Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people

OBJECTIVES: To predict the risk of future unfavourable health outcomes in older people it is common to assess the level of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living. To accomplish this, the commonly used Katz-6 and the Lawton IADL questionnaires can be combined to form the ‘Modified Kat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nutrition, health & aging health & aging, 2014-12, Vol.18 (9), p.848-854
Hauptverfasser: Laan, Wijnand, Zuithoff, N. P. A, Drubbel, I, Bleijenberg, N, Numans, M. E, De Wit, N. J, Schuurmans, M. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 9
container_start_page 848
container_title The Journal of nutrition, health & aging
container_volume 18
creator Laan, Wijnand
Zuithoff, N. P. A
Drubbel, I
Bleijenberg, N
Numans, M. E
De Wit, N. J
Schuurmans, M. J
description OBJECTIVES: To predict the risk of future unfavourable health outcomes in older people it is common to assess the level of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living. To accomplish this, the commonly used Katz-6 and the Lawton IADL questionnaires can be combined to form the ‘Modified Katz ADL’ scale, also known as the Katz-15 scale. So far, the validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale is unknown. The objective of the current study is to investigate how well the Katz-15 is able to predict future unfavorable health outcomes and how this is related to the existing Katz-6 scale. DESIGN: We performed a follow-up study using data from a group of 60 year and older participants from a large Dutch clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We included 2321 participants in the analysis. The average age of the study population was 74 years and 44% was male. MEASUREMENTS: We studied the relation between the Katz-15 scale and a number of unfavourable health outcomes, such as hospitalization, admission to a nursing home, admission to a home for the aged and death within one year of follow-up. RESULTS: We found the Katz-15 to be both internally consistent and strongly associated with quality of life measures. We observed moderate to strong associations between the Katz-15 and the unfavourable health outcomes All associations studied were stronger for the Katz-15 scale as compared to the Katz-6 scale. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the Katz-15 scale is able to reliably and validly predict future unfavorable health outcomes. This makes the scale a valuable measure in determining both basic and instrumental activities of daily living.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1630184961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3516636051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-840df5aa3c2bdba68ba61df1a120f84a1e93db0be4dc4616475e9bf59f3c7d1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQhSMEoqXwA9iAJcTSxY4fiZeo4qVWYgFla03i8b2pnPhiJ1Tl19dRLtAVC9sz9nfOWKeqXnJ2zhlr3mVeayYo45IypVqqHlWnvNGMyqZtH5e6bgxtGtacVM9yvmFMKtPqp9VJrURrjBan1e0PCIMb5jsCkyMJwwDdENY-ejLvkVzC_JtyRXIPAckcyYiQl4RkmTz8igm6cr1HCPOexGXu44iZDBMpxbhMxYi6WwxhmHYkBoeJHDAeAj6vnngIGV8cz7Pq-uOH7xef6dXXT18u3l_RXgo901Yy5xWA6OvOdaDbsrjzHHjNfCuBoxGuYx1K10vNtWwUms4r40XfON6Ls-rN5ntI8eeCebY3cUlTGWm5Foy30mheKL5RfYo5J_T2kIYR0p3lzK5R2y1qW6K2a9RWFc2ro_PSjej-Kv5kW4C3RwDW8HyCqR_yP84wqWuzcvXG5fI07TA9-OJ_pr_eRB6ihV0qxtffasYVK7wpu7gHk-GhWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1630184961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Laan, Wijnand ; Zuithoff, N. P. A ; Drubbel, I ; Bleijenberg, N ; Numans, M. E ; De Wit, N. J ; Schuurmans, M. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Laan, Wijnand ; Zuithoff, N. P. A ; Drubbel, I ; Bleijenberg, N ; Numans, M. E ; De Wit, N. J ; Schuurmans, M. J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: To predict the risk of future unfavourable health outcomes in older people it is common to assess the level of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living. To accomplish this, the commonly used Katz-6 and the Lawton IADL questionnaires can be combined to form the ‘Modified Katz ADL’ scale, also known as the Katz-15 scale. So far, the validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale is unknown. The objective of the current study is to investigate how well the Katz-15 is able to predict future unfavorable health outcomes and how this is related to the existing Katz-6 scale. DESIGN: We performed a follow-up study using data from a group of 60 year and older participants from a large Dutch clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We included 2321 participants in the analysis. The average age of the study population was 74 years and 44% was male. MEASUREMENTS: We studied the relation between the Katz-15 scale and a number of unfavourable health outcomes, such as hospitalization, admission to a nursing home, admission to a home for the aged and death within one year of follow-up. RESULTS: We found the Katz-15 to be both internally consistent and strongly associated with quality of life measures. We observed moderate to strong associations between the Katz-15 and the unfavourable health outcomes All associations studied were stronger for the Katz-15 scale as compared to the Katz-6 scale. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the Katz-15 scale is able to reliably and validly predict future unfavorable health outcomes. This makes the scale a valuable measure in determining both basic and instrumental activities of daily living.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1279-7707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1760-4788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25389963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Aging ; Biological and medical sciences ; clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; death ; elderly ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Frailty ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics/Gerontology ; Health sciences ; Homes for the Aged - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Netherlands ; Neurosciences ; nursing homes ; Nursing Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Nutrition ; Older people ; Primary care ; Primary Care Medicine ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Residence Characteristics ; risk ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging, 2014-12, Vol.18 (9), p.848-854</ispartof><rights>Serdi and Springer-Verlag France 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-840df5aa3c2bdba68ba61df1a120f84a1e93db0be4dc4616475e9bf59f3c7d1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-840df5aa3c2bdba68ba61df1a120f84a1e93db0be4dc4616475e9bf59f3c7d1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29046293$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laan, Wijnand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuithoff, N. P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drubbel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleijenberg, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Numans, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Wit, N. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, M. J</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people</title><title>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging</title><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES: To predict the risk of future unfavourable health outcomes in older people it is common to assess the level of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living. To accomplish this, the commonly used Katz-6 and the Lawton IADL questionnaires can be combined to form the ‘Modified Katz ADL’ scale, also known as the Katz-15 scale. So far, the validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale is unknown. The objective of the current study is to investigate how well the Katz-15 is able to predict future unfavorable health outcomes and how this is related to the existing Katz-6 scale. DESIGN: We performed a follow-up study using data from a group of 60 year and older participants from a large Dutch clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We included 2321 participants in the analysis. The average age of the study population was 74 years and 44% was male. MEASUREMENTS: We studied the relation between the Katz-15 scale and a number of unfavourable health outcomes, such as hospitalization, admission to a nursing home, admission to a home for the aged and death within one year of follow-up. RESULTS: We found the Katz-15 to be both internally consistent and strongly associated with quality of life measures. We observed moderate to strong associations between the Katz-15 and the unfavourable health outcomes All associations studied were stronger for the Katz-15 scale as compared to the Katz-6 scale. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the Katz-15 scale is able to reliably and validly predict future unfavorable health outcomes. This makes the scale a valuable measure in determining both basic and instrumental activities of daily living.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>death</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics/Gerontology</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Homes for the Aged - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>nursing homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>1279-7707</issn><issn>1760-4788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQhSMEoqXwA9iAJcTSxY4fiZeo4qVWYgFla03i8b2pnPhiJ1Tl19dRLtAVC9sz9nfOWKeqXnJ2zhlr3mVeayYo45IypVqqHlWnvNGMyqZtH5e6bgxtGtacVM9yvmFMKtPqp9VJrURrjBan1e0PCIMb5jsCkyMJwwDdENY-ejLvkVzC_JtyRXIPAckcyYiQl4RkmTz8igm6cr1HCPOexGXu44iZDBMpxbhMxYi6WwxhmHYkBoeJHDAeAj6vnngIGV8cz7Pq-uOH7xef6dXXT18u3l_RXgo901Yy5xWA6OvOdaDbsrjzHHjNfCuBoxGuYx1K10vNtWwUms4r40XfON6Ls-rN5ntI8eeCebY3cUlTGWm5Foy30mheKL5RfYo5J_T2kIYR0p3lzK5R2y1qW6K2a9RWFc2ro_PSjej-Kv5kW4C3RwDW8HyCqR_yP84wqWuzcvXG5fI07TA9-OJ_pr_eRB6ihV0qxtffasYVK7wpu7gHk-GhWw</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Laan, Wijnand</creator><creator>Zuithoff, N. P. A</creator><creator>Drubbel, I</creator><creator>Bleijenberg, N</creator><creator>Numans, M. E</creator><creator>De Wit, N. J</creator><creator>Schuurmans, M. J</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people</title><author>Laan, Wijnand ; Zuithoff, N. P. A ; Drubbel, I ; Bleijenberg, N ; Numans, M. E ; De Wit, N. J ; Schuurmans, M. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-840df5aa3c2bdba68ba61df1a120f84a1e93db0be4dc4616475e9bf59f3c7d1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>death</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics/Gerontology</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Homes for the Aged - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>nursing homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laan, Wijnand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuithoff, N. P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drubbel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleijenberg, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Numans, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Wit, N. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, M. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laan, Wijnand</au><au>Zuithoff, N. P. A</au><au>Drubbel, I</au><au>Bleijenberg, N</au><au>Numans, M. E</au><au>De Wit, N. J</au><au>Schuurmans, M. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition, health &amp; aging</jtitle><stitle>J Nutr Health Aging</stitle><addtitle>J Nutr Health Aging</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>848</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>848-854</pages><issn>1279-7707</issn><eissn>1760-4788</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: To predict the risk of future unfavourable health outcomes in older people it is common to assess the level of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living. To accomplish this, the commonly used Katz-6 and the Lawton IADL questionnaires can be combined to form the ‘Modified Katz ADL’ scale, also known as the Katz-15 scale. So far, the validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale is unknown. The objective of the current study is to investigate how well the Katz-15 is able to predict future unfavorable health outcomes and how this is related to the existing Katz-6 scale. DESIGN: We performed a follow-up study using data from a group of 60 year and older participants from a large Dutch clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We included 2321 participants in the analysis. The average age of the study population was 74 years and 44% was male. MEASUREMENTS: We studied the relation between the Katz-15 scale and a number of unfavourable health outcomes, such as hospitalization, admission to a nursing home, admission to a home for the aged and death within one year of follow-up. RESULTS: We found the Katz-15 to be both internally consistent and strongly associated with quality of life measures. We observed moderate to strong associations between the Katz-15 and the unfavourable health outcomes All associations studied were stronger for the Katz-15 scale as compared to the Katz-6 scale. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the Katz-15 scale is able to reliably and validly predict future unfavorable health outcomes. This makes the scale a valuable measure in determining both basic and instrumental activities of daily living.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>25389963</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1279-7707
ispartof The Journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2014-12, Vol.18 (9), p.848-854
issn 1279-7707
1760-4788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1630184961
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Aging
Biological and medical sciences
clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic
death
elderly
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Frailty
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geriatric Assessment - methods
Geriatrics/Gerontology
Health sciences
Homes for the Aged - statistics & numerical data
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Netherlands
Neurosciences
nursing homes
Nursing Homes - statistics & numerical data
Nutrition
Older people
Primary care
Primary Care Medicine
Quality of Life
Quality of Life Research
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Residence Characteristics
risk
Risk Assessment - methods
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validity
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
title Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T12%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20Katz-15%20scale%20to%20measure%20unfavorable%20health%20outcomes%20in%20community-dwelling%20older%20people&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition,%20health%20&%20aging&rft.au=Laan,%20Wijnand&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=848&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=848-854&rft.issn=1279-7707&rft.eissn=1760-4788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3516636051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1630184961&rft_id=info:pmid/25389963&rfr_iscdi=true