Disabling Assumptions
Long before the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) movement was a glimmer in a corporate CEO's eye, good teachers have been differentiating instruction to engage all students in high-level intellectual tasks that motivate learners to read, understand, and write about a variety of texts. Good te...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | English journal 2014-11, Vol.104 (2), p.118 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 118 |
| container_title | English journal |
| container_volume | 104 |
| creator | Dunn, Patricia A |
| description | Long before the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) movement was a glimmer in a corporate CEO's eye, good teachers have been differentiating instruction to engage all students in high-level intellectual tasks that motivate learners to read, understand, and write about a variety of texts. Good teachers also know that students need motivation and encouragement to revise their drafts. The following ideas for reading, writing, and responding to student writing can be used to differentiate lessons for students with individualized education plans (IEPs), but they can support everyone, thus reducing possible stigma for some students and increasing options for all. An additional benefit is that, in the implementation of these ideas, some of society's disabling assumptions about how "reading," "writing," and "responding" are defined may need to be revisited. Technology today offers a variety of composing choices. All students should have access to the voice-to-text technologies that may help them produce better first drafts. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1635219027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3523512211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16352190273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz1LWwsDRlYeA0MDA01rUwMjfhYOAqLs4yAPItTIw5GURdMosTk3Iy89IVHIuLS3MLSjLz84p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre0MzY1MjQ0sDI3Jg4VQCj3Sp2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635219027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disabling Assumptions</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Dunn, Patricia A</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><description>Long before the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) movement was a glimmer in a corporate CEO's eye, good teachers have been differentiating instruction to engage all students in high-level intellectual tasks that motivate learners to read, understand, and write about a variety of texts. Good teachers also know that students need motivation and encouragement to revise their drafts. The following ideas for reading, writing, and responding to student writing can be used to differentiate lessons for students with individualized education plans (IEPs), but they can support everyone, thus reducing possible stigma for some students and increasing options for all. An additional benefit is that, in the implementation of these ideas, some of society's disabling assumptions about how "reading," "writing," and "responding" are defined may need to be revisited. Technology today offers a variety of composing choices. All students should have access to the voice-to-text technologies that may help them produce better first drafts.</description><edition>High school edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0013-8274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-8895</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENGJBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Audio Books ; Computers ; Educational standards ; Handwriting ; Individualized Education Programs ; Individualized Instruction ; Individualized Programs ; Learning Disabilities ; Literary Genres ; Motivation ; Printed Materials ; Prose ; Reading ; Reading Difficulties ; Special education ; Spelling ; State Standards ; Student Motivation ; Student writing ; Students with disabilities ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Response ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Video Technology ; Word Processing ; Writing</subject><ispartof>English journal, 2014-11, Vol.104 (2), p.118</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Council of Teachers of English Conference on College Composition and Communication Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><title>Disabling Assumptions</title><title>English journal</title><description>Long before the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) movement was a glimmer in a corporate CEO's eye, good teachers have been differentiating instruction to engage all students in high-level intellectual tasks that motivate learners to read, understand, and write about a variety of texts. Good teachers also know that students need motivation and encouragement to revise their drafts. The following ideas for reading, writing, and responding to student writing can be used to differentiate lessons for students with individualized education plans (IEPs), but they can support everyone, thus reducing possible stigma for some students and increasing options for all. An additional benefit is that, in the implementation of these ideas, some of society's disabling assumptions about how "reading," "writing," and "responding" are defined may need to be revisited. Technology today offers a variety of composing choices. All students should have access to the voice-to-text technologies that may help them produce better first drafts.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Audio Books</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Educational standards</subject><subject>Handwriting</subject><subject>Individualized Education Programs</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Individualized Programs</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Literary Genres</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Printed Materials</subject><subject>Prose</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>State Standards</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><subject>Students with disabilities</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Response</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0013-8274</issn><issn>2161-8895</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz1LWwsDRlYeA0MDA01rUwMjfhYOAqLs4yAPItTIw5GURdMosTk3Iy89IVHIuLS3MLSjLz84p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre0MzY1MjQ0sDI3Jg4VQCj3Sp2</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Dunn, Patricia A</creator><general>National Council of Teachers of English</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>7XI</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Disabling Assumptions</title><author>Dunn, Patricia A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16352190273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Audio Books</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Educational standards</topic><topic>Handwriting</topic><topic>Individualized Education Programs</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Individualized Programs</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Literary Genres</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Printed Materials</topic><topic>Prose</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>State Standards</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><topic>Students with disabilities</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Response</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Teacher Journals</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>English journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Patricia A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disabling Assumptions</atitle><jtitle>English journal</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><pages>118-</pages><issn>0013-8274</issn><eissn>2161-8895</eissn><coden>ENGJBP</coden><abstract>Long before the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) movement was a glimmer in a corporate CEO's eye, good teachers have been differentiating instruction to engage all students in high-level intellectual tasks that motivate learners to read, understand, and write about a variety of texts. Good teachers also know that students need motivation and encouragement to revise their drafts. The following ideas for reading, writing, and responding to student writing can be used to differentiate lessons for students with individualized education plans (IEPs), but they can support everyone, thus reducing possible stigma for some students and increasing options for all. An additional benefit is that, in the implementation of these ideas, some of society's disabling assumptions about how "reading," "writing," and "responding" are defined may need to be revisited. Technology today offers a variety of composing choices. All students should have access to the voice-to-text technologies that may help them produce better first drafts.</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>National Council of Teachers of English</pub><edition>High school edition</edition></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-8274 |
| ispartof | English journal, 2014-11, Vol.104 (2), p.118 |
| issn | 0013-8274 2161-8895 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1635219027 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Academic Standards Audio Books Computers Educational standards Handwriting Individualized Education Programs Individualized Instruction Individualized Programs Learning Disabilities Literary Genres Motivation Printed Materials Prose Reading Reading Difficulties Special education Spelling State Standards Student Motivation Student writing Students with disabilities Teacher Effectiveness Teacher Response Teachers Teaching Methods Video Technology Word Processing Writing |
| title | Disabling Assumptions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disabling%20Assumptions&rft.jtitle=English%20journal&rft.au=Dunn,%20Patricia%20A&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.pages=118-&rft.issn=0013-8274&rft.eissn=2161-8895&rft.coden=ENGJBP&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3523512211%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635219027&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |