenda</atitle><jtitle>European business organization law review</jtitle><stitle>Eur Bus Org Law Rev</stitle><addtitle>European Business Organization Law Review</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>545-584</pages><issn>1566-7529</issn><eissn>1741-6205</eissn><abstract>Promoting entrepreneurship is high on the agenda at both European and national level. This is, e.g., reflected in a number of company law initiatives, which have mainly focused on creating easier and cheaper access to limited liability, for example, by introducing sub-types of the private limited company. The main questions addressed here are whether it is possible to promote entrepreneurship through company law reforms and what the content of such frameworks should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. The analysis takes its point of departure in a new Danish survey of what the content of company legislation should be in order to meet the needs of entrepreneurs. In line with existing empirical studies, the importance of the capital requirement and formation procedures and costs is analysed, and further insight is given into, for example, what level of minimum capital and cost is regarded as acceptable. Besides this insight, the Danish survey adds to the existing studies and literature by also shedding light on whether company laws can be further optimised, for instance, by introducing more flexible rules for company management, etc. The results of the survey are compared with the reforms which, in recent years, have been adopted in several EU Member States, with the aim of evaluating whether these have met the needs indicated in the survey. The overall conclusion is that this is not the case on all points and that there is thus room for improvement. It is also briefly discussed whether the different reform methods used in the recent national reforms are well-suited for further optimising the legislation and it is shown that the method of introducing sub-types of private limited companies has its limitations.</abstract><cop>The Hague, NL</cop><pub>T.M.C. Asser Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S156675291400127X</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1566-7529 |
ispartof | European business organization law review, 2014-12, Vol.15 (4), p.545-584 |
issn | 1566-7529 1741-6205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1636647170 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Capital requirements Comparative Law Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship European Law International & Foreign Law International Economic Law Law Law and Criminology Legislation Liability Limited liability companies Private International Law Questionnaires Reforms Regulation Regulatory reform Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Small business Stockholders Studies Supranationalism Trade Law |
title | Promoting Entrepreneurship – The New Company Law Agenda |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promoting%20Entrepreneurship%20%E2%80%93%20The%20New%20Company%20Law%20Agenda&rft.jtitle=European%20business%20organization%20law%20review&rft.au=Neville,%20Mette&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=545-584&rft.issn=1566-7529&rft.eissn=1741-6205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S156675291400127X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3528662881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1636647170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S156675291400127X&rfr_iscdi=true |