Refining the range of an importance index
An index measuring interaction importance (Iᵢₘₚ) was proposed in a paper published on 2010 by the Journal of Ecology. This index, now widely used by researchers, has been claimed to symmetrically range in the interval (−1, 1), with negative values for competition and positive values for facilitation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of ecology 2014-11, Vol.102 (6), p.1471-1474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | An index measuring interaction importance (Iᵢₘₚ) was proposed in a paper published on 2010 by the Journal of Ecology. This index, now widely used by researchers, has been claimed to symmetrically range in the interval (−1, 1), with negative values for competition and positive values for facilitation. Here, the index properties are carefully analysed, and it is demonstrated that Iᵢₘₚ can never exceed the value of 0.5 in facilitation. Several years have passed since its publication, yet nobody has corrected the inexact index range, and several researchers continue to inaccurately refer to it. Overlooking this lack of symmetry could potentially lead to biased conclusions. Synthesis. Iᵢₘₚ cannot be treated as a symmetric index for negative and positive interactions. This is only the last of several concerns discussed in literature: current approaches to measuring interaction importance still need to be debated and analysed in depth. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1365-2745.12328 |