Potato Gas Exchange Response to Drought Cycles under Elevated Carbon Dioxide
Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) influences photosynthesis (AN), transpiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE) for well‐watered potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Little is known regarding effects of short‐term drought and CO2. Two experiments, differing in the quantity of solar radiation, were conduc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2014-11, Vol.106 (6), p.2024-2034 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2034 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2024 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Fleisher, David H. Barnaby, Jinyoung Sicher, Richard Resop, Jonathan P. Timlin, D. J. Reddy, V. R. |
description | Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) influences photosynthesis (AN), transpiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE) for well‐watered potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Little is known regarding effects of short‐term drought and CO2. Two experiments, differing in the quantity of solar radiation, were conducted in soil‐plant‐atmosphere‐research chambers. Plants were grown at ambient (aCO2) or twice‐ambient CO2 (eCO2) and received one of three irrigation treatments: no water stress (C), short‐term (11–16 d) water‐withholding during vegetative and post‐tuber initiation stages (VR), or post‐tuber initiation (R) only. Canopy conductance to CO2 transfer (τ) and water vapor (Gv), light use efficiency (α), daily AN, and ET decreased at the onset of each drought and were correlated with volumetric water content. The rate of decrease was similar for R and VR. Gv declined more sharply than AN, resulting in higher WUE. Seasonal AN declined with the pattern of C > R > VR and was higher for eCO2 C and R treatments. Seasonal WUE was higher for eCO2 at all irrigation treatments. Total dry matter, harvest index, and leaf area were reduced (p < 0.05) for droughted treatments and total dry matter and harvest index were also higher for eCO2 VR pots. Relative responses to drought and CO2 were similar among experiments, with greater magnitude of response under high solar radiation. Findings were similar to those reported under longer‐term water‐withholding studies, suggesting that interactions between CO2 and drought on carbon assimilation and water use are conserved across production zones with varying radiation and rainfall patterns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj14.0220 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1622369479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3491370671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1e965271802ef8104c7e7ffaad2c9e8dc4df3ce13d7064013dae8986635122283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwsltiTvHZzpeYqrQEqoqiCmbLOJc2VYiLnUD770kprEzvcM97d3oIuQY24iDkrV4522xAjhjn7IQMQIowYJEMT8mAMcYDSCN-Ti683zAGkEoYkPmzbXVraa49ne7MWjcrpEv0W9t4pP1g4my3Wrc025saPe2aAh2d1vipWyxopt2bbeiksruqwEtyVura49VvDsnr_fQlewjmi_wxG88DIyBmAWAahTyGhHEsE2DSxBiXpdYFNykmhZFFKQyCKOL-e9anxiRNokiEwDlPxJDcHPdunf3o0LdqYzvX9CcVRJyLKJVx2lPBkTLOeu-wVFtXvWu3V8DUQZj6E6YOwnr-7sh_VTXu_4fVOJ_xcb5cPM1A_rS_AUaacBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1622369479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potato Gas Exchange Response to Drought Cycles under Elevated Carbon Dioxide</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Fleisher, David H. ; Barnaby, Jinyoung ; Sicher, Richard ; Resop, Jonathan P. ; Timlin, D. J. ; Reddy, V. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, David H. ; Barnaby, Jinyoung ; Sicher, Richard ; Resop, Jonathan P. ; Timlin, D. J. ; Reddy, V. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) influences photosynthesis (AN), transpiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE) for well‐watered potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Little is known regarding effects of short‐term drought and CO2. Two experiments, differing in the quantity of solar radiation, were conducted in soil‐plant‐atmosphere‐research chambers. Plants were grown at ambient (aCO2) or twice‐ambient CO2 (eCO2) and received one of three irrigation treatments: no water stress (C), short‐term (11–16 d) water‐withholding during vegetative and post‐tuber initiation stages (VR), or post‐tuber initiation (R) only. Canopy conductance to CO2 transfer (τ) and water vapor (Gv), light use efficiency (α), daily AN, and ET decreased at the onset of each drought and were correlated with volumetric water content. The rate of decrease was similar for R and VR. Gv declined more sharply than AN, resulting in higher WUE. Seasonal AN declined with the pattern of C > R > VR and was higher for eCO2 C and R treatments. Seasonal WUE was higher for eCO2 at all irrigation treatments. Total dry matter, harvest index, and leaf area were reduced (p < 0.05) for droughted treatments and total dry matter and harvest index were also higher for eCO2 VR pots. Relative responses to drought and CO2 were similar among experiments, with greater magnitude of response under high solar radiation. Findings were similar to those reported under longer‐term water‐withholding studies, suggesting that interactions between CO2 and drought on carbon assimilation and water use are conserved across production zones with varying radiation and rainfall patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj14.0220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Drought ; Gas exchange</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2014-11, Vol.106 (6), p.2024-2034</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1e965271802ef8104c7e7ffaad2c9e8dc4df3ce13d7064013dae8986635122283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1e965271802ef8104c7e7ffaad2c9e8dc4df3ce13d7064013dae8986635122283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0220$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0220$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnaby, Jinyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicher, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resop, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timlin, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, V. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Potato Gas Exchange Response to Drought Cycles under Elevated Carbon Dioxide</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) influences photosynthesis (AN), transpiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE) for well‐watered potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Little is known regarding effects of short‐term drought and CO2. Two experiments, differing in the quantity of solar radiation, were conducted in soil‐plant‐atmosphere‐research chambers. Plants were grown at ambient (aCO2) or twice‐ambient CO2 (eCO2) and received one of three irrigation treatments: no water stress (C), short‐term (11–16 d) water‐withholding during vegetative and post‐tuber initiation stages (VR), or post‐tuber initiation (R) only. Canopy conductance to CO2 transfer (τ) and water vapor (Gv), light use efficiency (α), daily AN, and ET decreased at the onset of each drought and were correlated with volumetric water content. The rate of decrease was similar for R and VR. Gv declined more sharply than AN, resulting in higher WUE. Seasonal AN declined with the pattern of C > R > VR and was higher for eCO2 C and R treatments. Seasonal WUE was higher for eCO2 at all irrigation treatments. Total dry matter, harvest index, and leaf area were reduced (p < 0.05) for droughted treatments and total dry matter and harvest index were also higher for eCO2 VR pots. Relative responses to drought and CO2 were similar among experiments, with greater magnitude of response under high solar radiation. Findings were similar to those reported under longer‐term water‐withholding studies, suggesting that interactions between CO2 and drought on carbon assimilation and water use are conserved across production zones with varying radiation and rainfall patterns.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwsltiTvHZzpeYqrQEqoqiCmbLOJc2VYiLnUD770kprEzvcM97d3oIuQY24iDkrV4522xAjhjn7IQMQIowYJEMT8mAMcYDSCN-Ti683zAGkEoYkPmzbXVraa49ne7MWjcrpEv0W9t4pP1g4my3Wrc025saPe2aAh2d1vipWyxopt2bbeiksruqwEtyVura49VvDsnr_fQlewjmi_wxG88DIyBmAWAahTyGhHEsE2DSxBiXpdYFNykmhZFFKQyCKOL-e9anxiRNokiEwDlPxJDcHPdunf3o0LdqYzvX9CcVRJyLKJVx2lPBkTLOeu-wVFtXvWu3V8DUQZj6E6YOwnr-7sh_VTXu_4fVOJ_xcb5cPM1A_rS_AUaacBs</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Fleisher, David H.</creator><creator>Barnaby, Jinyoung</creator><creator>Sicher, Richard</creator><creator>Resop, Jonathan P.</creator><creator>Timlin, D. J.</creator><creator>Reddy, V. R.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Potato Gas Exchange Response to Drought Cycles under Elevated Carbon Dioxide</title><author>Fleisher, David H. ; Barnaby, Jinyoung ; Sicher, Richard ; Resop, Jonathan P. ; Timlin, D. J. ; Reddy, V. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3170-1e965271802ef8104c7e7ffaad2c9e8dc4df3ce13d7064013dae8986635122283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnaby, Jinyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicher, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resop, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timlin, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, V. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleisher, David H.</au><au>Barnaby, Jinyoung</au><au>Sicher, Richard</au><au>Resop, Jonathan P.</au><au>Timlin, D. J.</au><au>Reddy, V. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potato Gas Exchange Response to Drought Cycles under Elevated Carbon Dioxide</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2024</spage><epage>2034</epage><pages>2024-2034</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) influences photosynthesis (AN), transpiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE) for well‐watered potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Little is known regarding effects of short‐term drought and CO2. Two experiments, differing in the quantity of solar radiation, were conducted in soil‐plant‐atmosphere‐research chambers. Plants were grown at ambient (aCO2) or twice‐ambient CO2 (eCO2) and received one of three irrigation treatments: no water stress (C), short‐term (11–16 d) water‐withholding during vegetative and post‐tuber initiation stages (VR), or post‐tuber initiation (R) only. Canopy conductance to CO2 transfer (τ) and water vapor (Gv), light use efficiency (α), daily AN, and ET decreased at the onset of each drought and were correlated with volumetric water content. The rate of decrease was similar for R and VR. Gv declined more sharply than AN, resulting in higher WUE. Seasonal AN declined with the pattern of C > R > VR and was higher for eCO2 C and R treatments. Seasonal WUE was higher for eCO2 at all irrigation treatments. Total dry matter, harvest index, and leaf area were reduced (p < 0.05) for droughted treatments and total dry matter and harvest index were also higher for eCO2 VR pots. Relative responses to drought and CO2 were similar among experiments, with greater magnitude of response under high solar radiation. Findings were similar to those reported under longer‐term water‐withholding studies, suggesting that interactions between CO2 and drought on carbon assimilation and water use are conserved across production zones with varying radiation and rainfall patterns.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj14.0220</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2014-11, Vol.106 (6), p.2024-2034 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1622369479 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Drought Gas exchange |
title | Potato Gas Exchange Response to Drought Cycles under Elevated Carbon Dioxide |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A03%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potato%20Gas%20Exchange%20Response%20to%20Drought%20Cycles%20under%20Elevated%20Carbon%20Dioxide&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Fleisher,%20David%20H.&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2024&rft.epage=2034&rft.pages=2024-2034&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj14.0220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3491370671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1622369479&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |