Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic
Rural development policy in the European Union (EU) has been implemented through different instruments. This paper is focused on support for the forestry sector from the EU funds in the years 2004–2006 in two EU Member States – Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK). The comparison of support for for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forest economics 2014-12, Vol.20 (4), p.380-395 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 395 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 380 |
container_title | Journal of forest economics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | JARSKY, Vilém SARVASOVA, Zuzana DOBSINSKA, Zuzana VENTRUBOVA, Katerina SARVAS, Milan |
description | Rural development policy in the European Union (EU) has been implemented through different instruments. This paper is focused on support for the forestry sector from the EU funds in the years 2004–2006 in two EU Member States – Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK). The comparison of support for forestry activities from the EU funds, delivered through the implementation of National Operational Programmes, showed differences at country level. Both countries had the opportunity to apply for support based on common EU policy, but they were able to select measures that reflected their specific needs and priorities at national level. Within Operational Programmes the following indicators were evaluated: description of forestry measures, financial support, number of applications, beneficiaries, outcomes and impacts. The comparison of financial support showed that the greater part of support in SK was granted to non-profit investments, whereas in CZ into profit making investments. The main difference was in the interest shown by applicants for support. In CZ nearly 80% of submitted applications were approved compared to 59% in SK. The analysis showed that the main reason for differences in utilisation of available sources was that different principles were applied when selecting supported measures or defining the activities to be supported within the measure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1630415041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S110468991400049X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3517137261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-67abf3a6d2819ecef4ed3a71fa5b95c947c5e0f12e633d745c6f64c0d931716e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIHcLOEOCZ4Y8dJxAlV5SFVAgE9cLJcZy0S2jjYTaVy4h_4Q74EV6165LDah2ZmdyeKzoEmQEFcNUljMEkp8NAnlPKDaAACihgyRg9DDZTHoijL4-jE-4bSFFieDqK3p342rzXxfddZtyTGuk2gX7o1Mc4uyHhKTN9Wnvx-_5CR8uiJNWT0hfqdPGO3pau2Ii9zu1If-9lpdGTU3OPZLg-j6e34dXQfTx7vHkY3k1jzolzGIlczw5So0gJK1Gg4VkzlYFQ2KzNd8lxnSA2kKBircp5pYQTXtCoZ5CCQDaOLrW7n7GcfDpeN7V0bVkoQjHLIQgQUbFHaWe8dGtm5eqHcWgKVGwdlI4ODcuPgZhQcDJzLnbLyWs2NU62u_Z6YlpSnlBYBd73FYXhzVaOTXtfYaqxqh3opK1v_s-UPHAeF6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1630415041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>JARSKY, Vilém ; SARVASOVA, Zuzana ; DOBSINSKA, Zuzana ; VENTRUBOVA, Katerina ; SARVAS, Milan</creator><creatorcontrib>JARSKY, Vilém ; SARVASOVA, Zuzana ; DOBSINSKA, Zuzana ; VENTRUBOVA, Katerina ; SARVAS, Milan</creatorcontrib><description>Rural development policy in the European Union (EU) has been implemented through different instruments. This paper is focused on support for the forestry sector from the EU funds in the years 2004–2006 in two EU Member States – Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK). The comparison of support for forestry activities from the EU funds, delivered through the implementation of National Operational Programmes, showed differences at country level. Both countries had the opportunity to apply for support based on common EU policy, but they were able to select measures that reflected their specific needs and priorities at national level. Within Operational Programmes the following indicators were evaluated: description of forestry measures, financial support, number of applications, beneficiaries, outcomes and impacts. The comparison of financial support showed that the greater part of support in SK was granted to non-profit investments, whereas in CZ into profit making investments. The main difference was in the interest shown by applicants for support. In CZ nearly 80% of submitted applications were approved compared to 59% in SK. The analysis showed that the main reason for differences in utilisation of available sources was that different principles were applied when selecting supported measures or defining the activities to be supported within the measure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1104-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jena: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Czech Republic ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Funds ; Programme evaluation ; Public policy ; Rural development ; Rural development policy ; Slovakia ; Studies ; Support measure</subject><ispartof>Journal of forest economics, 2014-12, Vol.20 (4), p.380-395</ispartof><rights>2014 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-67abf3a6d2819ecef4ed3a71fa5b95c947c5e0f12e633d745c6f64c0d931716e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-67abf3a6d2819ecef4ed3a71fa5b95c947c5e0f12e633d745c6f64c0d931716e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29042008$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JARSKY, Vilém</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARVASOVA, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOBSINSKA, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENTRUBOVA, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARVAS, Milan</creatorcontrib><title>Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic</title><title>Journal of forest economics</title><description>Rural development policy in the European Union (EU) has been implemented through different instruments. This paper is focused on support for the forestry sector from the EU funds in the years 2004–2006 in two EU Member States – Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK). The comparison of support for forestry activities from the EU funds, delivered through the implementation of National Operational Programmes, showed differences at country level. Both countries had the opportunity to apply for support based on common EU policy, but they were able to select measures that reflected their specific needs and priorities at national level. Within Operational Programmes the following indicators were evaluated: description of forestry measures, financial support, number of applications, beneficiaries, outcomes and impacts. The comparison of financial support showed that the greater part of support in SK was granted to non-profit investments, whereas in CZ into profit making investments. The main difference was in the interest shown by applicants for support. In CZ nearly 80% of submitted applications were approved compared to 59% in SK. The analysis showed that the main reason for differences in utilisation of available sources was that different principles were applied when selecting supported measures or defining the activities to be supported within the measure.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Czech Republic</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Funds</subject><subject>Programme evaluation</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Rural development policy</subject><subject>Slovakia</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Support measure</subject><issn>1104-6899</issn><issn>1618-1530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIHcLOEOCZ4Y8dJxAlV5SFVAgE9cLJcZy0S2jjYTaVy4h_4Q74EV6165LDah2ZmdyeKzoEmQEFcNUljMEkp8NAnlPKDaAACihgyRg9DDZTHoijL4-jE-4bSFFieDqK3p342rzXxfddZtyTGuk2gX7o1Mc4uyHhKTN9Wnvx-_5CR8uiJNWT0hfqdPGO3pau2Ii9zu1If-9lpdGTU3OPZLg-j6e34dXQfTx7vHkY3k1jzolzGIlczw5So0gJK1Gg4VkzlYFQ2KzNd8lxnSA2kKBircp5pYQTXtCoZ5CCQDaOLrW7n7GcfDpeN7V0bVkoQjHLIQgQUbFHaWe8dGtm5eqHcWgKVGwdlI4ODcuPgZhQcDJzLnbLyWs2NU62u_Z6YlpSnlBYBd73FYXhzVaOTXtfYaqxqh3opK1v_s-UPHAeF6A</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>JARSKY, Vilém</creator><creator>SARVASOVA, Zuzana</creator><creator>DOBSINSKA, Zuzana</creator><creator>VENTRUBOVA, Katerina</creator><creator>SARVAS, Milan</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Now Publishers Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic</title><author>JARSKY, Vilém ; SARVASOVA, Zuzana ; DOBSINSKA, Zuzana ; VENTRUBOVA, Katerina ; SARVAS, Milan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-67abf3a6d2819ecef4ed3a71fa5b95c947c5e0f12e633d745c6f64c0d931716e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Czech Republic</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Funds</topic><topic>Programme evaluation</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Rural development policy</topic><topic>Slovakia</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Support measure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JARSKY, Vilém</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARVASOVA, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOBSINSKA, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENTRUBOVA, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARVAS, Milan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of forest economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JARSKY, Vilém</au><au>SARVASOVA, Zuzana</au><au>DOBSINSKA, Zuzana</au><au>VENTRUBOVA, Katerina</au><au>SARVAS, Milan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forest economics</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>380-395</pages><issn>1104-6899</issn><eissn>1618-1530</eissn><abstract>Rural development policy in the European Union (EU) has been implemented through different instruments. This paper is focused on support for the forestry sector from the EU funds in the years 2004–2006 in two EU Member States – Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK). The comparison of support for forestry activities from the EU funds, delivered through the implementation of National Operational Programmes, showed differences at country level. Both countries had the opportunity to apply for support based on common EU policy, but they were able to select measures that reflected their specific needs and priorities at national level. Within Operational Programmes the following indicators were evaluated: description of forestry measures, financial support, number of applications, beneficiaries, outcomes and impacts. The comparison of financial support showed that the greater part of support in SK was granted to non-profit investments, whereas in CZ into profit making investments. The main difference was in the interest shown by applicants for support. In CZ nearly 80% of submitted applications were approved compared to 59% in SK. The analysis showed that the main reason for differences in utilisation of available sources was that different principles were applied when selecting supported measures or defining the activities to be supported within the measure.</abstract><cop>Jena</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1104-6899 |
ispartof | Journal of forest economics, 2014-12, Vol.20 (4), p.380-395 |
issn | 1104-6899 1618-1530 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1630415041 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Comparative analysis Czech Republic Forest management Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Funds Programme evaluation Public policy Rural development Rural development policy Slovakia Studies Support measure |
title | Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20support%20for%20forestry%20from%20EU%20funds%20%E2%80%93%20Cases%20of%20Czech%20Republic%20and%20Slovak%20Republic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forest%20economics&rft.au=JARSKY,%20Vil%C3%A9m&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=380-395&rft.issn=1104-6899&rft.eissn=1618-1530&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3517137261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1630415041&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S110468991400049X&rfr_iscdi=true |